Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Results
An idea whose time may be
here?
Anwar Shah, World Bank
CEPAL Regional Seminar on Fiscal
Policy
Santiago, Chile
January 24-27, 2005
Outline
Theme:
Structure:
PB: What?
PB: Why?
PB: How? -- International Experience
Some Conclusions
Performance
Budgeting:
What?
Performance Budgeting:
What?
A system of budgeting that presents the
purpose and objectives for which funds
are required, the costs of the programs
proposed for achieving these objectives,
and outputs to be produced or services
to be rendered under each program.
Strict Definition: A system of budgeting
that explicitly links each increment in
allocated resources to an increment in
outputs and outcomes.
Anwar Shah, World Bank
A comparative
perspective on the two
budgeting approaches
Focus on Results
Focus on Control
Increased
Managerial
Discretion
and less
control
Managers are
accountable for
what they achieve.
No
Managerial
Discretion
Managers are
accountable for
what and how they
spend on inputs.
PB
Line-Item
Anwar Shah, World Bank
Strategic Goals
Outcomes
(Medium Term)
Budget
(Annually)
P1
P2
P3
P2
A1 A2
P3
Anwar Shah, World Bank
A1 A2 A3 A4
Outputs
Bottom-up
Outputs
Reach
Achievement
scores,
graduation
rates, dropout rates
Inputs
Educational spending
by age, sex,
urban/rural; spending
by level; teachers,
staff, facilities, tools,
books, regulations
Enrollments,
student-teacher
ratio, class size
Outcomes
Literacy
rates, supply
of skilled
professionals
Informed
citizenry, civic
engagement,
enhanced
international
Anwar Shah, competitivene
World Bank
ss
Impact
Winners and
losers from
government
programs
Performance Measures
Used in Performance
Budgeting
Cost: Inputs/resources used to produce outputs
Output: Quantity and quality of goods and services
produces.
Outcome: Progress in achieving program objectives
Impact: Program goals
Reach: People who benefit or are hurt by a program
Quality: Measure of service such as timeliness,
accessibility, courtesy, accuracy
Productivity: Output by work hour
Efficiency: Cost per unit of output
Satisfaction: Rating of services by users
Anwar Shah, World Bank
Citizen-centered
performance budgeting
Performance Management
Framework is a pre-requisite
for the success of PB
Performance
Budgeting: Why?
Accountable Governance:
A Framework for
Improving Government
Performance
Mandate
Authorizing
Environment
Operational
Capacity
Outputs, Results,
Outcomes
Inputs
Activities
Outputs
Reach
Outcomes
Impacts
(goals)
2. Output
contract
2. Executive
concerned with
outcomes
3. Internal
and external
Results and
process
Evaluations
3. E V
A T
2.
Outcome
contract
Legislature
1. Citizens
N S
3.Citizen
evaluations
Management
tool
The entire
process driven
by a citizen
focus:
Performancebased budget
Benchmarking
Activity-Based
Costing (and
others)
Full reporting
using accrual
accounting
Balanced
Scorecard
Performance
Budgeting: How?
International
Experiences
Theory to Reality
Diversification in
Implementation
Alternate approaches
Output Orientation
under the Malaysian and
NZ
Models
Singapore: PB
Framework
line-item budget
program budget
Half-way to PB
PB
Texas
27 states
10 states
10 states
Michigan &
Programs: Resurfacing
Program Mission: To resurface the Countrys roads on a seven year cycle to assure an aesthetically pleasing,
adequately maintained, functional roadway surface
Program Measures
FY99
Actual
FY00
Actual
FY01
Actual
FY02
Budget
FY02
Actual
FY03
Approved
77
79
76
64
39
42
300
309
296
248
152
162
9.1
8.8
9.2
11.0
18.0
16.9
4,483
5,706
5,115
5,109
5,099
5,230
1,345
1,763
1,514
1,267
775
Outcomes:
Lower maintenance cost and better safety
Outputs:
Percentage of roads needing resurfacing that
were resurfaced (assuming a 7-year cycle)
Lane miles resurfaced
Service Quality:
Effective resurfacing cycle (years)
Efficiency:
Average cost per lane-mile resurfaced ($)
Inputs:
Expenditure ($000)
847
Workyears
Source: Office of Management and Budget, Montgomery Country. Montgomery Measures Up! For the Year 2002
Anwar Shah, World Bank
Conclusions