Sie sind auf Seite 1von 15

Three-dimensional

Robust Solver for


Parabolic Equation
Lanfa Wang
5.18.2011
Proposal in LCLS effort meeting

Motivation

Parabolic equation has been solved in FEL, CSR,


and Impedance calculations, etc. (Important for
LCLS and LCLSII, etc).

The present codes(solver) are limited for simple


cases (geometry), or/and slow, and kind of 2D
solver (3D problem, z is treated like time)

We propose to develop fast 3D parabolic solver


for general cross-section of the beam pipe.

FEL
FEL (for example, Genesis by sven reiche)

Modeling challenges : EE-HG (D. Xiang and G. Stupakov, PR


STAB 12, 030702 (2009)
Large number of particles, CSR in Chicane

New numerical methods have to be applied to solve field equation

Genesis (boundary approximation)


Set the field ZERO out the domain of interest

CSR
CSR ( for example, CSR in bend magnet (Tomonori Agoh, Phys.
Rev. ST Accel. Beams 7, 054403 (2004))

All this type of codes can only for rectangular cross-section!


Agoh, PRSTAB 054403
Gennady, PRSTAB 104401
Demin, in preparation

Impedance calculation

Gennady Stupakov, New Journal of Physics 8


(2006) 280(mathematica code )

Axis ymmetric geometry

GENERALITY

IF We neglect the 1st term

Various Solver we have developed


Solver for all modes in Disk-loaded Structures, NIMA, Vol. 481,
95(2002). (Traveling wave, all mode, meshless method)
Solver for microwave element and accelerating structure
High Energy Physics &Nuclear Physics, 25 (2001)(2D)

Solver for Poisson Equation (2D,3D), PRSTAB 5, 124402 (2002)


Adaptive impedance Analysis of grooved surface (THPAS067 ,PAC07)
Two-dimensional FEM Code for Impedance Calculation (IPAC'10)

Fields in Disk-loaded Structures

Advantages of FEM
Irregular grids
Arbitrary geometry
Easy to handle boundary

Impedance of
Grooved surface
(THPAS067 ,PAC07)

Shape A
Shape B

(b)

Shape C

Rounded Tip

Advantages of FEM
Irregular grids
Arbitrary geometry
Easy to handle boundary
Small beam in a large domain (FEL in undulator)
CPU (fast)
Accuracy(higher order element, adaptive mesh, etc)

Disadvantage & Challenge:


Complexity in coding (irregular grid, arbitrary geometry, 3D)

Time tables of milestones: (hard to predict)


(1) coding---6 months
(2)benchmark, application.

Deliverables :
SLAC-pub, and maybe Journal paper

Mesh of chamber & beam


Arbitrary geometry of beam pipe
Any shape of beam

2D parabolic solver for


Impedance calculation

L. Wang, L. Lee, G. Stupakov, fast 2D solver (IPAC10)


0.5
2.5

0.4

1.5

r (cm)

r (mm)

0.3

0.2

0.5

0.1
0
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0
0

z (mm)

10

z (cm)

0.14

0.07

0.05

dot-lines: FEM code

0.1

0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01

0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0

0
-0.01
0

Real, ECHO2
-Imaginary, ECHO2

0.12

ReZ, ImZ (k )

ReZ, ImZ (k )

0.06

Real, ECHO2
Imaginary, ECHO2
Real, FEM code
Imaginary, FEM code

200

400

600

f (GHz)

800

1000

-0.02
0

200

400

600

f (GHz)

800

1000

HIGHER ORDER ELEMENTS

Tetrahedron elements

4=

20 nodes, cubic:

10 nodes, quadratic:

4 nodes, linear:

=constant

3= k
1=

=1

16

11

7
10
1
2= j

=1

17

9
10

8
19
5 18 15

P
y

13

20

=0
z

14

12

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen