Sampling and Inference

Learning Objectives
1) Why Random Sampling is of Fundamental Importance in Political Research. 2) Why Samples that Seem Small can Yield Accurate info About Much Larger Groups. 3) How to Find the Margin of Error in a Sample. 4) How to Use the Normal Curve to Make Inferences About the Info in a Sample.

We Continue to Hunger for Numbers and for the Certainty they Seem to Convey.

Which Candidate OR Ballot Measure is the Likely Choice among voting age adults? By how large a Margin?
Anyone interested in Politics, Society, or the Economy wants to understand the Attitudes, Beliefs, or Behavior of very large groups -- Large Aggregations of

Units are populations.

Populations
Population: Generically defined as the Universe of Subjects the Researcher wants to Describe. Emp = Studying the Financial Activity of Political Action Committees in 2008. My population would include all PAC contributions in 2008. Population Parameter: Identifying a Characteristic of the Population:
The Dollar Amount of the Average PAC contribution, The Percentage of Voting Age Adults who are Republicans.

Census: Complete Access to a Populations Interest. A Census Allows the Researcher to Obtain Measurements for All Members of a Population.
Thus, the Researcher Not Need to Infer or Estimate any of the Populations Parameters when Describing the Units of Analysis.

Sample
More often, Researchers are Unable to Examine a Population Directly, thus We Rely on a Sample. Sample: A Number of Cases or Observations Drawn from a Population. (A fixture of life for Political Research). Population Characteristics are Frequently Hidden from View, thus, we turn to Samples, which Yield Observable Sample Statistics. Sample Statistic: Is an Estimate of a Population Parameter, based on a Sample Drawn from the Population. Pollster 1) Takes a Sample. 2) Elicits an Opinion. and 3) Then Infers or Estimates a Population Characteristic from this Sample Statistic.
Such Samples Size of 1500 is Typical, but seems small.

Just How Accurately does a Sample Statistic Estimate a Populations Parameter?

This CH Discusses 3 Factors that Determine How Closely a Sample Statistic Reflects a Populations

Parameter.

The 1st Two Factors Deal with a Sample: 1) The Procedure that We Use to Choose the Sample 2) The Samples Size, the Number of Cases in the Sample. 3) The 3rd Factor Deals with a Populations Parameter that We Want to Estimate: The Amount of Variation in the Population.

Also, CH Shows How the Normal Distribution comes into play in Helping Researchers
1) Determine the Margin of Error of a Sample Estimate and 2) How this info is used for Making Inferences.

Factor 1- The Procedure that We Use to Choose the Sample: Random Sampling

For a Sample to Yield an Accurate Estimate of a Population Parameter, You Must Use a Random Sample = A Sample that has been Randomly

Drawn from the Population.

A Random Sample Insures that Every Member of the Population has An Equal Chance of Being Chosen for the Sample.

Sampling Frame: The Method for Defining the Population We Want to Study. Poor Sampling Frames Give Life to Evil Twins of Sampling Selection Bias and Response Bias.
Selection Bias: (Or Sampling Bias) Occurs When Some Members of the Population Are More Likely to be Included in the Sample Than are Other Members of The Community. Response Bias; Occurs When Some Cases in the Sample Are More Likely Than Others to be Measured.

Random Sampling Continued

Sound Off Polls The Staple for Newspapers and Radio Talk Suffer From Both Selection & Response Bias.

Since Only those Whom Read Newspapers are Sampled (Selection Bias) Only those Newspaper Readers SelfMotivated to Call are Sampled (Response Bias).

We have Devised Sampling Procedures that Minimize Response Bias.

Random Sampling Continued

A Valid Sample is Based on Random Selection: It Occurs When Every Member of the Population has An Equal Chance of Being Included in the Sample. Emp = If 100 members are in the Population, then the Probability that One Member is Chosen is 1 out of 100. Basic procedure used regularly by big-time polling firms Gallup, CBS/New York Times Poll, Univ of Michigan inst for soc research.

If a Sample is Not Randomly Selected, Then the Size of the Sample Does Not Matter.

In this CH, we Explore these points using a Hypothetical Example of a Student Organization that Wants to Gauge Student GPAs. Since, We Cannot Survey All Students; thus, We Decide to Take a Sample of 100 Students. 1st Define Sampling Frame by assigning a unique sequential number to each student in the population from 1st student listed in administration list to the last.

Random Sampling Continued

Random Sampling is The Only Way to Guard Error Selection bias and Sampling Bias.

Random Sampling Error

Important = In Eliminating Bias We Do Not Eliminate Error, In Fact, in Drawing a Random Sample, We are Consciously Introducing Random Sampling Error. Random Sampling Error: Is defined as The Extent to which a Sample Statistic differs by chance from a Population Parameter. Random Sampling Error is Vastly Better because We Know 1)

How It Affects a Sample Statistic, and 2) We Fully Understand How to Estimate its Magnitude.
Assuming Sample Bias to be 0, The Population Parameter will be Equal to the Sample Statistic, Plus Any Random Error that was Introduced by Taking the Sample

Population Parameter = Sample Statistic + Random Sampling Error. Example = An Instructors Measurements of Students Exam Scores will be Equal to Their True Scores Plus The Error Introduced by Haphazard or Random Occurrences.

Random Sampling Error Cont..

What makes Random Sampling Error a better kind of Error = We have the Statistical Tools for Figuring out How Much a Statistic is

Affected by Random Sampling Error.

Components: 1) The Size of the Sample. 2) The Amount of Variation in the Population Characteristic being Measured. Sample Size has an Inverse Relationship with Random Sampling Error = As the Sample Size Goes Up Random Sampling Error Goes

The Magnitude of Random Sampling Error Depends on Two

Down.

The Variation Component and the Sample Size Component Are Not Separate and Independent They Work Together in Determining the Size of Random Sampling Error.

Random Sampling Error Cont..

Random Sampling Error = (Variation / Sample Size). Variation is the Numerator (Reflects its Direct Relationship with Random Sampling Error) & Sample Size is the Denominator (Depicting its Inverse Relationship with Random Sampling Error). In the Hypothetical Example of a Student Organization that Wants to Gauge Student GPAs, Suppose there was a Great Deal of Variation in GPAs among students (The Student Population is Widely Dispersed Across the Values of GPA) and you were working with a Small-Sized Random Sample. Thus, the Variation is a BIG Number and the Sample Size is a small number. Dividing the Large Variation by the Small Sample Size

would yield a Large Amount of Random Sampling Error.

Under Theses Circumstances We Can Not Be Very Confident that the Sample Mean Statistic Provides an Accurate Picture of the True Population Mean -- Because their Estimate contains so much Random Sampling Error. But, if a Larger Sample were taken or if

Students GPA were Not So Spread Out, Random Sampling Error Would Diminish = Gain Confidence in Sample Statistic.

Factor 2: How Sample Size Affects Random Sampling Error

The Basic Effect of Sample Size on Random Sampling Error -As the Sample Size Increases, Error Decreases.

The Sample Size is Denoted by a Lowercase n. Sample of n = 400 is Better Than n = 100 since a Larger Sample Provides a More Accurate Picture of what we are after. A Catch = A Larger Sample Size Does Not Deliver a Fourfold Reduction in Random Sample Error -- Because the Inverse Relationship between Sample Size and Sampling Error is Curvilinear. For Smaller Sample Sizes (Smaller Values of n) An Increase in Sample Size Decreases a Lot of Error. For Larger Sample Sizes Larger Values of n An Increase in the Sample Size has a Modest Effect on Error Reduction.

How Sample Size Affects Random Sampling Error Cont

For Sampling, the Shape of the Curve Fits this Pattern = As Sampling Size Increases, Random Sampling Error is Reduced by the Square Root of the Sample Size.

That is, The Sample Size Component of Random Sampling Error is Equal to the Square Root of the Sample Size, n: Sample Size Components of Random Sampling Error = n

Plugging this into our Conceptual Formula for Random Sampling Error:

*Random Sampling Error = (Variation Component) / n Square

x

How Sample Size Affects Random Sampling Error cont..

Curvilinear Relationship between Sample Size and Random Sampling Error.

Consider 3 Samples: n = 400, n = 1,600, n = 2,800.

The Sample Size Components of the Smallest Sample Size (from the four samples above) is The Square Root of 400 = 20.

Thus, for a Sample of this Size, we would Calculate Random Sampling Error by Dividing the Variation Component by 20.

