You are on page 1of 15

Description

Yogyakarta province government plan to make Kulon Progo coastal areas as megaproject site of iron-sand mining The conflict arouse as the manifestation of different perspective that happened between corporation and society at seeing megaproject This conflict affect to economical, political, social and cultural side of society

Conflict Mapping
Vertical between society and government Horizontal between societies (pro and contra parties), society and corporation

Actors Mapping
DIRECT PARTIES A. Government - Central government (pro mining) - Provincial government (pro mining) the strongest party pushing the iron-sand mining project - District / local government (pro mining)

Actors Mapping
DIRECT PARTIES B. PT Jogja Magasa Iron (JMI) a corporation which trying to exploit Kulon Progos coastal sand [mining industry] * PT JMI is owned by PT Jogja Magasa Mining (JMM) which the financial capital were divided by Indonesia (30%) and Australia (70%)

Actors Mapping
DIRECT PARTIES C. Society - Pro: the resident live in the North side of Daendles road * theyre not coastal sharecroppers * they wont affect by the exploitation even in positive or negative way

Actors Mapping
DIRECT PARTIES C. Society - Contra: the resident live in the South side of Daendles road * they work as coastal sharecroppers * if the exploitation continued, the resident will loss their job * the contra party established an organization addressed Paguyuban Petani Lahan Pantai (PPLP)

Actors Mapping
INDIRECT PARTIES A. Non-Government Organization - LBH Yogyakarta - Walhi (Wahana Lingkungan Hidup) - IDEA (Institute of Development and Economic Analysis)

Actors Mapping
INDIRECT PARTIES B. DPRD DIY, Kulon Progo * dont have any bargaining position to fight with the rules because the authority held by the central government

Actors Mapping
INDIRECT PARTIES C. Komnas HAM (National Commision of Human Right) * help PPLP by evaluating the mining pilot project and arranging recommendation to the president

Conflict Analyzing
1st: this conflict rooted on agrarian conflict [land owning] * Pakualaman claimed that half of Kulon Progo coastal area [the mining sites] is part of Pakualaman Ground * the resident also claimed that they have right to Kulon Progo coastal because they have been taken care of that land for more than 20 years * dualism of law

Conflict Analyzing
2nd: unequal distribution of power [local level] * the made of public policy that bias elite interest * practically, that bias policy drive the local elite to optimalize their power to the economic resources

Conflict Analyzing
3rd: the coming of investor triggered the conflict * as the manifestation of the 1st and the 2nd point above * alteration from latent conflict to the manifest one * the aftereffect noticeable, the pro party destroyed and burnt contra partys command post [there were 7 posts and 2 houses broken]

Our standing position


* this conflict is not affected by the resident that want to be employed by the corporation * furthermore, this conflict growing up to ecological and cultural conflict * ecological: abrasion, environment sustainability, post-mining effect, etc. * cultural: resident dependency to the area for more than two decades [intergeneration entanglement with the environment]

Resolution
Relocated the resident to the new place that fits their characteristics Optimalizing CSR to empowering resident around there Monitoring the exploitation and its impact to the society and environment. If they proved offend the rule, they have to chased away from the area and responsible to every damage they made.