Living Labs and Regional Smart Specialisation

www.centralivinglab.
eu
Living Labs & Regional Smart Specialisation

Francesco Molinari, mail@francescomolinari.it Kielce, PL - 27-06-2013
This project is implemented through the CENTRAL EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF
www.centralivinglab.eu
Outline
Glossary
What do we mean by Living Labs?
Good Practice Examples
What does the term Regional Smart Specialisation refer to?
What role can Living Labs play in a Regional Smart Specialisation Strategy?
Examples Conclusions and Way Forward in CEE Countries
Living Lab
Four meanings
A User driven, Open Innovation Methodology in Real Life Environments for Product, Service (and we may add, Policy) Innovation The LL approach A physical location where this Methodology is being experimented LL environment A project wherein this experimentation is framed and takes place LL trial or pilot A (real or virtual) organization based on a public private people partnership that adopts the LL approach in a given environment and for a specific pilot experimentation LL as such
Antecedents
William J. (Bill) Mitchell (2010) http://web.media. mit.edu/~wjm/
http://betalabs.nokia.com/
Eric Von Hippel http://web.mit.edu/ evhippel/www/
Henry Chesbrough http://facultybio.ha as.berkeley.edu/fac ultylist/chesbroughhenry
http://openlivinglabs.eu/
https://www.collaborationjam.com/
Don Tapscott http://dontapscott. com/
Key Elements (1)
Key Elements (2)
ENoLL Membership
Consequences (1)
Consequences (2)
R. Tuffs, ERRIN
Consequences (3)
C. Saublens, EURADA
10
Consequences (4)
Source: DRAFT Partnership Agreement Italy-EC 2014-2020, April 2013

11
Living Lab
Three possible roles
Vertical tool for promoting user driven RDI in a given sector (such as e.g. eHealth, Domotics, or eInclusion), thus attracting investments and talents (or simply tourists) into a region and contributing to the actualisation of Smart Specialisation in the territory; Orchestration agent between individual users and the other PPPP (or Quadruple Helix) stakeholders. Therefore, playing a more encompassing and systemic role in structuring and providing meaning to user engagement in RDI processes within the broader context of territorial innovation policy; Territorial innovation or Smart Region model, including guidelines for a proactive behaviour of public administration, grounded on a successful mixture of technological, social and organisational RDI activities, to valorise local intellectual capital and increase knowledge for development.
12
Living Lab
Examples
Vertical tool for promoting user driven RDI in a given sector The thematic pilots of CENTRALAB & ALCOTRA Innovation projects Orchestration agent between individual users and the other PPPP (or Quadruple Helix) stakeholders PARTERRE project & TLL Sicily (followed by other Territorial Living Labs) Territorial innovation or Smart Region model, including guidelines for a proactive behaviour of public administration Apulian ICT Living Labs
13
CENTRALAB Pilots
14
ALCOTRA Innovation
P. Capello, http://www.alcotra-innovation.eu
15
TLL Sicily
J. Marsh, http://tll-sicily.ning.com
16
PARTERRE Project
www.parterre-project.eu
17
Apulian ICT Living Labs
M. Di Ciano, http://livinglabs.regione.puglia.it
18
Conclusion
Framework conditions
Physical/Virtual Infrastructure
Regional development
Sustainable Growth
Human Capital
Policy instruments
Smart Specialisation Strategy EU Funding of R&D and Innovation
Natural Resources Etc.
Social Inclusion
Living Labs?
19
EU Regions 2014-2020
Source: DG Regio
20
New Cohesion Policy

Thematic concentration
Focused on Europe 2020 objectives Critical mass of interventions Avoid excessive dispersion of funding
Strategic programming
Common Strategic Framework Common rules for joint management of funds Partnership Agreements between EC and Member States
Performance orientation
Extensive use of ex-ante conditionality Smart Specialisation Strategy Increased emphasis on result indicators
http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/what/future/proposals_2014_2020_en.cfm
21
The S3 concept
Inward-looking
Focus policy support and public investments on key national/regional priorities, challenges and needs for development Build interventions on the country's/regions strengths, competitive advantages and potential for excellence Support technological innovation as well as practice-based (e.g. ecological and organisational) innovation Get local stakeholders fully involved and encourage private sector investment and pilot experimentation Develop evidence-based policies with sound monitoring and evaluation systems.
Outward-looking
Search integration and coordination of the nations / regions potential for excellence and comparative advantage within the international division of work Prioritize interventions on the countrys / regions most connected industries, so that they are best enabled to learn from the outside world Promote technological diversification of existing local industries in related and emerging domains Align human capital endowments and qualifications to the current and prospective needs of the key enterprise sector(s) Enhance the framework conditions for greater business expenditure in R&D and (open, social) innovation
22
Hypothetical structure
P. Godin, DG REGIO
23
S3 Platform
24
What kind of synergies?

