Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
OBJECTIVE
To
Principles Indication
of wound treatment
and kind of amputation
Closure
Worldwide,
The single strongest risk factor for limb loss 40 x for leg amputation at normal (trauma)
Amputated Trauma Patient vs Amputated Diabetic Patient Consulted to Vascular Division FM University of Indonesia during 2001 2004 in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta: 35% : 65% Annual health care cost (exceeds 1 billion dollars) incl. nutrients, rehabilitations
Data from Vascular Division FM University of Indonesia / Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital (Irfan W, 2008)
Rule of 15
15%
of diabetes patients Foot ulcer in lifetime of foot ulcers Osteomyelitis of foot ulcers Amputation
Clinical Care of the Diabetic Foot, 2005
7 2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
15% 15%
Tragic: Rule of 50
50% 50% 50%
Ulceration
Perioperative
9% in Netherlands, 10-15% in UK In Sweden and Italy, 3-year survival rates 59% & 50%
High
mortalityreflects:
The old age, widespread vascular disease, and other complications of DM.
2.
3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
Peripheral neuropathy Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) Biomechanic abnormality Deformity Overweight History of foot ulcer / gangrene Nail growth abnormality Level of education Inapropriate shoes
Motor Neuropathy
Autonomic Neuropathy
Sweating 2 dry skin
PAD
sensation
Foot
Ischemia
Healing
Callus
Local factors
Infection
and contamination
If
Local factors
Smoking
Stimulate
vasoconstriction Increase platelet aggregation Reduce oxygen carrying capacity Damaging endothel Reduce colagen synthesis
Local factors
Radiation
Damaging
DNA Creating abnormal fibroblast Hypersynthesis colagen fiber Vessel occlusion Hair and apocrine damage
Systemic factors
Malnutrition
Cancer Old
age
Hyperglycemia
Immunocompromised
condition
Nerve damage
metabolic abnormalities & disease of the vasa nervorum loss of protective sensation-leads to lack of awareness.
Sensory neuropathy
Motor neuropahtyaffects the muscle requires for normal foot movement, altering the distribution of forces during walking reactive thickening of skin (callus) at abnormal load.
Ischemia necrosis of tissues beneath the callus breakdown of skin and subcutaneous tissue neuropathic ulcer with a punched-out appearance. Charcot foot
Pathophysiology
Neuropathy
Neuropathy
Motor
Sensory
Autonomic
Reduced sweating
nociception
Dry skin
Callus formation
Trauma
Ulcer
Infection
*Shunts: blood vessels that bypass capillaries and lead directly from arteries to veins
Hammer Toes
Hallux Valgus
Claw Toes
From Levin and Pfeifer, The Uncomplicated Guide to Diabetes Complications, 2002
2006. American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.
Dislocation or collapse of 1 or more joints or bones on the foot Occurs spontaneously or after slight trauma often painful in acute stage Principal defect is osteopenia Result from arterio-venular shunting of vasomotor neuropathy Slight trauma triggers fracture of a weakened bone, increases the load on adjacent bones, leading to gross destruction The process is self-limited but the persisting deformity greatly increases the risk of 2nd ulceration
Macrovascular
disease (atherosclerosis) Microvascular diseaseboth structural (thickened basement membrane, capillary wall fragility, and thrombosis) and functional (vasomotor neuropathy with defective microcirculation and abnormal endothelial function)
Protective
sweating is lost and the skin is red, dry, thin with dystrophic nails, and susceptible to the pressure from a shoe or even an adjacent toe.
Pathophysiology
Then how are blood vessels affected? High blood sugar expedites artherosclerosis giving peripheral vascular disease (reduction of blood supply to the foot).
The delivery of essential nutrients and Foot ischaemia oxygen to the foot is compromised leading to anaerobic Foot ulcer Necrosis/ Gangrene infections and tissue necrosis.
