Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
All M.C. Escher works (c) 2009 The M.C. Escher Company - the Netherlands.
All rights reserved. Used by permission. www.mcescher.com
Self-referential to self-sarcastic, often at the boundaries between feasible and infeasible, flat and spherical, two-dimensional and threedimensional, finite and infinite, constant and variable, visible and invisible, the ingenious Dutch artist Maurits Cornelis Escher (1898-1972) is nowadays recognized as a significant mathematician, too, despite his self-proclaimed total lack of mathematical culture. His possibly best known achievement, that is the carving of geometrical tilings of the plane into most symmetrical embracings of sundry animals, fish, birds, and reptiles, gives to this presentation its main topic and its title.
M. C. Escher (1919)
M. C. Escher, 1955
I am beginning to speak a language that is understood by only very few. This makes my loneliness greater and greater.
M. C. Escher, 1959
4+4=8
A contour line between two interlocking figures has a double function, and the act of tracing such a line therefore presents a special diffi culty. On either side of it, a figure takes shape simultaneously. But, as the human mind can t be busy with two things at the same moment, there must be a quick and continuous jumping from one side to the other. The desire to overcome this fascinating diffi culty is perhaps the very reason for my continuing activity in this field.
M. C. Escher, 1964
ESCHER on ESCHER: EXPLORING the INFINITE, p. 32
In various ways Escher points out to us that the staircase on the right is actually an arch (towel on window, hanging pitcher, trees), while the staircase on the left is indeed a staircase (maid, sitting passerby, boat): convex on the left, concave on the right
The lady faces east, the gentleman faces north, therefore the visitors have room to place their ladder and climb up!
Belvedere (1958)
Waterfall (1961)
Beware of Windows!
Comparison: the impossible triangle Of Oscar Reutersvard and Roger Penrose 17 (threefold, rather than fourfold, turn)
Unless we view the colorless region as white-colored (rather than hollow), Moebius Strip I is impossible.
Whirlpools (1957)
Reflection
Glide Reflection? NO
Rotation pairs
Glide reflection
A strictly geometrical relative of Unicorns: vertical glide reflection of two kinds (tails, heads)
Comparison: Peruvian birds -- fauna without tiling (Peter Stevens, Handbook of Regular Patterns, p. 188)
[1942]
[1942]
[1965]
Despite their visual differences, all six preceding examples belong to the same symmetry type:
46
QuickTime and a TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor are need ed to see this picture.
[1942] Sixfold turn (left hands), threefold turn (right knees), Twofold turn (right hands)
[1942] Sixfold turn (tails), threefold turn (heads), twofold turn (left fins)
2 fourfold turns (left feet, right hands), 1 twofold turn (noses - knees) [1959]
[1941] Horizontal and vertical reflection, fourfold turn (wings), twofold turn (feet)
[1953] Vertical reflection and glide reflection (a type contained the previous three types)
Vertical reflection, horizontal glide reflection (and twofold turn at crab legs) [1941]
[1959] - ( )
The eminent geometer H. S. M. Coxeter, a personal friend of Escher, has written a paper where he proves that the white lines intersect the circumference at ~800: H. S. M. Coxeter, The Non-Euclidean Symmetry of Escher's Picture Circle Limit III, Leonardo 12, No. 1, 19-25 (1979)
[1960] Cyclic Limit V - Hyperbolic Geometry (fourfold turn and central threefold turn)
Already in 1942 Escher had provided a spherical version of this tiling, also known as Heaven and Hell:
gbaloglouATgmailDOTcom, http://crystallomath.wordpress.com