Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Incidence
Varies widely based on criteria used for diagnosis. Gross et al, Toronto General Hospital - 1987
Acker et al 1986
2 Percent based on assessment of operator
the fetal shoulders after delivery of the head. Due to impaction of the fetal shoulder behind the symphysis pubis.
Risk Factors
Remember, many cases of shoulder dystocia occur with no readily identified risk factors!!!! ANTEPARTUM FACTORS Maternal Obesity Maternal Diabetes Mellitus Postterm Pregnancy Excessive Weight Gain INTRAPARTUM FACTORS Prolonged Second Stage of Labor Oxytocin Induction Midforceps and Vacuum Extraction
Fetal Complications
Fetal Fractures -
In 18 to 25% of cases
Erbs Palsy -
Maternal Complications
Postpartum Hemorrhage
Vaginal Lacerations
Cervical Lacerations
Puerperal Infection
REMAIN CALM
REMAIN CALM
Oh, and by the way, dont forget to call for help.
shoulder dystocia be managed by the most experienced person in the room. This individual ( generally the attending physician) must have the ability to intervene at any time and should be the only one giving orders.
Preliminary Steps
Call for help and have the team assembled Drain the bladder Perform a generous episiotomy TAKE YOUR TIME, THIS IN AN EMERGENCY, BUT
IT IS NOT A RACE!!!
A bilateral shoulder dystocia. The posterior shoulder is not in the hollow of the pelvis. This presentation oftern requires a cephalic replacement. (C.Pauerstein [ed.], Clinical
(B. Harris, Shoulder dystocia. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984l 27:106)
Preliminary Measures:
Gentle
pressure on the fetal vertex in a dorsal direction will move the posterior fetal shoulder deeper into the maternal pelvic hollow, usually resulting in easy delivery of the anterior shoulder.
(Gabbe, et al., Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1986)
McRoberts Maneuver
Marked flexion of the maternal thighs unto
the abdomen Decreases the angle of pelvic inclination Cephalic rotation of the pelvis frees the anterior shoulder
Suprapubic Pressure
Moderate suprapubic pressure is often the only additional maneuver necessary to disimpact the anterior fetal shoulder. Stronger pressure can only be exerted by an assistant.
Woods' corkscrew maneuver. The shoulders must be rotated utilizing pressure on the scapula and clavicle. The head is never rotated. (B.Harris, Shoulder dystocia, Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984; 27:106.)
Delivery may be facilitated by counterclockwise rotation of the anterior shoulder to the more favorable oblique pelvic diameter, or clockwise rotation of the posterior shoulder.
During these maneuvers, expulsive efforts should be stopped and the head is never grasped !!
To bring the fetal wrist within reach, exert pressure with the index finger at the antecubital junction.
(E. Sandberg. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985; 152: 481.)
Sweep the fetal forearm down over the front of the chest.
If less invasive maneuvers fail to affect this impaction, delivery should be facilitated by manipulative delivery of the posterior arm by inserting a hand into the posterior vagina and ventrally rotating the arm at the shoulder with delivery over the perineum.
The fetal shoulders are rocked from side to side by applying force to the maternal abdomen. Step 2: If step one is not successful, push the presenting fetal shoulder toward the chest. This will often cause abduction of both shoulders and create a smaller shoulder to shoulder diameter.
blade with a narrow handle is slipped between the symphysis and the impacted anterior shoulder. This used like a shoe-horn as a lever where the symphysis is the fulcrum.
Release of the anerior shoulder is initiated by firm pressure against the infant's jaw and neck in a posterior and upward direction. An assistant is poised, ready to apply fundal pressure after proper suprapublic pressure As the anterior shoulder slips free, fundal pressure is applied, and pressure against the neck is shifted slightly toward the rectum. Proper suprapubic pressure is continued.
Continued fundal and suprapublic pressure results in an upwardinward rotation of the newly freed anterior shoulder and a further descent in a position beneath the pubic symphysis.
transverse diameter of the shoulders is reduced. Lateral (upward) flexion of the head releases the posterior shoulder into the hollow of the sacrum.
ramis of the pubis. Care should be taken to avoid puncturing the lung by angling the fracture anteriorly. Theoretically, a fracture of the clavicle is less serious than a brachial nerve injury and often heals rapidly.
described in 1988 Consists of cephalic replacement and then cesarean delivery. Mixed reviews in the literature.
Conclusions
Although shoulder dystocia represents a
catastrophic event in obstetrics, a wellreasoned plan of action with adequate support and skilled personnel can reduce fetal morbidity. Proper patient selection and awareness of risk factors for shoulder dystocia can also reduce morbidity.
Addendum to Lecture
Although half of shoulder dystocias occur in infants weighing less than 4000 gms. The incidence of shoulder dystocia is directly related to fetal size.
10.0% 9.0% 8.0% 7.0% 6.0% 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0%
10.0%
1.7% 0.2%
Q: Can Cesarean Sections for Suspected Macrosomia Reduce the Rates of Shoulder Dystocia?
Sensitivity of clinical estimates of BW > 4500 gms is only 20% USG is not very accurate at extremes of EFW Most cases of shoulder dystocia occur in infants of average weight The incidence of birth trauma in large infants is not trivial
A: NO
Top Reasons for Successful Claims Against Obstetricians in Cases of Shoulder Dystocia
Inappropriate obstetrical delivery notes Absence of delivery notes Failure to document the dystocia Failure to document use of McRoberts maneuver Lack of prenatal documentation or follow-up of
Check for and treat reproductive tract injuries Pediatric neurology and neonatology consultation Document a detailed delivery note, including maneuvers used Explain the occurrence of dystocia to the parents of the infant Do not finger-point Be truthful, but avoid discrepancies in notes by doctors, midwives and nurses.
Harvard Risk Management Foundation (1994)
www.rmf.org