HAJAR SAKINAH BINTI YAHYA NORHAFIZAH BINTI ABD RASHID QURRATU AINI BINTI CHE MANSOR ARIEL LIBAU ANAK EKOM TYPES OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
BASIC RESEARCH APPLIED RESEARCH ACTION RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH QUALITATIVE RESEARCH EVALUATION RESEARCH PURPOSE OF THE APPROACH STRENGTH OF THE APPROACH WEAKNESS OF THE APPROACH Research carried out to increase understanding of fundamental principles.
It is not intended to yield immediate commercial benefits.
Can be thought of as arising out of curiosity.
Advances fundamental knowledge about the human world. Not intended to yield immediate commercial benefits. Generates new ideas, principles and theories May not be immediately utilized Usually carried on in a laboratory situation instead of in real life situation. Example: Humanistic approach Example: Language board game BASIC RESEARCH PURPOSES STRENGHT WEAKNESESS solve practical problems of the modern world, rather than to acquire knowledge for knowledge's sake. Develop generalisation on T&L process and instructional materials. Answer real-world problems Directly useful to practitioners
Impossible to use random sample Need basic research as a foundation Need market research and public opinion
APPLIED RESEARCH Action research is a process of systematic inquiry that seeks to improve social issues affecting the lives of everyday people (Bogdan & Bilken, 1992; Lewin, 1938; 1946; Stringer, 2008). Purposes of Action Research 1. To solve an educational problem; 2. To help educators reflect on their own practices 3. To address school-wide problems 4. When teachers want to improve their practices
Strengths of Action Research Building the reflective practitioner Making progress on educational priorities Building Professional Cultures Facilitates teacher authorization and motivation Provides practitioners with new knowledge and understanding about how to improve educational practices or resolve significant problems in classrooms and schools
Limitations of Action Research Lack of time Validity as research Unfamiliarity with research methods Action research produces results which are not generalizable Representations of the process of action research may confuse, rather than enlighten
Quantitative research Purpose Strength Weaknesses
To qualify data and generalise results from a sample to the population of interest To measure the incidence of various views and opinions in a chosen sample Sometimes followed by qualitative research which is used to explore some finding further Provide precise, quantitative, numerical data Data analysis is relatively less time consuming It is useful for studying large number of people. The researchers categories / theories that are used might not reflect local constituencies understanding Researcher might miss out on phenomena occurring (too focus on theory / hypothesis generation) Knowledge produced might be too abstract EXPERIMENTAL QUASI- EXPERIMENTAL SURVEY CORRELATION EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH Research type Purposes Strengths Weaknesses EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH 1) To predict and control the phenomena. 2) To examine probability and causality among selected variables.
1) Objective, systematic and controlled investigation. 1) Can impose artificiality on the situation. 2) May be able to tell that one method of instruction is better than conventional practice.
QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS The prefix quasi means, in essence, sort of. So a quasi-experiment is a sort of experiment. Specifically, a quasi-experiment is a study that includes a manipulated independent variable but lacks important controls (e.g., random assignment), or a study that lacks a manipulated independent variable but includes important controls. Purposes of QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN 1. frequently used when it is not logistically possible or ethical to conduct a randomized controlled trial 2. offer the most clear-cut route to testing hypotheses about causes and effects.
Strengths of QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN is more reasonable, given the typical time and logistical constraint tend to present the situation under investigation in real-world conditions, increasing the external validity
Limitations of QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Lack of random assignment (without random assignment, internal validity is reduced, and causal claims become quite difficult to make) Increased potential for bias associated with sampling
https://otl.curtin.edu.au/professional_develo pment/conferences/tlf/tlf2013/refereed/hine. html http://www.edu.plymouth.ac.uk/resined/acti onresearch/arhome.htm#LIMITATIONS AND CRITICISMS OF ACTION RESEARCH Survey research Purpose Strength Weaknesses 1. Observe with close analysis the population bounded by the research parameters; 2. Make a careful record of what they observe so that when the aggregate record is made, the researchers can then return to the record to study the observations that have been described there. 1. Simple in design. -a common approach, used with more or less sophistication in many areas of human activity. 2. Because of its frequent use the survey is any less demanding in its design requirements.
3. Easier for the researcher to conduct.
4. Capable of collecting data from a large number of respondents.
1. Respondents may not feel encouraged to provide accurate, honest answers. 2. Surveys with closed- ended questions may have a lower validity rate than other question types. 3. Answer options could lead to unclear data because certain answer options may be interpreted differently by respondents.
Correlation research Purpose Strength Weaknesses 1. Explain important human behaviour or predict likely outcomes (identify relationship among variables) 2. Investigates a range of factors, including the nature of the relationship between two or more variables and the theoretical model that might be developed and tested to explain these resultant correlations. 3. Can only enable the researcher to make weak causal inferences at best. 1. Quick and easy way to see the relationship of two variables are worth exploring further. 2. Simple and objective way to describe the strength of relationship between two variables. Expressing it as a precise number makes it clear and easy to understand.
1. Correlation do not equal causation. It is impossible to claim that one co variable actually causes the other co variable, as it could be that a third unknown variable (a mediating variable). 2. correlation can be misused. other than that a relationship exists, it is very difficult to make accurate conclusions about the causes of the relationship. Qualitative research Purpose Strength Weaknesses 1. Gain a deep understanding of a specific organization or event, rather a than surface description of a large sample of a population. 2. Investigation that : -seeks answers to a question. -collect evidences -produced findings that were not determined in advance.
1. Can conduct cross-case comparisons and analysis. 2. Can describe a rich- detail information as they are situated in local contexts. 3. Responsive to local situations, conditions and subjects needs. 4. Instruments are more flexible. 1. Knowledge produced might not generalize to other people or other settings. 2. Difficult to make quantitative predictions. 3. Takes more time to collect the data when compared to quantitative research. 4. Data analysis is often time consuming. PURPOSES STRENGHT WEAKNESESS Aware what has happened in the past -Learn from mistakes/successes -Apply to present-day problems -Make predictions Permits investigation of topics
Well suited for trend analysis
No possibility of researcher-subject interaction Bias in interpreting historical sources
Time consuming
Sources may be problematic
Lack of control over external variables HISTORICAL RESEARCH PURPOSES STRENGHT WEAKNESESS 1. to attempt to understand what is happening naturally in the setting and to interpret the data gathered to see what implications could be formed from the data. 2. To describe, analyze, and interpret the culture of a group over time to understand the groups shared beliefs, behaviors, and language 1. Make sense of hidden meaning uncover true behaviour or attitudes 2. Provide an in-depth descriptive account 3. Participant observation intensive & extensive exposure to peoples life experiences 4. Interpret and explain using existing theories 1. Time consuming 2. Difficulties negotiating access to research sites 3. Does not provide straightforward answers or quantifiable answers 4. Difficult to generalise findings from specific contexts ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH PURPOSES STRENGHT WEAKNESESS 1. To provide a more thorough analysis of a situation or "case" (often the story of an individual) which will reveal interesting information to the reader. 2. used in social development to describe a persons life. Case studies often accompany reports, to give flesh to written reports. 1. Comparatively flexible emphasize exploration rather than prescription and prediction 2. Inclusive allows researchers to begin with broad questions and try diff. methods to narrow it down. 3. Emphasis in context specialise in deep data 4. Vividness and concreteness carry a powerful intellectual and emotional impact on the reader. 1. Inherent subjectivity - can be stereotyped as the weak sibling among social science methods 2. Time consuming take time to include different research methods in order to get an inclusive case study 3. High investment 4. Ethical consideration the personal integrity, sensitivity, and possible prejudices and biases of the investigators
CASE STUDY EVALUATION RESEARCH Research type Purposes Strengths Weaknesses EVALUATION RESEARCH 1) Evaluating an event and to make judgment about its usefulness. 2) Providing legitimacy for decisions. 3) Testing new ideas.
1) Can be used to influence system design, development, and implementation. 1) Inconsistent data collection techniques, bias of the observer, the data collection setting, behaviour of human subjects can affect the validity and reliability of measures.
Research type Purposes Strengths Weaknesses EVALUATION RESEARCH 4) Choosing the best alternatives. 5) Providing feedback. 6) Highlighting goals. 2) Incorporate people, social, organizational, ethical, legal, and economic considerations into all phases of a project. 3) Evaluator can reach conclusions with a known degree of confidence.
2) Evaluators conducting quantitative data analyses will need to be familiar with techniques for summarizing and describing the data.