March 03, 2014 2 Introduction Literature review Methodology Results and Discussions Conclusion and Recommendations Content Bio-based polymer Plant Oils Polymeric composite Eco-friendly Triglycerides Functionalization Introduction 4 Nowadays, biodegradable vegetable oils have attracted more attention due to oil crises (raw material with relative high cost and low production), biodegradability and environmental friendly. There are several techniques and various types of catalyst that have been used by researchers to cure epoxidized vegetable oils and hence produced thermosetting polymer resin such as epoxy (Zlatani et al., 2004). Green thermosetting resins were prepared using epoxidized palm oil (EPO) and epoxy based petroleum (Mamauod et al., 2012). Background of study 5
Due to the advantage of Malaysia as the producer of palm oil, this research plans to explore the potential of epoxidized palm oil (EPO).
Several studies have investigated about different ratio of VE/AESO, UPE/ ESO and VE/nanoclay. However, the EPO/VE/nanoclay ratios have not been developed. Following are some of the questions that need to be answered to expand this research area.
Problem Statement 6 What are the effects of loadings of EPO/VE/nanoclay composite on thermal characteristic and curing behavior of composite resin as well as its resistance to moisture absorption?
What are the effects of loadings of EPO/VE/nanoclay composite on the mechanical properties of the composite resin such as tensile, flexural and impact strength?
What are the dispersion and morphology of nanoclay inclusion in EPO/VE resin composite resin?
Problem Statement 7 To investigate the effect of composition of EPO/VE/nanoclay on the mechanical properties of nanocomposite polymer resin such as flexural, tensile, impact strength.
To characterize EPO/VE/nanoclay composite on thermal and curing behavior of nanocomposite polymer resin as well as its resistance to thermal decomposition compared to the parent VE and EPO.
To determine the dispersion and morphology of nanoclay inclusion in EPO/VE. Objective 8 Preparation of EPO/VE/clay at various ratio of VE/EPO 100/0, 95/5, 92.5/7.5and 90/10-wt % respective and clay at various amounts of 1, 2and 3 phr.
Mechanical testing of EPO/VE/clay using tensile, flexural and impact test.
Characterization analysis on the thermal and curing behavior of EPO/VE/nanoclay resin for using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
Morphological study of EPO/VE/nanoclay resin using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Scope 9 Literature Review 10
Type of Resin
Advantages Disadvantages Epoxy
High mechanical and thermal properties. High water resistance. Long working times available. Temperature resistance can be up to 140C wet/220C dry. Low cure shrinkage More expensive than vinylesters. (315/kg) Critical mixing. Corrosive handling 11 Resin Advantages Disadvantages Polyester Easy to use Lowest cost of resins available (12/kg) Only moderate mechanical properties. High styrene emissions in open molds. High cure shrinkage Limited range of working times 12 Resin Advantages Disadvantages Vinylester Very high chemical/environment al resistance. Higher mechanical properties than polyesters Postcure generally required for high properties. High styrene content. Higher cost than polyesters (24/kg) High cure shrinkage 13 Type of Vinyl Ester Resins Epoxy vinyl ester resins Non epoxy vinyl ester resins.
Curing Reaction Initiator Crosslinking
Vinyl ester resin
14 Schematic representation of free-radical crosslinking mechanism.
15 Vegetable Oils R1 R2 R3fatty acid chain
Schematic of a triglyceride molecule Synthesis of triglyceride 16 Vegetable Oils a) Palm oil b) Epoxidized palm oil 17 Types of Nanocomposites Conventional Composite Intercalated Composite Delaminated Composite or exfoliated
Nanoclay
Nanocomposites
18 Nanocomposites Schematic representations of different types of composite prepared from the layered silicates and polymers Autor Blend Year Result Miyagawa UPE/EMS 2006 High elastic modulus, Constant Tg, HDT and E decreased Haq UPE/ESO/silicate 2009 Thermo-Physical properties improved, Karger VE/AESO 2010 Modulus, Strength and Tg decreased but ductility and Fracture toughness increased Gefu VE/MMT 2008 Mechanical properties improved Your logo here 20
23 Sonication Clay (1Kg) +Acetone (50L) for 2 hours Mixing Sonicated clay/Acetone+ VE Acetone Removal Heating on heater @ 55 o C for 3 hours Styrene Addition Add a lost amount of styrene Initiator Addition (MEKP)1.5 wt % Mixing EPO+VE+clay Stirring Curing @ room temperature for 24 hours Post curing @ 120 o C for 2 hours 24 Fourier Transform Infra-red Spectroscopy (FTIR) X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) Flexural Test Tensile Test Impact Testing
Characterization 25 Results and Discussion 26 Tensile Properties of VE/ EPO/ Clay Nanocomposite
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 T e n s i l e
s t r e n g t h
( M p a )
EPO wt% 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 t e n s i l e
M o d u l u s
( G P a )
EPO wt%
Effect of EPO content on tensile strength of VE/EPO blend Effect of EPO content on tensile modulus of VE/EPO blends 27 Tensile Properties of VE/ EPO/ Clay Nanocomposite
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 0 1 2 3 T e n s i l e
S t r e n g t h
( M P a )
Clay Loading (phr) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 0 1 2 3 4 T e n s i l e
M o d u l u s
( M P a )
Clay loading (phr) Tensile strength of VE/5 wt% EPO with various clay loadings
Tensile modulus of VE/5 wt% EPO with various clay loadings
28 Tensile Properties of VE/ EPO/ Clay Nanocomposite
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 0 1 2 3 E l o n g a t i o n
a t
B r e a k
( % )
Clay Loading (phr) Elongation at break of VE/5 wt% EPO with various clay loadings
29
Flexural Properties VE/EPO/ Nanoclay Composite
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 f l e x u r a l
s t r e n g t h ( M p a )
Clay Loading (phr) 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 0 1 2 3 f l e x u r a l
m o d u l u s ( M p a )
Clay Loading (phr) Flexural strength of VE/5 wt% EPO with various clay loadings
Flexural modulus of VE/5 wt% EPO with various clay loadings
30
Flexural Properties VE/EPO/ Nanoclay Composite
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 f l e x u r a l
s t r a i n
EPO Loading (wt%) Flexural strain of VE/EPO with various EPO loadings
31 Impact Properties VE/EPO/ Nanoclay Composite
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 I m p a c t
s t r e n g t h
( J / m )
EPO wt% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 0 1 2 3 4 i m p a c t
s t r e n g t h
( J / m )
Clay Loading (phr) Impact strength of VE/5 wt% EPO with various clay loadings
Impact strength of VE/EPO with various EPO content
32 X-Ray Diffraction VE/EPO/Nanoclay Composite
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 10 20 30 40 50 I n t e n s i t y
2 ( ) a g h 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 0 10 20 30 40 50 I n t e n s i t y
2 () ab ac ad X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) pattern of (a) clay; (g)VE; (h) VE/5 wt% EPO
A Comparative Study of Mechanical Properties of Zinc Acrylate Epoxy nanocomposites Reinforced by AL2O3 and Cloisite®30B and Their Mixture: Tensile Strength and Fracture Toughness: A Comparative Study of Mechanical Properties of Zinc Acrylate Epoxy nanocomposites Reinforced by AL2O3 and Cloisite®30B and Their Mixture: Tensile Strength and Fracture Toughness