Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
THE INTEGRITY
DEVELOPMENT ACTION
PLAN
REALITY
CHECK
REALITY CHECK
THE FIGHT
AGAINST √ Corruption is a problem
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION √ No government is spared
from the sting of corruption
THE IDAP
√ Corruption is one of the
biggest problems of the
IMPLEMENTIN Philippines since time
G THE IDAP immemorial
√ The Government is doing its
MONITORING part in trying to
THE IDAP
solve/eradicate this problem
PAGC-RDC I √ The Government cannot
PARTNERSHI solve this problem overnight
P nor can it solve the problem
REALITY
CHECK
GOVERNMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST INITIATIVES TO FIGHT
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION
GRAFT AND CORRUPTION
Administrative Controls
THE IDAP and
Procedural Reforms
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP Increased funds for
anti-graft
MONITORING
THE IDAP Internal audit controls
and streamlining of
PAGC-RDC I systems
PARTNERSHI
P
Procurement reforms
REALITY
CHECK
THE FIGHT
Ch 21: MTPDP 2004-
AGAINST
GRAFT AND
2010
CORRUPTION ANTI-CORRUPTION
“Anti-corruption efforts
will focus on three areas of
THE IDAP
reform: (1) Punitive
IMPLEMENTIN measures that include
G THE IDAP effective enforcement of
anti-corruption laws…; (2)
MONITORING Preventive measures that
THE IDAP include the strengthening
of anti-corruption laws,
PAGC-RDC I improvement of integrity
PARTNERSHI
P systems, conduct of
REALITY
CHECK
THE FIGHT
THE INTEGRITY
AGAINST
GRAFT AND
DEVELOPMENT ACTION
CORRUPTION PLAN
National anti-corruption
framework of the Executive
THE IDAP Branch
IMPLEMENTIN Holistic approach in
G THE IDAP fighting corruption
composed of 22 specific
MONITORING anti-corruption measures
THE IDAP
(“doables”) clustered into
the strategies of
PAGC-RDC I Prevention, Education,
PARTNERSHI Investigation and
P
Enforcement (Deterrence),
The 22 “Doables”
Easy to implement
Do not require
amendments of related
laws
REALITY
CHECK
THE FIGHT
IDAP STRATEGIES
AGAINST
GRAFT AND PREVENTION – systems reforms
CORRUPTION to minimize opportunities for
graft and corruption
THE IDAP EDUCATION – informing the
public on the ills of corruption
IMPLEMENTIN through advocacy, values
G THE IDAP
formation and educating the
public servants on the dos and
MONITORING don’ts of public service
THE IDAP
INVESTIGATION AND
ENFORCEMENT – making
PAGC-RDC I corruption a high-risk, low-
PARTNERSHI
P reward activity
REALITY
CHECK PREVENTION
THE FIGHT
AGAINST 1. Strengthening of internal control
GRAFT AND through the institutionalization of
CORRUPTION internal audit service
2. Conduct of Integrity Development
Review
THE IDAP
3. Adoption of e-NGAS and fast
tracking of e-bidding
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP 4. Incorporating integrity check in
recruitment and promotion of
government personnel.
MONITORING
THE IDAP 5. Institutionalization of a multi-
stakeholder personnel and
organizational performance
PAGC-RDC I evaluation system
PARTNERSHI
P
6. Protection of meager income of
government employees
REALITY
CHECK PREVENTION
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION 1) Strengthening of internal
controls through the
institutionalization of
THE IDAP
internal audit unit
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP OUTCOME: Revival and
strengthening
MONITORING
THE IDAP
of systems integrity in all
agencies in the Executive
PAGC-RDC I Department
PARTNERSHI
P
REALITY
CHECK
PREVENTION
THE FIGHT
AGAINST HOW CAN INTERNAL AUDIT
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION
HELP PREVENT CORRUPTION?
