2014 - Nachhaltige Mobilität Angebote Kommunen End

1
KJ.Beckmann:ProStadt
Kommunalforschung, Beratung, Moderation und Kommunikation

City on the move Rethinking and implementing mobility
7
th
International Congress Cities for Mobility
Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart, 01. - 03. Juni 2014

Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Klaus J. Beckmann

Academy for Spatial Research and Planning

KJ.Beckmann:ProStadt Kommunalforschung, Beratung, Moderation und Kommunikation
Achieving sustainable mobility
through intelligent municipal policies
(Nachhaltige Mobilitt durch intelligente Angebote von Kommunen)
2

Agenda
1. Two scenarios: Sustainable Mobility and E-Mobility
2. Goals and Mega-Trends
3. Changes in mobility behaviour and values
4. Municipal approaches
4.1 Strategies and processes
4.2 Particular measures and activities
5. Conclusion
3

Scenario Sustainable Mobility 2035 I
Home-Office
Mobility Package, Flat-Rate Mobility
(Public Transport, Car-Sharing, Bike-Sharing, Delivery-Services,)
Options for Mobility:
walking, biking, bike of a bike sharing fleet, pedelec, car of a car-
sharing-fleet, public transport (light rail, express bus, bus rapid
transit, neighborhood bus, e-taxi, rickschaw)
Info-package, Mobility app (offers, costs, time, comparisons,)
Information on the way
Intermodal services
Integrated Town-/Regional Planning and Transport Planning
Principles : efficiency, consistency, sufficiency
4

Scenario Sustainable Mobility 2035 II
Reduction of car ownership
Increase of car-sharing and bike-sharing
Increase of intermodality and multimodality
Increased amount of (short-distance) local mobility
(walking, biking)

5

Scenario e-mobility 2035
Offers of electric vehicles (cars, bicycles) and hybrid vehicles
Driverless cars, autonomous driving
Continued use of cars with optimised combustion engines;
partial replacement by electric cars
Continued increase in second/third cars
Reduced public transport offerings, car sharing, bike sharing
Dominance of mono-mobility (habitualisation)
Dominance of long-distance orientation
Privileging of electric vehicles (parking, bus lanes, etc.)
Municipal financing of charging stations
Lack of integration between urban/land use planning and
traffic/mobility planning
6

Basic assumptions

The time frame similar to the requirements for new urban
quality or quality of life is wide open.
The time frame for behavioural changes in the mobility sector
as well as for new mobility concepts is (relatively wide) open.
The main objective is post-fossil mobility. The path and scope
of actions is open.
A new mobility culture will emerge in our cities.

Cities and regions are of great importance for the emergence of
a new mobility culture.
What is important is the transformation process (system
adaptation, system development, participation)

7

Three messages !!!
We need a new mobility culture in our cities
using and fostering the possibilities of changing values and
mobility behaviour
For the future of our cities we need an intelligent and innovative
adaption of new technologies for mobility
The present is characterised through windows of
opportunities

Mobility culture means an intelligent handling of mobility,
including perspecticves on efficiency, consistency and
sufficiency (low-impacts of transport (cars and driving); modal shift;
reduction of physical mobility)
8

Agenda
5. Conclusion
9

Mobility and transport in the future...
... stronger integration of land use and transport development
(proximity, transit-oriented development)
... networking between transport modes, carriers, people and
commercial traffic
... with a variety of participation options
... better information
... more decentralised offers, organisations, funding bodies
... demand-driven
... sustainable

despite the counter-productive effects of
... individualised lifestyles
... individualised consumption (teleshopping)

10

Trends !? Niche or not? a new culture of mobility
Intermodality and multimodality
Sharing economy
Willingness and commitment to environmental protection
(individual environmental control)
Offers of combined modes
Mobility packages (easy booking and optimised billing; flatrates)
Preparatory and accompanying info chains
Focus on short distances in mobility and local supply
11

Mega-Trends in the development of mobility
Chances and limitations for sustainable mobility
Energy transition ++
Climate protection ++
Management of climatic impacts, climate change o
Demographic change ++
Accessibility requirements (e.g. barrier-free infrastructures) +
Social division, exclusion +
Globalisation, liberalisation -
Urban renaissance ++
Technology development +
(e.g. electromobility)
Change in values and behavioural change mobility ++
Public debt, debt brake +
Decline of infrastructures o
Rising mobility costs ++
(energy prices, user financing)

K
.

J
.

B
e
c
k
m
a
n
n

12

Approaches to reducing CO
2
-emissions in transport
Increased efficiency:
vehicles, driving behaviour
efficiency!
Consistency:
zero-emission mobility, renewable energy
sources, non-motorised private transport, (local)
public transport
consistency!
Sufficiency:
traffic reduction
sufficiency!
13

Thesis I
Urban renaissance trends even re-urbanisation as well as
higher quality of life in the cities stimulate sustainable urban
transport.

Opportunities can be found in informed mobility behaviour,
with a transport system featuring diverse transport choices and
transport combinations.

To this end, the willingness and tendencies toward value and
behavioural changes in the mobility sector need to be stabilised,
supported and promoted.

We need to rethink mobility! New mobility culture
K. J. Beckmann
14

Thesis II
To promote values and behavioural change, the following is
needed:
Clear and wisely negotiated objectives
The intensive involvement of citizens and businesses
(participation)
Consistent strategies
Political courage
A high level of consistency and reliability of negotiation
strategies
Clever combinations of measures for increasing efficiency,
expanding consistency and verifying sufficiency
A conscious, but not ideological configuration of traffic
prevention, modal shifts in traffic forms and compatible traffic
K. J. Beckmann
15

Thesis III
Urban growth must be combined either with subdued traffic
growth or without any traffic growth whatsoever.

A reduction in specific traffic must be achieved (per inhabitant,
per production unit, etc.), and especially in specific traffic impacts
(total emissions, the numbers of those affected).

The return effects here include improvements of urban qualities
(quality of life in cities) and thus the increased attractiveness of
cities.
K. J. Beckmann
16

Sustainability essential concept and guiding principle for
planning disciplines (cities, regions, transport, infrastructure)
Sustainability with
economic stability and
development
social justice and social
responsibility
environmental responsibility and
efficiency

In compilance with
The physical and mental-
emotional states of the people
The preservation and further
development of cultural heritage
The requirements of future
generations
Sustainability Trias / Quintupel
Social
Economical Ecological
Sustainability
Nachhaltigkeit
Mental-
emotional
and
physical
Cultural
K. J. Beckmann
17

OECD (Vancouver (1996)): GUIDING PRINCIPLES for
Sustainable Transportation
Access: People are entitled to reasonable access to other people, places, goods and services.
Equity : Nation states and the transportation community must strive to ensure social,
interregional and inter-generational equity, meeting the basic transportation-related needs of all
people including women, the poor, the rural, and the disabled.
Health and Safety: Transportation systems should be designed and operated in a way that
protects the health (physical, mental and social well-being) and safety of all people, and enhances
the quality of life in communities.
Individual Responsibility : All individuals have a responsibility to act as stewards of the
natural environment, undertaking to make sustainable choices with regard to personal movement
and consumption.
Integrated Planning: Transportation decision makers have a responsibility to pursue more
integrated approaches to planning.
Pollution Prevention: Transportation needs must be met without generating emissions that
threaten public health, global climate, biological diversity or the integrity of essential ecological
processes.
Land and Resource Use: Transportation systems must make efficient use of land and
other natural resources while ensuring the preservation of vital habitats and other requirements for
maintaining biodiversity.
Fuller Cost Accounting: Transportation decision makers must move as expeditiously as
possible toward fuller cost accounting, reflecting the true social, economic and environmental costs,
in order to ensure users pay an equitable share of costs.
18

