100%(1)100% fanden dieses Dokument nützlich (1 Abstimmung)
416 Ansichten16 Seiten
The document describes three case exercises involving decision making under uncertainty. The first case involves a retailer deciding how much stock to hold for the summer season. The second case involves a soft drink company planning production strategy given uncertain weather conditions. The third case involves a farm manager deciding whether to plant potatoes or an alternative crop after a virus affected the previous season's potato yield. Each case presents probability information and payoff tables to help evaluate the best course of action.
The document describes three case exercises involving decision making under uncertainty. The first case involves a retailer deciding how much stock to hold for the summer season. The second case involves a soft drink company planning production strategy given uncertain weather conditions. The third case involves a farm manager deciding whether to plant potatoes or an alternative crop after a virus affected the previous season's potato yield. Each case presents probability information and payoff tables to help evaluate the best course of action.
The document describes three case exercises involving decision making under uncertainty. The first case involves a retailer deciding how much stock to hold for the summer season. The second case involves a soft drink company planning production strategy given uncertain weather conditions. The third case involves a farm manager deciding whether to plant potatoes or an alternative crop after a virus affected the previous season's potato yield. Each case presents probability information and payoff tables to help evaluate the best course of action.
CASE EXERCISE 1 Stock Retailer A retailer has to decide whether to hold a large or a small stock of a product for the coming summer season. A payoff table for the courses of action and outcomes is shown below:
(Profits) Decision Low sales High sales Hold small stocks $80 000 $140 000 Hold large stocks $20 000 $220 000 Stock Retailer The retailer estimates that there is a 0.4 probability that sales will be low and a 0.6 probability that they will be high. What level of stocks should he hold?
Stock Retailer New Information Before implementing his decision the retailer receives a sales forecast which suggests that sales will be high. In the past when sales turned out to be high the forecast had correctly predicted high sales on 75% of occasions. However, in seasons when sales turned out to be low the forecast had wrongly predicted high sales on 20% of occasions. The underlying market conditions are thought to be stable enough for these results to provide an accurate guide to the reliability of the latest forecast. Should the retailer change his mind in the light of the forecast? DECISION TREE? CASE EXERCISE 2 Production Strategy The managers of a soft drinks company are planning their production strategy for next summer. The demand for their products is closely linked to the weather, and an analysis of weather records suggests the following probability distribution for the June to August period: Weather conditions Probability Hot and dry 0.3 Mixed 0.5 Cold and wet 0.2 1 Production Strategy The table below shows the estimated profits ($000s) which will accrue for the different production strategies and weather conditions: Weather conditions Production strategy Hot & dry Mixed Cold & wet Plan for high sales 400 100 -100 Plan for medium sales 200 180 70 Plan for low sales 110 100 90 Production Strategy On the basis of the information given, determine the course of action which will maximize expected profits! Production Strategy A long-range weather forecast suggests that next summers weather conditions will, in general, be cold and wet. The reliability of the forecast is indicated by the following probabilities which are based on past performance: p(cold, wet conditions forecast when weather will be hot and dry) = 0.3 p(cold, wet conditions forecast when weather will be mixed) = 0.4 p(cold, wet conditions forecast when weather will be cold and wet) = 0.6 In the light of the long-range weather forecast, should the company change from the course of action you recommended before?
CASE EXERCISE 3 North Holt Farm A year ago a major potato producer suffered serious losses when a virus affected the crop at the companys North Holt farm. Since then, steps have been taken to eradicate the virus from the soil and the specialist who directed these operations estimates, on the basis of preliminary evidence, that there is a 70% chance that the eradication program has been successful. North Holt Farm The manager of the farm now has to decide on his policy for the coming season and he has identified two options: He could go ahead and plant a full crop of potatoes. If the virus is still present an estimated net loss of $20000 will be incurred. However, if the virus is absent, an estimated net return of $90 000 will be earned. He could avoid planting potatoes at all and turn the entire acreage over to the alternative crop. This would almost certainly lead to net returns of $30000. North Holt Farm The manager is now informed that Ceres Laboratories could carry out a test on the farm which will indicate whether or not the virus is still present in the soil. The test itself would cost $10000. Suppose that, after making further enquiries, the farm manager discovers that the Ceres test is not perfectly reliable. If the virus is still present in the soil the test has only a 90% chance of detecting it, while if the virus has been eliminated there is a 20% chance that the test will incorrectly indicate its presence. THANK YOU