Sie sind auf Seite 1von 66

Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.

publishing as Prentice Hall


1
BUS 411
DAY 4
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Agenda
Question?
Assignment 1 due
We will develop a class wide SWOT next class for use
in future assignments
Assignment 2 posted
Due Feb 15
Begin Discussion on the External Assessment
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Assignment 2
External Assessment: Developing an EFE Matrix
and Competitive Profile Matrix for Walt Disney

Using the information gathered in assignment 1 and the Walt Disney
SWOT analysis prepared in class, develop an EFE matrix for Walt
Disney (50 points)
Using the information gathered in assignment 1, the McDonalds
SWOT analysis prepared in class, and additional research materials
available for Time Warner, Inc and News Corporation develop a CPM
matrix comparing Walt Disney, Time Warner, Inc and News
Corporation (50 points)
You may use the templates provided with this assignment or develop
your own.
Upload your completed matrixes.
2-3
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The External
Assessment
Chapter Three
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

It is not the strongest of the species that
survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one
most responsive to change.
Charles Darwin
External Assessment

Nothing focuses the mind better than the
constant sight of a competitor who wants to
wipe you off the map.
Wayne Calloway, Former CEO, PepsiCo
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Chapter Objectives
1. Describe how to conduct an external strategic-
management audit.
2. Discuss 10 major external forces that affect
organizations: economic, social, cultural, demographic,
environmental, political, governmental, legal,
technological, and competitive.
3. Describe key sources of external information, including
the Internet.
4. Discuss important forecasting tools used in strategic
management.
5. Discuss the importance of monitoring external trends
and events.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Chapter Objectives (cont.)
6. Explain how to develop an EFE Matrix.
7. Explain how to develop a Competitive Profile Matrix.
8. Discuss the importance of gathering competitive
intelligence.
9. Describe the trend toward cooperation among
competitors.
10. Discuss market commonality and resource similarity in
relation to competitive analysis.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
External Audit
External audit
focuses on identifying and evaluating trends
and events beyond the control of a single
firm
reveals key opportunities and threats
confronting an organization so that managers
can formulate strategies to take advantage of
the opportunities and avoid or reduce the
impact of threats
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Nature of an External Audit
The external audit is aimed at identifying
key variables that offer actionable
responses
Firms should be able to respond either
offensively or defensively to the factors by
formulating strategies that take advantage of
external opportunities or that minimize the
impact of potential threats.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Key External Forces
External forces can be divided into five
broad categories:
1. economic forces
2. social, cultural, demographic, and natural
environment forces
3. political, governmental, and legal forces
4. technological forces
5. competitive forces
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Relationships Between Key External Forces
and an Organization
3-12
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Process of Performing an
External Audit
First, gather competitive intelligence and
information about economic, social,
cultural, demographic, environmental,
political, governmental, legal, and
technological trends.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Process of Performing an
External Audit
Information should be assimilated and
evaluated
A final list of the most important key
external factors should be communicated
10-20 external factors (balanced)

Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Process of Performing an
External Audit
Key external factors should be:
1. important to achieving long-term and annual
objectives
2. measurable
3. applicable to all competing firms, and
4. hierarchical in the sense that some will pertain
to the overall company and others will be more
narrowly focused on functional or divisional
areas
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Industrial Organization
(I/O) View
The Industrial Organization (I/O)
approach to competitive advantage
advocates that external (industry) factors
are more important than internal factors in
a firm for achieving competitive
advantage.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Industrial Organization
(I/O) View
Firm performance
is based more on
industry properties
than the firm
properties

Economies of scale
Barriers to market entry
Product differentiation
The economy
Level of competitiveness
3-17
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Economic Forces
3-18
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sources of Economic Data
FRED
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/
World Bank
http://data.worldbank.org/
Google Public Data Explorer
http://www.google.com/publicdata/directory
Bureau of Economic Analysis
http://www.bea.gov/
International Monetary Fund
http://www.imf.org/external/data.htm

2-19
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Advantages and Disadvantages
of a Weak Dollar
3-20
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Social, Cultural, Demographic, and
Natural Environmental Forces
U.S. Facts
Aging population
Less white
Widening gap between rich & poor
2025 = 18.5% population > 65 years
2075 = no ethnic or racial majority
United States Census Bureau
http://www.census.gov/#
UN Data
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/2010_PHC/def
ault.htm
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Social, Cultural, Demographic, and
Natural Environmental Forces
Facts
World population 7 billion
World population = 8 billion by 2028
World population = 9 billion by 2054
U.S. population > 310 million
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Key Social, Cultural, Demographic, and
Natural Environment Variables
3-23
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Political, Governmental, and
Legal Forces
The increasing global interdependence
among economies, markets,
governments, and organizations makes it
imperative that firms consider the
possible impact of political variables on
the formulation and implementation of
competitive strategies.
CIA Data
https://www.cia.gov/index.html
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Political, Government, and
Legal Variables
3-25
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
American Labor Unions
The extent that a state is unionized can be a
significant political factor in strategic planning
decisions as related to manufacturing plant
location and other operational matters
The size of American labor unions has fallen
sharply in the last decade due in large part to
erosion of the U.S. manufacturing base
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.toc.htm
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Technological Forces
The Internet has changed the very nature of
opportunities and threats by:
altering the life cycles of products,
increasing the speed of distribution,
creating new products and services,
erasing limitations of traditional geographic
markets,
changing the historical trade-off between
production standardization and flexibility.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Technological Forces
The Internet is altering economies of
scale, changing entry barriers, and
redefining the relationship between
industries and various suppliers,
creditors, customers, and competitors
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Economic Trade Zones
2-29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_bloc
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Technological Forces
Many firms now have a Chief
Information Officer (CIO) and a Chief
Technology Officer (CTO) who work
together to ensure that information
needed to formulate, implement, and
evaluate strategies is available where and
when it is needed
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Technological Forces
Technological advancements can:
Create new markets,
Result in a proliferation of new and improved
products,
Change the relative competitive cost positions in
an industry,
Render existing products and services obsolete.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Competitive Forces
An important part of an external audit is
identifying rival firms and determining
their strengths, weaknesses, capabilities,
opportunities, threats, objectives, and
strategies
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Competitive Forces
Characteristics of the most competitive
companies:
1.Market share matters
2.Understand and remember precisely what business
you are in
3.Whether its broke or not, fix itmake it better
4.Innovate or evaporate
5.Acquisition is essential to growth
6.People make a difference
7.There is no substitute for quality
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Key Questions About Competitors
3-34
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Competitive Intelligence
Programs
Competitive intelligence (CI)
a systematic and ethical process for
gathering and analyzing information about
the competitions activities and general
business trends to further a businesss own
goals
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Competitive Intelligence Programs
The three basic objectives of a CI program
are:
1. to provide a general understanding of an industry and
its competitors
2. to identify areas in which competitors are vulnerable
and to assess the impact strategic actions would have
on competitors
3. to identify potential moves that a competitor might
make that would endanger a firms position in the
market

Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Media Monitoring
Companies that gather competitive
intelligence for a fee
http://www.burrellesluce.com/
http://www.vocus.com/content/index.asp
http://www.metromonitor.com/
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Market Commonality and Resource
Similarity
Market
commonality
the number and
significance of
markets that a firm
competes in with
rivals
Resource
similarity
the extent to which
the type and
amount of a firms
internal resources
are comparable to
a rival
3-38
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model of
Competition
3-39
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model of
Competition
1. Identify key aspects or elements of each
competitive force that impact the firm.
2. Evaluate how strong and important each
element is for the firm.
3. Decide whether the collective strength of
the elements is worth the firm entering or
staying in the industry.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model
Rivalry among competing firms
Most powerful of the five forces
Focus on competitive advantage of strategies
over other firms
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model
3-42
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model
Potential Entry of New Competitors
Barriers to entry are important
Quality, pricing, and marketing can overcome
barriers
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Barriers to Entry
Need to gain economies of scale quickly
Need to gain technology and specialized know-
how
Lack of experience
Strong customer loyalty
Strong brand preferences
Large capital requirements
Lack of adequate distribution channels
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Barriers to Entry
Government regulatory policies
Tariffs
Lack of access to raw materials
Possession of patents
Undesirable locations
Counterattack by entrenched firms
Potential saturation of the market

Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model
Potential development of substitute
products
Pressure increases when:
Prices of substitutes decrease
Consumers switching costs decrease
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model
Bargaining Power of Suppliers is
increased when there are:
Large numbers of suppliers
Few substitutes
Costs of switching raw materials is high
Backward integration is gaining control or
ownership of suppliers
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
The Five-Forces Model
Bargaining power of consumers
Customers being concentrated or buying in
volume affects intensity of competition
Consumer power is higher where products
are standard or undifferentiated (commodity
products)
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Conditions Where Consumers Gain
Bargaining Power
1. If buyers can inexpensively switch
2. If buyers are particularly important
3. If sellers are struggling in the face of falling
consumer demand
4. If buyers are informed about sellers products,
prices, and costs
5. If buyers have discretion in whether and when
they purchase the product
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sources of External Information
Unpublished sources include customer
surveys, market research, speeches at
professional and shareholders meetings,
television programs, interviews, and
conversations with stakeholders.
Buy stock in competitors' companies
Published sources of strategic information
include periodicals, journals, reports,
government documents, abstracts, books,
directories, newspapers, and manuals.
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Sources of External Information:
Web Sites
http://www.marketwatch.com/
http://moneycentral.msn.com
http://finance.yahoo.com
http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/
https://us.etrade.com/e/t/invest/markets
www.hoovers.com
UMFK Databases

Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Forecasting Tools and Techniques
Forecasts
educated assumptions about future trends
and events
quantitative, qualitative techniques
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Making Assumptions
Assumptions
Best present estimates of the impact of major
external factors, over which the manager has
little if any control, but which may exert a
significant impact on performance or the
ability to achieve desired results.
Document your assumptions
Will be tested by time and actual outcomes
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Industry Analysis: The External Factor
Evaluation (EFE) Matrix
Economic
Social
Cultural
Demographic
Environmental
Political
Governmental
Technological
Competitive
Legal

3-54
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.
publishing as Prentice Hall
EFE matrix.xlt
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
5 Steps (Page 80-82)
1. List key external factors
10-20 (balanced 5&5 10&10)
Opportunities then threats
Assign weights from 0.0 to 1.0 based on importance
Sum of all weights across all factors = 1
Assign a rating from 1 to 4 for all factors where
4 = the firms response is superior
3 = the firms response is above avg
2 = the firms response is average
1 = the firms response is poor
1. Multiply the rating by the weight
2. Sum the weighted scores

Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Ch 3 -58

Total weighted score of 4.0
Organization response is outstanding to threats
and weaknesses
Industry Analysis EFE

Total weighted score of 1.0
Firms strategies not capitalizing on opportunities or
avoiding threats

Average is 2.5
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Ch 3 -59
Industry Analysis: Competitive Profile Matrix
(CPM)
Identifies firms major competitors and
their strengths & weaknesses in relation
to a sample firms strategic positions

Critical success factors include internal
and external issues
CPM_matrix.XLT
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Steps to a CPM
Identify Critical Success Factors (CSF)
Broad issues
Internal and external (5 of each is a good mix)
Assign a weight to each CSF
Must add up to 1
Assign a rating for your firm and each of your competitors
4 = major strength
3 = minor strength
2 = minor weakness
1 = major weakness
Multiply weight by rating
Sum the weighted ratings and compare

Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Ch 3 -61
Gateway Apple Dell
CSFs
Wt Rating Wtd
Score
Rating Wtd
Score
Rating Wtd
Score
Market share 0.15 3 0.45 2 0.30 4 0.60
Inventory sys 0.08 2 0.16 2 0.16 4 0.32
Fin position 0.10 2 0.20 3 0.30 3 0.30
Prod. Quality 0.08 3 0.24 4 0.32 3 0.24
Cons. Loyalty 0.02 3 0.06 3 0.06 4 0.08
Sales Distr 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 3 0.30
Global Exp. 0.15 3 0.45 2 0.30 4 0.60
Org. Structure 0.05 3 0.15 3 0.15 3 0.15
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Ch 3 -62
Gateway Apple Dell
CSFs (contd)
Wt Rating Wtd
Score
Rating Wtd
Score
Rating Wtd
Score
Prod. Capacity 0.04 3 0.12 3 0.12 3 0.12
E-commerce 0.10 3 0.30 3 0.30 3 0.30
Customer Serv 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 4 0.40
Price
competitive
0.02 4 0.08 1 0.02 3 0.06
Mgt. experience 0.01 2 0.02 4 0.04 2 0.02
Total 1.00 2.83 2.47 3.49
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
An Example Competitive
Profile Matrix
3-64
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Ch 3 -65
Industry Analysis CPM

Just because one firm receives a 3.2 rating and
another receives a 2.8 rating, it does not follow
that the first firm is 20 percent better than the
second.
Important
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
3-66
Copyright 2013 Pearson
Education, Inc. publishing as
Prentice Hall

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen