Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Logistics Relationships
Types of Relationships
Vertical relationships
Horizontal relationships
includes those business agreements between firms that have
parallel or cooperating positions in the logistics process.
Intensity of Involvement
Ranges from vendor to strategic alliance
73.7%
68.4
61.4
56.1
40.4
38.6
33.3
29.8
22.8
21.0
19.3
17.5
17.5
15.8
5.3
3.5
Note: Figures refer to percentages of users indicating use of specific 3PL services
Source: C.John Langley Jr., Gary R. Allen, and Gene R.Tyndall, Third-Party-Logistics Services:
Views from the Customers (Atlanta, Ga: Georgia Institute of Technology , Cap Gemini Ernst
& Young and Ryder System, Inc. 2001)
3
RELATIONSHIPS-TYPES
TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS
Partnerships
Adversarial
Arms
Length
Emphasis
on price
Co-operative
Coordinated
Emphasis
on
relationshi
ps
Integration
Joint
Ventures
Emphasis on
sharing risk and
rewards through a
legal entity
Vertical
Integrati
on
Supply chain
Owned and
controlled by a
single
organization
5
Intensity of Involvement
Transactional
Both parties in a vendor relationship are said to be at arms
length
Collaborative
the relationship suggested by a strategic alliance is one in
which two or more business organizations cooperate and
willingly modify their business objectives and practices to
help achieve long-term goals and objectives
Strategic
represents an alternative that may imply even greater
involvement than the partnership or strategic alliance.
Figure 4.1
Relationship Perspectives
Duration
Obligations
Expectations
Interaction/Communication
Cooperation
Planning
Goals
Performance analysis
Benefits and burdens
8
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.3
10
11
Figure 4.4
Source: Ray A. Mundy C. John Langley Jr., and Brian J. Gibson Used with permission
12
13
Figure 4.5
Types of Collaboration
14
Table 4.1
collaborative partnerships
Co-buyer and co-supplier relationships
Flexibility and security
Collaboration across all stages of business process
integration
Open integration with other sources
Collaboration around essential logistics flows
15
16
Transportation-based
Warehouse/distribution-based
Forwarder-based
Financial-based
Information-based firms
17
Table 4.2
18
Table 4.3
19
Figure 4.6
Source: Predictions and major trends for third part logistics 2011,
Armstrong & Assoc., Inc. Used with permission
20
21
22
Figure 4.7
Source: Fifteenth Annual 3PL Study, C. John Langley Jr. Ph.D. . Used with permission
23
Figure 4.9
Source: 2005 Tenth Annual 3PL Study, C. John Langley Jr. Ph.D. and Cap Gemini LLC.
Used with permission
24
Figure 4.10
25
26
27
28
Both partners must have something of value to contribute to the relationship. Both
partners are strong. Motives for the relationship are positive and focus on opportunities.
Reasons for entering the partnership should not be negative to mask a weakness or to
escape from a difficult situation.
Importance
The relationship must fit-in with each partners strategic objectives and they must make it
work. Each partner must have long-term goals in which relationships play a key role
Interdependence
Each partner needs the other. They have complementary assets and skills. Neither can
accomplish alone what both can together
Investment
Partners invest in each other (e.g. through equity swaps, cross-ownership or mutual board
service) to demonstrate their respective stakes in the relationship with each other. They
show tangible signs of long-term commitment by devoting financial and other resources
to the relationship
Information
Integration
Partners develop linkages and shared ways of operating so that they can work together
smoothly. They build connections between many people at many organizational levels.
Partners become teachers and learners
Institutionalizatio
n
Relationships are given formal status ,with clear responsibilities and decision processes.
It extends beyond the people who formed it, and cannot be broken on a whim
Integrity
Partners behave honorably to each other, which enhances mutual trust. They do not
abuse information gained from working together to undermine each other
29
Figure 4.11
Source: 2005 Tenth Annual 3PL Study, C. John Langley Jr. Ph.D. and Cap Gemini LLC.
Used with permission
30
Summary
The two most basic types of supply chain relationships are
31
Summary, continued
Summary, continued
Summary, continued
34