Internal Auditors…
THE IDAP
Examine control procedure to
IMPLEMENTIN determine their adequacy and
G THE IDAP propriety
Verify reliability and integrity of
MONITORING
THE IDAP financial and operating
information
PAGC-RDC I Review the systems established
PARTNERSHI to ensure compliance with
P
existing policies, regulations,
REALITY
CHECK
PREVENTION
THE FIGHT
AGAINST HOW CAN INTERNAL AUDIT
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION
HELP PREVENT CORRUPTION?
(2)
Internal Auditors…
THE IDAP
Review the means of
IMPLEMENTIN safeguarding assets
G THE IDAP Appraise the quality of
performance in carrying out
MONITORING
THE IDAP
assigned responsibilities
Review operations or
PAGC-RDC I programs to ascertain whether
PARTNERSHI the operations or programs are
P
being carried out as planned
INDICATORS:
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
national security)
Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt
necessary
IAU has already complied with the International Standard for the
THE IDAP
Issuance of OP Memorandum
Circular No. 89
IMPLEMENTIN Creation of the Committee on the
G THE IDAP Institutionalization of Internal Audit
Units
MONITORIN RSP per EO 366
G THE IDAP
US$300,000 WB-IDF Grant for the
PAGC-RDC Strengthening of Internal Audit
PARTNERSHI Units for Effective Procurement
P
Monitoring and Enforcement
US$300,000 WB-IDF Grant for the
Strengthening of Internal Audit Units
for Effective Procurement Monitoring
and Enforcement
Development of a Quality Assurance Program
on internal auditing functions
Development of a Generic Internal Audit
Manual
Operationalization of a National Training
Program for Internal Auditors
Study on Certification/Accreditation of
Internal Auditors
Development of a Procurement Monitoring
Pilot Agencies:
•Department of •Department of
Agriculture Transportation and
Communication
•Department of Education •Department of Finance
•DBM-Procurement Service •Land Bank of the
Philippines
•Department of the •National Power
Interior and Local Corporation
Government
•Department of Social •Province of Bulacan
Welfare and Development
Individual
Human Performance
Resource Management
Development
• Leadership
Organizational •Code of Ethics Financial
Procurement• Gifts and Management
Management Benefits
Policy
Whistleblowing,
Corruption
Internal Reporting
Risk
& Investigation
Management
Environment
Managing Interface with
External Environment
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
5
IDR findings already presented and validated with the
management/head of agency
Agency already prepared an agency anticorruption/integrity
includes:
o Preparation of a Site Visit Plan
o Process map
o Risk Assessment
o Evaluation of controls and safeguards
3
Corruption Resistance Review (CRR) already conducted which
includes:
o Integrity Development Assessment (IDA)
o Survey of Employees
o Analysis of Results
1 MOA among the agency, service provider and PAGC or OMB already
signed (should include the scope of the IDR and the terms of
reference, timeframe, resource and manpower requirements for the
conduct of the IDR)
Agencies covered by IDR:
DOH DENR
AFP NIA
BFP LRA
DPWH BOC
LTO DND-PVAO
BUCOR PNP
DAR BIR
LRTA DBM-PS
REALITY
CHECK PREVENTION
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND 3) Fast tracking of e-
CORRUPTION
NGAS and e-bidding
for the procurement
THE IDAP
of goods services and
infrastructure
IMPLEMENTIN projects
G THE IDAP
OUTCOME: greater
transparency, correct,
MONITORING reliable, complete and
THE IDAP
timely recording of
government financial
PAGC-RDC I transactions and
PARTNERSHI financial reports
P
INDICATORS *e-bidding indicators subject to the
guidelines yet to be released by GPPB
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
include:
o Server System Requirements
o Workstation requirements
o People ware requirements
o Local Area Network (LAN)
o Existing System
Milestones:
R
Accomplished by: ___________________ Signature : ___________________
M Position: _________________________ Company: _________________________
Telephone No.: ______________________ Date accomplished : __________________
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
promotion process
regularly reviewed
board
HRD personnel and members of the selection/promotion review
CROSS RATING
360-degree evaluation process
which involves multi-raters:
Percentage
Weight
Client Rater
Subordinate
Rater
P eer Rater
Self Rater
Supervisor
Rater Each rater is assigned
specific percentage
weight.
