Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Course Contents
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Introduction Conservation of Mass Conservation of Energy Entropy An additional Balance Equation Liquefaction, Power Cycles, Explosions Thermodynamic Properties of Real Substances Equilibrium and Stability One Component Thermodynamics of Multi-Component Systems Estimation of Gibbs Energy and Fugacity of a Component in a Mixture 10. Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium in Mixtures 11. Chemical Equilibrium
2
Course Books
1. Chemical, Biochemical & Engineering Thermodynamics 4 Edition, Stanley I. Sandler , John Wiley and Sons (2006) 2. Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics (The McGraw-Hill Series in Civil and Environmental Engineering) by J.M. Smith, Hendrik C. Van Ness, and Michael Abbott (2004) 3. Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics by J.M. Smith (2001) 4. Engineering and Chemical Thermodynamics by Milo D. Koretsky (2003)
3
NUMBER WEIGHT 4 5% 2
1
TOTAL 20 30
50 50
15%
50% 100%
Objectives
At the end of this Chapter, the student must: Be able to evaluate partial derivatives of thermodynamic variables with respect to one variable (e.g. T), while holding a second variable (P) constant! Be able to interrelate partial derivatives arising in thermodynamics Be able to obtain volumetric equation of state parameters from critical properties Be able to solve problems for real fluids using volumetric equations of state (e.g. Van der-Waals or Peng-Robinson)
5
Objectives II
At the end of this Chapter, the student must: Be able to construct tables and charts of thermodynamic properties (Sec. 6.4).
Mathematical Preliminaries
Eight thermodynamic state variables thus far discussed: P, T, V, S, U, H, A, G If values of two of them were known: we could calculate the values of the remaining six state variables thermodynamic state of pure, single-phase system is fixed! Mathematically: we choose two variables as independent variables (for the pure, single-phase system, single component system) Remaining six variables are dependent variables
7
Mathematical Preliminaries
EXAMPLE: T and V independent variables Any other thermodynamic state variables are dependent variables: U: Internal Energy is a dependent variable! U = U ( T, V) This means that the Internal Energy is a function of temperature and specific volume. The change in internal energy d U , which is a result of differential changes in T and V is therefore:
Mathematical Preliminaries
The subscript on each derivative denotes the variable being held constant: : Shows the differential change in molar internal energy accompanying a diff. change in temperature, whereby the molar volume is constant.
Mathematical Preliminaries
Keep in mind that : (U / T)V and (U / V)T are partial derivatives of the type
)Z
At the same time: X , Y , Z are used to denote the state variables and are used here to represent the state variables P, T, V, S, U, H, A and G Goal of present chapter is to develop methods to allow us to calculate the numerical values of these derivatives Needed for many thermodynamic applications
10
Mathematical Preliminaries
We can re-write
As
Above equation says that the Internal Energy is a function of all three independent variables: temperature, total volume and number of moles in the system.
11
Mathematical Preliminaries
We can re-write
As
Above equation says that the Internal Energy is a function of all three independent variables: temperature, total volume and number of moles in the system. For a differential change in T , V, or N; the change in internal energy is given as above 12
Mathematical Preliminaries
Note that in equation below
It is necessary to have two subscripts (i.e. two variables are kept constant for each differential change. We remember that any extensive property can be considered to be the product of the related intensive property and its mass (or its mole number). X=XN
13
Mathematical Preliminaries
Then the derivative of an extensive property with respect to the intensive property related at a constant mole number is:
Therefore:
We have already seen in Ch. 3 that CV is the constant volume heat capacity CV
14
15
)Z
18
Note the symmetric form of equation in which each variable appears only once in each derivative position
19
Finally if we consider the special case, when L = K we get the Chain Rule
20
With L = Z :
Chain Rule
Hence we can introduce a new variable in evaluating a partial derivative, as with Y in equation above
21
Thermodynamic Derivatives