Infection
Artheroma plaque narrowing the arterial lumen Ischaemic toes due to artherosclerosis
ABI Normal 0.91-1.30 Mild obstruction 0.71-0.90 *Moderate obstruction 0.41-0.70 *Severe obstruction 0.40 **Poorly compressible >1.30
*Poor ulcer healing with ABI 0.50 **Further vascular evaluation needed
Chronic wound
the normal process of healing has been disrupted at one or more points fail to heal in a timely and orderly manner. often regarded as being "stuck" in the inflammatory phases of wound healing
Microbiology
High levels of bacterial content Presence of more than one bacterial strain Presence of multi-drug resistant organisms Presence of biofilms
Bacterial
infection
superficial and local, soft tissue and spreading (cellulitis), and osteomyelitis
Tissue
ischemia Continuing trauma Poor management Cause diabetic foot ulcers to heal slowly and transform readily into chronic wounds
Diagnosis:
More
Deterioration
in a wound Median delay between onset of ulceration and 1st referral was 15 days. Delays are more likely to be caused by lack of speedy access to an informed opinion and poor communication between specialist department
1981
Wagner FW: Wagner Classification 1996 Lavery & Armstrong: University of Texas Diabetic Wound Classification System 1999 Macfarlane & Jeffcoate: S(AD)SAD system
Wound location
Dorsum of Digits: 13% Plantar aspect of lesser digits: 10% 30% 22%
6% 2% 2% 9%
4% 1%
Gr O Gr Gr Gr Gr Gr 1 2 3 4 5
no obvious ulcer, but deformity, hyperkeratosis, or bony abnormality superficial ulcer, no infection sign deep ulcer with infection, no bony involvement deep ulcer with abscess & bony involvement local gangrene (e.g., toe, forefoot) whole foot gangrene
Assessment
0 Ulcer stage A Pre / postulcerative lesion completely epethelialised Pre / postulcerative lesion with Infection
I. Superficial lesion, not involving tendon, capsule or bone Superficial lesion, not involving tendon, capsule or bone with Infection
Superficial lesion, not involving tendon, capsule or bone with infection and ischaemia
Treat
any infection Establish whether any associated ischemia is amenable to revascularisation Keep forces applied to the ulcerated part to a minimum Improve the condition of the wound or ulcer by wound-bed preparation, topical applications, and removal of callus Prevention of ulcer recurrence
Chosen antibiotics-based Aminopenicillin+penicillinase inhibitor Quinolone+metronidazole or clindamycin Soft tissue infection: imipenem+gentamicin MRSA: vancomycin, teicoplanin, rifampicin, or linezolid Osteomyelitis: beta-lactams + quinolone concentrated intracellularly at site of infeciton, clindamycin penetrates bone well, infected bone removed Parenteral route preferred for severely ischemic or systemic illness Prolonged courses treatment is preferred despite risk of antibiotics resistance
Parenteral agents for empiric treatment of moderate to severe diabetic foot infections
Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors
Ampicillin-sulbactam Piperacillin/tazobactam Ticarcillin-clavulanate 3 g every 6 hours 4.5 g every 8 hours 3.1 g every 4 hours
Carbapenems
Imipenem
Meropenem
Alternative regimens
Metronidazole PLUS one of the following: Ceftazidime Cefepime Ciprofloxacin Aztreonam
38
500 mg IV every 8 hours 2 g every 8 to 12 hours 2 g every 12 hours 400 mg IV every 12 hours 2 g every 6 to 8 hours
ONLINE 16
Antibiotic
Nafcillin Oxacillin Cefazolin
Dosing
1-2 g intravenously every 6 hours 1-2 g intravenously every 6 hours 1 g intravenously every 8 hours 30 mg/kg intravenously every 24 hours in 2 equally divided doses; not to exceed 2 g/24 hours unless concentrations in serum are inappropriately low
MRSA*
Vancomycin
30 mg/kg intravenously every 24 hours in 2 equally divided doses; not to exceed 2 g/24 hours unless concentrations in serum are inappropriately low
Vancomycin
Ciprofloxacin
Levofloxacin Ceftazidime
Cefepime
Empiric therapy
ONLINE 16.3
Angioplasty
Thrombolysis
Bypass
Unrealistic
to tell patients to immobilise the foot during healing time Immobilisation carries risk of
Custom-made
orthotic devices and plaster or fiberglass casts used for off-load the wound
Ulcers
heal more quickly if surface clean Vigorous and repeated sharp debridement recommended Complete excision of neuropathic ulcers lead to healing in mean 31-47 days. Necrotic material removed with debriding agents (enzymes, hydrogels, and hydrocolloids) Larval therapy (maggots) clean the wound bed Antiseptics containing iodine and silver
lack of healthy granulation tissue, change in color of the wound bed, and friable granulation tissue, feature of locally infected wounds
failure to heal
Foot-compression
Protect
the ulcer from injury and 2nd infection Provide a warm, moist environment to promote tissue repair Hydrogels, hydrocolloids, film, foams, alginates
Protect
the ulcer from injury and 2nd infection Provide a warm, moist environment to promote tissue repair Hydrogels, hydrocolloids, film, foams, alginates
Debridement
Removal of necrotic tissue Reduce the number of microbes,toxins & other subtances that inhibit healing
Debridement
Size Position Type of wound Efficiency & selectivity Pain management Exudate levels Risk of infections Cost of procedure
1. 2.
