0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
193 Ansichten20 Seiten
A test user implicitly accepts the definition of the construct used by the test developer. A Nomological Network illustrates a construct's relation to as many other constructs as possible. The nomological network is the basis for a number of hypotheses about the behaviors that people who have people who have more or less --quantities of a construct should display.
A test user implicitly accepts the definition of the construct used by the test developer. A Nomological Network illustrates a construct's relation to as many other constructs as possible. The nomological network is the basis for a number of hypotheses about the behaviors that people who have people who have more or less --quantities of a construct should display.
A test user implicitly accepts the definition of the construct used by the test developer. A Nomological Network illustrates a construct's relation to as many other constructs as possible. The nomological network is the basis for a number of hypotheses about the behaviors that people who have people who have more or less --quantities of a construct should display.
Two Points to Remember A test user implicitly accepts the definition of the construct used by those who developed and validated the test. When you use a test for a construct such as Creativity, you are not measuring creativity as such but behaviors the test developer decided would count as indicators of creativity. An Example of Construct Development Self Efficacy This abstract construct was proposed by Albert Bandura (1977): Expectations of personal efficacy determine whether coping behavior will be initiated, how much effort will be expended, and how long it will be sustained in the face of obstacles and aversive experiences (p. 191).
Sources of Self-Efficacy Performance Accomplishments Vicarious Experience: Watching others Verbal Persuasion: Messages received from others Emotional Arousal: Anxiety or attention Construct Explication There are three steps for defining or explaining a psychological construct: Identify the behaviors that relate to the construct. Identify other constructs that may be related to the construct being explained. Identify behaviors related to similar constructs. A Nomological Network A Nomological (law-like) network involves illustrating a constructs relation to as many other constructs and behaviors as possible. The nomological network provides the basis for a number of hypotheses about the behaviors that people who have people who have more or less quantities of a construct should display. An example of a nomological network for intelligence We would expect that tested intelligence would be related to: Academic Achievement as measured by GPA Tests designed to measure creativity. A Nomological Network for Self-Efficacy We would expect people with high self efficacy to: express positive attitudes regarding their own competence Display persistence in accomplishing a new and difficult task Establishing evidence of construct validity is the process of testing the predictions made by the nomological network Summary Points 1. Construct Explication is the basis for establishing a tests construct validity. -A construct must be part of a theory that defines the construct in observable and measurable term. 2. A nomological network: defines a construct by illustrating its relation to other constructs and behaviors Gathering Evidence of Construct Validity Gathering theoretical evidence: Establishing a nomological network Propose experimental hypotheses. Gathering Psychometric Evidence
Gathering Psychometric Evidence
Gathering Psychometric Evidence: Reliability Convergent Validity Discriminant Validity Experimental Interventions Content Validity Criterion-Related validity Reliability To show a test measures a single theoretical construct there should be evidence of internal consistency (or homogeneity). Test-retest reliability is also important, to ensure that the theoretical predictions hold true over time. Convergent Validity Convergent Validity is a strong correlation between the test and other tests measuring the same or similar constructs Example: We would expect that two measures of general self-efficacy to yield strong, positive, and statistically significant correlations. They might also correlate with scores of task specific tests, such as mathematical or managerial self efficacy. Related Constructs Convergent validity is also established when there are positive correlations with measures of constructs that the underlying theory says are related. Example Self-efficacy theory suggests that self- efficacy is related to competency. Discriminant Validity When the test scores are not correlated with unrelated constructs, there is evidence of discriminant validity. Example: There would probably be an insignificant correlation between self-efficacy and artistic aptitude Multitrait-Multimethod Method In 1959, Campbell and Fisk cleverly combined the need to collect evidence of reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity in one study. The Logic of Multitrait- Multimethod Design This design allows investigators to test for: convergence across different measuresof the same thingand for divergence between measuresof related but conceptually distinct things (Cook & Campbell, 1979, p 61).
Implementing Multitrait- Multimethod Measures The researcher chooses three constructs that are unrelated in theory and three types of testssuch as objective, projective, and a peer ratingto measure each of the constructs. In this way, data are collected on each participant in the study on each construct using each method. Interpreting Multitrait- Multimethod Matrix One would look forand expect to find high reliability estimates for each measure, high validity coefficients for tests with different formats measuring the same construct, and low correlation coefficients for tests with different formats measuring different constructs.