Definitions:
Further Definitions:
Energy Balance
+ G dN
22
Thermodynamic Derivatives
For Closed Systems we can write *):
Then we have:
And
=T
*) NOTE: U = U (S, V) ; dU =
23
Thermodynamic Derivatives
However we may remember that:
Then we have And if we now divide by N we get:
24
Thermodynamic Derivatives
Therefore from the First Law we can derive:
25
Thermodynamic Derivatives
The Maxwell Relations: Expressions for other derivatives:
26
Thermodynamic Derivatives
The Maxwell Relations: Similar expressions for other derivatives:
From the First Law we remember: U = Q + W or as derivatives: dU = dQ + dW Since it is obviously true also for reversible changes, we have: dU = dQrev + dWrev We know that dWrev = -P dV reversible work Then we can write: dU = dQrev - P dV From the definition of entropy (Second Law) we
remember: dS =
So we can put these together to form an expression for dU which only involves functions of state. For a hydrodynamic system, for instance: dU = T dS - P dV The fundamental thermodynamic relation It involves only functions of state, so it is true for all changes, not just reversible ones This suggests that the natural variable in which to express U are S and V: U = U (S , V) That means that internal energy will be unchanged for processes at constant volume and entropy-29
not the most common experimental conditions. It is therefore useful to introduce other functions of state, called ``thermodynamic potentials'', which are conserved, or whose change is easily calculated, in common experimental conditions. These are: Enthalpy H = U + P V ; hence, dH = d U +P dV + Vdp and with: dU = T dS - P dV , the fundamental thermodynamic relation, we obtain: dH = d U +p dV + V dP = T dS - P dV + P dV + V dP dH = T dS + V dP
30
Maxwells Relations
We remember: dU = T dS P dV fundamental thermodynamic relation On purely mathematical grounds, we may re-write this as: U = U (S, V) ; or
dU = (
)V
dS + (
)S
dV
; Pressure: P = -
( )S
33
Maxwells Relations
Temperature T = ( )V ; Pressure: P = - ( )S
These definitions (especially the second) are interesting in their own right. But we can go further, by differentiating both sides of the first equation by V and of the second by S :
( )V
( )S = ( =-
( )V ) S ( ( )S ) V
the order of differentiation in the second derivation is irrelevant, right hand sides are equal, and thus so are the left hand sides, giving:
( )S
=-
( )V
34
Maxwells Relations
By starting with , E, H and G, we can get three more relations i. ii. iii. iv.
dU = TdS PdV => T = ( )V and P = - ( )S dE = -SdT PdV => S = ( )V and P = - ( )T dH = TdS + VdP => T = ( )P and V = - ( )S dG = -SdT + VdP => S = ( )V and V = - ( )T
The two equations involving derivatives of S are particularly useful; as they provide a possibility to determine S,
35
Heat Capacities
Heat capacities are related to changes of entropy with temperature A heat capacity is the temperature change per unit heat absorbed by a system during a reversible process C dT = dQ rev Specific heat capacity (C)'; the latter is the heat capacity C per kg or per mole The heat capacity is is different for different processes. Useful heat capacities are those at constant volume or constant pressure (for a fluid). Since dQ rev = T dS we have at constant volume CV dT = T dS , so
36
Heat Capacities
we have at constant volume CV dT = T dS , so
i.
CV = T ( )V
ii. CP = T
( )P
At constant volume (reversible conditions!) no work is done; therefore: dU = dQ rev + PdV dU = dQ rev i. CV = ( )V expressed in terms of internal Energy
Also (usefully for chemists), at constant pressure dP=0 d H = dQ rev where H is the enthalpy, so
ii. CV =
( )P
Heat Capacities
The specific heat capacity is the heat capacity per unit mass (or per mole). Heat capacities are not independent of temperature (or pressure) in general, but over a narrow temperature range they are often treated as such, especially for a solid. Together with two of Maxwell's relations, we now have expressions for the partial derivatives of the entropy with respect to all easily measurable variables (P, V , T). These can be used to derive expressions for the entropy change in real processes as well! We can show how to do that by using the Van der Waals Equation
P=
38
Heat Capacities
We can also derive a relation between , , and other measurable properties of a substance which can be checked experimentally: If a is the isobaric thermal expansion coefficient and kT is the isothermal compressibility With a=
1 ( ) P
and kT = 2
1 ( ) T
We obtain
kT which is always greater than zero.
39
CP CV = VT
Heat Capacities
kT This relation is a firm prediction of thermal physics without any approximations whatsoever. It has to be true! For real gases and compressible liquids and solids it can be checked. For relatively incompressible liquids and solids it is hard to carry out processes at constant volume so CV may not be well known and this equation can be used to predict it. For one mole of a van der Waals gas this gives CP CV = R[ 1 2 ()2 -1 ]
CP CV = VT
RTV 3
40
Heat Capacities
For one mole of a van der Waals gas this gives
CP CV = R[ 1 -
2 ()2 -1 ]
RTV 3
In the ideal gas case a, b 0 are zero (limit) Above equation then reduces to CP CV = R Question What is the entropy change during the expansion of a van der Waals gas for which CV is a constant? Equation of state for one mole: P= - 2
41
b represents the volume taken up by the finite size of the molecules, a/V2 is the reduction in pressure due to interactions between the molecules (Van der Waal forces). In this way the two most important corrections neglected in the ideal gas are included. However, the heat capacity at constant volume is still independent of temperature and volume, as in an ideal gas. During an expansion, both the temperature and the volume may change. 42
( )V =
from definition of CV = T ( )V
we obtain:
43
dT +
Choose variables, either (V, T) or , (P, T) and writing dS in terms of infinitesimal changes of these variables then using the definition of the heat capacities, and a Maxwell relation, we obtain something like the second line. Then we can calculate the total entropy change by integrating, first at constant T and then at constant V:
S ( T1, V2) = S ( T1, V1) +
2 1
(1,) ]T
dV
44
dT +
Choose variables, either (V, T) or , (P, T) and writing dS in terms of infinitesimal changes of these variables then using the definition of the heat capacities, and a Maxwell relation, we obtain something like the second line. Then we can calculate the total entropy change by integrating, first at constant T and then at constant V:
S ( T1, V2) = S ( T1, V1) +
2 1
(1,) ]T
dV
45
Heat Capacities
Then we can calculate the total entropy change by integrating, first at constant T and then at constant V: S(
(1,) T1, V2) = S ( T1, V1) + [ ]T 2 ) T1, V2) = S ( T1, V1) + ( )T dV 1 2 ) = S ( T1, V1) + ( ) 1 2 (1,) [ ]T 1 2 dT 1 2 1
dV
S(
Similarly:
dP
46
(1,) ]T
dP
= S (T1 , V2) +
2 1
dT
= S ( T1, V2) + CV ln
T2 T1
2 1
= S ( T1, V2) + CV
Therefore:
T2 + CV ln T1
2 1
T2 S ( T2, V2) - S ( T1, V2) = CV + CV ln T1 where in the second integration we used the fact that CV is constant.
47
for a reversible adiabatic expansion we can use T1 V1 -1 = T2 V2 -1 We remember heat capacities at constant pressure and at constant volume differ by a constant for ideal gases:
48
Then from the Ideal Gas Law: p V = n R T it follows that: 1 T V -1 = constant and T P
( 1 )
= constant
49
Thermodynamic Derivatives
Expressions of S, U and H in terms of T and V or T and P (which are the convenient choices (why measurement of S?) S = S (T, V) and
50
Thermodynamic Derivatives
Then we obtain:
And by substituting:
We get:
51
Thermodynamic Derivatives
To obtain complete expressions of dU and dH in measurable entities we start again with equation:
We get:
52
Thermodynamic Derivatives
Finally, we can express dH in a similar way as follows:
From equation above and the last one of the previous slide:
dU
We get:
and:
53
54
55
56
and U = 2 ( T ); therefore
we obtain with
C V ( )V ( )V
57
= CV
( )V =
58
And by integration we get the well known equation for an ideal gas
59
= CV ( )V
( )V
60
Similar partial derivatives with Different State Variables held constant are NOT EQUAL (Illustration 6.2-1)
Similar partial derivatives with Different State Variables held constant are NOT EQUAL (Illustration 6.2-2)
61
STATEMENTS
By using partial derivatives develop expressions for The coefficient of thermal expansion, a Isothermal compressibility factor kt The Joule-Thomson Coefficient The difference CP - Cv
Using: a. The Ideal Gas Equation: PV = RT b. The Van der Waals Volumetric Equation of State (P + V2 ) (V b) = R T (Illustration 6.2.3)
62
Redlich Kwong
Peng Robinson
63
Equations of State
For real substances we need a volumetric equation of state Generalized Class
Virial
Heat Capacity
We start with: And
Using the Commutative Property, which states that in a mixed second derivative, the order of taking derivatives is not important:
65
Heat Capacity
We also use: And If we use the same method as with the heat capacity at constant-volume for the constant-pressure heat capacity
We convert above equation into the much more versatile second equation Integration of the above gives:
66
Heat Capacity
67
Heat Capacity
The same results are expected if one considers the constant-volume heat capacity:
And
By integration for P1= 0 and V1= we obtain for the constant-volume heat capacity:
68
II.
We saw during Illustration 4.5.-2 that the entropy balance for the portion of the gas remaining in the cylinder is: Also from
V=NV
Also from
N (t=0) =
V=NV
0.15 3
we get:
= V(=0) V(=0) These equations apply equally to ideal and non-ideal gases Calculation of N(t=0) I. Ideal Gas Equation of State P V = R T or V (t=0) = =
8.31410 5 100 (=0) (=0)
3 170
(=0) (=0)
=
And
73
= 9.80 x 10 -5 m3/mol
And
N (t=0) =
= 1529.8 mol
We use the constants given in Table 6.4.-1, whereby for nitrogen a value for a = 0.1368 [Pa 106/mol2] and for b = 3.864 [105m3/mol] are listed! Then we have:
P = 100 bar = 107 Pa= Cubic Equation:
8.314170 =0 3.864105
3.864105 =0 2
= 1589.9 mol
N (t) = (1589.9 10t) mol We can also compute the molar volume of the gas at any later stage from the volume of cylinder (0.15 m3) and N(t) V (t) =
0.15 3 ()
Example: Van der Waals: N (t) = (1589.9 10t) mol = 1589.9 10 x50 = 1089.9 mol
V (t) =
0.15 3 ()
= 1.376 x 10 -4 m3/mol
76
Ideal Gas
An ideal gas is an imaginary gas that satisfies the following conditions: Negligible interactions between the molecules, Its molecules occupy no volume (negligible molecular volume), Collisions between molecules are perfectly elastic this is, no energy is lost after colliding. This fluid is imaginary because as we know there are no ideal gases
77
Ideal Gas
The ideal gas EOS is inaccurate both qualitatively and quantitatively Qualitatively, ideal gas will not condense no matter what pressure and temperature the system is subjected to. Quantitatively, pressures and volumes used by the ideal gas model are higher than the values that a real gas would have. These were the primary reasons that scientists have made an effort to go beyond the ideal gas EOS: simply because it does not apply for most cases of interest
78
Ideal Gas
The ideal gas EOS is inaccurate both qualitatively and quantitatively Qualitatively, ideal gas will not condense no matter what pressure and temperature the system is subjected to.
1. volume of the gas becomes very large at very low pressures (i.e., as , a concept that agrees with what we know from our experience in the physical world). 2. And second, as (the volume of matter just vanishes if the pressure is high enough: this concept we would not be as willing to accept). These two behaviors are a consequence of the assumptions made in the ideal gas model.
79
Ideal Gas
Qualitatively, ideal gas will not condense no matter what pressure and temperature the system is subjected to. Ideal EOS is therefore qualitatively wrong
This figure has an obvious discontinuity (at the vapor+liquid transition). For a real substance, as pressure increases, there must be a point of discontinuity that represents the phase change. Hence, we cannot hope to reproduce the P-V behavior (actual!) using the ideal equation since no discontinuity is to be found. However, the real P-v isotherm can be approximated by ideal behavior at low pressures, as we can see from the plots.80
Ideal Gas
Quantitatively, ideal gas pressures and volumes used by the ideal gas model are higher than the values that a real gas would have. Ideal EOS is therefore also quantitatively wrong for most conditions of interest at a given volume and temperature, the ideal gas model over-predicts the pressure of the system: P Ideal Gas > P Real Gas real gas does have interaction forces between molecules ideal model assumes that the physical space that the molecules themselves occupy is negligible. In reality molecules are physical particles and they do occupy space
81
Real Gas
How can we adjust the ideal model to make it suitable for real gases? The answer: We said that once we have established a base (ideal) model, we look at a real case by estimating how close (or far) it performs with respect to the base (ideal) case, and introducing the corresponding corrections. Such corrections will take into account all the considerations that our original assumptions left out.
Real Gas
We introduce a correction factor Z the compressibility
factor , which is defined as: Z = V V ideal V is the real volume occupied by the gas and V ideal is the volume that the ideal model predicts for the same conditions. The ideal volume is given by: V ideal = n R T P Hence, the equation of state for real gases: PV=ZnRT
for Z = 1, this equation collapses to the ideal gas model. In fact, unity is the compressibility factor of any gas that behaves ideally
83
85
Equation of State
1873: With van der Waals, a quantitative approach was taken for the first time. He was an experimentalist and proposed the continuity of gases and liquid that won for him a Nobel Prize. He has provided the most important contribution to EOS development. 1927: Ursell proposed a series solution (polynomial functional Virial form) for EOS: P = 1 + b/V + c/V2 + d/V3 + 1940: Benedit, Webb, & Rubbin proposed what can be called the Cadillac of EOS, i.e., the most sophisticated and most accurate for some systems. However, the price to pay is that it is too complicated and not easy to use. 1949: Redlich & Kwong introduced a temperature dependency to the attraction parameter a of the vdW EOS.