By going from a Sample Size of 400 to a Sample Size of 16,000 We can Increase the Sample Size Component of Random Sampling Error from 20 to 40 Thus We Double the Denominator, n Square.

This has a Beneficial Effect on Random Sampling Error Cutting It In Half.

1st Jump in Sample Size: From 400 to 1,600 Delivered a Big Boost in the Sample Size Component From 20 to 40. But 1,600 to 2,800 Gave us a More Modest Increase From 40 to 53.

Thus, The Same 1,200 Case Increase in Sample Size Produces a Bigger Reduction in The Sampling Error for Smaller Values of n than for Larger Values of n.

Sophisticated Sampling is Expensive Pollsters Must Balance The Cost of Drawing Larger Samples Against the Payoff in Precision. For this reason, A Sample Size in the 1,500 to 2,000 Range is an Acceptable Comfort Range for Estimating a Population Parameter.

How Random Sampling Error is Affected By n.

Campus Organization Collects a Sample (n = 100) and Computes a Sample Statistic a Sample Mean GPA = 2.80.

The Group wants to know How Much Random Sampling Error is Contained in This Estimate.

I.

Part of the Sampling Error Depends on The Sample Size.

Sample Size Component is Equal to 100 Squared = 10. What does the Sample Size Error Component of 10 have to do with Accuracy of the Sample Mean of 2.80?

II.

Answer Depends on the Second Component of Random Sampling Error, The Amount of Variation in The Population Characteristic being Measured.

This Connection is Direct: As Variation in the Population Characteristic Goes Up, Random Sampling Error Goes Up.

How Random Sampling Error is Affected By n.

Since Variation in the Population Characteristic is Low, the Variation Component of Random Sampling Error is Low.

A Random Sample taken from the Population Would Produce a Sample Mean that is Close to The Population Mean. Moreover, Repeated Sampling from the Same Population would Produce Sample Mean After Sample Mean that are Close to The Population Mean and Close to Each Other.

If Students GPA are More Widely Dispersed Around The Population Mean, If there are Large Numbers of Students In Each Value of GPA, From Lower to Higher, with only a Slight Amount of Clustering around the Population Mean of 2.80., then Variation is high and Random Sampling Error is High.

Since Variation in the Population Characteristic is High, The Variation Component of Random Sampling Error is High.

A Random Sample would Produce a Sample Mean that May or Not be Close to the Population Mean It Depends on which Cases were Randomly Selected. One Sample Might Pick Up a Few More Students who Reside Above The Population Mean and Produce a Sample Mean of 2.90.

How Random Sampling Error is Affected By n.

How to Determine the Amount of Variation in a Population Characteristic?

1st, Look at a Key Measurement of Variation Standard Deviation How Does it Affect Random Sampling Error? (Next Slide).

Variation Revisited: The Standard Deviation

The Amount of Variation in a Variable is Determined by the Dispersion of Cases Across the Values of the Variable.

If the Cases Tend to Fall in or close to the Modal or Median Value, the Variable has a Low Amount of Variation. If the Cases are More Dispersed, the Variable has a High Amount of Variation.

For Interval-Level Variables, the Standard Deviation a More Precise Measure is used.

If, the Individual Cases in the Distribution Do Not Deviate Very Much from the Distributions Mean, then the Standard Deviation Is a Small Number. Contrast If, Individual Cases Tend to Deviate a Great Deal From the Mean then a Large Difference Exist Between the Values of Individual Cases and the Mean of the Distribution then the Standard Deviation is a Large Number.

Variation Revisited: The Standard Deviation Continued.

Calculation of the Standard Deviation Necessary Symbols and Notation.

Emp: Raw Data of Wages of 11 Members of a Fictional Population: $2.00; $5.00; $7.00; $8.00; $9.50; $10.00; $10.50; $12.00; $13.00; $15.00; $18.00

Sample Size: Denoted by Small n. Population Size is denoted by big N.

What is the Population Mean?

By Dividing the Summation of All Wages which equals = $110.00, by the Population Size, 11, We Arrive at the Mean Wage Rate, or the Central Tendency, for the Population, $10.00.

Population Parameters are Always Symbolized by Greek letters -mew.

Variation Revisited: The Standard Deviation continued.

