Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer / Orthodontic Courses by Indian Dental Academy

Microvascular Free
Tissue Transfer

INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY

Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy.com

History
Early 1900s Alexis Carrel
1950s Jacobsen and Suarezanastomoses
in animals
1959 Seidenberg free jejunum segments to
repair pharyngoesophageal defects (human)
1972 McLean and Buncke omental flap to cover
a cranial defect (first microvascular flap)
1973 Daniels and Taylor free flap
First free cutaneous flap
1976 Baker and Panje first free flap in head and
neck cancer reconstruction
Groin flap pedicled on the circumflex iliac artery
Advantages of free tissue transfer
Two team approach
Improved vascularity and wound healing
Low rate of resorption
Defect size of little consequence
Potential for sensory and motor innervation
Permits use of osseointegrated implants

Advantages of free tissue transfer
Wide variety of available
tissue types
Large amount of composite
tissue
Tailored to match defect
Wide range of skin
characteristics
More efficient use of
harvested tissue
Immediate reconstruction
Recipient vessels
Arteries
Superficial temporal system
scalp and upper face
Facial arterymidface and
cervical region
(atherosclerosis common)
Superior thyroid or lingual
arterylower cervical region
Other: thyrocervical trunk,
external carotid, common
carotid
Recipient vessels
Veins
External jugular
Branches of internal jugular
(common facial)
Internal jugular
Retrograde (superficial
temporal, thyroid)
Transverse cervical, occipital
(very small)
Recipient vessels after previous
neck dissection
Gold standard: Angiogram (short-term injury to
endothelium reported)
Operative reports
Long-pedicled flaps
Thyrocervical trunk (transverse cervical), Occipital
vessels, retrograde drainage (thyroid veins,
superficial temporal), external carotid artery
Contralateral vessels (recipient or graft)
End-to-side anastomoses with large vessels
Vein grafts
Arteriovenous loop (poorer results)
Vessel selection
Size
Arterial vs.Venous
Atherosclerosis
XRT-related changes
Vessel geometry (location and
orientation)
Vessel length
Vessel preparation
Arteries need to have strong pulsatile
flowcut until it flows.
Cut back beyond branches or ligate them if
sufficiently distant from the anastomosis
site.
Atherosclerosis
Intimal inspection
Dilation
Removing the adventitia
Irradiated vessels
Technically more difficulteffects appear specific
to arteries
Higher incidence of atherosclerosis
Vessel wall fibrosis, increased wall thickness,
more intimal dehiscence
No reported difference in outcome of
microvascular anastomoses (Nahabedian MY, et al.,
2004, Kroll SS, et al 1998)
Microvascular anastomoses tolerate XRT well
long-term (Foote RL., et al., 1994)
Require careful handling, cut off clot (teasing
thrombi may denude vessel wallsticky walls),
smaller suture, needle introduced from lumen to
outside wall (to pin intima to wall)

Prepare vessels
Evaluate vessel geometry
Trim, irrigate, dilate
Partial flap insetting (bony cuts and plating
done at donor bed, if necessary)
Arterial vs. venous anastomosis first with
early or delayed unclamping of first vessel
showed no difference. (Braun, et al., 2003)
Anastomosis of remaining vessel
Complete flap insetting
Microvascular Anastomosis
Microvascular surgical technique
Trim adventitia
2-3mm
Gentle handling (no full-thickness)
Trim free edge, if needed
Dissect vessels from surrounding tissues
Irrigate and dilate
Heparinized saline
Mechanical dilation (1 times normal
paralyses smooth muscle)
Chemical dilation, if necessary
Suturing
Microvascular suture technique
3 guide sutures (120 degrees
apart)
Perpendicular piercing
Entry point 2x thickness of vessel
from cut end
Equal bites on either side
Microforceps in lumen vs.
retracting adventitia
Pull needle through in circular
motion
Surgeons knot with guide sutures,
simple for others
Avoid backwalling2
bites/irrigation
3 suture
technique
Vessel size mismatch
Laminar flow vs. turbulent flow
<2:1 dilation, suture technique
>2:1, <3:1 beveling or spatulation
(no more than 30 degrees to avoid
turbulence)
>3:1 end-to-side
End-to-end vs. End-to-side
Recent reports indicate end-to-side without
increase in flap loss or blood flow rate.
End-to-side overcomes size discrepancy,
avoids vessel retraction, and IJ may act as
venous siphon.
End-to-side felt best when angle is less
than 60 degrees (minimize turbulence)
Vessel incision should be elliptical, not slit
Can use continuous suture technique
End-to-side
Anastomosis
Continuous suture technique
May significantly narrow anastomosis
May be used on vessels >2.5 mm
Decreases anastomosis time by up to
50%
Decreases anastomosis leakage
Most commonly used for end-to-side
anastomoses with large vessels
Mechanical anastomosis
Devices
Clips
Coupler
Laser
Results
Increased efficiency and speed, use
in difficult areas
Patency rates at least equal to
hand-sewn (Shindo, et al 1996, De
Lorenzi, et al 2002)
Can be used for end-to-end or end-
to-side (DeLacure, et al 1999)
Poorer outcome with arterial
anastomosis20-25% failure
(Shindo, et al 1996, Ahn, et al 1994)
Vein grafts
Used in situation where pedicle is not long enough
for tension-free anastomosis
Usually harvested from lower extremity
(saphenous system)
Valve orientation is necessary
Avoid anastomosis at level of vein valve
Keep clamps in place until both anastomoses
sewn
Prognosis for success controversial (Jones NF, et al.,
1996, German, et al. 1996)
Recent literature

