TRANSACTION OR UNDERTAKING, THEY SHALL BE SOLIDARILY LIABLE TO THE AGENT FOR ALL THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE AGENCY. (1731) Art. 1915 Requisites for solidary liability There are three requisites for the application of the above article:
1) There are two or more principals;
2) The principals have all concurred in the appointment of the same agent; and
3) The agent is appointed for a common transaction or undertaking. Where principals are members of a non- profit association A distinction has been made in respect of the liability of the principals of a profit association as compared to that of a non-profit or voluntary association. While the principals in the first are personally liable on all business contracts, the principals or members in the second are liable personally only under two circumstances:
1) Where the member assented to the particular act or transaction in respect of which personal liability is sought to be fastened. Such assent is usually indicated by an affirmative vote at the meeting where the proposal is discussed. 2) Where the member assented by his conduct WHEN TWO PERSONS CONTRACT WITH REGARD TO THE SAME THING, ONE OF THEM WITH THE AGENT AND THE OTHER WITH THE PRINCIPAL, AND THE TWO CONTRACTS ARE IN- COMPATIBLE WITH EACH OTHER, THAT OF PRIOR DATE SHALL BE PREFERRED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 1544. (N) Art. 1916 Example P authorized A to contract for the construction of his house for a price of not more than P100,000.00. Without the knowledge of A, P contracted with B for the construction of the house for P95,000.00. Later, A entered into a contract with C for the construction of the same house for P90,000.00.
Under Article 1916, the contract with B shall be preferred as it is of prior date.
IN THE CASE REFERRED TO IN THE PRECEDING ARTICLE, IF THE AGENT HAS ACTED IN GOOD FAITH, THE PRINCIPAL SHALL BE LIABLE IN DAMAGES TO THE THIRD PERSON WHOSE CONTRACT MUST BE REJECTED. IF THE AGENT ACTED IN BAD FAITH, HE ALONE SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE. (N)
Art. 1917 THE PRI NCI PAL I S NOT LI ABLE FOR THE EXPENS- ES I NCURRED BY THE AGENT I N THE FOLLOWI NG CASES:
( 1) I F THE AGENT ACTED I N CONTRAVENTI ON OF THE PRINCI - PAL S I NSTRUCTI ONS, UNLESS THE LATTER SHOULD WI SH TO AVAI L HIMSELF OF THE BENEFI TS DERI VED FROM THE CONTRACT;
( 2) WHEN THE EXPENSES WERE DUE TO THE FAULT OF THE AGENT;
Art. 1918 ( 3) WHEN THE AGENT INCURRED THEM WI TH KNOWLEDGE THAT AN UNFAVORABLE RESULT WOULD ENSUE, I F THE PRI NCI PAL WAS NOT AWARE THEREOF;
( 4) WHEN I T WAS STI PULATED THAT THE EXPENSES WOULD BE BORNE BY THE AGENT, OR THAT THE LATTER WOULD BE ALLOWED ONLY A CERTAIN SUM. ( N)