1 BUS 411 DAY 4 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Agenda Question? Assignment 1 due We will develop a class wide SWOT next class for use in future assignments Assignment 2 posted Due Feb 15 Begin Discussion on the External Assessment Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Assignment 2 External Assessment: Developing an EFE Matrix and Competitive Profile Matrix for Walt Disney
Using the information gathered in assignment 1 and the Walt Disney SWOT analysis prepared in class, develop an EFE matrix for Walt Disney (50 points) Using the information gathered in assignment 1, the McDonalds SWOT analysis prepared in class, and additional research materials available for Time Warner, Inc and News Corporation develop a CPM matrix comparing Walt Disney, Time Warner, Inc and News Corporation (50 points) You may use the templates provided with this assignment or develop your own. Upload your completed matrixes. 2-3 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The External Assessment Chapter Three Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change. Charles Darwin External Assessment
Nothing focuses the mind better than the constant sight of a competitor who wants to wipe you off the map. Wayne Calloway, Former CEO, PepsiCo Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter Objectives 1. Describe how to conduct an external strategic- management audit. 2. Discuss 10 major external forces that affect organizations: economic, social, cultural, demographic, environmental, political, governmental, legal, technological, and competitive. 3. Describe key sources of external information, including the Internet. 4. Discuss important forecasting tools used in strategic management. 5. Discuss the importance of monitoring external trends and events. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter Objectives (cont.) 6. Explain how to develop an EFE Matrix. 7. Explain how to develop a Competitive Profile Matrix. 8. Discuss the importance of gathering competitive intelligence. 9. Describe the trend toward cooperation among competitors. 10. Discuss market commonality and resource similarity in relation to competitive analysis. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall External Audit External audit focuses on identifying and evaluating trends and events beyond the control of a single firm reveals key opportunities and threats confronting an organization so that managers can formulate strategies to take advantage of the opportunities and avoid or reduce the impact of threats Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Nature of an External Audit The external audit is aimed at identifying key variables that offer actionable responses Firms should be able to respond either offensively or defensively to the factors by formulating strategies that take advantage of external opportunities or that minimize the impact of potential threats. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Key External Forces External forces can be divided into five broad categories: 1. economic forces 2. social, cultural, demographic, and natural environment forces 3. political, governmental, and legal forces 4. technological forces 5. competitive forces Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Relationships Between Key External Forces and an Organization 3-12 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Process of Performing an External Audit First, gather competitive intelligence and information about economic, social, cultural, demographic, environmental, political, governmental, legal, and technological trends. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Process of Performing an External Audit Information should be assimilated and evaluated A final list of the most important key external factors should be communicated 10-20 external factors (balanced)
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Process of Performing an External Audit Key external factors should be: 1. important to achieving long-term and annual objectives 2. measurable 3. applicable to all competing firms, and 4. hierarchical in the sense that some will pertain to the overall company and others will be more narrowly focused on functional or divisional areas Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Industrial Organization (I/O) View The Industrial Organization (I/O) approach to competitive advantage advocates that external (industry) factors are more important than internal factors in a firm for achieving competitive advantage. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Industrial Organization (I/O) View Firm performance is based more on industry properties than the firm properties
Economies of scale Barriers to market entry Product differentiation The economy Level of competitiveness 3-17 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Economic Forces 3-18 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Sources of Economic Data FRED http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/ World Bank http://data.worldbank.org/ Google Public Data Explorer http://www.google.com/publicdata/directory Bureau of Economic Analysis http://www.bea.gov/ International Monetary Fund http://www.imf.org/external/data.htm
2-19 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Advantages and Disadvantages of a Weak Dollar 3-20 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Social, Cultural, Demographic, and Natural Environmental Forces U.S. Facts Aging population Less white Widening gap between rich & poor 2025 = 18.5% population > 65 years 2075 = no ethnic or racial majority United States Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/# UN Data http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/2010_PHC/def ault.htm Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Social, Cultural, Demographic, and Natural Environmental Forces Facts World population 7 billion World population = 8 billion by 2028 World population = 9 billion by 2054 U.S. population > 310 million Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Key Social, Cultural, Demographic, and Natural Environment Variables 3-23 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Political, Governmental, and Legal Forces The increasing global interdependence among economies, markets, governments, and organizations makes it imperative that firms consider the possible impact of political variables on the formulation and implementation of competitive strategies. CIA Data https://www.cia.gov/index.html Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Political, Government, and Legal Variables 3-25 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall American Labor Unions The extent that a state is unionized can be a significant political factor in strategic planning decisions as related to manufacturing plant location and other operational matters The size of American labor unions has fallen sharply in the last decade due in large part to erosion of the U.S. manufacturing base http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.toc.htm Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Technological Forces The Internet has changed the very nature of opportunities and threats by: altering the life cycles of products, increasing the speed of distribution, creating new products and services, erasing limitations of traditional geographic markets, changing the historical trade-off between production standardization and flexibility. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Technological Forces The Internet is altering economies of scale, changing entry barriers, and redefining the relationship between industries and various suppliers, creditors, customers, and competitors Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Economic Trade Zones 2-29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_bloc Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Technological Forces Many firms now have a Chief Information Officer (CIO) and a Chief Technology Officer (CTO) who work together to ensure that information needed to formulate, implement, and evaluate strategies is available where and when it is needed Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Technological Forces Technological advancements can: Create new markets, Result in a proliferation of new and improved products, Change the relative competitive cost positions in an industry, Render existing products and services obsolete. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Competitive Forces An important part of an external audit is identifying rival firms and determining their strengths, weaknesses, capabilities, opportunities, threats, objectives, and strategies Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Competitive Forces Characteristics of the most competitive companies: 1.Market share matters 2.Understand and remember precisely what business you are in 3.Whether its broke or not, fix itmake it better 4.Innovate or evaporate 5.Acquisition is essential to growth 6.People make a difference 7.There is no substitute for quality Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Key Questions About Competitors 3-34 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Competitive Intelligence Programs Competitive intelligence (CI) a systematic and ethical process for gathering and analyzing information about the competitions activities and general business trends to further a businesss own goals Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Competitive Intelligence Programs The three basic objectives of a CI program are: 1. to provide a general understanding of an industry and its competitors 2. to identify areas in which competitors are vulnerable and to assess the impact strategic actions would have on competitors 3. to identify potential moves that a competitor might make that would endanger a firms position in the market
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Media Monitoring Companies that gather competitive intelligence for a fee http://www.burrellesluce.com/ http://www.vocus.com/content/index.asp http://www.metromonitor.com/ Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Market Commonality and Resource Similarity Market commonality the number and significance of markets that a firm competes in with rivals Resource similarity the extent to which the type and amount of a firms internal resources are comparable to a rival 3-38 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Five-Forces Model of Competition 3-39 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Five-Forces Model of Competition 1. Identify key aspects or elements of each competitive force that impact the firm. 2. Evaluate how strong and important each element is for the firm. 3. Decide whether the collective strength of the elements is worth the firm entering or staying in the industry. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Five-Forces Model Rivalry among competing firms Most powerful of the five forces Focus on competitive advantage of strategies over other firms Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Five-Forces Model 3-42 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Five-Forces Model Potential Entry of New Competitors Barriers to entry are important Quality, pricing, and marketing can overcome barriers Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Barriers to Entry Need to gain economies of scale quickly Need to gain technology and specialized know- how Lack of experience Strong customer loyalty Strong brand preferences Large capital requirements Lack of adequate distribution channels Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Barriers to Entry Government regulatory policies Tariffs Lack of access to raw materials Possession of patents Undesirable locations Counterattack by entrenched firms Potential saturation of the market
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Five-Forces Model Potential development of substitute products Pressure increases when: Prices of substitutes decrease Consumers switching costs decrease Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Five-Forces Model Bargaining Power of Suppliers is increased when there are: Large numbers of suppliers Few substitutes Costs of switching raw materials is high Backward integration is gaining control or ownership of suppliers Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall The Five-Forces Model Bargaining power of consumers Customers being concentrated or buying in volume affects intensity of competition Consumer power is higher where products are standard or undifferentiated (commodity products) Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Conditions Where Consumers Gain Bargaining Power 1. If buyers can inexpensively switch 2. If buyers are particularly important 3. If sellers are struggling in the face of falling consumer demand 4. If buyers are informed about sellers products, prices, and costs 5. If buyers have discretion in whether and when they purchase the product Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Sources of External Information Unpublished sources include customer surveys, market research, speeches at professional and shareholders meetings, television programs, interviews, and conversations with stakeholders. Buy stock in competitors' companies Published sources of strategic information include periodicals, journals, reports, government documents, abstracts, books, directories, newspapers, and manuals. Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Sources of External Information: Web Sites http://www.marketwatch.com/ http://moneycentral.msn.com http://finance.yahoo.com http://www.bloomberg.com/markets/ https://us.etrade.com/e/t/invest/markets www.hoovers.com UMFK Databases
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Forecasting Tools and Techniques Forecasts educated assumptions about future trends and events quantitative, qualitative techniques Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Making Assumptions Assumptions Best present estimates of the impact of major external factors, over which the manager has little if any control, but which may exert a significant impact on performance or the ability to achieve desired results. Document your assumptions Will be tested by time and actual outcomes Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Industry Analysis: The External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix Economic Social Cultural Demographic Environmental Political Governmental Technological Competitive Legal
3-54 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall EFE matrix.xlt Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 5 Steps (Page 80-82) 1. List key external factors 10-20 (balanced 5&5 10&10) Opportunities then threats Assign weights from 0.0 to 1.0 based on importance Sum of all weights across all factors = 1 Assign a rating from 1 to 4 for all factors where 4 = the firms response is superior 3 = the firms response is above avg 2 = the firms response is average 1 = the firms response is poor 1. Multiply the rating by the weight 2. Sum the weighted scores
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Ch 3 -58
Total weighted score of 4.0 Organization response is outstanding to threats and weaknesses Industry Analysis EFE
Total weighted score of 1.0 Firms strategies not capitalizing on opportunities or avoiding threats
Average is 2.5 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Ch 3 -59 Industry Analysis: Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM) Identifies firms major competitors and their strengths & weaknesses in relation to a sample firms strategic positions
Critical success factors include internal and external issues CPM_matrix.XLT Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Steps to a CPM Identify Critical Success Factors (CSF) Broad issues Internal and external (5 of each is a good mix) Assign a weight to each CSF Must add up to 1 Assign a rating for your firm and each of your competitors 4 = major strength 3 = minor strength 2 = minor weakness 1 = major weakness Multiply weight by rating Sum the weighted ratings and compare
Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Ch 3 -61 Gateway Apple Dell CSFs Wt Rating Wtd Score Rating Wtd Score Rating Wtd Score Market share 0.15 3 0.45 2 0.30 4 0.60 Inventory sys 0.08 2 0.16 2 0.16 4 0.32 Fin position 0.10 2 0.20 3 0.30 3 0.30 Prod. Quality 0.08 3 0.24 4 0.32 3 0.24 Cons. Loyalty 0.02 3 0.06 3 0.06 4 0.08 Sales Distr 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 3 0.30 Global Exp. 0.15 3 0.45 2 0.30 4 0.60 Org. Structure 0.05 3 0.15 3 0.15 3 0.15 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Ch 3 -62 Gateway Apple Dell CSFs (contd) Wt Rating Wtd Score Rating Wtd Score Rating Wtd Score Prod. Capacity 0.04 3 0.12 3 0.12 3 0.12 E-commerce 0.10 3 0.30 3 0.30 3 0.30 Customer Serv 0.10 3 0.30 2 0.20 4 0.40 Price competitive 0.02 4 0.08 1 0.02 3 0.06 Mgt. experience 0.01 2 0.02 4 0.04 2 0.02 Total 1.00 2.83 2.47 3.49 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall An Example Competitive Profile Matrix 3-64 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall Ch 3 -65 Industry Analysis CPM
Just because one firm receives a 3.2 rating and another receives a 2.8 rating, it does not follow that the first firm is 20 percent better than the second. Important Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-66 Copyright 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology, Kenya - BSC Computer Security & Forensics MSC IT Security & Audit, PHD IT Security & Audit