Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
=
j
jK
, ,
j2
,
j1 j
o o o
(
(
(
=
j
bjK
, ,
bj2
,
bj1 bj
R R R R
9
System Model - Equations
o can be written in SIR terms as,
such that the required transmit power is
Therefore, S
j
can be define as
with a normalized traffic demand defined as
Total interference is
* W Spread bandwidth
R
bj1,
o
j1
R
bj2,
o
j2
.
.
.
R
bjKj,
o
jKj
OVSF code 2
OVSF code K
j
W
OVSF code 1
W
t
I
b
R S =
o = =
W
t
I
b
R
S
0
I
b
E
tj
I
'
j bj W
1
j
S R =
j W
1
j bj W
1
j
= =
'
R
j
n
M
j i 1, i
i
S +
= =
=
tj
I
10
Approach (1)
If S = [S
1
, S
2
,,S
M
], with some manipulation,
such that
Perron-Frobenius Theorem I
p
has positive eigenvalue,
equal to the spectral radius and if < 1, the solution is non-
negative.
Example - M = 2
- By solving the characteristic polynomial, det[I
p
- I
M
] = 0
-
1
=
2
= , n
1
= n
2
= n (uniform traffic demands and noise)
Observations -
- For any power distribution, traffic demand is upper bounded
by spread bandwidth.
- The higher the noise or the closer the traffic demands are to
W, the higher the required transmit power.
1 < =
2
1
,
>
W
n
1,2
S
, n S
D
s
>
W <
n
1
P
M
I S
D
>
|
.
|
\
|
W <
2 1
11
Approach (2)
Limiting case Ignore n for each user and minimize transmit
power
- By solving for a non-trivial solution, for uniform traffic
demands,
therefore,
(necessary condition for convergence - 1)
and
Observation
- All users transmit the same power and raise the transmit
power until interference can be ignored
1 M
1
=
1 M
W
=
0 = S
s
=
=
=
M
1 i
i
S
M
1
j
S
1 M
tj
I
12
Approach (3)
General case - If S
j
is such that
Therefore,
Consequently,
(necessary condition for convergence - 2)
1
j
n
M
j i 1, i
i
S
j
S
j
<
+
= =
s
=
s
M
1 i
i
S
j
S
M
1
M i
1 i
i
|
|
.
|
\
|
<
[
=
=
1
W M
1
M i
1 i
i
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
|
|
.
|
\
|
<
[
=
=
13
Admission policy
The conditions sufficient for convergence will used to accept or
reject a request for connection in the admission controller.
1) For all Is (for users already connected and those requesting),
calculate E(I) and Var(I) such that
2) Admission policy
- Admit -
- Reject -
- Admit light traffic demand -
and
( )
( )
|
|
.
|
\
|
-
=
E M
Var
3
1
W
M
1
M i
1 i
i
|
|
|
.
|
\
|
<
[
=
=
1 M
MW
M
1 i
i
>
=
1 M
MW
M
1 i
i
<
=
1
W
M
1
M i
1 i
i
|
|
|
.
|
\
|
>
[
=
=
14
Simulation Results
The higher the variation in the normalized traffic demand, the
looser the bound and the higher the capacity.
Uniform traffic achieves the minimum capacity.
At M , the variation in traffic becomes less significant and
the distribution of the traffic demand looks uniform.
Admission of a new call can lead to other users having to
change their transmit power to achieve their desired SIR values.
15
Comments
Worst case scenario - When most users increase their
transmit power to meet QOS constraints, the system blows up.
- Total traffic demand < 0.8W.
- Better to have power constraints (average or total power).
Multicell system - Link Quality in SIR Based Power Control
for UMTS CDMA system by Oppermann et al.
Fading / ISI channel - Adaptive Multicode CDMA for the
uplink Throughput Maximization by S.A Jafar and A. Goldsmith