Strategic level Adopting and promoting all forms of Innovation as transversal to Technological Development (RIS3 Sicily, 2013) Testing the potential of cross-border Living Labs for the extension of vertical value chains (Alcotra Innovation project, 2011-2013) Leveraging pre-commercial procurement for the solution of real societal challenges and wicked problems (MISE/MIUR, 2013)
Operational level
Supporting the process of entrepreneurial discovery in a rural territory (Urdaibai Bird Center, 2013)
Integrating stakeholders views in a shared RIS3 construction process (PARTERRE Project, 2012) Localising the pilot phase of pre-commercial procurement in and within the local territory (Valle DAoste, 2012-2013)
(a non exhaustive list)

25
Loci of Innovation
J. Marsh, RIS3 Sicily

26
Stages of Development
J. Marsh, RIS3 Sicily

27
Cross-border Living Labs
www.alcotra-innovation.eu
28
Why go cross-border?
1. To realise a Smart Specialisation process at regional level 2. To attain a critical mass of population and demand on the marketplace 3. To integrate the respective economic and social systems at the two sides of the border 4. To exchange best practice on development policy 5. To develop pan-European products and services
www.alcotra-innovation.eu
29
The MISE/MIUR Call for EoI
http://attiministeriali.miur.it/anno-2013/marzo/di-13032013.aspx
30
Urdaibai Bird Center
http://www.scribd.com/doc/131605322/Working-paper-by-ENoLL-member-GAIA-Bird-LivingLab This project is implemented through the CENTRAL 31

EUROPE Programme co-financed by the ERDF
PARTERRE Project
Monitoring Analysis
Policy mix
Governance
Selection
Vision
www.parterre-project.eu
32
PCP in Valle DAoste
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/pdf/news_alert/Issue24_Case_Study54_Valle%20D%27Aosta%20Region_Energy_Mobility.pdf
33
Conclusions
The Territorial Living Lab Model does have potential for policy, not only product/service, innovation Complementarities are evident with the RIS3 process and should be taken seriously More evidence is required, as well as embedment (institutionalisation) of success stories in the normal practice of public administration However what we have gained so far is unequivocal and convergent
34
What about CEE Countries?

Too little capitalisation of CENTRALAB so far
Recent experiences, still ongoing (esp. at cross border level) Risk of effort duplication, limited impact But the LEADERS approach is here to stay
The NeSTI initiative (Budapest Manifesto) has good potential and should be further disseminated in Europe Ongoing RIS3 efforts in CEE are promising lead markets for LL-driven policy innovation:
With RDI as the guiding principle, but also improving democratic governance Capturing the potential of increasing civic participation together with Future Internet Re-framing the role of the public sector in a demand-driven and needs oriented perspective
35
Thanks for your kind attention

Francesco Molinari, mail@francescomolinari.it

Living Labs and Regional Smart Specialisation

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Living Labs and Regional Smart Specialisation

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

www.centralivinglab.

Living Labs & Regional Smart Specialisation

What does the term Regional Smart Specialisation refer to?

Eric Von Hippel http://web.mit.edu/ evhippel/www/

Henry Chesbrough http://facultybio.ha as.berkeley.edu/fac ultylist/chesbroughhenry

Don Tapscott http://dontapscott. com/

Key Elements (1)

Key Elements (2)

Source: DRAFT Partnership Agreement Italy-EC 2014-2020, April 2013

Apulian ICT Living Labs

Natural Resources Etc.

New Cohesion Policy

What kind of synergies?

(a non exhaustive list)

J. Marsh, RIS3 Sicily

J. Marsh, RIS3 Sicily

Cross-border Living Labs

The MISE/MIUR Call for EoI

Urdaibai Bird Center

http://www.scribd.com/doc/131605322/Working-paper-by-ENoLL-member-GAIA-Bird-LivingLab This project is implemented through the CENTRAL 31

PCP in Valle DAoste

What about CEE Countries?

Thanks for your kind attention

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen