Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

S&P 500 Weekly (NonLog) ~ “Unimportant” Trend Lines

1576 Some trend lines are more important than others. A lot of “technical types”
have highlighted this particular trend line. Perhaps this is going to be provide
important resistance, but in terms of Wave Analysis, this is an irrelevant line.
The move that finished at 667 was a COMPLETE wave, therefore the trend
lines created from the lesser degree waves are no longer of much
importance. However, others are looking at it, so we will as well…..

Maybe a break of this line will trigger a last bout


of short covering?

667

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________


S&P 500 Daily ~ A Triple Completed?
(Z)
Bulls should treat 1061 and 1029 as first and second
“c”
levels of medium term support. (Y) “a”
“c”

1061

“a” 1029
(X) “b”

(W) “b”
957
alt ( W )

869
(X)

This is the basic model that’s been employed for months now, ever since 957 was taken out.
This corrective move up from 667 must be considered some kind of “double” or “triple”
combination (a moving involving x-waves). Earlier this month, I had thought the (Z)-Wave here
might evolve into a ‘triangle,’ but that has not happened yet. One of the odd things on this
chart, among many things, is the way the market has just meandered through the uptrend line
(light blue) as if it wasn’t respecting it all. This sort of “non-eventful” break of a trend line is
almost always associated with a “triangle” development. According to this model, we should
have a completed move higher; so where’s the breakdown?

667

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________


S&P 500 Daily - Another Push Higher?
(Z)
When a market doesn’t “behave” in a way anticipated by the models,
“c”
the model is probably wrong. So, what else could be going on here?
Highlighted here is a decent possibility. In this one, the (X) wave
concludes later at 1029. The “a”-wave up from 1029 is best counted “a”
as a five advance, therefore the 1061 level should be important to (Y) “x”
hold for the “b”-wave. This model should decisively take out the 1114 “c”
highs and get “technical types” “excited” about breaking that trend
line from the first page of this report. “b”
“a”
1029
“w” “y”
(W) (X)
“b”
alt ( W )

869
(X)

Ever since 957 was taken out, my posture has been to not even think about
calling “the top” in this market until it finally shows confirmed signs of breaking
down. It almost did that at 1029 when it nearly took out a previous low. But,
let’s face it, it held in there. In the longer term, I remain convinced that a very
deep correction is coming, but until this market finally shows some evidence of
“peaking,” there’s no point in getting short or guessing at tops.

This is the count that would support the model on the next page
667

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________


This is a longer range bullish model that has become an increasing possibility given the price action between 2007 and
2009. We could be carving out a Supercycle Wave IV triangle. The 1165 zone would the be the 62% of <B> = <D>
target. The 38% of <C> = <E> from there would be the 820 zone a be a “neutral” triangle as the <E> wave would
conclude in the area of the <A> Wave.

Reprinted from 10/24/09


Supercycle
Wave III <B>

<D>
1165

820

<A> <E>
IV
<C>

S&P 500 Weekly (Log Scale)

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________


“b”

S&P 500 (60 min) “a” of ( Z )


3 5
-5- -5-
(b) -b-
(c)
-3-
(5)
(b)
(a)
(3) (d)

(a) “b”
(a)

(e)
(4) -4- (b)
4
(c)
(c)
-a-
(1)

-1-
“b”
(2)
1
1161
-2-

This would be the bullish interpretation in support of the Model on Page 3. It would mean
2 that the market must hold above 1161 and would mean decisively higher high.

(X)

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________


S&P 500 Daily ~ A Triangle Conclusion?
“a” (Z)
a c “c” “e”
(Y)
“c”

“b” “d”
“a”
b
(X)
(W) “b”

alt ( W )

Because of the way we saw this “non-eventful” break of the long


standing trend line, we must be still be open to a larger triangle
869 developing up here. At this point, it’s difficult to imagine what it
(X) might look like. Perhaps we see weeks and weeks of
congestion to close out the year and begin the new year?

Based on the few possibilities that exist in finishing this wave up from 667, it’s going to be
important to keep track of how the market “behaves.” Does it “impulsively” moving lower?
Does it congest? Does it make another “impulsive” move higher? At this point, only more price
action will ‘tell the tale.’

667

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________


S&P 500 - Daily (Log Scale) - A Triple Combination?
(Y) “a” (Z)
“c” “c” “e”

A triple combination is of the structure:


5-3-5-X-5-3-5-X-Triangle “d”
“a”
“b”
(X)
alt ( W ) “b”
(W) 957
“c”

869
“a”
(X)
“b”

This model is looking more viable with each day. The steep uptrend line was
broken on the log scale charts, which is the chart scale we should be using for
a move that covered this much distance. Retesting the backside of a broken
trend line is common--this might be what is going on here. Or, as implied by
this model, we’re forming a concluding triangle that will “exhaust” all remaining
buyers.

Reprinted from 11/9/09


It would take a break above 1110 to start damaging this model--that would be the “a”=“c” target.

Andy’s Technical Commentary__________________________________________________________________________________________________


DISCLAIMER WARNING DISCLAIMER WARNING DISCLAIMER

This report should not be interpreted as investment advice of any kind. This report is technical
commentary only. The author is NOT representing himself as a CTA or CFA or Investment/Trading
Advisor of any kind. This merely reflects the author’s interpretation of technical analysis. The
author may or may not trade in the markets discussed. The author may hold positions opposite of
what may by inferred by this report. The information contained in this commentary is taken from
sources the author believes to be reliable, but it is not guaranteed by the author as to the accuracy
or completeness thereof and is sent to you for information purposes only. Commodity trading
involves risk and is not for everyone.

Here is what the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has said about futures trading:
Trading commodity futures and options is not for everyone. IT IS A VOLATILE, COMPLEX AND
RISKY BUSINESS. Before you invest any money in futures or options contracts, you should
consider your financial experience, goals and financial resources, and know how much you can
afford to lose above and beyond your initial payment to a broker. You should understand commodity
futures and options contracts and your obligations in entering into those contracts. You should
understand your exposure to risk and other aspects of trading by thoroughly reviewing the risk
disclosure documents your broker is required to give you.