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
performance of employees
Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt
performance in place
Multi-stakeholder performance evaluation system regularly reviewed
and improved
regularly
regularly reviewed
to all employees
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND 1) Disseminate
CORRUPTION compendium of
anti-corruption
THE IDAP
laws, rules and
regulations
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP OUTCOME:
increased
MONITORING awareness of anti-
THE IDAP corruption laws,
rules and
PAGC-RDC I regulations among
PARTNERSHI government
P
employees
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
places
employees conducted
dissemination
REALITY
CHECK EDUCATION
THE FIGHT
AGAINST 2) Prepare agency-
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION specific code of
ethical
standards/guideli
THE IDAP
nes for adoption
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP OUTCOME: strict
adherence of
MONITORING employees to an
THE IDAP
agency-specific
PAGC-RDC I
code of ethical
PARTNERSHI standards
P
REALITY
CHECK EDUCATION
G. Customer Relations
1. Gift Acceptance Policy
2. Complaints Handling Policy
What should be considered
in the code?
H. Personnel
1. Responsibility for Human Resource Policy
2. Equal Employment Opportunity Policy
3. Nepotism Policy
4. Sexual Harassment Policy
5. Workplace Environment Policy
6. Complaints Policy
7. Performance Review Policy
I. Communications
1. Media Relations Policy
2. Crisis Communications Policy
3. Electronic Media Policy
4. Political Activity Policy
What should be considered
in the code?
J. Committees
1. Governance Committee Policy
2. Financial Committees: Finance, Audit
and Investment Policy
3. Development Committee Policy
4. Executive Committee Policy
5. Management Committee Policy
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
4
Employees’ record of adherence to or violation of the agency code of
ethical standards used as one of the considerations for promotion
Rewards given to officials and employees who consistently exhibit
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION
3) Provide ethics
training, spiritual
formation, moral
THE IDAP
recovery program
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP
OUTCOME:
MONITORING
Government
THE IDAP employees with
renewed sense of
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI
idealism
P
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
Trainers evaluated
1
Department Order prioritizing ethics training spiritual formation and
moral recovery program approved and disseminated
Discussions, studies and coordination with agencies on appropriate
THE FIGHT
AGAINST 4) Mandate
GRAFT AND integration of anti-
CORRUPTION
corruption in
elementary and
secondary
THE IDAP
education modules
IMPLEMENTIN - For DepEd only
G THE IDAP
Corruption Prevention
MONITORING Teaching Exemplars
THE IDAP
Affirm the
indispensability of
PAGC-RDC I values education
PARTNERSHI programs that focus on
P building personal
REALITY
CHECK INVESTIGATION AND
THE FIGHT ENFORCEMENT
1. Development of agency Internal
AGAINST
Complaint Unit.
GRAFT AND 2. Setting up/strengthening of
CORRUPTION agency Internal Affairs Unit.
3. Publication of blacklisted
offenders and on-line database
THE IDAP for public access.
IMPLEMENTIN 4. Holding superiors accountable
G THE IDAP for corrupt activities of
subordinates.
5. Advocacy for the submission of
MONITORING
Income Tax Returns as
THE IDAP
attachment to the SALN.
