0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
210 Ansichten13 Seiten
AQUASURE was not entitiled to sell water to third party. The state of victoria would provide support by procuring alternative funding procuring state supported guarantee for the debt funding termination of the project and payment of the relevant termination Risk Mitigates Pay out of the balance of any unrefined debt Price reset mechanism in case AGL technologies became insolvent or a defaulter after 10 years.
AQUASURE was not entitiled to sell water to third party. The state of victoria would provide support by procuring alternative funding procuring state supported guarantee for the debt funding termination of the project and payment of the relevant termination Risk Mitigates Pay out of the balance of any unrefined debt Price reset mechanism in case AGL technologies became insolvent or a defaulter after 10 years.
AQUASURE was not entitiled to sell water to third party. The state of victoria would provide support by procuring alternative funding procuring state supported guarantee for the debt funding termination of the project and payment of the relevant termination Risk Mitigates Pay out of the balance of any unrefined debt Price reset mechanism in case AGL technologies became insolvent or a defaulter after 10 years.
7/21/2014 Beginning Our water our future campaign. Deal worth of 5.2 billion for a period of 30 years and 1 month. Reasons Drought and population growth. Financing through PPP
Some aspects about PPP: Constrained government budgets. Encouraged efficiency in delivery of infrastructure service. Tighter monitoring to ensure quality. There should be real competition in PPP auction. Immovable infrastructure Bilateral monopoly. Difficult to punish non compliance by firm. Filter for White Elephants Partnerships Victoria- Centralized authority for PPP with intention of growing the market- Adopted PSC(Public sector Comparator). PSC: 1. Raw PSC = capital cost of construction + operating cost 2. Competitive Neutrality adjustment= Tax saving from public ownership. 3. Transferable Risk = Expected cost of risk transferred to pvt provider. 4. Retained Risk = Expected cost of risk transferred to government CAPM APPROACH Systematic Risk Holder Discount Rate = CAPM RATE No systematic risk Discount Rate = Risk free rate *complication involved in different pattern of cash outlay. Revenue for AQUASURE 1. Monthly water security payment- Cover fixed cost 2. Monthly water usage payments- As per amount ordered.
AQUASURE was not entitiled to sell water to third party.! Party involved Risk Aquasure Throughput risk The Sponsors Resource risk, Technical risk The state of Victoria Socio political risk, Completion risk D & C Contractor Completion risk O & M Contractor O & M Failures Transmission line operator Completion Risk Electricity and REC provider (AGL Energy Ltd.) Throughput risk Equity Providers Resource Risk Debt Providers Completion risk, Interest rate risk Risks Associated With The Project Risk Mitigates The key player's risks in the structuring of the project were mitigated in the following manner:
The State of Victoria:
The state would provide support by procuring alternative funding Procuring state supported guarantee for the debt funding Termination of the project and payment of the relevant termination
Risk Mitigates Pay out of the balance of any unrefined debt Price reset mechanism in case AGL technologies became insolvent or a defaulter after 10 years.
Design and Construction Contractor:
To avoid the risk of undersupply and risk abatement to service payments, the plant would be built with redundancy and additional capacity with parallel processing and modular design.
Risk Mitigates Operations and Maintenance Contractor:
The risks of failures were borne by O&M contractor but were protected by joint and several guarantees by the parent company.
Role of The State The state was responsible for procuring the land for desalination plant and related infrastructure. The state provided support for financing the project through guaranteeing the debt project. a) Global financial crisis b) Equity investors demanding higher returns & liquidity premium. c) The consortium could only secure A$1.925 billion d) Remaining A$1.746 billion was to be syndicated to a wider group of banks. Role of The State e) The state effectively acted as a lender-of-last-resort. Thank You