European Commission White Paper COM (2011)144
WHITE PAPER Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area
Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system
(selection)
Halve the use of conventionally-fuelled cars in urban transport
by 2030; phase them out in cities by 2050 (1)
achieve essentially CO
2
-free city logistics in major urban centres
by 2030 (1)
By 2050, connect all core network airports to the rail network (6)
By 2050, move close to zero fatalities in road transport. (9)
Move towards full application of user pays and polluter pays
principles and private sector engagement to eliminate
distortions, including harmful subsidies, generate revenues and
ensure financing for future transport investments. (10)

19

Zurich Municipal Code (Art. 2
quinquies
and Art. 124)
1
The city of Zurich is taking measures to protect the population against
the negative impacts of traffic.
The city of Zurich is firmly committed to public transport, pedestrian
and bicycle traffic and in particular encourages the tangential
connections of public transport and a continuous cycle route network
along or parallel to the main axes.
The construction or upgrading of high-speed and major roads is
permitted only under the condition that this does not increase the
capacity of the entire road network for motorised traffic. The city acts in
accordance with this principle in the context of its legal options and
represents this principle in its dealings with higher authorities.
Within ten years of Art. 2
quinquies
(new) coming into effect, the
percentage of public transport, pedestrian and bicycle traffic in the total
traffic of the city of Zurich shall be increased by at least 10 percentage
points; decisive here are the distances travelled within the city limits in
terms of overall traffic. The city of Zurich is to meet the necessary
measures and publish an annual progress report.
20

0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Berlin
(2008)
Berlin
(2025)
Wien
(2012)
Wien
(2020)
Zrich
(2010)
Zrich
(2025)
Mnchen
(2000)
Mnchen
(Szenario
2015
"Bewusste
Mobilitt")
Stuttgart
(2009/2010)
Stuttgart
(2025)
public transport bicylcle pedestrian ecomobility motorised individual transport (car) ???
Modal Split status quo and development goals in comparison,
increase of ecomobility
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
21

Agenda
5. Conclusion
22

The importance of mobile, internet, car,
partner(ship)
I can not imagine a life without
mobile
internet
car
partner
age 14-29
total population
23

source: KBA, Bratzel 2011, additional translation.
Car ownership rate of young men in Germany
significantly decreasing
by age groups
(cars per 1.000 male
inhabitants)
(actual stocks of cars in Mio.)
24

Quelle: T. Kuhnimhof/ ifmo, 2011.
share of young car owners
using cars daily:
using PT once a week:
25

Car-Sharing in Germany 1997-2014

C
a
r
s
h
a
r
i
n
g

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

v
e
h
i
l
c
e
s

C
a
r
s
h
a
r
i
n
g

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

u
s
e
r
s

user free-floating
user station based/traditional sharing
vehicles station based/traditional sharing
vehicles free-floating
source: VCD based on data material of the Bundesverband Car-Sharing, 2014. (own translation)
26

Bike Rental Systems Examples 2012
source: nextbike, 2012: Public Bike Sharing.
27

Multimodal
Transport
Behaviour in
Germany
s
o
u
r
c
e
:

U
w
e

K
u
n
e
r
t
,

S
a
b
i
n
e

R
a
d
k
e
,

B
a
s
t
i
a
n

C
h
l
o
n
d
,

M
a
r
t
i
n

K
a
g
e
r
b
a
u
e
r

(
2
0
1
3
)
:

A
u
t
o
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y

i
n

F
l
u
x
:

M
o
r
e

W
o
m
e
n

a
n
d

O
l
d
e
r

D
r
i
v
e
r
s

a
t

t
h
e

W
h
e
e
l
.

I
n
:

D
I
W

(
e
d
.
)
:

E
c
o
n
o
m
i
c

B
u
l
l
e
t
i
n

0
8
/
2
0
1
3
.

28

Modal Split share of public transport by age group
Quelle: MiD 2008 Anwenderworkshop, September 2009
29

Multimodality already reality for major parts of the population
Percent of persons using a transport mode within a week in Germany
all (car, pt, bicycle),
5%
bicycle and pt / no
car, 7%
only walk and pass,
6%
only bicycle / no car
, 5%
only pt / no car, 11%
only car (no pt, no
bicycle), 39%
bicycle and car / no
pt, 16%
pt and car / no
bicycle, 10%
source: B.Chlond/T.Kuhnimhof, Fahrrad und V versus MIV? Analysen zur Konkurrenz und Synergie von
Verkehrsmitteln. Vortrag Meetbike Konferenz Dresden am 12.3.2009
classification of means of
transport (bycicle, car, pt)
within a week!

~ 60% monomodal
(always using one mode of transport)

~ 40% multimodal
(using different modes of transport on a
regular base)

~ 60% ecomobility
(using bicycle, public transport, walking)
30

Driving licence holder among adult population, car use
driver/passenger and multimodality by age groups and
population of the municipality
source: Beckmann, u.a., Internationales Verkehrswesen 04/2006, S. 143.
number of
inhabitants
of the
municipality
age groups
multimodal,
PT usage regular
multimodal,
PT usage limited
car driver, no usage of PT
only car passenger
No driving license
31

Mobidrive (Karlsruhe): modal split
(all purposes of transport/mobility (periode of observation 42 days))
Verkehrsmittelanteile - alle Wegezwecke ( Mobi drive , Karlsruhe, individuelle Werte)
V
e
r
k
e
h
r
s
m
i
t
t
e
l
a
n
t
e
i
l

100
80
60
40
20
0
Pedestrian in %
Bicycle in %
Motor car passenger
in %
Public transport in %
Individual motor car
traffic in %
[%]
159 persons
(source: von der Ruhren, Rindsfser, Beckmann 2004, own translation)
(sorted by the dominance of transport mode)
32

Institut fr Mobilitt & Verkehr Institut fr Mobilitt & Verkehr Institut fr Mobilitt & Verkehr
Long term mobility/modal split-scenarios for Mnster
- all kilometers within town (Argus / Difu, 2010)
e-bicycles
A
b
b
i
l
d
u
n
g
s
q
u
e
l
l
e
:

H
a
r
t
m
u
t

T
o
p
p
,

S
t
d
t
i
s
c
h
e

M
o
b
i
l
i
t
t

o
h
n
e

E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
n

e
i
n
e

V
i
s
i
o
n
?
,

8
.
/
9
.
0
9
.
2
0
1
1

S
.

1
3
.

t
r
a
f
f
i
c

p
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e

/

k
i
l
o
m
e
t
e
r
s

p
e
r

d
a
y

pedestrian bicycle public transport car
Scenario
base
Scenario
settlement
strong needs
for adjustments
medium needs
for adjustments
33

New chances for a changed mobility culture
reduced importance of cars as symbols of status
vehicle use instead of vehicle ownership (Car-Sharing, Call-a-
E-car, Call-a-E-bike)
intelligent use of modes (intermodality, multimodality)
sustainable, efficient and C-reduced mobility
Integration of mobility management in other services (housing
related services, cooperation with business and housing
companies,)
K. J. Beckmann
34

Agenda
5. Conclusion
35

Integrative enforcement of sustainable mobility
settlement and site related development
planning - management of uses
integrated traffic development planning
infrastructure
Traffic and transport management
Mobility management
Pattern of activities
Accessibility/
grace of location
choice of location
(long term)
Strategic management of traffic and mobility
Intermodal/multimodal strategies
Mobility management
local/regional
business/company related
target groups
intermodal/multimodal strategies
Traffic management (dynamic)
traffic control strategies
breakdown and accident strategies
event strategies
Information and
steering systems
car
PT
Individualised
information/
guidance
systems
mobility behaviour
vehicle configuration
mobility culture
(long term/
medium term)
modal split
choice of destinations
route selection
choice of time
(short term nature)
route selection
driving behaviour
K. J. Beckmann
36