Microvascular Hints & Helps
Use background to help visualize suture
Demagnetize instruments, if needed
May reclamp vessels for repair after 15
minutes of flow
Reclamp both arterial and venous vessels
when revising venous anastomosis
Support your hands and hold instruments
like a pencil
Ischemia
Primary and secondary
Primary: 2.25-6 hours
Secondary: 1-12 hours
Interrelation
No flow phenomenon
Cold vs. normothermic
In vitro studies show benefit to cooling of flaps
In vivo studies show surface cooling (<4hr ischemia time)
does not adversely effect flap success (Shaw W. et al
1996)
Tissue specific critical ischemia times
Metobolic rate dependent
Perfusates (UW, tissusol, Viaspan, Heparin)
Literature unclear
Anastomotic failure

93-95% success rate expected
Venous thrombosis:Arterial thrombosis 4:1,
ateriovenous loop, tobacco use significant factors
(Nahabedian M., et al, 2004) Other literature indicates
9/10 thromboses secondary to venous thrombus
Tobacco use as contribution controversial (4/5
failures in Nahabedian study - venous thrombosis)
Venous occlusion, Delayed reconstruction,
Hematoma significant factors in breast free tissue
recon. (Nahabedian M., et al, 2004)
Salvage 50% in breast reconstruction
Age, prior irradiation, DM (well-controlled), method
of anastomosis, timing, vein graft, and specific
arteries/veins not felt to contribute to failure rate

Anastomotic Failure--timeline
15-20 minutes
<72 hours
5-7 days
>8 days
Thin vs. thick flaps
Thrombus formation
Injury to endothelium and media of vessel
Mechanical vs. thermal
Error in suture placement
Backwall or loose sutures
Edges not well-aligned (most common in veinsmost
common site of thrombus)
Intimal discontinuity with exposure of media
Oblique sutures, large needles, tight knots
Infection
Hypovolemia and low flow states
Nitroprusside at dose to decrease arterial pressure by
30% causes severe reduction in flap blood flow (40%)
(Banic, et al. 2003)
Vessel geometry (kinking, tension)
Vessel spasm
Causes
Trauma
Contact with blood
Vasoconstrictive drugs
Phenylephrine--dose causing 30% increase in arterial
pressure shows no effect on flap circulation (Banic A,
et al., 1999)
Nicotine
Temperature, drying
Treatment
Warmth
Xylocaine
Papavarine, thorazine
Volume repletion
Treatement for anastomotic failure
Revision of anastomoses
Exploration of wound
Streptokinase, urokinase, rt-PA (Atiyeh BS, et al 1999)
Leech therapy
Wound care
Statistics
Revisions successful in 50%
Revisions less successful after first 24-48hr
>6 hrs of ischemia leads to poor survival
12 hrs of ischemia leads to no-flow phenomenon
After 5 days almost all flaps in rabbit model survived with
loss of artery or vein (but not both)this is rational for
other modalities after 48 hours
Post-operative care
Anticoagulation
Attention to wound care
Flap monitoring
Nothing around neck that might compress
pedicle
Antibiotics
Hemoglobin/intravascular volume
literature unclear (Velanovich V., et al 1988, Quinlan
2003)
No pressors/nicotine/cooling of flap
(literature unclear)
Anticoagulation
Rheology
RBC concentration
Plasma viscosity
RBC aggregation
RBC deformability
Other (platelets, thrombogenic mediators)
Agents
Aspirin
Heparin
Dextran
Other
Indications
Hypercoagulable state (Friedman G, et al, 2001)
Excessive vessel trauma
Complications
Dextran
Macromolecule which is a compound of glucose
subunit
Thought to improve RBC flexibility, increase
electronegativity of vessel wall (which decreases
platelet adhesion), act as intravascular volume
expander, decrease RBC aggregation
Shown to decrease clotting secondary to exposed
collagen in rabbit arteries. Little effect on platelet,
rather inhibits fibrin stabilization of thrombi
(Weislander, JB, et al., 1986)
No effect on overall flap survival when compared
with aspirin. Systemic complications 3.9-7.2 times
more common with dextran infusion (Disa J., et al,
2001)
Complications can include renal damage,
anaphylactic shock, congestive heart failure, MI,
pulmonary edema, pleural effusion, pneumonia
Aspirin
Prevent platelet thrombosis
Inhibits arachidonic acid to prostaglandin
synthesis on the plateletprevents release of
platelet granuoles that cause platelet aggregation.
Mechanism is biphasic and dose-dependant
High doses of aspirin can have negative effect on
endothelial production of prostacyclin which
prevents platelet accumulation on exposed
collagen and dilates vessels.
ASA PR qd x several weeks (often given at
beginning of case)5 grains (325 mg)
No good studies to confirm benefit of use
Hematoma formation
Heparin
Naturally occuring glycosoaminoglycan which interrupts
clotting cascade
Prevents transformation of prothrombin to thrombin, fibrinogen
to fibrin
Does not lyse existing thrombi
Strongly adheres to endothelium
Concentration on endothelium 100x serum
life = 90 minutes
Given at time of first quarter of arterial anastomoses vs. at
time of unclamping (bolus only vs. bolus with drip x 3 days)
Literature unconvincing, although it may increase
microvascular perfusion after ischemia
Hematoma formation
Used as irrigation solution
Local infusion may possibly be beneficial
Low molecular weight heparin
Appears to decrease vessel thrombosis in renal
transplants (Broyer M, et al.,1991, Alkhunaizi AM,
et al, 1998)
Flap monitoring
Clinical flap checks
Most commonly used
Warmth
Color
Pin prick
Wound monitoring (hematoma, fistula)
Frequency
Mechanical
Doppler
Implanted vs. external vs. color flow
Other
Clinical flap monitoring
Normal exam:
Warm, good color, CRT 2-3 seconds, pinprick
slightly delayed with bright red blood
Venous occlusion (delayed):
Edema, mottled/purple/petechiae, tense
CRT decreased
Pinprick immediate dark blood, wont stop
Arterial occlusion (usually <72hr):
Prolonged CRT, temperature, turgor
Pale
Pinpricklittle bleeding, very delayed
Mechanical flap monitoring
Doppler
External
Implanted
Buried flaps
80-100% salvage
(Disa J, et al 1999)
Color flow
Other

Antibiotics
8-20% of patients undergoing free tissue
transfer will develop an infection despite
intravenous antibiotic coverage.(Cloke DJ., et al,
2004)
1 day vs. 5 day course of Clindamycin
showed no significant difference in free flap
survival (Carroll WR., et al., 2003)
Topical antibiotics in combination with
intervenous antibiotics did not show a
significant difference in post-operative
complications after free tissue transfer
(Simons JP, et al., 2001)
Free flap reconstructionthe costs
Longer ICU stay, more expensive,
longer OR time (McCrory AL, et al.,
2002)
Sources
Broyer M, Gagnadoux MF, Sierro A, Fischer AM, Niaudet P. Preventive treatment of
vascular thrombosis after kidney transplantation in children with low molecular weight
heparin. Transplant Proc 1991; 23: 1384.
Alkhunaizi AM, Olyaei AJ, Barry JM, et al. Efficacy and safety of low molecular weight
heparin in renal transplantation. Transplantation 1998; 66: 533.
Nahabedian MY. Singh N. Deune EG. Silverman R. Tufaro AP. Recipient vessel
analysis for microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. [Journal Article] Annals
of Plastic Surgery. 52(2):148-55; discussion 156-7, 2004 Feb.
McCrory AL. Magnuson JS. Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap in head and
neck reconstruction. [Journal Article] Laryngoscope. 112(12):2161-5, 2002 Dec.
Kroll SS. Robb GL. Reece GP. Miller MJ. Evans GR. Baldwin BJ. Wang B.
Schusterman MA. Does prior irradiation increase the risk of total or partial free-flap
loss?. [Journal Article] Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 14(4):263-8, 1998 May.
Jones NF. Johnson JT. Shestak KC. Myers EN. Swartz WM. Microsurgical
reconstruction of the head and neck: interdisciplinary collaboration between head and
neck surgeons and plastic surgeons in 305 cases. [Journal Article] Annals of Plastic
Surgery. 36(1):37-43, 1996 Jan.
Foote RL. Olsen KD. Meland NB. Schaid DJ. Kunselman SM. Tumor-ablative surgery,
microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction, and postoperative radiation therapy
for advanced head and neck cancer. [Journal Article] Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
69(2):122-30, 1994 Feb.
Cloke DJ. Green JE. Khan AL. Hodgkinson PD. McLean NR. Factors influencing the
development of wound infection following free-flap reconstruction for intra-oral cancer.
[Journal Article] British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 57(6):556-60, 2004 Sep.
Sources
Braun S. Mine R. Syed SA., et al. The optimal sequence of microvascular repair
during prolonged clamping in free flap transfer. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
111(1):233-241, 2003
Banic A. Krejci V. Erni D., et al. Effects of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine on
blood flow in free musculocutaneous flaps during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology
90(1):147-155, 1999
German G. Steinau HU. The clinical reliability of vein grafts in free flap transfer.
Journal of Reconstructive Surgery 67:194-199, 1996
Nahabedian MY. Bahram M. Manson PN. Factors associated with anastomotic failure
after microvascular reconstruction of the breast. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
114(1):74-82, 2004
Nahabedian M. Singh N. Deune EG. Recipient vessel analysis for microvascular
reconstruction of the head and neck. Annals of Plastic Surgery 52(2):148-155, 2004
Disa JJ. Polvora VP. Pusic AL Singh B. Cordeiro P. Dextran-related complications in
head and neck microsurgery: Do the benefits outweigh the risks? A prospective
randomized analysis. Head and Neck Microsurgery 112(6):1534-1539, 2001
Carroll WR. Rosenstiel D. Fix JR. de la Torre J. Solomon JS. Brodish B. Rosenthal EL.
Heinz T. Niwas S. Peters GE. Three-dose vs extended-course clindamycin prophylaxis
for free-flap reconstruction of the head and neck. [Clinical Trial. Journal Article.
Randomized Controlled Trial] Archives of Otolaryngology -- Head & Neck Surgery.
129(7):771-4, 2003 Jul.
Simons JP. Johnson JT. Yu VL. Vickers RM. Gooding WE. Myers EN. Pou AM.
Wagner RL. Grandis JR. The role of topical antibiotic prophylaxis in patients
undergoing contaminated head and neck surgery with flap reconstruction. [Clinical
Trial. Journal Article. Randomized Controlled Trial] Laryngoscope. 111(2):329-35, 2001
Feb.
Sources
Shindo M., Costantino P., Nalbone V., et al., Use of a mechanical microvascular anastomotic device
in head and neck free tissue transfer. Archives of OtolaryngologyHead & Neck Surgery
122(5):529-532, 1996.
De Lorenzi F., van der Hulst R., Boeckx W., et al., VCS auto suture stapled microvascular
anastomoses in lower leg free flaps. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 109(6):2023-2030, 2002
DeLacure M., Kuriakose M., Spies A., et al., Clinical experience in end-to-side venous anastomoses
with a microvascular anastomotic coupling device in head and neck reconstruction. Archives of
OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery 125(8):869-872, 1999
Ahn C., Shaw W., Berns S., et al., Clinical experience with the 3M microvascular coupling
anastomotic device in 100 free-tissue transfers. Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery 93:1481-1484,
1994
Berggren A., Ostrup L., Lidman D., et al., Mechanical anastomosis of small arteries and veins with
the Unilink apparatus: a histologic and scanning electron microscopic study. Plastic and
Reconstructive Surgery, 80:274-283, 1987
Swartz W., Banis J., Head and Neck Microsurgery. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MA, c.1992
Baker S. Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Head and Neck. Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY,
c.1989
Panje W., Moran W. Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck. Thieme Medical Publishers,
Inc., New York, NY c.1989
Velanovich V. Smith DJ. Robson MC. Heggers JP. The effect of hemoglobin and hematocrit levels on
free flap survival. American Surgeon 54(11):659-663, 1988
Quinlan J. Anaesthesia for reconstructive free flap surgery. Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine
The Medicine Publishing Company, Ltd., c.2003

Thank you

For more details please visit


Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer / Orthodontic Courses by Indian Dental Academy

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer / Orthodontic Courses by Indian Dental Academy

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

Microvascular Free

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen