Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Project constraints.
Project dependence
Method of selection
Mathematical programming
Ranking method
1.
Rank all the projects in a decreasing order according to their individual NPVs or IRR Accept budget in the order until capital is exhausted.
2.
Conflict in ranking
Consider a set of five projects A, B, C, D and E for which investment outlay, expected annual cash flow and project life are shown below
Project
Investment outlay
A B C
12 4 20
D
E
38,000
35,000
12,000
12,000
16
9
Project
A B C D E
NPV
14,776 5,370 14,814 45,688 28,936
NPV Ranking 4
5 3 1 2
IRR
39 22 19 30 29
IRR Ranking 1
4 5 2 3
B
C D E
1,000,000
800,000 700,000 600,000
350,000
300,000 300,000 250,000
Define all combinations of project which are feasible, given the capital budget restriction and project interdependencies. Choose the feasible combination that has the highest NPV
B
C D E
1,500,000
1,200,000 750,000 600,000
600,000
500,000 360,000 300,000
B and D
B and E C and D C and E B,D and E C,D and E
2,250,000
2,100,000 1,950,000 1,800,000 2,850,000 2,550,000
960,000
900,000 860,000 800,000 1,260,000 1,160,000
It is formulated in terms of two broad categories of equations The objective function The constraint equation The mathematical model seeks to optimize the objective function subject to various constraint
Linear Programming Model cash outflow in 1st period cannot be more than 50 cash outflow in 1st period cannot be more than 20
Project 1 2 3 NPV 14 17 17 Cash outflow in period 1 12 54 6 Cash outflow in period 2 3 7 6
4 5 6 7 8 9
15 40 12 14 10 12
6 30 6 48 36 18
2 35 6 4 3 3
Consider a firm which is evaluating seven projects with following characteristics the budget available to the firm is restricted to 35 in year 1 and 30 in year 2 Project NPV Cash outflow in period 1 Cash outflow in period 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
6 8 8 7 4 12 9
5 9 12 3 4 10 13
7 5 4 10 6 15 9
There are two additional constraint Project 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Power requirement Managerial requirement 2 6 4 5 3 4 7 6 <= 18 5 7 2 4 8 3 <= 20