0 Bewertungen0% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (0 Abstimmungen)
16 Ansichten5 Seiten
An FEA analysis was performed on a chain linkage using 3D tetrahedral elements with a mesh size of 0.1mm. Materials used were JIS SCM 420 steel for pins and bushes with yield strength of 685MPa, and SAE 1050 steel for plates with yield strength of 590MPa. A load of 294.3N was applied at both ends inside the bush. Results found maximum stress of 766.7MPa on the bush/plate linkage and 206.4MPa on the pin/plate linkage, below the ultimate tensile strength of both materials. Maximum strain of 0.003164 was found at the pin/bush contact, below the elastic limit. It is advised to
An FEA analysis was performed on a chain linkage using 3D tetrahedral elements with a mesh size of 0.1mm. Materials used were JIS SCM 420 steel for pins and bushes with yield strength of 685MPa, and SAE 1050 steel for plates with yield strength of 590MPa. A load of 294.3N was applied at both ends inside the bush. Results found maximum stress of 766.7MPa on the bush/plate linkage and 206.4MPa on the pin/plate linkage, below the ultimate tensile strength of both materials. Maximum strain of 0.003164 was found at the pin/bush contact, below the elastic limit. It is advised to
An FEA analysis was performed on a chain linkage using 3D tetrahedral elements with a mesh size of 0.1mm. Materials used were JIS SCM 420 steel for pins and bushes with yield strength of 685MPa, and SAE 1050 steel for plates with yield strength of 590MPa. A load of 294.3N was applied at both ends inside the bush. Results found maximum stress of 766.7MPa on the bush/plate linkage and 206.4MPa on the pin/plate linkage, below the ultimate tensile strength of both materials. Maximum strain of 0.003164 was found at the pin/bush contact, below the elastic limit. It is advised to
Amit Kumar FEA Modelling A Non-Linear Implicit Analysis of the chain was performed using the CAD data provided by the customer. The modeling was done using 3D simple Tetra Elements with an average mesh size of 0.1 mm. Materials used of the pin and bush was JIS SCM 420 and the plates are made in SAE 1050. SCM 420 has a Yield strength of 685 MPa and a Ultimate Tensile Strength of 885 Mpa. SAE 1050 has a Yield Strength of 590 Mpa and Ultimate tensile Strength of 880 Mpa. Youngs Modulus for both Material is 200 GPA, with an Elongation of 8-25%. As can be seen in th Figure below, a load of 30 KgF or 294.3 N was applied to both ends of the chain, inside the bush (seen in Yellow) and the Constraints location is assumed and shown in Green Triangle on the edge of the Pin Plate. RESULTS
For our model breaking point is of higher significance, hence the UTS of the material will be considered instead of YS. The maximum Stress (figure below) on the bush and bush plate linkage is 766.7 MPa and in the Pin and Pin Plate linkage is 206.4 MPa, both being below the UTS of both SAE 1050 and SMC 420. This shows that the linkage will not break when loaded to 30KgF from both ends. The maximum strain in the linkage is 3.164X10^(-3) and is concentrated at the point of contact between the pin and the bush, as seen in the Picture above.
Contact Pressure
The Below Plot shows the contact pressure of all the elements within the contact region. The maximum contact pressure is 793.9MPa, however , it is a point load on the pin bush interface and not to be considered as a Pressure load. The Pin-Bush interface is Loaded upto 360.9MPa, and the avarage contact pressure zones range from 36.24 Mpa to 144.5MPa. Conclusion 1. Neither the bush, plate or Pin have stresses Exceeding the UTS, and hence do not break under the given load. 2. Since according to Hookes law = E, Where = Yield Stress, E = Youngs Modulus, and = elastic strain limit, hence the maximum strain of 0.003164 in the inside section of the bush, is lower than the of JIS SMC 420 steel, of 0.00345, there is no plastic deformation. 3. The maximum stress is found on the bush pin interface of 766.7 MPa , and though higher than the Yield point of JIS SMC 420, is point stresses, causing no permanent plastic deformation. 4. Since there is presence of point stresses at critical junctions, repeated loading may lead to fatigue induced failures such as crack propagation. Thus it is advisable to conduct a High Cycle Strain-Life Fatigue analysis, to further study the model.