88
Equation of State
1955: Pitzer introduced the idea of the acentric factor to quantify the non-sphericity of molecules and was able to relate it to vapor pressure data. 1972: Soave modified the RK EOS by introducing Pitzers acentric factor. 1976: Peng and Robinson proposed their EOS as a result of a study sponsored by the Canadian Gas Commission, in which the main goal was finding the EOS best applicable to natural gas systems. Since then, there has not been any radical improvement to SRK and PR EOS
89
Equation of State
1955: Pitzer introduced the idea of the acentric factor to quantify the non-sphericity of molecules and was able to relate it to vapor pressure data. 1972: Soave modified the RK EOS by introducing Pitzers acentric factor. 1976: Peng and Robinson proposed their EOS as a result of a study sponsored by the Canadian Gas Commission, in which the main goal was finding the EOS best applicable to natural gas systems. Since then, there has not been any radical improvement to SRK and PR EOS
90
92
93
94
97
98
=0
and
= 0
It turns out that when one imposes these conditions on vd Waals equation, one is able to derive expressions for the parameters a and b as a function of critical properties
101
(3)
103
(5)
This we now solve with re-arrangement to obtain the critical volume: (6) We substitute Vc in equation (1)
Then we get: (7)
or (8)
104
Then we get:
(9)
And finally:
(10)
105
and a =
9 8
We can further calculate the compressibility Z at the critical point as follows: P V = Z nRT at the critical point we have:
Zc =
We can express a and b in terms of the critical temperature and critical pressure:
and
Zc = = 0.375
3 8
a =
2722 64
b=
106
a =
3Pc V2c
b=
And finally:
107
Equation:
becomes:
[Pr +
] [3Vr 1] = 8 Tr
108
[Pr +
] [3Vr 1] = 8 Tr
is extremely interesting: It suggests that at given values of the reduced temperatures and reduced pressures all van der Waals fluids will have the same value of reduced volume Further conclusion: the same reduced form equation of state applies, no matter what a and b may be for the particular fluid. If two fluids have the same reduced pressure, reduced volume, and reduced temperature, we say that their states are in corresponding states
109
The parameter b is related to the size of each molecule. The volume that the molecules have to move around in is not just the volume of the container V, but is reduced to ( V - nb ). The parameter a is related to intermolecular attractive force between the molecules, and n/V is the density of molecules. The net effect of the intermolecular attractive force is to reduce the pressure for a given volume and temperature. 110
Solution:
V = 22.4 L T = (0.000 + 273.15) = 273.15K a (O2) = 1.36 L2 atm/mol2 (From Table) b (O2) = 0.0318 L /mol (From Table)
(nRT)/(V-nb) = 1.0014 atm - a (n/V)2 = -0.0027 atm p = (nRT)/(V-nb) - a (n/V)2 = 0.9987 atm If O2 was perfectly ideal, the pressure would be 1.0000 atm.
111
The first term on the right-hand-side of the van der Waals equation, (nRT)/(V-nb), represents the ideal gas pressure corrected for finite molecular volume. In other words the volume is slightly less than 22.415 L due to the mole of O2 in it. the molecules collide a bit more frequently with the walls of the container, because they have less room to fly around in in the middle of the container.
112
114
115
116
with Zc |real real fluid critical compressibility Attempt to express compressibility factor as a function of reduced pressure and temperature
functional relationship between Tr , Pr and Z is determined from experimental data or another EOS, which should be more accurate
117
118
119
120
Graph is pretty accurate but there are systematic deviations from the simple corresponding-states relation above. In particular, the compressibility factors for the inorganic fluids are almost always below those for the hydrocarbons. Furthermore, if equation above were universally valid, all fluids would have :he same value of the critical compressibility Zc = Z(Pr = 1, Tr = I); however: from Table , it is clear that Z, for most real fluids ranges from 0.23 to 0.31. 121
122
123
124
125
With
126
THANK YOU
127