Integrated urban development as the basis for a
sustainable city spheres of activity
Urban
development
Coexistence/
integration
Labour +
employment
Economy
Family,
children, youth
Housing + local
living environment
Infrastructure
+ traffic/mobility
Environment,
health
School,
education
Safety/
security
K. J. Beckmann
Culture
Integrated
urban
development
City
Traffic
37

Urban planning principles with potential mobility
effects
Moderation of the suburbanisation of housing, work, trade
Using the opportunities of rail-based urban development
(transit oriented development)
Density, minimum density , redensification, inner-urban
development
Mixed uses, proximity/neighbourhood (accessibility of social
environment)
Polycentricity (citywide or regional accessibility)
Quality of urban space, road space, open space (attractive living
environments)
Expansion of offers (in-patient services, mobile services, Internet-
based services, transportation services, etc.)
Environmental qualities
Accessibility management
Land (use) management
38

New measures of Mobility Management
Interdependencies between Settlement and Traffic
integrated development
of rail and town
in the region
functional mix,
urban qualities
rail revival
traffic
diminution and
modal shift
reinforced
centers
car oriented urban sprawl
traffic volumes
recreated after source: BAHN.VILLE, 2001
39

Urban development concept Munich
Urban-Kompakt-Grn (urban, compact, green)
Quelle: Landeshauptstadt Mnchen, 1995, S. 42
40

Functional spatial concept Mnster
Stadt der kurzen Wege (city of short distances)
(Quelle: Stadt Mnster, 1997)
41

Extended range of options for post-fossil mobility

Maintenance, upgrading and expanding social environment in
the near (local environment) with usage options (work, education,
social infrastructure, utilities, services, leisure, recreation, etc.)
Promoting pedestrian traffic and bicycle traffic as means of
travel in the local environment
Enhancement of the expansion and usage areas for bicycles
through electric bicycles (pedelecs, e-bikes, segways):
accessibility, physical strain, vehicle payload
Car sharing, rental cars (using instead of owning)
Public bicycles, public pedelecs, public cars
Expansion of more differentiated offers in public transport
Intermodality
Multimodality

42

Elements of innovative solutions in the field of traffic
and transport
strengthening local/short-
distance mobility (e.g. design of
public space/road space, Shared Space)
rental bikes
auxiliary engines (Pedelec, E-Bike)
electronic booking (Call a Bike)
velo-parking
Car-Sharing (car2go, car2gether,
Flinkster, Stadtmobil, drivenow,)
electric-vehicles (V, Auto,
Fahrrad)
mobility cards (vehicle sharing, PT,
parking fees)
intelligent payment systems
info chains (accompanying,
preparatory)
parking space management
Road toll, city toll

K. J. Beckmann
43

Organisation und Koordination
von stdtischem/regionalem Mobilittsmanagement
Handlungsfelder des Mobilittsmanagements
Mobilittsmanagement fr
spezielle Zielgruppen bzw.
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM fr Kinder und Jugendliche
MM an Wohnstandorten
MM an Krankenhusern
MM an Groeinrichtungen fr Freizeit
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittsberatung und
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeits- und Wegeorganisation fr
Arbeitnehmer
Motivation der Arbeitnehmer fr eine
nachhaltige Mobilitt, auch durch
Vorbildwirkungen
verkehrliche Manahmen im Berufs-,
Dienstreise- und Gterverkehr, u.a.
Fahrgemeinschaften, JobTickets,
Parkraumbewirtschaftung,
Informationsbereitstellung, neue
Angebote, Fuhrparkmanagement etc.
intermodale Information und Beratung
Ticketvertrieb und Reservierung aus
einer Hand
Abwicklung neuer Mobilittsangebote
Durchfhrung von Kampagnen
telefonische, elektronische und
persnliche Kundenansprache ber
CallCenter/Hotline, Mobilittsportale
im Internet, Auskunftsterminals,
Kundenzentren des V/
Mobilittszentralen etc.
ISB 2003, Stand des MM in Deutschland und im Ausland
Initiierung der anderen Handlungsfelder
Schaffung neuer Angebote, wie z.B. CarSharing,
Lieferdienste, Radstationen, neue V-Tickets...
Politische und organisatorische Verankerung
des MM
Erstellung eines Mobilitts-Leitbildes
u.a.
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
einer Hand
des MM
u.a.
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
einer Hand
des MM
u.a.
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
einer Hand
des MM
u.a.
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
einer Hand
des MM
u.a.
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
einer Hand
des MM
u.a.
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
einer Hand
des MM
u.a.
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
einer Hand
des MM
u.a.
Handlungsfelder des Mobilit tsmanagements
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeits - und Wegeorganisation fr
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
verkehrliche Manahmen im Berufs - ,
Dienstreise - und Gterverkehr, u.a.
einer Hand
CallCenter /Hotline, Mobilittsportale
Lieferdienste, Radstationen, neue V - Tickets...
des MM
Erstellung eines Mobilit ts - Leitbildes
u.a.
Fields of action in mobility management
Einrichtungen
MM an Schulen
MM an Krankenhusern
und Einkauf
MM fr Touristen
...
Betriebliches
Mobilittsmanagement
Mobilittszentralen
Arbeits - und Wegeorganisation fr
Arbeitnehmer
Vorbildwirkungen
verkehrliche Manahmen im Berufs - ,
Dienstreise - und Gterverkehr, u.a.
einer Hand
CallCenter /Hotline, Mobilittsportale
Lieferdienste, Radstationen, neue V - Tickets...
des MM
Erstellung eines Mobilit ts - Leitbildes
u.a.
44

Stdtebauliche Bemessung (urban dimensioning)
Randnutzung (side use)
Fugnger (pedestrians)
Proportionen (proportions)
Bildquelle: RASt06, S. 11.
erforderliche
Seitenraumbreite
(necessary side
walk dimensions)

mgliche Fahrbahnbreite
(possible road/lane dimensions)
Abwgung
(balancing of interests)
45

London / Greater London Shared Space:
Oxfordstreet
Quelle: TfL
Before
After
46

Shared Space Chambry

Jrg Thiemann-Linden
47

Shared Space Duisburg

48

Digital infrastructure, electric infrastructure in synergetic
combination with e-mobility
Abbildungsquelle: Wilhelm Kistner, 2011: Elektromobilitt novelliert den Vertrieb im Automobilmarkt, S. 48.
49

Mobil in Dsseldorf;
mobility flat-rates
A
b
b
i
l
d
u
n
g
s
q
u
e
l
l
e

F
l
y
e
r
:

R
h
e
i
n
b
a
h
n
,
2
0
1
2
.

Quelle: http://www.steig-ein.de
Quelle: http://www.steig-ein.de
Quelle: www.car2go.com
50

Berlin: BerlinelektroMobil
A
b
b
i
l
d
u
n
g
s
q
u
e
l
l
e

F
l
y
e
r
:

w
w
w
.
b
e
m
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
d
e

Fotos: C. Albrecht / J. Thiemann-Linden
51

Source: Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart (2013): Verkehrsentwicklungskonzept 2030, p. 38 and 39.
52

Car2Go
Institut fr Mobilitt & Verkehr Institut fr Mobilitt & Verkehr Institut fr Mobilitt & Verkehr
car2go
Geschftsgebiet
A
b
b
i
l
d
u
n
g
s
q
u
e
l
l
e
:

H
a
r
t
m
u
t

T
o
p
p
,

S
t
d
t
i
s
c
h
e

M
o
b
i
l
i
t
t

o
h
n
e

E
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
n

e
i
n
e

V
i
s
i
o
n
?
,

8
.
/
9
.
0
9
.
2
0
1
1

S
.

3
3
.

53

New York: new urban mobility bike-sharing network and
bicycle lanes
Development and qualitative
upgrade of bicycle infrastructures
Step-by-step extension of bicycle-
sharing systems
Lower Manhattan
Quelle: NYCPlanning , 2011.
Q
u
e
l
l
e
:

N
Y
C
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g

,

2
0
0
9
.

54

Parking for Bicycles
Apeldoorn, Den Haag, Mnster

Fotos: Jrg Thiemann-Linden.
55

London: Barclays Bank Cycle Superhighways
Jrg Thiemann-Linden.
56

New offers rent a bicycle
(station based versus free floating)
57

INTEGRATION Bicycle Public Transport
58

Berlin-Friedrichsstrae e-mobility
59

Abbildungsquelle: Julius Menge, 2012: Relevance of commercial transport from a munocipalitys perspective. Folie 19.
- different offers for (local) freight transport (last mile)
60

Agenda
5. Conclusion
61

New mobility culture trends are only sustainable with...
the reduction of counter-productive conditions
(e.g. commuter allowance)
the expansion of networks and informational support
extensive relinquishment of extension roads (no capacity
expansions, at best, reduction of critical bottlenecks)
the use of the current time frame
the stabilisation of trends toward changing ideals and mobility
behaviour among younger people through offers and social
communication.

62

Success will only come about through
Integrated approaches
Urban/settlement development and transport (environmental
compatibility, traffic compatibility of settlements)
Information, consulting, incentives, management, operation, and (rarely)
construction
All means of transportation
Preference for modernisation over new construction and expansion
Greater consideration for...
Healthcare
Environmental protection
Climate protection
Energy efficiency
Active participation and active contribution of citizens (citizens are often
further along than politicians)

63

Sustainable mobility, sustainable urban traffic
Accessibility more important than speed
(compact settlement structure, mixed use, polycentric urban structure)
Expansion of the set of choices for mobility options and information
(apps)
New principles of urban/regional/metropolitan mobility
Less possession of drivers licenses and car ownership in motorised
age groups
Use of electric bikes to expand the usage areas of bicycles (distance,
topography)
Use of electric vehicles (battery electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid vehicles,
etc.) but not 1:1 replacement of internal combustion vehicles
Use combustion vehicles with enhanced efficiency
Electric vehicles for delivery/distributional traffic
Promoting new mobility culture (location consulting, mobility consulting,
mobility management)
64

Conclusion
Mobility as (requirement for) participation remains important;
mobility in terms of being physically on the go is becoming
less important (virtual mobility, mobility in the social environment,
slow traffic);
decreasing importance of motorized mobility as lifestyle
Intermodality and multimodality are increasing they bring
benefits and are enjoyable due to budding control-competence
A (gradually) increasing ecological responsibility supports the
new culture of mobility
Increasing openness toward a sharing economy and eco-
innovation

65

Three messages !!!
We need a new mobility culture in our cities
using and fostering the possibilities of changing values and
mobility behaviour

For the future of our cities we need an intelligent and innovative
adaption of new technologies for mobility

The present is characterised through windows of
opportunities
66

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
vielen Dank fr Ihre Aufmerksamkeit!

67

Akademie fr Raumforschung und
Landesplanung (ARL)
Leibniz-Forum fr Raumwissenschaften
Hohenzollernstr. 11
30161 Hannover
Tel.: +49 511 34842-0
Fax: +49 511 34842-41
E-Mail: arl@arl-net.de
Internet: www.arl-net.de
c/o UrbanPlan GmbH
Ltzowstrae 102-104
10785 Berlin
Tel.: +49 30 78 795 795
E-Mail: kjbeckmann.kjb@gmail.de
Kontakt:

2014 - Nachhaltige Mobilität Angebote Kommunen End

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

2014 - Nachhaltige Mobilität Angebote Kommunen End

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

1

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen