Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ASF (Accelerating.org) is a small nonprofit community of scholars (est. 2003) exploring accelerating change in:
1. Science, Technology, Business, and Society (STBS), at 2. Personal, Organizational, Societal, Global, and Universal (POSGU) levels of analysis.
We practice evolutionary developmental (evo devo) futures studies, a model of change that proposes the universe contains both:
1. Convergent and predictable developmental forces and trends that direct and constrain our long-range future and 2. Contingent and unpredictable evolutionary choices we may use to create unique and creative paths (many of which will fail) on the way to these highly probable developmental destinations.
Some developmental trends that may be intrinsic to the future of complex systems on Earth include:
Accelerating intelligence, interdependence and immunity in our global sociotechnological systems Increasing technological autonomy, and Increasing intimacy of the human-machine and physicaldigital interface.
2007 Accelerating.org
A Developmental Spiral
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Homo Habilis Age Homo Sapiens Age Tribal/Cro-Magnon Age Agricultural Age Empires Age Scientific Age Industrial Age Information Age Symbiotic Age Autonomy Age Tech Singularity
2,000,000 yrs ago 100,000 yrs 40,000 yrs 7,000 yrs 2,500 yrs 380 yrs (1500-1770) 180 yrs (1770-1950) 70 yrs (1950-2020) 30 yrs (2020-2050) 10 yrs (2050-2060) 2060
2007 Accelerating.org
Foresight Development
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Foresight Development is: Futures Studies Education plus Personal Foresight Skills Practice
Course Description: Foresight is the act of looking to the future. This course helps you learn better global, business and personal foresight, so you can better enjoy and manage your own future. This course will explore the big picture history of accelerating change from universal, historical and technological perspectives, and consider global trends that are affecting individuals, society, businesses and governments. Additionally, the course will examine how organizations make bets on the future, and gives the student a chance to explore career prospects in a variety of fields. Finally, discussion of how biology, psychology, community and culture help and hinder personal thinking about the future will be discussed. We will explore four fundamental foresight skills: creating the future (innovating products and services); discovering the future (models, trend identification and analysis); planning the future (developing shared goals and processes); and benefiting in the future (achieving measurable positive environmental, social, or economic results). Assignments will be personalized to your own foresight goals, and include brief readings, writing, discussions, debates, visuals, film, podcasts and games
Foresight Networks
"No one can deny that a network (a world network) of economic and psychic affiliations is being woven at ever increasing speed which envelops and constantly penetrates more deeply within each of us. With every day that passes it becomes a little more impossible for us to act or think otherwise than collectively." Finite Sphericity + Acceleration = Phase Transition
Global Futures Network: Foresight Professionals, Future-Oriented Specialists, Foresight Educators & You!
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
A public, community-edited People, Orgs, and Resources directory for emerging global foresight culture. FuturesNetwork.org
GFN is a directory of the best online social networks (Shaping Tomorrow, GFN Facebook, GFN LinkedIn), social groups (ASF Future Salons, WTA and WFS Chapters), organizations, listserves, conferences, websites, periodicals, publications, etc. for those interested in futures/foresight subjects. Join us!
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
2007 Accelerating.org
FERN (FERNweb.org) is a global community for foresight educators, students, alumni, and advocates of foresight education.
It networks foresight educators, the ten existing academic programs in foresight/futures studies (offering credentials to become a foresight educator), MS and PhD students and alums, and seeks to help develop open source futures/foresight materials, courses, and new academic programs globally.
2007 Accelerating.org
Evo Devo Universe: For Scholars of Evolutionary and Developmental Processes in the Universe
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Improving foresight through better theories of universal change. EvoDevoUniverse.com is a global community of physicists, chemists, biologists, cognitive and social scientists, technologists, philosophers, and complexity and systems theorists who are interested in better characterizing the relationship and difference between evolutionary (mostly unpredictable) and developmental (significantly predictable) processes in the universe and its subsystems.
2007 Accelerating.org
Dynamic Private University, Innovative Programs, Technology-Focused. Tempe/Phoenix, AZ 1400 Students Mission: To educate students in the fields of advancing technology to become innovators of the future. 14 Bachelors Degrees MS in Technology Studies MS in Artificial Life Programming
Tamkang University 27,000 undergrads Top-ranked private university in Taiwan Like history and current affairs, futures studies (15 courses to choose from) have been a general education requirement since 1995. Why not here?
Very few undergrads use it more than one month before graduation, even for summer internships! Get the stats so you can show the problem. Design Industry Research, Mentoring, Internship and Resource Building programs in conjunction w/ the Center. Key: Students get credit for their own career searches, share their knowledge with later classes.
Business/Entrepreneur/Innovation Dept/School/Ctr
Every student needs to learn to deal with change. Every student needs to save and invest for the future. Every student comes up with new ideas during their careers, or participates on a team coming up with new ideas or business processes, and needs to learn how to evaluate and implement them. Students need to understand the innovation mindset, the customer/client, and what makes a new or ongoing enterprise successful Innovation and competitiveness are national priorities. Innovators/business minded students are among the best alumni (measured by participation and giving).
Alumni Center
Alumni giving and alumni interest is usually low, and starts late. Get the stats so you can show the problem. Alumni Research, Mentoring, and Internship programs in conjunction w/ the Center. Case Study Presentations on the Life Stories of Distinguished Alumni in FD Course. Key: Students get credit for researching and reaching out to alumni, share their knowledge with later classes.
Library
Computer Center
Can live in the Career Services Center, Library, a Sponsoring Dept (Business, etc.) or Independently Foresight Speaking Topics/Research/Pubs by Faculty
Faculty Benefits
Student Benefits
Like science and technology studies (STS), a similarly cross-disciplinary activity, foresight and futures MS and PhD programs can live in a wide range of schools and departments at a university. In the ideal case, such programs exist as independently-funded interdisciplinary centers at the university, able to collaborate on foresight projects with departments and centers across the campus, as well external universities, government, and corporate clients.
1902, H.G. Wells, Anticipations 1904, Henry Adams, A Law of Acceleration 1930, William F. Ogburn, Presidents Committee on Social Trends 1945, Project RAND (RAND Corp.) 1946, Stanford Research Institute (SRI International) 1962, Arthur C. Clarke, Profiles of the Future 1967, World Future Society, World Futures Studies Federation Institute for the Future 1970, Rand Graduate Institute (PhD in Policy Analysis); Alvin Toffler, Future Shock 1971, U. of Hawaii, PhD in Futures Studies (Poli. Sci.) 1974, U. of Houston, Studies of the Future M.S. 1977, Carl Sagan, Dragons of Eden; Inst. for Alternative Futures 1986, Eric Drexler, Engines of Creation 1987, Global Business Network 1995, Tamkang U., Center for Futures Studies 1999, Ray Kurzweil, Age of Spiritual Machines 2003, Acceleration Studies Foundation
Futures Studies is concerned with three Ps and a W, or Possible, Probable, and Preferable futures, plus Wildcards (low-probability but high-impact events). In other words, futurists try to create, discover, and manage (CDM) the future. Creation (Possible) personal, collective, and entrepreneurial tools and strategies for imagining and creating experimental futures, innovation, exploratory research and development, creative thinking, social networking Discovery (Probable and Wildcards) forecasting methods, metrics, statistical trends, history of prediction, technology roadmapping, science and systems theory, risk analysis, marketing research Management (Preferable) environmental scanning, competitive intelligence, networking, scenario development, risk mgmt (insurance), hedging, enterprise robustness, planning, matter, energy, space, and time management systems, positive-sum outcomes
Global Primary Foresight / Futures Studies Programs: Five PhDs, Eleven Masters An Emerging Discipline
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
AUSTRALIA 1. Swinburne U. of Tech., MS,PhD in Strategic Foresight (Bus. Admin.). FINLAND 2. Turku School of Econ. and Finland Futures Academy. MS,PhD in Futures Studies (Econ. and Bus. Admin.). FRANCE 3. CNAM, PhD in Strategic Foresight (Bus. Admin, Engrg). ITALY 4. Da Vinci Online U, MS in Scenarios for Innovation Mgmt. MEXICO 5. Monterrey Inst. of Tech, MS in Strategic Foresight PORTUGAL 6. Univ. Tecnica de Lisboa, MS in Foresight, Strategy & Innovation SOUTH AFRICA 7. U. Stellenbosch and Inst. for Futures Resrch. M.Phil,PhD in Futures Studies (Econ/Mgmt). TAIWAN 8. Tamkang U. and Grad. Inst. of Futures Studies. MA in Futures Studies (Education). 9. Fo Guang U. and Grad. Inst. of Futures Studies, MA in Futures Studies (Sociology) UNITED STATES 10. Regent University, MA in Strategic Foresight (Bus. Admin.) 11. U. Hawaii. MA,PhD in Alternative Futures (Pol Sci). 12. U. Houston, MS in Studies of the Future (Tech).
Fundamental Questions Remain: What is predictable? What is intrinsically unpredictable? What long-range forces act on complex systems, besides natural selection? Does history have directionality?
Recent scientific ideas, such as evo devo theory, provide the beginnings of a framework for answers to such questions.
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
\Fu"tur*ist\, n.
One who looks to and provides analysis of the future.
Social Types
Methodological Types
Preconventional Futurist Personal Futurist Imaginative Futurist Agenda-driven Futurist Consensus-driven Futurist Professional Futurist
Critical Futurist Alternative Futurist Predictive Futurist Evo-devo Futurist Validating Futurist Epistemological Futurist
See: accelerationwatch.com/futuristdef.html
Foresight, also known as futures studies (FS) is a transdisciplinary educational program that seeks to reliably improve one's ability to anticipate, create, and manage change. It can be practiced in a variety of domains (scientific, technological, environmental, economic, political and societal), on a variety of levels/scales (personal, organizational, societal, global, universal), and with a variety of disciplines/specialties (theories and methods). Anticipating, creating, and managing change in our increasingly fast-paced, technological and globalized world is a difficult yet worthy challenge.
Foresight / Futures Studies Possible, Probable, & Preferable change (scenarios, trends, strategy) Development Studies (Developmental inevitability) Predictable and statistically irreversible change (emergences, phase changes) Acceleration Studies (Accelerating developments) Sustained exponential growth, positive feedback, self-catalyzing, increasingly autonomous processes Each of these is seeing a resurgence of interest in todays fast-paced and poorly modeled world. Nevertheless, there are few primary academic programs in FS to date (12 total, after thirty years), and none in DS or AS (by name at least).
We suggest an MS or PhD foresight/futures programs should provide basic proficiency in all the primary foresight specialties (the core curriculum of futures studies), and at least a conceptual introduction to the secondary specialties. Electives and thesis topics should be possible in both primary and secondary specialties. We also propose that the best foresight programs should satisfy all of the following requirements: Ideal Admission Prerequisites 1. An undergraduate degree (foresight work needs context and maturity, it is best as an MS-and-above degree) 2. Applied, specialized, real-world experience (3+ years incoming experience after undergrad degree) 3. Science, tech, and history (econ, political and social) prereqs or testing, with mandatory deficit remediation Ideal Program Requirements 1. Broad-based, balanced, integral curriculum (all quadrant, all level, all discipline, globally- and accel-aware) 2. Considers both evolutionary (possible and reversible) and developmental (probable and irreversible) change 3. Measurably improves knowledge (pre- and in-program testing) 4. Measurably improves skills, incl. prediction and change mgmt (validated via prediction markets, tests, etc.) 5. Transdisciplinary. Foresight students should become subject matter experts (SME's) in more than one discipline
We explore five systems levels in relation to foresight, starting big picture and doing an inward spiral: 1. Universal systems (science, systems theory, and spirituality) 2. Global systems (technology, environment, and global problems) 3. Societal systems (socio-economic, socio-political, and socio-cultural) 4. Organizational systems (entrepreneurship, management, cooperation, activism, family) 5. Personal systems (aesthetics, self-development, tools, health, wealth, other social impact)
We consider eight categories in relation to foresight: 1. Science issues (general science, general systems theory, cognition science and systems theory) 2. Technology issues (computing, engineering, automation, virtualization, transparency, biotech) 3. Environment issues (resources, commodities, energy, biodiversity, pollution, catastrophes, sustainability) 4. Economics issues (entrepreneurship, capitalism, globalization, aid and development) 5. Political issues (democracy, sustainability, rights, migration, governance, law, defense, crime) 6. Social-Big (S1) issues (education, media, religion, demographics) 7. Social-Medium (S2) issues (organizational, social activism, subcultures) 8. Social-Small (S3) issues (personal, relationships, psychology, family, aesthetics, health)
FD Nomenclature
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Framework/Learning Paradigm
The Learning Paradigm (World-View, Foundational Philosophical Assumptions, Goals) Used by an Educator Manifests as the Learning Objectives of the FD/FS program (Objectives are Implicitly or Explicitly tied to the Framework). Hypothetical and ideally empirically testable models of structure, function, and dynamics of some system Pragmatically discovered algorithms, practices, and talents applicable to some system.
Theories
Methods/Skills
Knowledge
Historical and current information used to improve construct framework and improve theories and methods
Discrete sets of Theories, Methods, and Knowledge taught by educators as specialties or disciplines.
Specialties/Disciplines
Alternative Futures Cross Impact and Pattern Analysis Critical Futures and CLA Development and Acceleration Studies Emerging Issues/ Technology Analysis Environmental/ Horizon Scanning Ethnographic Futures Forecasting and Modeling (basic) Foresight Frameworks and Foundations History and Analysis of Prediction Images of the Future Personal Futures/ Foresight Development Prediction Markets Predictive Surveys/ Delphi Roadmapping Scenario Development and Backcasting Scenario Planning Strategic Foresight Systems Thinking Transhumanist/ Ethics of Emerging Tech Trend Extrapolation Visioning, Intuition, and Creativity Weak Signals Wildcards
In terms of foresight skills, well use the classic 3Ps Skills Model, and practice seeing and analyzing Possible, Probable, and Preferable Futures. This model was first developed by Roy Amara, President and CEO (1970-1990) of one of the first futures think tanks, the Institute for the Future, founded in 1968. Another name for this, based on the actions involved, is the CDM Skills Model, as it is about:
1. Creating/Envisioning a range of Possible futures 2. Discovering/Predicting the most Probable futures 3. Managing/Measuring toward Preferable futures.
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Primary and Secondary Specialties Classified by Amaras 3Ps/Evo Devo Foresight Framework
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Roy Amara's 3P's framework can be used to group specialties that explore the Possible future (what could happen), the Preferable future (what we want) and the Probable future (what seems likely, even in spite of our personal plans). This is also an Evo Devo framework, dividing foresight into "Evolutionary" (possible), "Developmental" (probable), and "Evo Devo" (preferable) futures.
First cited in: Perspectives in Cross-Cultural Psychology, Jim Dator, Academic Press, 1979
The philosopher Ken Wilber (A Brief History of Everything) proposes the following Integral/Four Quadrant Framework to categorize fundamental complementary processes of human understanding and change.
We see four fundamental foresight skills, creating, planning, benefiting, and predicting, which map to Wilbers four quadrants of life experience.
Creating/Innovating "Seeing and making the future things, images, and ideals I want" Planning/Negotiating "Getting consensus and forming strategies for the future we want."
Benefiting/Measuring "Objectifying and measuring my progress toward a better future." Predicting/Discovering "Predicting and discovering how the system is moving toward the future."