How to Summarize Variation in Wages Among Members of this Hypothetical Population?

A

Measure is provided by The Range defined as The Maximum Value Minus the Minimum Value. In this Exmp, the Range is the Highest Wage, $18.00, Minus the Lowest Wage, $2.00 = A Range of $16.00. In Gauging Variation in Interval-level Variables, the Measure of Choice is the Standard Deviation Greek Sigma.

The Standard Deviation Measures Variation as a Function of Deviations from the Mean of a Distribution. 1st step in Finding the Standard Deviation is to Express each Value as a Deviation from the Mean to Subtract the Mean from Each Value. (Individual Value Mew or ) = Deviation from the Mean.

Variation Revisited: The Standard Deviation Continued.

An Individual Wage Below Pop Mean will have a Negative Deviation. An Individual Wage Above The Mean will have A Deviation of 0 -- Deviations From The Mean.

Examp = Wage Earner 1, making a paltry $2.00 per hour, has a Deviation of - $8.00, (neg 8) Below the Population Mean of $10.00.

All Measures of Variation in Interval Level- Variables are based on the Square of the Deviations From the Mean of the Distribution.

Squared Deviations From the Mean Removes the Minus Sign on Negative Deviations for Populations Wages Below the Population Mean.

Eamp = The Logic of The Standard DeviationSo Both Deviations Figure Equally in Determining the Dispersion of Wages Around the Mean.

Rest assure that, when all is said and done, The Standard Deviation Will Provide the Info We Need to Distinguish Between Wage Earners Who Fall Below the Pop Mean and Those Who Fall Above the Pop Mean. Smaller Deviations Make Smaller Contributions to the Variation in Wages.

Variation Revisited: The Standard Deviation continued.

The Average of The Squared Deviations is Known by a Statistical Name, The Variance: It Looks At The Overall Summary of Variation in the Distribution and Then Computes the Mean of This Amount by Dividing by N.

Exap = The Variance is the Summation of The Squared Deviations ($204.50) Divided By The Population Size (N= 11), Which Yields an Average Wage that is, on Average , $18.59. So the Contribution Each Individual Wage Earner Makes to the Overall Variation in Wages is, on Average, $18.59.

Notice, As with Any Mean, The Size of the Average of Squared Deviations is Sensitive to Values that Lie Far Away from The Mean.

Wage Earners Toward the Tails of the Distribution On the Low End and the High End Make Greater Contributions to the Variance than do Wage Earners Who Lie Closer to The Population Mean.

As Deviations From The Mean Increase, Then The Variance Increases Too. The Standard Deviation is Based on The Variance. Fact, Standard Deviation Is The Square Root of The Variance. The Standard Deviation (o) for The Population of Wage Earners, then, is The Square Root of $18.59, = $4.31

Variation Revisited: The Standard Deviation continued

The Standard Deviation has Two Important Applications:

1)

When Combined With Some Workable Assumptions about a Variables Distribution, Knowledge of o Permits Useful Inferences About a Single Case Drawn at Random From a Population. When Combined with Knowledge of The Sample-Size Component of Random Sampling Error, The SD Allows the Researcher to Estimate The Accuracy of a Statistic From a Random Sample Drawn From a Population.

2)

In Both Applications this Inferential Leverage is Rooted in the Known Properties of The Normal Distribution.

The Normal Distribution

Normal Distribution: Is a Bell Shaped Distribution Used to Describe Interval-Level Variables.

The Mean of the Normal Distribution is marked by 0. The Hash Marks along the Horizontal Axis represents The Number of Standard Deviations Relative to the Mean: 1 for The Point One Standard Dev Above The Mean, -1 for The Point One Standard Dev Below and Mean, and so on.

Emp = If a Member of a Population that has a Value on Some Characteristic that puts that Member One Standard Deviation Above The Population Mean, then the Member would fall under the somewhat Shorter Part of The Curve, Above The +1 Point on the Normal Distribution.

The Numbers Along the Horizontal Axis are known as Standardized Scores Z Scores.

A Z Score: Is Obtained for Any Value in a Population by Finding the Values Deviation From The Mean and Dividing by The Standard Devotion of The Distribution. A Z Score Converts Raw Deviation From The Mean into a Standardized Deviation from the Mean. It also Tells Us How Many Standard Deviations a Case Lies Above The Mean (A positive sign on Z) or Below The Mean (A negative sign on Z).

