Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Background
Modern safety legislation places responsibility on Owners, Operators and Manufacturers to identify and manage the risks associated with their operations and products and to demonstrate that they are doing so in an effective manner. This has led many of them to appreciate the benefits of doing formal Risk Assessment methods as the starting point in their risk managing process.
PHA in PETRONAS
As part of PETRONAS HSE/S MS program, PHA is now made a mandatory for example Petrochemical complex facility- to provide a framework for a structured approach to assessing risks, and Decisions are based on systematic analysis of risks and identification to reduce risks as low as reasonably practicable.
Course Objectives
Provide an understanding of Process Safety Management (PSM) framework and necessary Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) requirements in Applied Hazard Processes. Introduce commonly used tools and techniques available for Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment used in conducting HAZOP analysis. Develop the necessary knowledge to understand what are the fundamental elements to consider in dealing with risky activities of Hazardous Installations, by the review of two major incidents in Oil & Gas Industries.
Definitions
HARM - Physical injury or damage to health, damage to the property or/and damage to the environment HAZARD A source of harm to human lives
Definitions
ACCIDENTS An event resulting from the actual realisation of a hazard, resulting in injuries and damages. They may be due to sudden unintended deviations from normal operating conditions, in which some degree of harm is caused. Sometimes a neutral term event or incident is used in place of accident
Definitions
RISK The likelihood of a specific undesired event to occur within a specified period or specified circumstances Example: 1. Undesired Event: Car breakdown and stranded in remote area or at night Likelihood: Once in 5 years Risk: Stranded in remote area/at night once in 5 years 2. Undesired Event: Gas explosion in congested processing area and injury Likelihood: Once in 20 years Risk: Injury from gas explosion once in 20 years
Risk - Exercise
Rank the risk (High, Medium or Low) of the following activities or technologies and compare your ranking with those of a risk professional Driving a motor vehicle Smoking Driving a motorcycles Swimming Working in large construction site Commercial aviation Fire fighting Traveling by rail Working in a nuclear power station Skiing
Aspects of Risk
1.Time element involved 2.Two-dimensional (Severity / Likelihood) 3.Ascribed quantity (does not exist as a measurable quantity) 4.It is a probability and hence associated with uncertainty
Understanding Risk
Really answering a series of questions: What can go wrong? (Identification) How likely is it to go wrong? (Likelihood) How bad can it get if it does go wrong (Severity) Do I need to worry about it? What are my options for the Control measures? What is my last course of action? ( quick Decision making) Analysis of actual accidents has shown that one or more of the questions above had not been addressed adequately by an organization.
Risk Measurement
Risk measurement can be qualitative, semi-quantitative or quantitative Overall process is generally the same, the difference lies in the approaches to frequency and consequence evaluation This difference is reflected in how risks are presented and mitigation measures evaluated
The PSM standard contains the requirements for the management of hazards associated with processes using hazardous chemicals to help assure safe and healthful workplaces.
Treating Risk
Define Context
The PHA Framework requires The context to be framed. This refers to the following activities:
Involving the appropriate people at the appropriate stages (consultation, involvement of designers, operators, maintainers, contractors, specialist consultants) Defining the exact purpose of the study, the general approach that will be taken, and how the results will be used Gathering and preparation of the necessary information, and Identification of plant / activity areas to be assessed The PHA methodology must be appropriate to the
Define Context
The following information is generally useful / required at some point in the process: Safety Management System Information (corporate policies, risk criteria, design philosophies, manning philosophies, training philosophies) Plant design information (design basis, hazard registers, civil & mechanical, capacity and inventory) Process technology information (materials, flammability, toxicity, process chemistry, materials of construction, P&IDs, electrical classifications, operating procedures) Process Safety Information (interlocks, detection, or suppression systems and relief system design
PROCESS
OUTPUT
HAZARD IDENTIFICATION
Brainstorming
What-if Techniques (SWIFT)
HAZOP Guidewords
NO MORE LESS PART OF AS WELL AS REVERSE OTHER THAN
No Less Flow Temperature Pressure Level Chemical comp. Physical state Type of use: normal start-up shutdown X X X X
More Reverse
X
X X
X
X X
X
Other
Deviation
Examine Possible Causes
Examine Consequences
Assess Safeguards Decide on any required Actions Repeat for other Guide Words Repeat for all Sub-Systems HAZOP Completed
Tolerable only if risk reduction is impracticable or if its cost is grossly disproportionate to the improvement gained
Broadly Acceptable region (No need for detailed working to demonstrate ALARP)
Necessary to maintain assurance that risk remains at this level. This is also part of ALARP
Negligible Risk
Part 4
Linking Hazard Control Measures to the Safety Management System (SMS) Awareness
Implementation of Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) into the Safety Management System (SMS)
All Hazards identified by the Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) must be recorded in Hazard Registers that form part of the Safety Management System (SMS). All control measures identified by the PHA must be managed by elements of the Safety Management System (SMS). Essential control measures identified through the PHA require Performance Standards, Performance Indicators, Testing regimes etc. The lifecycle risk management process ensures that this occurs from project conception through to the end of operational life / decontamination.
Implementation of SMS
Plan - Ensure procedures are developed - Ensure work instructions are complete - Develop training modules Do - Conduct training - Start using procedures - Provide assistance initially in using the procedures correctly Check - Verify that procedures are understood - Verify procedures are used correctly Act - Start using procedures routinely - Hold feedback meetings and take remedial actions until system is satisfied.
Plan Do
Act
Check
Lack of resources and high overtime rates Toleration of deviations from safe SOP.
NOTE: We in LR have global strength as well as local expertise to help our clients benefit from the lessons of the Texas City accident.
Background
In 1988, Britain suffered one of its worst industrial disasters when the Piper Alpha oil platform was destroyed by fire and explosion, resulting in 167 fatalities The catastrophe caused significant changes to the manner by which safety was regulated and managed in the U.K. offshore oil industry
What Happened?
The Piper Alpha platform was operated by Occidental Petroleum Ltd. The platform was linked to the adjacent installations Tartan, Claymore and the MCP01 by sub-sea pipelines Immediate cause of the accident was due to communication problems relating to shift handover and Permit to work procedures. Night shift workers unaware of the safety valve of a condensate pump was removed An ignition of gas leaking from the blank flange caused fire. Fire spread rapidly and later a major explosion occurred due to rupturing of pipeline carrying gas to Piper from nearby Tartan platform
The delay in Claymores shutdown was deemed to have exacerbated the situation on Piper
An explosion on Piper was caused by the gas riser pipeline from Tartan fracturing and pouring more hydrocarbons onto the already blazing platform. OIM had not been trained in emergency response for an event of this magnitude.
Concluding Remark
As an experienced engineer, I believe that every successful Organizational Enterprise in business, especially those in hazardous and risky installations, or even Institution of Higher Learning should be able to demonstrate its excellence in SMS practices. After all, it is now a legal requirement. And there are so much to be gained by implementing SMS.
CONCLUSION
END OF PRESENTATION (Question & Answer Session)
TERIMA KASIH