3.
4. 5.
Surgical Debridement
Sharp debridement The fastest way to remove necrotic tissue Cause pain anesthetics Quite selective but some damage to viable tissue Bleeding cauter, apply pressure & Ca alginate dressing
Autolytic debridement
All wound experience this! by endogenous proteolytic enzymes breakdown tissue Not fast enough enhanced by occlusive dressing, moist wound bed,managing excess exudate
Autolytic Debridement
E.g : hydrogel, honey Hydrogel: soften & breakdown necrotic tissue, + occlusive dressing to absorb exudate Honey: rapid, antibacterial, deodorized the wound,antiinflammatory,stimulate immune response Easy but takes prolonged time for complete removal of necrotic tissue
Enzymatic Debridement
Highly selective method Using naturally proteolytic enzymes Exogenous applied + endogenous enzyme E.g: bacterial collagenase, papain-urea, fibrinolysin / DNAse, trypsin, streptokinase-streptodornase combination, subtilisin
Mechanical debridement
nonselective, Using mechanical force Easy to perform, more rapid than autolytic & enzymatic Can damage healthy granulation tissue in wound bed & margins discomfort to patients Wet-to-dry dressings
Pressurized irrigation by water wash away bacteria, foreign materials, NT if pressure too great : forcing bacteria & debris deeper
Mechanical debridement
Ultrasound: debride wound & reduce infection caused by bacteria Vacum-assisted closure: Noninvasive Expose wound bed to negative pressure Minimizing exudate & slough tissue edema peripheral blood flow Improving local oxygenation Promoting angiogenesis & good granulation tissue
Biosurgery (mylasis)
Introduced in 1931 Sterile fly maggots digest sloughing & necrotic material without damaging the surrounding healthy tissue The precise mechanism remains unclear ingesting & killing bacteria, exerting a bacteriostatic effect, secreting proteolytic enzymes that are important in eschar degradation, and tissue oxygenation Consideration: pain (some), psychological & aesthetic
Primary
preventionprevention-
Secondary
Recurrence
rate is high Ulcer healing should be followed by a well coordinated programme of secondary prevention Surgery to correct deformities and abnormalities of posture, gait, and load-bearing
Reduce
abnormal pressure loading Cushioning in frail and immobile people Individually fitted footwear in mobile Education focus on foot care, regular podiatry, selfexamination, provision of emergency contacts Education improves knowledge and illness-related behaviour, and three-fold reduction in re-ulceration and amputation within 13 months
Rates
Piaggesi-
79% healing at 25 weeks in neuropathic ulcers after conventional treatment, 96% after excision of the ulcer & adjacent bone
Despite
good management,
healing rates in large multicenter trials were 24% at 12 weeks, 31% at 20 weeks
Predictive of amputation
duration
of diabetes poor glucose control smoking microalbuminuria retinopathy neuropathy absent foot pulses