NORMAL CURVE
0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02
95% of the population lies
between +- 1.96 st. deviations 2/3 of the population lies between +- 1 st. deviation

Area = .6823

Area = .95 2.5% of population

2.5% of population

0.01
0

- 1.96

+ 1.96

The Normal Distribution Continued..

If a case has a value equal to the mean, its Z score is 0. so, for any value in a population,

Z Score = (Deviation from the Mean) /

Thus Wage earner 1, with a raw deviation from the mean of -$8.00, gets a standardized Z score of -$8.00 / 4.31 = -1.86. Wage earner 1s $2.00 wage situates him 1.86 standard deviations below the mean. And the Z score for wage earner 11, at +1.86, affirms his highly paid status relative to everyone else in the population mean. His hourly wage of $18.00 places him 1.86 standard units above the population mean.

The arrow stretching between Z = -1 and Z = +1 bears the label 68%. It means this: if a distribution is normally distributed, then 68 % of the cases in the distribution will have Z scores between -1 (one standard deviation below the mean) and +1 (one standard deviation above the mean). Since the curve is perfectly symmetrical.

So the range between Z = -1 and Z = +1 is the fattest and tallest part of the curve, containing over two-thirds of the cases. 95 percent of the cases will have Z scores in the long interval between 1.96 standard deviations below the mean and 1.96 standard deviations above the mean. This long interval will contain just bout all the cases.

Since the curve is symmetrical, half of this 5 %, or 2.5 %, will fall in the region below Z = -1.96, and the other 2.5 % will fall in the region above Z = 1.96.

The Normal Distribution Continued

Consider the normal distributions essential role in making probabilistic inferences about the individuals in a population.

A Probability: is defined as the likelihood of the occurrence of a single event.

If we know the mean and the standard deviation of a distribution, then we can calculate the Z score for any individual in the pop. Furthermore, assume the distbution is normally distributed, we can make reasonable inferences about the Z score of any single case drawn at random from the distribution.

Randomly picking a single case, what is the probability it will have a Z score between -1 and +1? -- thanks to the inferential leverage of the normal distribution, you know that 68 % of all the cases fall in this interval thus 68 % probability that a single case drawn at random will have a Z score in the interval between Z = -1 and Z = +1. 68 % confident that the case will have a Z score in this interval. There is a chance that case will have a Z score outside the -1 to +1 region. How much of a chance? 32 %, must lie in the area above Z = +1 or below Z = 1. thus there is a 32% probability that a randomly chosen case will have a Z score outside the fat and tall part of the curve.

Knowledge of the standard deviation and the normal distribution can be directly applied when making inferences about an unseen population based on samples randomly drawn from that population.

How the Standard Deviation Affects Random Sampling Error

How a sample statistic is affected by variation in the pop from which the sample is drawn.

Emp = student pollsters took a random sample of n = 100 from a student pop of N = 20,000. they calculated a sample statistic, mean GPA in sample, 2.80.

Now the group knows that their sample estimate (x bar) will be equal to the true pop mean (u) plus the random sampling error they introduced by taking the sample. They also know the magnitude of the sample size component of random sampling error. As sample size increases, the sample size error component decreases as a function of the square root of n. Sample size of 100, this component is sq root of 100 = 10.

The missing ingredient, the variation component of random sampling error the connection is direct: As variation in a pop characteristic increases, so does random sampling error.

The variation component of random sampling error is determined by standard deviation (0). For any given sample size of n, as the population standard deviation increases, random sampling error increases (and vice versa). When we combine this principal with the sample size error component, we again can represent the partnership between the two components of random sampling error:

Random sampling error = Standard deviation / Square root of the sample size. OR using symbols, Random sampling error =

/ n

How the Standard Deviation Affects Random Sampling Error Contin

The Formula captures the effects of the variation component and the sample size component.

If we use a very large sample to estimate a pop parameter that had a very small standard dev, our sample statistic would be quite accurate. If the population standard dev was large and the sample was small our estimate would have a bigger dose of random error, thus, less accurately mirror the pop parameter we are measuring.

Assuming that the pop standard dev is known, the procedure for figuring out the size of random sampling error is straightforward.