6. Effective use of existing agency
PAGC-RDC I administrative disciplinary
PARTNERSHI machinery and publication of
P results
REALITY
CHECK INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION
1) Develop agency
Internal
Complaint Unit
THE IDAP (including
IMPLEMENTIN
protection of
G THE IDAP whistleblowers)
\
MONITORING OUTCOME:
THE IDAP
Increase number of
informants willing
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI
to come out and
P expose graft and
REALITY
CHECK INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST 1) Develop agency Internal Complaint
GRAFT AND Unit (including protection of
CORRUPTION
whistleblowers)
5
The agency regularly assesses whether the internal reporting system being used
is an effective mechanism to prevent corrupt practices
Results of the assessment used to improve and enhance the internal reporting
process
4 The agency protects and rewards employees who report corrupt behavior
3
The agency has an internal reporting system which follows a standard processing
time and specifies roles and responsibilities for accepting reports and giving
advice to employees who want to report corruption
The agency records steps taken on complaints and provide feedback to
complainants
Coordination with Internal Affairs Unit on-going
corruption
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION
2) Set-
up/strengthen
internal affairs
THE IDAP
unit
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP
OUTCOME:
MONITORING
Stronger
THE IDAP investigative
capability within
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI
the agency and
P faster resolution
REALITY
CHECK INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND 2) Set-up/strengthen internal affairs unit
CORRUPTION
Internal Affairs Unit
THE IDAP Act and investigate
IMPLEMENTIN complaints involving
G THE IDAP violations of the Code of
Conduct and Anti-Graft
MONITORING
THE IDAP Law
May conduct motu
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI
proprio investigation
P
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
investigation process
on-going
The agency imposes appropriate sanctions to erring employees and
officials
cases
Relevant personnel trained on investigation
disseminated
REALITY
CHECK INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION 3) Publish blacklisted
offenders and
maintain on-line
THE IDAP
central database
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP OUTCOME:
Greater
MONITORING
THE IDAP
perception of
corruption being a
PAGC-RDC I
high-risk, low-
PARTNERSHI reward activity
P
REALITY
CHECK INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST IDAP CIRCULAR NO. 01 – 2005
GRAFT AND For blacklisting:
CORRUPTION
A supplier who violated
the Procurement Law
THE IDAP
Employees who are found
IMPLEMENTIN guilty of violations and
G THE IDAP
whose sanction involves
dismissal with perpetual
MONITORING
THE IDAP
disqualification from
public office
PAGC-RDC I this measure shall only
PARTNERSHI apply to cases whose
P
decisions are final and
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
75
500+
538%
%
134 presidential appointees:
5
Guidelines and rules of procedures regularly reviewed and
improved
Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt
responsibility
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
5) Advocate for the
GRAFT AND submission of
CORRUPTION
ITR as
attachment to
THE IDAP the SALN
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP
OUTCOME:
increased
MONITORING
transparency of
THE IDAP the income and
net worth of
PAGC-RDC I government
PARTNERSHI
P employees
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
4 The agency rewards employees who attached their ITR to their SALN
SALN
SALN
REALITY
CHECK INVESTIGATION AND ENFORCEMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND 6) Use effectively
CORRUPTION existing agency
administrative
THE IDAP disciplinary
machinery and
IMPLEMENTIN publish results
G THE IDAP
OUTCOME: Greater
MONITORING adherence to and a
THE IDAP
more proactive
implementation of
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI the administrative
P disciplinary
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND 7) PAGC to carry out
CORRUPTION independent survey to
check anti-graft and
corruption programs
THE IDAP and effectiveness
IMPLEMENTIN Development of IDAP
G THE IDAP indicators (1-5 levels of
achievement)
MONITORING to measure efficiency
THE IDAP (process-based)
Development of the Anti-
PAGC-RDC I Corruption Scorecard
PARTNERSHI
P
(ACS)
to measure effectiveness/
REALITY
CHECK
ANTI-CORRUPTION SCORECARD
THE FIGHT (ACS)
AGAINST aims to assess the impact or
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION
effectiveness of existing anti-
corruption reforms, with special
focus on the IDAP (results-
THE IDAP focused).
THE IDAP
2. Enhancement of the private
sector and civil society
IMPLEMENTIN participation in various
G THE IDAP areas of governance.
3. Tapping of international
MONITORING
THE IDAP development agencies and
private sector for support.
