Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Mean
SD
Lower Upper
t-Value
p Value
3.20
3.20
0.96
0.72
3.12
3.14
3.27
3.26
4.90***
6.71***
0.0000
0.0000
Table 4.16
Major Aspects of Training Needs Comparison of Respondents Opinion by Number of Training Programmes Attended Major Aspects
To Build self-awareness and selfconfidence To Do the job in better way and achieve work values
One
3.25 (0.81) 3.28 (0.84) 3.31 (0.86)
23
3.16 (0.75) 3.10 (0.81) 3.14 (0.83)
>3
3.18 (0.95) 3.20 (0.86) 3.10 (0.93)
F Value
0.78
p Value
0.4585
2.92**
0.0549
3.12**
0.0449
To Evaluate the employees' knowledge and performance To Enhance good human relations among employees To Enhance job motivation and job adaptiveness
1.62
0.1983
3.19**
0.0421
1.74
0.1757
2.40
0.0917
Source: Primary Data. Figures in brackets are standard deviation. **Significant at 5% level
Table 4.17 Major Aspects of Training Needs Comparison of Opinion across Employee Groups by Number of Years in Service
Major Aspects To Build self-awareness and selfconfidence To Do the job in better way and achieve work values To Familiarize with new techniques and develop inter-personal skills To Evaluate the employees' knowledge and performance To Enhance good human relations among employees To Enhance job motivation and job adaptiveness
F Value 4.23***
p Value
0.0057
3.51**
0.0151
2.23
0.0837
3.57**
0.0140
2.60**
0.0516
1.41
0.2402
3.60***
0.0134
Source: Primary Data. Figures in brackets are standard deviation. **Significant at 5% level; ***Significant at 1% level
Table 4.20 Standardized Canonical Coefficients and Structure Matrix with Discriminant Function for Training Need Dimensions by Sector
Structure Matrix
0.8803
To Build self-awareness and self-confidence To Do the job in better way and achieve work values To Familiarize with new techniques and develop inter-personal skills To Evaluate the employees' knowledge and performance To Enhance good human relations among employees To Enhance job motivation and job adaptiveness
0.2938
0.0919 -0.0374 -0.5660 0.3935
0.7183
0.7256 0.7390 0.4210 0.6720
Table 4.25 Status of Factors Underlying Training Effectiveness Perception of Entire Sample 95% CI
Lower Upper
Mean
3.22 3.21 3.20 3.21 3.27 3.19 3.20 3.21
SD
0.87 0.82 0.88 0.91 1.00 0.89 1.02 0.72
t-Value
5.99*** 6.24*** 5.57*** 5.47*** 6.54*** 5.06*** 4.62*** 7.12***
p Value
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Table 4.26 Status of Factors Underlying Training Effectiveness Comparison of Opinion between Male and Female Employee Groups Training Effectiveness Factors
Self-Efficacy Skill development Organizational need Employee Relations Thrive at work Self-Learning Performance evaluation Overall Training Effectiveness
Male
3.23 (0.85)
Female
3.16 (0.92)
t Value
0.78
p Value
0.4330
3.25 (0.82)
3.24 (0.87) 3.22 (0.90) 3.29 (0.99) 3.20 (0.90)
3.08 (0.83)
3.05 (0.93) 3.14 (0.94) 3.19 (1.04) 3.14 (0.88)
1.90
2.12** 0.83 0.96 0.66
0.0576
0.0347 0.4048 0.3376 0.5122
3.24 (1.02)
3.24 (0.72)
3.02 (1.00)
3.11 (0.73)
2.08**
1.72
0.0375
0.0852
Source: Primary Data. Figures in brackets are standard deviation. **Significant at 5% level
Table 4.33 Status of Factors Underlying Training Effectiveness Comparison of Respondents Opinion by Number of Training Programmes Attended
Training Effectiveness Factors
One 3.31 (0.85) 3.32 (0.82) 3.29 (0.85) 3.25 (0.88) 3.30 (0.98) 3.21 (0.88) 3.28 (1.08) 3.29 (0.70)
23 3.14 (0.87) 3.10 (0.82) 3.12 (0.90) 3.19 (0.94) 3.26 (1.02) 3.17 (0.90) 3.12 (0.96) 3.15 (0.72)
>3 3.19 (0.89) 3.25 (0.81) 3.24 (0.88) 3.14 (0.89) 3.24 (1.01) 3.19 (0.92) 3.19 (1.01) 3.21 (0.75)
Self-Learning
Performance evaluation Overall Training Effectiveness
Source: Primary Data. Figures in brackets are standard deviation. ***Significant at 1% level
Table 4.38 Results of Regression analysis for SELF-EFFICACY with Training Needs
Estimated Values Major Training Needs Beta
Intercept
t Value 5.85
p Value 0.0000
0.7505***
0.1275**
0.1858*** 0.1662*** 0.1412** 0.0706 0.0796
2.23
3.32 3.03 2.29 1.50 1.79 0.4089 0.4026 65.48*** 6..568
0.0259
0.0010 0.0026 0.0223 0.1353 0.0745
Table 4.39 Results of Regression analysis for SKILL DEVELOPMENT with Training Needs
Estimated Values Beta 0.5619*** 0.1713*** 0.1980*** 0.2573*** 0.0204 0.1018*** 0.0804** t Value 5.19 3.55 4.20 5.55 0.39 2.56 2.14 0.5910 0.5260 107.16*** 6..568 p Value 0.0000 0.0004 0.0000 0.0000 0.6954 0.0108 0.0329
To Familiarize with new techniques and develop interpersonal skills To Evaluate the employees' knowledge and performance
To Enhance good human relations among employees To Enhance job motivation and job adaptiveness
Table 4.43 Results of Regression analysis for SELF-LEARNING with Training Needs
Major Training Needs
Intercept To Build self-awareness and self-confidence To Do the job in better way and achieve work values To Familiarize with new techniques and develop interpersonal skills To Evaluate the employees' knowledge and performance To Enhance good human relations among employees To Enhance job motivation and job adaptiveness
Estimated Values Beta 0.6771*** 0.1711*** 0.1482*** 0.1376** 0.1501** 0.0737 0.1043** t Value 5.08 2.88 2.55 2.41 2.35 1.50 2.25 0.3979 p Value 0.0000 0.0041 0.0110 0.0161 0.0194 0.1331 0.0247
R2
Adjusted R2
Model F value Degrees of freedom
**Significant at 5% level; ***Significant at 1% level
0.3915
62.55*** 6..568
Table 4.56 Major Impact of Training at Work Comparison of Opinion across Employee Groups by Family Income (Monthly) Major Impact at Work
Up to Rs.15000 Rs.1500125000 Rs.2500130000 > Rs.30000
F Value
p Value
Cognitive ability
2.80**
0.0395
4.32***
0.0050
Work efficiency
0.98
0.4004
4.04***
0.0074
Source: Primary Data. Figures in brackets are standard deviation. **Significant at 5% level; ***Significant at 1% level
Table 4.57 Major Impact of Training at Work Comparison of Respondents Opinion by Number of Training Programmes Attended Major Impact at Work
Cognitive ability Use of knowledge and skills gained from training Work efficiency Overall Impact at Work
Source: Primary Data. Figures in brackets are standard deviation. **Significant at 5% level; ***Significant at 1% level
Table 4.76 Status of Factors Underlying Training Impact at Organizational Level Comparison of Respondents Opinion by Number of Training Programmes Attended Major Impact at Organizational Level
Employees' self-actualization Increased productivity Stakeholders' benefit Efficient utilization of resources Organizational benefit Overall Impact on organization
One 3.25 (0.91) 3.25 (1.02) 3.34 (0.98) 3.31 (0.99) 3.22 (1.02) 3.28 (0.74)
23 3.06 (0.99) 3.09 (0.99) 3.17 (0.97) 3.21 (0.99) 3.18 (1.01) 3.14 (0.73)
>3 3.08 (1.01) 3.28 (1.02) 3.13 (0.95) 3.07 (1.01) 3.16 (0.99) 3.14 (0.78)
Table 4.80 Standardized Canonical Coefficients and Structure Matrix with Discriminant Function for Training Impact at Organizational Level by Sector
First Function
Table 4.82 Canonical Loadings of Dimensions of IMPACT AT ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL and Dimensions of TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS
Variables CRITERION VARIABLES Dimensions of Impact at Organizational Level Employees' self-actualization Increased productivity Stakeholders' benefit Efficient utilization of resources Organizational benefit PREDICTOR VARIABLES Dimensions of Training Effectiveness Self-Efficacy Skill development Organizational need Employee Relations Thrive at work Self-Learning 0.7958 0.8895 0.8582 0.7696 0.6481 0.7599 0.7480 0.7763 0.7062 0.7307 0.7755 Canonical Function
Table 4.90 Standardized Canonical Coefficients and Structure Matrix with Discriminant Function for Employees Satisfaction by Sector First Function Organizational Level Impact Factors Standardized Coefficients 0.0910 0.4260 0.3173 -0.0873 -0.0350 0.0364 Structure Matrix 0.5651 0.7536 0.6798 0.5262 0.5737 0.4448
Satisfied with the quantum of training offered for advancement Satisfied with technical knowledge and skill acquired I can recommend this training program to other employees Materials and methods used in the training were impressive Gave me chance to have my questions answered Provided information I need to perform my job in better way
-0.6835
0.9345
0.3536
0.7527
Table 4.92 Canonical Loadings of Dimensions of EMPLOYEES SATISFACTIOIN and TRAINING EFFECTIVENESS
Variables
CRITERION VARIABLES Employees Satisfaction Measures
Satisfied with the quantum of training offered for advancement Satisfied with technical knowledge and skill acquired I can recommend this training programme to other employees Materials and methods used in the training were impressive Gave me chance to have my questions answered Provided information I need to perform my job in better way Training was at a comfortable pace so I could understand the content. Prepared me to complete my specific job responsibilities
Canonical Function 2 3
Self-Efficacy Skill development Organizational need Employee Relations Thrive at work Self-Learning Performance evaluation