Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Group Decision-
Making
Large groups facilitate the pooling of
information about complex tasks.
Smaller groups are better suited to
coordinating and facilitating the
implementation of complex tasks.
Simple, routine standardized tasks reduce the
requirement that group processes be effective
in order for the group to perform well.
Group Decision Making
Advantages Disadvantages
Generates more Time consuming
complete information Minority domination
and knowledge.
Pressures to conform
Generates more
diverse alternatives. Ambiguous
responsibility
Increases acceptance
of a solution.
Increases legitimacy
of decision.
Problems in Group
Decision Making
When groups are... ...leading to decisions
• Highly cohesive characterized by...
• Insulated from outside • Limited search for
input information
• Dominated by leader • Limited analysis of
alternatives
• Rejection of expert
opinions
...they often experience
• Few, if any, contingency
GROUPTHINK...
plans
• Illusion of invulnerability ...that result in...
• Illusion of morality • Decisions of poor quality
• Illusion of unanimity • Poor group performance
• Stereotyping of opponents • Wasted resources
• Rationalization • Lost opportunities
Groupthink Defined
Collective rationalization
When group start taking more time justifying the decision rather
for all. This belief is so strong that the decision taken by the group
are not only considered sensible but also morally correct
Symptoms of Groupthink
Self-censorship
Its situation where the doubts regarding wisdom of
group consensus are internally suppressed. The
group members tends to minimize the importance
of their own feelings of disagreements.
Illusion of unanimity
Everyone might disagree but everyone thinks that
everyone else agrees. Means where the team
members remain silent rather than expressing his
disagreement.
Quality of Decisions