Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Introduction
30% of large property damage losses are caused by failures in tanks, process drums and marine vessels. Average Trended Loss was $40.5MM for tanks alone.
Power Boilers Water Boilers and Steel Tanks Cast Iron Boilers Pressure Vessels (poorest record)
PV Failure Causes
Operator error or poor maintenance 149 / 933 Faulty Design 144 / 933 Corrosion or erosion 132 / 933 Pressure control failure 41 / 933 Other 420 / 933
PV Failure Types
Cracked 403 / 1087 Other - 298 / 1087 Leakage 163 / 1087 Rupture 158 / 1087 Explosion 22 / 1087 Collapsed Inward 15 / 1087
Search OSHA records On Internet Google Extract records Create Excel Database Sort and Filter data Analyze Data
Personal Experiences
Normal mass balance. Start-up, shut down or upset. Recycle conditions. Off-loading situations unplanned.
Inventory logistics not well defined. Flammable or toxic inventories too high.
Containment
Dyke dimensions do not meet codes. Drainage does not follow NFPA 15. Catastrophic failure overwhelms dyke walls.
Materials Of Construction
Not suitable for corrosive fluid at high temperature. Not suitable for low temperature excursions.
A-515-70 grade CS brittle failure of heat exchanger shell. Start-up, inlet flange leak, isolated exchanger and depressured to flare. 30 minutes to failure. Two fatalities, seven serious burns, major damage to ethylene plant.
Nozzles
Level control nozzles in wrong location. Nozzles too small creating impingement on far wall. PSV nozzles not suitable for thrust.
Chemical Emergency Preparedness and Prevention Office web site at www.epa.gov/ceppo/acc-his.html Check Rupture Hazard of Pressure Vessels. Check Catastrophic Failure of Storage Tanks.
Oil and Gas Journal, Dec 26, 1998 Pressure storage in spheres Removes bottom unloading lines. Converts to overhead siphon system. Excellent article on 4 process design options.
KO Pot Design
Internals
Impingement details not well designed. Pump-out sumps act as dirt trap. KO Pot internals not designed properly.
Design Pressure
Reactive Chemicals
Very easy to bulge or suck-in resulting in loss of containment. PSV, pad de-pad settings very close. Floating roof explosion at Suncor in Sarnia. Roof hangs up on pumpout, air sucked into vapor phase, lightning ignites flammable vapor.
Breathing.
Pumping and temperature change breathing not allowed for in combination. High breathing losses a cost and an environmental problem Benzene tank.
EO storage bunkers located 1 mile from ISBL. 3 independent means of checking quantity to prevent overfilling (dual LC, weigh scale & flow rate x time). Refrigeration to prevent polymerization, chart temperature. Dump contents to pond if runaway reaction takes place.
EO Storage
Toxic Storage
What are three independent methods for preventing overfilling of a storage vessel. If a storage product can generate heat by polymerization at ambient temperatures, what safety measures should be considered? What are the main problems with fixed roof, low pressure API type storage vessels?
What is one of the main problems with an API, floating roof storage tank in flammable service? What are the safety measures that should be taken for a large chlorine storage sphere to prevent a toxic gas release?
Summary
This short list is indicative of some of the problems caused by poor engineering discipline in vessel design. Recommend you obtain a copy of the Chemical Plant Design programs and follow the procedures built into the vessel design spreadsheets.