Sample of 100, sample mean of 2.80. stand dev of GPAs in the student pop is 40. the size of random sampling error would be = Random Sampling Error = o / sq root of n = .40 / squ root 100 = .40 /10 = .04. Student group can say their sample mean (x bar = 2.80) is equal to the true pop GPA (mew) with random sampling error equal to .04.

Look at how this info can be used to draw inferences about the pop (next page).

Inference Using The Normal Distribution

Researchers describing the random sampling error associated with a sample mean (x bar) refer to the standard error of the mean. Standard error has the same adjective as another term, standard dev. The diff between them =

Standard deviation (o) is a measure of dispersion around a single mean. Standard error is a measure of how closely samples mean estimates a pop mean.

Emap = we take a random sample not a single case from the pop. Then calculate a sample mean. By knowing the size of the sample (n) and the amount of dispersion in the pop (0), we can est how closely the sample mean reflects the pop mean.

In both applications whether a single case or drawing a sample from a distribution, the normal curve comes into play.

Inference Using The Normal Distribution Cont

If sample mean GPA of 2.80 from a sample of 100 and pop standard dev is .40, then the stand error of the sample mean is .04. true pop GPA is 2.80, plus or minus .04.

That is, the true mean probably lies in the interval of about 2.76, a standard error below the sample est, to 2.84, a standard error above the sample est. here is where the normal distribution applies there is a 68 % chance that the pop mean lies within + or 1 standard error of the sample mean, and there is a 95% chance that it lies within + or 1.96 standard errors of the sample mean. How do we know this? Central limit theorem an est statistical rule that tells us that, if we were to take an infinite number of samples of size n from a pop of N subjects, the means of theses samples would be normally distributed, furthermore, would be centered on the true pop mean and have a stand dev equal to o divided by the square root of n.

Eamp = sample of size 100 from the student pop, wrote down the samples mean GPA, then took a third sample, then a 4th into infinity, we would find that the mean of all those samples is equal to the pop mean, that most (68%) of the sample means in this infinite group cluster within one standard error of the pop mean, and that just about all (95%) fall within 1.96 standard errors.

Inference Using The Normal Distribution Cont

o

researchers never talk about certainty instead confidence and probability.

95 percent confidence interval; (most common standard) defined as the interval within which 95% of all possible sample est will fall by chance. Boundaries of the 95% confidence interval are defined by the sample mean minus 1.96 standard errors at the lower end, and sample mean plus 1.96 standard errors at the upper end.

Lower confidence boundary = sample mean - 1.96 stand errors = 2.80 1.96 (.04) = 2.7216

Upper confidence boundary = sample mean + 1.96 stand errors = 2.80 + 1.96 (.04) = 2.8784 Conclusion: 95% of all possible random samples of n = 100 will yield sample means between 2.7216 and 2.8784. (customary to round off 1.96 to 2.0)

To find the 95% confidence interval for a sample mean, multiply the standard error by 2. Subtract this number from the sample mean to find the lower confidence boundary. Add this number to the sample mean to find the upper confidence boundary. Applying this rule, students can be 95% confident, that the unobserved pop mean has a value between 2.80 + or 2.80 + or 2(.04), this is , between 2.72 and 2.88.

Inference Using The Normal Distribution Cont

Suppose the dean decrees the sample mean to be a bit off. Hypothesize mean is at least 2.90. Seems reasonable, since, the fluke effect is always a possibility with random samples. Lets assume the dean is correct that the true population mean really is 2.92. How often by chance would a random sample yield a sample mean of 2.80 with a standard error of .04? The deans hypoth mean would occur less than 5 percent of the time. Normal distribution, however, allows for even greater precision.

1st assemble all the numbers: Deans hypo pop mean = 2.92 Observed sample mean (x bar) = 2.80 Stand error of the sample mean = .04

How far apart are the deans hypo pop mean, 2.92, and observed sample mean, 2.80? find this diff: subtract sample maen (x bar) from hypo pop mean: hypo mean minus sample mean = (mew) (x bar) = 2.92 2.80 = .12 Now question becomes how many standard errors lie between the hypo mean and the observed sample mean? Thus we convert the disputed diff (.12) to a familiar standard unit, Z:

Z = (hypo mean minus sample mean) / standard error = (2.92 2.80) / .04 = .12 / .04 = 3.0

Inference Using The Normal Distribution Cont

Number of standard errors separating the hypo pop mean and the observed sample mean the value of Z is 3 units. This is a large Z score. If the dean is right, what are the chances that the student groups random sample produced a mean that is so far off the mark?