Learning how and when to use all four of these foresight skills will make you a well-balanced or 'integral' futurist. Neglect any one of these and you will have an incomplete and underdeveloped foresight model and skillset. For example, many self-proclaimed futurists lack an adequate knowledge of science and systems, and may even state that "the future cannot be predicted." But science and history reveal extensive pattern and predictability, as long as we approach predictability from a statistical or probabilistic framework. As forecasting and actuarial work show, many well-established and/or well-understood trends and cycles allow insights into complex aspects of society. There Los Angeles are also futurists who love to create/imagine and even plan, but who never measure the benefit (or lack of benefit) New York on execution (or lack thereof) of their plans. Achieving competence in all four 'integral' skills is necessary if one is to Palo be Alto a 'whole futurist' with broad social and process effectiveness.
Innovating/Creating (I) Thinking and acting by personally preferred futures Planning/Negotiating (We) Thinking and acting by social consensus plans
Benefiting/Measuring (It)
Thinking and acting by objectively measurable results Predicting/Discovering (Its)
lnnovating
Tech, Culture, Art, Philos We (Social/Kinship) Consensus-Driven Futures
Benefiting
Econ-Political Its (Global/Species) Research-Driven Futures
Planning
Social-Political
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Predicting
Science, Systems
lnnovating
Tech, Culture, Art, Philos We (Social/Kinship) Consensus-Driven Futures
Benefiting
Econ-Political Its (Global/Species) Research-Driven Futures
Planning
Social-Political
Predicting
Science, Systems
Futures Studies is about Three Ps and a W: Possible, Preferable, and Probable Futures (plus Wildcards) Roy Amara
Limits: Biased. These are the most important factors. Oversimplified. There are other important factors. Abstract. They may not correspond to reality. Inaccurate. They may be incorrect.
Benefits: Consensual. They help us see what some group sees, not just what we see. Clarifying. They show categories, forces, interactions we may have overlooked. Balancing. They help us pay attention more across the spectrum of generally accepted importance. Focusing. They help us look better at the things we are seeing (drill deep in any subject).
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Syllabus Teaching templates Assignments Resources Course slides available to foresight educators on request. Visit: http://foresightdevelopment.wetpaint.com
Unit I. The Big Picture (Weeks 1-4) Intro to and history of futures studies, theories of universal change, and the unique nature of our timescientific and technological progress that is likely to run faster every year for the rest of our lives. Week 1 Intro to Futures Studies Week 2 Evolution, Development, and the Future of Science Week 3 Accelerating Change and the Future of Technology, Part I Week 4 Accelerating Change and the Future of Technology, Part II
Unit II. Global and Societal Foresight (Weeks 5-9) Forces and choices affecting our planet and our socio-economic, sociopolitical, and socio-cultural environments. Week 5 Global Trends, Scenarios, and Models Week 6 Global Problems and Priorities Week 7 Economics and the Future of Capitalism Week 8 Politics and the Future of Security and Democracy Week 9 Culture, Media and Education in a Network Society
Unit III. Business and Organizational Foresight (Weeks 10-11) Forces and choices shaping the business and organizational world, the many social definitions of success, and practical success strategies. Week 10 Biz-Org Leadership, Innovation, Learning, and Predicting Week 11 Biz-Org Planning, Consensus-Bldg, Benefiting, and Metrics
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Unit IV. Personal and Career Foresight (Weeks 12-15) Using foresight in your personal life and future careers. Finding your own strengths, passions, vision, and voice, and navigating an increasingly option-rich future, "present trends extended" (PTE). Week 12 Personal and Career Creativity and Visioning Week 13 Personal and Career Learning and Predicting Week 14 Personal and Career Planning and Negotiating Week 15 Personal and Career Benefiting and Measuring
DOAJ. Directory of Open Access Journals, scientific and scholarly. Full text. Free. Docstoc. Sharing business, legal, and other professional documents. Free. GDocs and Spreadsheets. Good basic collaboration platform. Free. GMail and GCalendar. Clean, fast, reasonably full-featured. Free basic. GReader. Great tool for organizing RSS feeds and tracking site updates. Free. iGoogle. Fast, customizable, reasonably useful home page. Free. LibraryThing. Catalog & find others with the same books. Free basic. 200K users. Linqia. Search tool for online groups & social networks, by keyword interest. Ning. Create your own full-featured social networks. Free. Plaxo Pulse. FB-like business network. Free. 13M Plaxo users (not Pulse). Slideshare. Largest community for publicly sharing your presentations. Free. SmugMug. Best fee-based photosharing. Document your life. $40/yr. 300K users. Spock. A search tool for finding people by interest. Free. 80M "indexed" people. Wetpaint. Easy personal or enterprise wikis. Free basic. 600K wikis (+ this site). Xing. For business networking. Free basic. 4M users. Yelp. Good reviews of local businesses and services. Democracy in action! Free.
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Personal Foresight System used in FD Course: Getting Things Done (GTD), GDocs, GCal
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
The Core GTD System: 1. Actualizer Doc (Done Items, Next Items, Waiting For Items) 2. Projects Doc
(Multistep Items)
3. Someday/Maybe Doc
(Long term/low priority)
Transfer your Actualizer record once a month to Archives Doc. Annotate as you transfer. How could you have been more foresighted, realistic, and effective? Use email reminders, try out shared calendars in GCal.
Psychological Foresight Tools Used in FD Course: StrengthsFinder (and other Psych Testing Rubrics)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Peter Drucker: Individuals should discover and focus on building their best strengths, much more than fixing their weaknesses, to make their best and happiest contribution to the world. Weaknesses in turn can be best managed by: 1. Being aware of strengths you dont have 2. Joining strengths-complementary teams 3. Allowing others to lead from their different strengths 4. Building situational intelligence (routines, tools, brief courses, etc.) to keep you from getting tripped up by your weaknesses. Gallups StrengthsFinder (and other psych profiling assessments like MBTI, DiSC, etc.) are predictive futures tools. How validated are they? (Gallup lists 34 strengths, large polling set) How complete are they (strengths and weaknesses, integral)? When will they be a required part of our educational, hiring (AMA: only 39% of U.S. companies use psych testing in hiring, mostly still minor, not yet open source), and assessment processes? We are still very early in this process. Major opportunity ahead.
Values Inventory What do you care about beyond survival needs? What is it others do that angers/offends you? Goals (in a Categorization System) Personal and Academic/Professional Health, Family, Relationships, Professional HRVWE Health Relationships Vision (Hindsight/Insight/Foresight) Work Environment (Possessions, etc.) Harvard MBA Goals Study The 3% with written goals earned 10X the others per capita The 15% with verbal goals earned 3X the others per capita The 20% of startups with business plans were 3X more likely to be solvent at 5 years.
Personal Futures Wiki (Portfolio) Used in Course: Fourteen Pages, Fifty Questions on FD
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
GTD Pages
Tasks+Waiting Single-step "Next Actions" ("Tasks"), & "Waiting For Others" items Projects+Skills Multi-step, long-term items ("Projects") and Skills that make you unique. Ideas+Questions "Someday/Maybe" Ideas (personal, biz, etc.) and Questions to research.
Personal Pages
Diary Money Habits Fam+Friends Values+Psych Social+Fun A place to journal--and review--daily or memorable life experiences. Income, expenses, budget, investments, money goals and plans. Health, exercise, practice, entertainment, any repeating healthy habits. Your important relationships, things your fam&friends like, dont like, & plans. Your values, ideals, personality, and psychological traits. Social groups, travel, other fun things you now or might do for recreation.
Career Pages
Career Goals Education+Work Networking Mentors Cos+Internships Career plans and possibilities, current life goals and objectives. Degrees, classes, jobs, highlights, current ed/work schedule, future plans. Group memberships, conferences, networks that connect you to professnls. Leaders and helpers in your profession, and your contact history with them. Co. profiles, site visits, contacts, internship opportunities and schedules.
Some Big Question Options to Debate in Course: Societal (Economic, Political, and Cultural) Issues
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Economics 1. Is the US destined to lose its economic and educational leadership to New Asia (China, Taiwan, Korea, Singapore, India, etc.)? What should we do? 2. What are ways the US can help manage global development in more equitable, innovative, and sustainable directions in coming years? 3. Have the corporations become too powerful in U.S. society? How can we keep powerful corporations from reducing global and local competition? From buying political influence? Politics 4. Will strategies of more participatory democracy (initiative politics, direct local democracy, grassroots activism, nonviolent resistance (boycotts, civil disobedience etc.) become more powerful in a Network 2.0 world? How might they change the U.S. political climate (positively and negatively)? 5. As military and security technologies get more autonomous (UAVs, etc.), more precise (smart weapons, and more networked and transparent, what changes can we expect in the U.S. military and homeland security environment (threatscape)? 6. If selfishness and evil (lying, violence, etc.) have been key parts of human nature up until now, how can we keep them in check in a world of accelerating economic growth (creating powerful new plutocrats) and accelerating tech (environmental degradation, terrorist WMDs)? Culture 7. Are any of our cultural indicators (citizen intelligence, independence, analytical ability, world knowledge, self-reliance, self-accountability, community) declining in the U.S.? Why? Is this a problem, or is this OK as long as our machines pick up the slack? Are they? 8. How can we, or do we want to, restore the American educational Social Contract of the mid-20th century, which tried to give all citizens an affordable and challenging education according to their ability rather than according to their wealth? 9. What has been the impact of Network 1.0 technology (TV, Web 1.0, etc.) and economy (early info/services economy) on U.S. culture so far? Where may it go in Network 2.0 (next 25 years of info and communication tech)? What are some of the opportunities and risks ahead?
Futures Movie Night Weeks 1-5 One Great Video Per Week on Foresight Development
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Week 2 - Science
Origins: Fourteen Billion Years of Cosmic Evolution, Episode 4: Where Are the Aliens?, NOVA, 2004 Evolution (8 Episode Series): Episode 2 - Great Transformations, PBS, 2001 Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial, NOVA, 2007
Futures Movie Night Weeks 6-7 One Great Video Per Week on Foresight Development
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Week 7 - Economics
Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price, Robert Greenwald, 2005 Learn about the largest, wealthiest company in the world. Grossly unfair US government subsidies, substandard wages and health care, exploitation of Chinese workers, aggressively antiunion policies allowing substandard working conditions to persist. Strong social democracies like Germany hold Wal-Mart to a much higher standard. When will we? The Corporation (2 Disc Special Edition), Mark Achbar, 2004 Overly histrionic and sloppy, yet still a reasonably useful exploration of the excesses of the corporate entity in the 20th century, which have become less extreme in individual instance, yet more pervasive as corporate wealth has grown to exceed national wealth the world over. Briefly considers the unrealized possibilities for corporate charter revocation and reform. Sicko (Special Edition), Michael Moore, 2007 One of Moore's more balanced works, while still biased infotainment. Special features on the DVD include this 8 minute piece on Norway's health care and penal system. Moore highlights Norwegian outliers in the prison bit, without telling you, as is typical of his propagandism. Still, when will US citizens have the power to create a health care system that puts universal care ahead of profits? We shall see.
