Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
How can team communications be improved? How can team decisions be improved?
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
accomplish them.
Turn a general sense of purpose into specific objectives. Set standards for measuring results and obtain feedback. Members have the right mix of technical, problem-solving
Team Building
Collaborative way to gather and analyze
Step 2:
Teamwork
Processes
Tough Battler
Acts aggressive Seeks authority
Friendly Helper
Acts insecure Tries to be helpful
Objective Thinker
Acts reflective Wants clear goals
Distributed leadership
Sharing of responsibility for meeting group task and
maintenance needs.
Task activities
Various things members and leaders do that directly
Maintenance activities
Support the social and interpersonal relationships among
team members.
Task Contributions
Offering ideas Clarifying suggestions Giving information Seeking information Summarizing discussion
Maintenance Contributions
Encouraging others Reconciling differences Expressing standards Offering agreement Inviting participation
Disruptive behaviors:
Bullying and being overly aggressive toward
other members.
Withdrawing and refusing to cooperate with
others.
Using the group as a forum for self-confession.
Role
Set of expectations associated with a job or position
on a team. . Role ambiguity Occurs when a person is uncertain about his or her role and what is expected.
Role overload
Occurs when too much is expected of the
individual.
Role underload
Occurs when too little is expected of the
individual.
Role conflict
Occurs when a person
Role negotiation
Process for discussing and agreeing upon
Norms
Represent ideas or beliefs about how
implications.
Performance norms. Ethics norms. Organizational and personal pride norms. High-achievement norms.
Cohesiveness
The degree to which members are attracted
of it.
There is a strong relationship between
Inter-team dynamics
The relationships between groups
another.
To assure high performance, team interaction patterns and communication networks must be aligned with
positions.
Poor communication is characteristic of this
type of situation.
interact.
Architects and consultants that specialize in office
results.
Two or three people are able to dominate or railroad the group into making a decision to which they agree.
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Formal voting usually takes place, or members may be polled, publicly or confidentially, to find the majority viewpoint.
Decision by consensus
Discussion leads to one alternative being favored by most members and the other members agree to support it.
Decision by unanimity
Disadvantages:
Imperfect decisions may result from social pressures to conform to group, or undue influence of team leader.
Groupthink
The tendency of members in highly cohesive
capabilities.
Avoiding groupthink
Leader refrains from announcing any position. Every team member acts as critical evaluator. Different sub-groups explore same problems. Bring in outside experts to evaluate information, realism of goals, and plans for action. Assign someone to be a devils advocate at each team meeting. Rotate an appointed team "devil's advocate" so that no one particular person appears to dissent.
Brainstorming
Used in teams to actively generate as many
ideas and alternatives as possible. All criticism is ruled out All ideas are welcomed
Think about how team cohesiveness and groupthink might be related. Can cohesiveness ever reduce groupthink?
For example, when there is a cohesive team,
and members are familiar with each other, they may be less likely to censor their opinions and more likely to disagree.
Agree or disagree?
Copyright 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Delphi technique
Involves generating decision-making
questionnaires.