Hash mark for Z = +3 on the horizontal axis. Represents the dean is correct the true pop mean really is way out there at Z = +3 how often will the student pollsters get a sample mean of 2.80? what percent of possible samples would produce such results? The answer is contained in a normal distribution probability table, such as the presented in table 5-2. The student group took a random sample (realistic enough), calculated a sample mean (realistic) however, the variation component of random sampling error , the standard deviation, was assumed that the pop standard deviation (o) was a known quantity. This is not realistic. Its practical a researcher rarely knows any of the pops parameters if known then no need to take a sample.

A different dist very similar to normal distribution can be applied to problems of inference when the pop standard deviation is not known quantity.

Inference Using The Student TDistribution

In most realistic sampling situations the researcher has a random sample thats it. Researcher uses this sample to calculate a sample mean to determine the standard error of the mean the degree to which the sample mean varies, by chance, from the pop mean.

Need to know pop standard dev. If parameter is unviable usually is then need an estimate of pop SD. Simply calculate the SD of the sample. Then use the sample standard dev as a stand-in for (o) in calculating the standard error. The standard error of the sample mean would become = Sample standard deviation / Square root of the sample size. Or using s to denote the sample standard deviation, the standard error is = s / n sq root.

When using smaller samples exact properties of the normal dist may no longer be applied in making inferences. The Students t-distribution can be applied.

The shape of the Students t-dist depends on the sample size. Boundaries of the 95% confidence interval are not fixed. Vary depending on how large a sample is being used for inference. Logic here is that when pop stand dev is not known and the sample size is small, the tdist sets wider boundaries on random sampling error and permits less confidence in the accuracy of a sample statistic. When the sampling size is large, the t-dis adjusts these boundaries accordingly, narrowing the limits of random sampling error and allowing more confidence in the measurements made from the sample.

Inference Using The Student TDistribution cont..

Terminology used to describe the t-dis is different from that used to describe the normal dist. The procedures for drawing inferences about a pop parameter are essentially the same. The similarities and diff between the inferential properties of the students tdis and the normal curve.

Sample size is n =100, sample mean GPA, (mean x bar) = 2.80. however, student group does not know the pop standard deviation. Must, rely, instead on stand dev of their sample, calculates to be .50. so s = .50. the standard error of the sample mean now becomes: s / n sq root = .50/100 sq root = .50/10 = .05 the campus group substitutes the sample standard dev for the pop stand dev, does the math and arrives at the standard error of the sample mean, .05.

Answer is contained in a students t-dis table table 5-3. the specific shape of the students t-dist depends on the sample size. In normal estimation, we do not worry about the size of the sample. So we calculate a value of Z. using students t, the sample size determines the shape of the distribution.

Inference Using The Student TDistribution cont..

Left-hand column of table 5-3 degrees of freedom a statistical property of a large family of distributions, including the students t-dist.

Number of degrees of freedom is tied to sample size. Number of degrees of freedom is equal to the sample size minus 1,or n 1. The signature of the students t-dist is that it adjusts the confidence interval, depending on the size of the sample. More degrees of freedom mean less random sampling error and, thus, more confidence in the sample statistic. Find the 95 % confidence interval of the student pollsters sample mean. 1st, determine the number of degrees of freedom, tied to the sample size (degrees of freedom = n 1 ). n = 100, degrees of freedom = 99. no row , corresponds exactly to 99 degrees of freedom, so use closest lower number, 90 degreees of freedom. Reads across the column labeled 025. Number 1.987, tells us that .025 or 2.5 % of the curve falls above t = 1.987. the students t-dist like the normal dist, is perfectly symmetrical. 2.5% of the curve must lie below t = -1.987. Theses t-values give us the info we need to define the 95% confidence interval of the sample mean: Lower confidence boundary = sample mean - 1.987 stand errors = 2.80 1.987 (.05) = 2.70 Upper confidence boundary = sample mean + 1.987 standard errors = 2.80 + 1.987 (.05) = 2.90