Design and analysis of artificial HIPjoint by Using Finite Element Methods

Project Guide: Dr. Bubesh Kumar D. (M.E., Ph. D) Submitted by: Sushant Kumar Jaiswal (3440910648)

What is Ansys?

A designing and simulating software. Found by Dr. John A. Swanson in 1970. (Swanson Analysis Systems). To develop and market FEM. Structural, stationary, dynamics and thermal problems.

Simulation Technology: Structural materials, Multiphysics, Fluid dynamics, Electromagnetics, Hydrodynamics.

Workflow Technology: Ansys workbench, High performence computing, Geometry interfaces, Simulation process and data management

PRODUCTS:

Bio-Medical (Bone Replacements), Automotive (Toyota Prius & RBR), Aerospace (Parker Aerospace), Energy (Columbia Power & Inder Electric), Electronics (Arizona Antena & Fujitsu), Consumer Products (Dyson Fans & Speedo).

Applications in Bio-Medical Field:

Hip-Joint

Materials Used:

Titanium Based Alloys, Stainless Steel, Magnesium Alloys.

Design Module of an Artificial Hip-Joint

Deformation:

Total Deformation: Graphical Analysis

(Deformation Vs. Load)
3 2.5

1.5

1 Titenium 0.5 Stainless Steel

Magnesium
0

Directional Deformation: Graphical Analysis (Deformation Vs. Load)

0.0045

0.004
0.0035 0.003 0.0025 0.002 0.0015 0.001 0.0005 0 Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Strain:

Equivalent Elastic Strain: Graphical Analysis (Strain Vs Load)

0.0016 0.0014 0.0012 0.001 0.0008 0.0006 0.0004 0.0002 0 Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Maximum Principal Elastic Strain: Graphical Analysis (Strain Vs Load)

0.0016 0.0014 0.0012 0.001 0.0008 0.0006 0.0004 0.0002 0 Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Middle Principal Elastic Strain: Graphical Analysis (Strain Vs Load)

0.0006 0.0005

0.0004

0.0003

0.0002 Titenium 0.0001 Stainless Steel Magnesium 0

Minimum Principal Elastic Strain: Graphical Analysis (Strain Vs Load)

2.00E-06 1.80E-06 1.60E-06 1.40E-06 1.20E-06 1.00E-06 8.00E-07 6.00E-07 4.00E-07 2.00E-07 0.00E+00 Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Maximum Shear Elastic Strain: Graphical Analysis (Strain Vs Load)

0.0025 0.002

0.0015

0.001

0.0005

Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Elastic Strain Intensity: Graphical Analysis (Strain Vs Load)

0.0025 0.002

0.0015

0.001 Titenium 0.0005 Stainless Steel Magnesium 0

Normal Elastic Strain: Graphical Analysis (Strain Vs Load)

0.001 0.0009 0.0008 0.0007 0.0006 0.0005 0.0004 0.0003 Titenium 0.0002 0.0001 0 Stainless Steel Magnesium

Shear Elastic Strain: Graphical Analysis (Strain Vs Load)

0.001 0.0009 0.0008 0.0007 0.0006 0.0005 0.0004 0.0003 Titenium 0.0002 0.0001 0 Stainless Steel Magnesium

Stress:

Equivalent Stress: Graphical Analysis

(Stress Vs Load)
70 60 50 40 30 20 Titenium 10 0 Stainless Steel Magnesium

Maximum Principal Stress: Graphical Analysis (Stress Vs Load)

70 60 50 40 30 20 Titenium 10 0 Stainless Steel Magnesium

Middle Principal Stress: Graphical Analysis (Stress Vs Load)

30 25

20

15

10 Titenium

Stainless Steel
0 Magnesium

Minimum Principal Stress: Graphical Analysis (Stress Vs Load)

25 20

15

10

Titenium

Stainless Steel
0 Magnesium

Maximum Shear Stress: Graphical Analysis (Stress Vs Load)

35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Stress Intensity: Graphical Analysis

(Stress Vs Load)
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Normal Stress: Graphical Analysis

(Stress Vs Load)
30

25

20

15

10 Titenium 5 Stainless Steel Magnesium 0

Shear Stress: Graphical Analysis

(Stress Vs Load)
9 8 7 6

5
4 3 2 1 0 Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Structural Error:

Graphical Analysis of Structural Error:

(Error Vs Load)
3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0

Titenium Stainless Steel Magnesium

Conclusion:

Mg is the most deforming whereas SS is least. Mg has the highest strain value & SS has least. Mg has highest structural error & SS has least. Titanium has everything almost average value. So Titanium can be considered as the best metal for use cause of its light weighted & as well as non corrosive nature.