Futures Movie Night Weeks 8-11 One Great Video Per Week on Foresight Development
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Futures Movie Night Weeks 12-15 One Great Video Per Week on Foresight Development
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Great Futures Books (Circulated in Class Each Week, Returned to Library Reference Section After Class)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Nanotech (nanoscale science and technology) Infotech (computing, comm., and engrg. technology) Sociotech (org. and social technology) Cognotech (brain sci, dev. psych, human factors) Biotech (life sciences, biotechnology, health care)
It is easy to spend lots of R&D or marketing money on a still-early technology in any field. Infotech examples: A.I., multimedia, internet, wireless It is also easy to spend disproportionate amounts on older, less centrally accelerating technologies. Every tech has the right time and place for innovation and diffusion. First and second mover advantages.
"Give me a lever, a fulcrum, and place to stand and I will move the world." Archimedes of Syracuse (287-212 BC), quoted by Pappus of Alexandria, Synagoge, c. 340 AD The good opinion of mankind, like the lever of Archimedes, with the given fulcrum [representative democracy], moves the world. (Thomas Jefferson, 1814) The lever of accelerating information and communications technologies (in outer space) with the fulcrum of physics (in inner space) increasingly moves the world. (Carver Mead, Seth Lloyd, George Gilder)
In Nine Chains to the Moon, 1938, poet and polymath Buckminster Fuller coined "Ephemeralization, positing that in nature, "all progressions are from material to abstract" and "eventually hit the electrical stage." (e.g., sending virtual bits to do physical work) Due to principles like superposition, entanglement, negative waves, and tunneling, the world of the quantum (single electrons, photons, etc.) appears even more ephemeral than the world of collective electricity. In Critical Path, 1981, Fuller called ephemeralization, "the invisible chemical, metallurgical, and electronic production of ever-more-efficient and satisfyingly effective performance with the investment of ever-less weight and volume of materials per unit function formed or performed". In Synergetics 2, 1983, he called it "the principle of doing ever more with ever less weight, time and energy per each given level of functional performance
This trend has also been called virtualization, weightlessness, and Matter, Energy, Space, Time (MEST) compression, efficiency, or density.
1. These levels have reorganized to fastest first. 2. We see more pluralism (a network property) as we rise in level. Examples: 50,000 Internatl NGOs, rise of the power of Media, Tort Law, Insurance, lobbies, etc. 3. Where is Society here? On all three levels. Can we move moer human aspirations and culture to the top of this list? Can we create a global network of tech shapers, early adopters, and critics?
The futures already here. Its just not evenly distributed yet. William Gibson
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Massive fertilizer use and city effluent runoff adds massive nutrients to ocean, causing an explosion of primitive organisms. This rise of slime is killing off the larger species.
90% of global stocks of tuna, cod, and other big fish have disappeared in the last 50 years. 97% of elkhorn and staghorn coral off Florida has disappeared since 1975. 150 oxygen depleted dead zones exist on global coastlines next to cities today. 10 existed in 1950. 75% of Southern Californias kelp forests have disappeared in the last 50 years. 650 Grey Whales have washed up sick or dead on the West Coast of N. America in the last seven years.
Particularly Strong Sign of a Global Problem (Since 1988): Less Fish (total tonnage), Even Less Fish (per capita)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Not enough fish in the sea, Kenneth Weiss, LA Times, 26 Nov 2006
Information/Services/Network Society
Society of Intangible Needs (Weightless Economy) Network 1.0 McJobs & Service 65% of Jobs, 2000s Network 2.0 New Middle Class 40% of Jobs, 2030s Network 3.0 Consolidation Again 15% of Jobs, 2060s
Products/Manufacturing Society
Society of Tangible Needs (Property Economy)
Manufacturing 1.0 Exploitive Jobs 50% of Jobs, 1900s Manufacturing 2.0 New Middle Class 35% of Jobs, 1950s Manufacturing 3.0 Offshoring/Globalizing 14% of Jobs, 2000s
Resources/Agricultural Society
Society of Basic Needs (Food/Shelter Economy) Agriculture 1.0 Subsistence Jobs 80% of Jobs, 1820s Agriculture 2.0 Family Farms 50% of Jobs, 1920s Agriculture 3.0 Corporate Farms 2% of Jobs, 1990s
The
Finance, Stocks, Investments) 47 trillion annual gross world product 55 trillion money supply (M3), growing at 2X or more GDP, an informal tax on economy. U.S. Govt (state, local, federal, military, contractors) employs 13% of U.S. society from formal and informal taxes. 10 trillion ann. goods and services trading 100 trillion ann. stocks and bonds trading 980 trillion annual currency trading volume Some equitocracy goals Government Reform & Accountability Balanced Government Budgets Solvent Social Insurance Corporate Reform & Accountability Progressive Corporate Taxation Progressive Income & Asset Taxation Consumer Trust Accounts
Data360.org; Global Money Supply, Mike Hewitt, 31 Jul 2007; Wikipedia (GWP)
1880
1995
2040
298,500 321,900
122,400 75,900 176,100 246,000
Prediction: We will see a continued strong increase in voluntary activities in all first world economies. Culture, entertainment, travel, education, wellness, nonprofit service, humanitarian and development work, the arts, etc. Source: The Fourth Great Awakening and Future of Egalitarianism, 2000, Robert Fogel (Nobel-prize-winning economist and founder of the field of cliometrics, the study of economic history using statistical and mathematical models)
Large companies have an incentive to innovate and patent, but no incentive to implement unless: a. Others can get around their innovation-blocking patents b. Political efforts to eliminate or slow competition are failing c. Existing product lines are presently being threatened d. Another large company is implementing (rare occurrence) Toyota has announced a 100 mpg hybrid (the 1/X). They have no incentive to produce it until another big carmaker is doing the same. Meanwhile Toyota will lobby the US government to lower CAF 2020 targets from 35 to 32 mpg. Laughable but grim.
Car cos form innovation-blocking partnerships to promote premature, controllable, slow-to-deploy tech (H2 fuel cells) vs. effective, low-barrier-to-entry tech (electrics and plug-in hybrids).
Toyota will develop but wont deploy a next-gen plug-in hybrid until forced to by other giants, rapidly growing small carmakers, or some other factor. Big leaders strategy: innovate and wait Some Solutions: Minimize oligopolies, mergers, size concentrations Lower barriers to entry (promote creative destruction) in industry Mandate tough and increasing performance standards Litigate against collusions to delay mandated technologies. Promote consumer information and informed buying decisions Promote buying consortiums based on performance specs Promote corporate transparency Promote public stock ownership
Toyotas 1/X Concept Car (2007) 1/3 the weight 2X the fuel efficiency of the Prius
Global auto sales by all carmakers: 65 million in 2005 Toyotas Official Sales Estimate: 73 million cars in 2010 Presently slow growth.
Wildcard: If ultra-low cost ($1,000-$2,000) cars and microfinancing are brought to market soon in emerging nations, the global car market might begin to grow as fast as 50% year. For many years in a row.
Wildcard Projection assuming 50% annual sales growth starting in 2010, from 73 million, for just five years: 553 million cars sold in 2015 Total Potential Cars Sold, 2010-2015 (or 2010-2020?): 1,514 million cars
Global Car Saturation could occur in a period as short as ten years, locking us into the energy efficiency, pollution, and safety standards of those particular automobiles for the next 20 years (avg. car lifetime). Conclusion: These need to be clean and efficient cars, or we may suffer a real global energy and pollution crisis. Are governments involved in slowing the rollout of todays machines, and/or setting minimum standards? The record is not encouraging.
IP Regulation and the Tech Innovation Rate: Examples from Bose and Microvision
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Innovation diffusion can be prevented due to overly restrictive IP (intellectual property) policy, often due to the philosophy of a single individual controlling the corporation (Amar Bose, etc.). IP law reform can change this, but only with foresight and political will!
Ingleharts Developmental Values Map: All Cultures Migrate to the Upper Right, On Diff. Paths
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Ecumenicalism (seeing
wisdom in all faiths)
Rationality (logic+empiricism) Self Expression Subjective Well Being Quality of Life Sustainability World Awareness Future Orientation Political Moderation Interpersonal Trust Casualness
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Average US literacy scores are projected to decline between 1992 and 2030, and increase in inequality.
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
In 1992, 70 million Americans out of 255M (27%) had Level 2 Literacy By 2030, 119 million Americans out of 363M (32%) will be in this Category
More Proficient
Aggregation of opinions is the new frontier for prediction/ innovation/ decisionmaking. Google realized there was hidden opinion order in an apparently chaotic net. PageRank captured that order, created much more relevant search. Avoids bias. Michael Jensen, HBS, Forecasting is paying people to lie.
Sample Internal Markets: Eli Lilly. Drug efficacy and market size. Siemens. Software project length. Google. Over 200 markets (experimental) Microsoft. Software development. Hewlett-Packard. Sales projections. Three Requirements: 1. Cognitive Diversity (The Difference) 2. Independence 3. Aggregation Tools (still primitive)
Diversity and Optimality (1998). Lu Hong, Scott E. Page, Dept. of Econ, Syracuse U, and Dept. of Econ., U. of Iowa, 27 p. A general [computational] model of diverse problem solvers of limited abilities. We use this model to derive two main results: (1) a collection of diverse, bounded problem solvers can locate optimal solutions to difficult problems and (2) a collection of problem solvers of diverse abilities tends to jointly outperform a collection of high ability problem solvers, where a problem solver's ability equals her expected individual performance.
Diversity is as important as ability for: Poorly defined problems (nonlinear optimization, prediction, horiz. scanning) High degrees of freedom problems Innovation What else?
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Evolutionary Development (Evo Devo): The Left and Right Hands of Universal Change
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Experimentation Main Actor: Seed Replication, Variation, Chaos, Contingency, Early Species Radiation (Mostly Nonadapted) Stochastic Search Strange Attractors
Natural Selection Main Actor: Organism Life Cycle, Growth Curves, Modularity, Responsiveness, Plasticity, Intelligence (Local Adaptation) Requisite Variety Mixed Attractors
Convergent Unification
Adaptation
Radiation
Main Actor: Environment MEST Compression, Ergodicity/Comp. Closure, Evolutionary Convergence, Path-Dependence/Hierarchy, Dissipative Structures, Positive Sumness/Synergy, Niche Construction/Stigmergy, Self-Organization (Global Adaptation) Environmental Optimization Standard Attractors
Hierarchy
Evolution
Left Hand of Change
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
New Computational Phase Space Opening
Development
Evo Devo
(Intersection)
Evolution and Development in Universal Terms: A Table and a Some Key Conjectures
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Some Key Conjectures: Evolution is intelligence/information accumulation. Development is intelligence/information preservation. Evolution causes ongoing unpredictability and novelty. Development causes cyclic predictability and stability. Evolution drives most unique local patterns. Development drives most predictable global patterns. Life, Intelligence, the Universe and You and I actively use both evo and devo processes in order to thrive. The more consciously we are aware of this, the more we can understand, value, and work with both. Each has different and often conflicting processes and aims. Both are critical to our life, society, and the universe.
2007 Accelerating.org
Thumbprints, brain wiring, learned ideas and behaviors, many local processes and small things are unpredictably unique in each twin. Yet many processes and large things are predictably the same. The Lesson: (Predictable and conservative) development is always different from but works with (unpredictable and creative) evolutionary processes. Both are fundamental to universal complexity.
2007 Accelerating.org
Evo Devo Theory in Politics: Innovation vs. Sustainability (Both are Fundamental!)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Evo devo theory argues for process balance in political dialogs on Innovation and Sustainability
Developmental sustainability without continuous change/creativity creates sterility, clonality, overdetermination, and adaptive weakness (Maoism). Evolutionary creativity (innovation) without sustainability creates chaos, entropy, and volatility that is not naturally stable/recycling (Unregulated Capitalism).
2007 Accelerating.org
Evo Devo Theory in Politics: Republican vs. Democrat (Both are Fundamental!)
Acceleration Studies Foundation
A 501(c)(3) Nonprofit
Evo devo theory suggests that both Republican and Democratic platforms bridge the evo devo political center in two complementary ways. That would make each integral, fundamental dialogs (among other integral evo devo mixes) that are likely to be long-term stable all cultures.
Republicans are Devo/Maintenance/Tradition on Social-Political Issues Evo/Innovation/Freedom on Economic Issues Democrats are Evo/Innovation/Freedom on Social-Political Issues Devo/Maintenance/Tradition on Economic Issues
2007 Accelerating.org
AI is growing, but not yet fastest growing industry $1B in 93 (mostly defense), $12B in 2002 (mostly commercial). AGR of 12% U.S., Asia, Europe are equally strong in AI Belief nets, neural nets, expert systems growing faster than decision support, agents, evo AI Mostly incremental enhancement of existing apps (online catalogs, etc.), few new platforms Translation, Natural Language Processing, and Computer telephony (CT) are improving rapidly (Google, Directory Systems, Booking Systems) Expect dedicated DSPs on the desktop soon. Coming: Conversational Interface (CI) Persuasive Computing, and Personality Capture/Valuecosm
2007 Accelerating.org
AIST and Kawadas HRP-2 (Can get up when he falls or when you knock him down)
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
Aibo Soccer
2007 Accelerating.org
Avg. Query 1.3 words 2.6 words 5.2 words 10.4 words
Nonverbal and verbal language in parallel is a much more efficient communication modality. Birdwhistell: 2/3 of information in face-to-face human conversation is nonverbal.
Ananova, 2002
2007 Accelerating.org
time when computers speak our language. A time when our technologies are very responsive to our needs and desires. A time when humans and machines are intimately connected, and always improving each other. A time when we will begin to feel naked without our computer clothes.
Los Angeles New York Palo Alto
2007 Accelerating.org
Conversational interfaces lead to personality models. In the long run, we become seamless with our machines.
No other credible long-term futures have been proposed.
I would never upload my consciousness into a machine. I enjoy leaving behind stories about my life for my children. Prediction: When your mother dies in 2050, your digital mom will be 50% her. When your best friend dies in 2080, your digital best friend will be 80% him. Successive approximation, seamless integration, subtle transition. When you can shift your own conscious perspective between your electronic and biological components, the encapsulation and transcendence of the biological should feel like only growth, not death.
Microcosm (Gilder), 1960s Telecosm (Gilder), 1990s Datacosm (Sterling), 2010s Valuecosm (Smart), 2030s - Recording and Publishing DT Preferences - Avatars that Act and Transact Better for Us - Mapping Positive-Sum Social Interactions - Much Potential For Early Abuse (Advice) - Next Level of Digital Democracy (Holding Powerful Plutocratic Actors Accountable) - Early Examples: Social Network Media
2007 Accelerating.org
2007 Accelerating.org