Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Inventory
Demand Type
Other
Independent Dependent
Dependent
Demand for items used to produce final products
Independent
Demand for items used by external customers
Cars, appliances, computers, and houses are examples of independent demand inventory
Item Demand Source Material Type Method of Estimating Demand Planning Method
Materials With Materials With Independent Demand Dependent Demand Company Customers Finished Goods Forecast & Booked Customer Orders EOQ & ROP Parent Items WIP & Raw Materials Calculated
MRP
Mfg. computer information system Determines quantity & timing of dependent demand items
Computer system Mainly discrete products Accurate bill-of-material Accurate inventory status
99% inventory accuracy
MRP systems are designed to calculate material requirements from dependent demand items. MRP systems use backward scheduling to determine activity start dates. Independent demand is the demand for finished products, whereas dependent demand is demand that is derived from finished products, MRP system use dependent demand. The objectives of MRP are to determine the quantity and timing of material requirements and to keep schedule priorities updated and valid. MPR determines what to order, how much to order, when to place the order, and when to schedule the arrival.
Aggregate
Production
Planning
Resource Availability
Capacity
Requirements Planning Realistic?
Shop
Floor
Yes
Schedules
MRP needs three inputs: the authorized MPS, the BOM file, and the inventory records file. The MPS is the planned build schedule, the BOM files shows the materials needed to build an item, and the inventory records file shows the inventory on hand.
Once the MPS has been input, MRP checks the inventory records to determine if enough end-item inventory is available. If sufficient end-item inventory is not on hand, MPR checks the end-items BOM file to determine what materials are needed and in what quantities.
Action notices show when to release planned orders, reschedule orders, or adjust due dates. They allow the planner to use the MRP output information effectively
What to make What items make up the product Material Requirements Planning Sys. How long to make items What items to make & when What is on order & when What is in stock
What to make What items make up the product Material Requirements Planning Sys. How long to make items Planned Order & Other Reports What is on order & when What is in stock
Bill of Materials
Master Production Schedule Material Requirements Planning Sys. Planned Order & Other Reports
Inventory Status
Item Master
Purchasing Data
Bill of Materials
Master Production Schedule Material Requirements Planning Sys. Planned Order & Other Reports
Inventory Status
Item Master
Purchasing Data
List of components & quantities needed to make product Provides product structure (tree)
Parents: Items above given level Children: Items below given level Lowest level in structure item occurs Top level is 0; next level is 1 etc.
Bicycle(1) P/N 1000 Handle Bars (1) P/N 1001 Frame Assy (1) P/N 1002 Frame (1) P/N 1004
Bill of Material P/N: 1000 Name: Bicycle P/N Desc Qty 1001 Handle Bars 1 1002 Frame Assy 1 1003 Wheels 2 1004 Frame 1
Move Time
Queue Time
Setup Time
1
Gross Requirements Scheduled Receipts Available Net Requirements Planned Order Receipts Planned Order Releases
2 20
3 30
4 25
5 15 8 7 7
2 5
20
25
23
33
33
Lead time = 3; lot policy = lot-for-lot (LFL); on-hand = 20 units; safety stock = 0 units.
On-hand is inventory physically present Allocated is inventory reserved for special orders
On-hand = Prior period's on-hand + Scheduled receipts Net requirement = Gross requirement - Available
Lot-for-lot (LFL) Economic order quantity (EOQ) Part period balancing Wagner-Whit in algorithm
Lot-for-lot techniques order just what is required for production based on net requirements
May not always be feasible If setup costs are high, lot-for-lot can be expensive
2 30
3 40
4 0
5 10
6 40
7 30
8 0
9 30
10 55
0 30 30
0 40 40
0 0
0 10 10
0 40 40 30
0 30 30
0 0
0 30 30
0 55 55
Net requirements
Planned order receipts Planned order releases
30
40
10
40
30
55
No on-hand inventory is carried through the system Total holding cost = $0 There are seven setups for this item in this plan Grosssetup cost = 7 x $100 = $700 Total 35 30 40 0 10 40
requirements Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 35 0 0 30 30 30 40 0 40 40 10 0 0 0 10 10 40 0 40 40 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 30 30 55 0 55 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 30 8 0 9 30 10 55
Net requirements
Planned order receipts Planned order releases
2 30
3 40
4 0
5 10
6 40
7 30
8 0
9 30
10 55
0 30 73
43 0
3 0
3 7 73
66 0
26 4 73
69 0
69 0
39 16 73
Net requirements
Planned order receipts Planned order releases
73
73
73
73
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week Average weekly gross requirements = 27; EOQ = 73 units
Annual demand = 1,404 Total cost = setup cost + holding cost Total cost = (1,404/73) x $100 + (73/2) x ($1 6 x 52 7 weeks) 1 2 3 4 5 8 9 Total cost = $3,798 Gross Cost for 10 weeks = $3,798 x (10 weeks/52 weeks) = $730 35 30 40 0 10 40 30 0 30
requirements Scheduled receipts Projected on hand 35 35 0 0 30 73 73 73 0 0 0 0 0 7 73 73 0 0 0 4 73 73 0 0 0 0
10 55
0 16 73
Net requirements
Planned order receipts Planned order releases
Holding cost = $1/week; Setup cost = $100; Lead time = 1 week Average weekly gross requirements = 27; EOQ = 73 units
In theory, lot sizes should be recomputed whenever there is a lot size or order quantity change
Lot sizes can be modified to allow for scrap, process constraints, and purchase lots Use lot-sizing with care as it can cause considerable distortion of requirements at lower levels of the BOM When setup costs are significant and demand is reasonably smooth, PPB, Wagner-Whit in, or EOQ should give reasonable results
Different lot size rules are used with MRP systems to generate different order quantities and order frequencies. The lot-for-lot (L$L) rule always minimizes the inventory investment but maximized ordering costs. Planned orders generated by mrp, plus any open shop orders, are inputs to capacity requirements planning (crp). CRP checks to see if available capacity is sufficient to complete the orders scheduled in a particular work center during a specific time period. Crp calculates the workloads at critical work centers by using the planned orders generated by the mrp system. These planned orders are multiplied by the standard times to calculate individual work center loads.
Closed-Loop MRP
MRP system provides input to the capacity plan, MPS, and production planning process
Capacity Planning
MRP system generates a load report which details capacity requirements This is used to drive the capacity planning process
System nervousness
Time fences: Portion of master schedule not scheduled Pegging: Tracing to parent in BOM
Reduce time buckets to daily or hourly Use planned receipts to sequence orders Use kanban cards to move material Use back flushing to reduce inventory
Distinguished dependent from independent demand inventory Defined material requirements planning Stated the benefits of MRP Identified the requirements of MRP Explained the inputs & outputs of MRP Computed order releases