PAGC-RDC I 4. Institutionalization of the
PARTNERSHI
P
participation of
stakeholders in agency
REALITY
CHECK STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP
THE FIGHT
AGAINST 1) Linking of
GRAFT AND existing
CORRUPTION databases of
complementary
agencies and
THE IDAP sharing of
information
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP OUTCOME: Greater
sharing of
MONITORING
information and
THE IDAP increased
evidences of
collaborative
PAGC-RDC I undertakings
PARTNERSHI among agencies in
P
education,
INDICATORS
going
agencies conducted
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND 2) Enlist or
CORRUPTION enhance
participation of
THE IDAP private sector
and civil society
IMPLEMENTIN in various areas
G THE IDAP
of governance
MONITORING OUTCOME: Greater
THE IDAP
vigilance and
PAGC-RDC I
strategic
PARTNERSHI investments in
P various forms by
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND 3) Tap international
CORRUPTION development
agencies and
THE IDAP private sector for
support
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP
OUTCOME: Greater
MONITORING
external resources
THE IDAP mobilized and
improved perception
PAGC-RDC I on the resolve to
PARTNERSHI
P fight graft and
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
for improvement
Monitoring system in place and operational
THE FIGHT
AGAINST
GRAFT AND 4) Institutionalize
CORRUPTION
stakeholder
participation
THE IDAP
IMPLEMENTIN OUTCOME:
G THE IDAP
Greater
involvement by
MONITORING
THE IDAP the
stakeholders
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI
guided by the
P principles of
INDICATORS
RATING LEVELS OF ACHIEVEMENT
conducted
Results of the review used to improve partnership
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP PAGC
MONITORING Media
THE IDAP
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI
P
REALITY
CHECK
MONITORING AND REPORTING THE
THE FIGHT IDAP
AGAINST
GRAFT AND IDAP Progress Report
CORRUPTION
Measures (Doables)
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI
P
IDAP PROGRESS REPORT FORM
Prevention
AGENCY NAME:
IDAP PROGRESS REPORT
As of ____________ 2007
5
The agency code of ethical standards regularly reviewed for
effectiveness in specifying and promoting desired behavior of
employees
The code of ethical standards integrated in all operating systems of the
agency (e.g. human resource management, procurement)
Impact of its effectiveness as a mechanism to prevent corrupt
practices regularly assessed
4
Employees’ record of adherence to or violation of the agency code of
ethical standards used as one of the considerations for promotion
Rewards given to officials and employees who consistently exhibit
behavior consistent with the agency code of ethical standards
3
Agency-specific code of ethical standards consistently enforced, with
managers having clear tasks of promoting and monitoring compliance
Applicable provisions of the code of ethical standards included in
contracts with external parties (e.g. suppliers)
2
Agency-specific code of ethical standards and reward and sanction
guidelines approved and disseminated
Employees oriented and made to sign a sworn commitment to comply
with the code of ethical standards
1
Department Order creating an agency-specific code of ethical
standards consistent with RA 6713 approved and disseminated
AGENCY NAME
3Fast-track e-NNGAS and e-bidding for the 3Publish blacklisted offenders & maintain on-
procurement of goods & services line central database for public access
4Incorporate integrity check in recruitment & 4Hold superiors accountable for corrupt
promotion of government personnel activities of subordinates
5Institutionalize multi-stakeholder personnel & 5Advocate for the submission of ITR as
organizational performance evaluation system attachment to the SALN
6Protect the meager income of government 6Use effectively existing agency administrative
employees disciplinary machinery and publish results
7Adopt single ID system for government 7PAGC to carry out independent survey to
officials & employees check anti-graft and corruption program
effectiveness
REALITY
CHECK
HOW TO GET THE AVERAGE
THE FIGHT RATING?
AGAINST
P1 – n/a Prevention (P) – 2.83
GRAFT AND + Deterrence (D) – 3.00
CORRUPTION + P2 – 3
Education (E) – 4.20
P3 – 2 Strategic
P4 – 3 Partnership (SP) – 3.00
P5 – 4
THE IDAP = 13.03
P6 – 3
P7 – 2 4
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP
________ = 3.26
= 17 = 2.83 (average rating
(average
6 of the agency)
MONITORING rating for
THE IDAP
Prevention)
PAGC-RDC I
PARTNERSHI
P
REALITY
CHECK
THE FIGHT
PAGC REQUESTS
AGAINST
GRAFT AND
CORRUPTION Adoption of the IDAP by
Local Government Units
THE IDAP of Region I
IMPLEMENTIN
G THE IDAP
Reporting of observed
MONITORING
irregularities
THE IDAP
POLITICAL WILL
PRESIDENTIAL ANTI-GRAFT COMMISSION