Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
4
Realit y
MN Legislature provided only $25 million
of bonding in spring 2003.
Fundraising goal needed to be increased
to $85 million in May 2003
An additional $15 million was needed to
complete the financing
Financing package needed to be in place
to break ground October 1, 2003 or cost
of project would increase substantially
5
Creat iv e Fin an cin g
Finance and Investment Committees of
Guthrie met with Public Finance Bankers
Use of Arbitrage Financing Explored
Tax-exempt bonds could be sold to finance
construction (Expected cost 2.5%)
Private contributions could go into
endowment until project was completed
(Expected return of 6.5%)
Back-up was to carry the deficit in debt
6
Requ iremen ts for
Arbi tra ge
Guthrie Board approval
City of Minneapolis approval
MN Commissioner of Finance approval
Letter of credit from local banks
Detailed schedule of private
contributions
Definitions of collateral and artistic
control 7
Endo wmen t
In vestmen t Po licy C han ges
OLD NEW
Large Equity 30% Large Equity 20%
Small Equity 15% Small Equity 10%
Inter. Equity 20% Inter. Equity 20%
Fixed Income 25% Fixed Income 5%
Hedge Funds 10% TIPS 15%
Hedge Funds 30%
8
200 3 O utcome
$85 million in AAA tax-exempt 501(c)(3) variable
rate 20-year demand revenue bonds were sold
by the City of Minneapolis (with $65 million to be
retired in 60 months)
Guthrie pledged general assets for letter of
credit on bonds, and accepted possibility of debt
Issues of collateral and artistic control resolved
Private contributions were put in Guthrie
Endowment as received
Project broke ground on time 9
Up date 2 005
Project is on time and within budget
Opening scheduled for late-spring 2006
$85 million in bonds still outstanding at
average cost of 2.5%
Net endowment return has been $4 million
in excess of normal balance returns and
borrowing costs for first 16 months
$2 million of excess return “to be taken off
the table” if 2005 goes negative 10
New Gu thrie Th ea ter
11
Lesso ns L earn ed
All stakeholders need to understand the
risks vs. rewards
Endowment investment policies should
be changed to protect down-side
Energetic collaborative effort required of
all stakeholders to put the arbitrage in
place
Bonding/Endowment arbitrage can be a
useful tool, but requires ongoing
monitoring and reasonable markets 12