Sie sind auf Seite 1von 26

1

Chemistry 343- Spring 2008


Chapter 1- Carbon Compounds and Chemical Bonds
Basic Concepts of Structure

•Valence= # of bonds an atom can typically form in a neutral


compound
Carbon = tetravalent; forms 4 bonds
Nitrogen = trivalent; forms 3 bonds
Oxygen = Divalent; forms 2 bonds, etc.

•Molecular Formula (e.g.) C4H10 , C6H12 O6


•Isomerism= different compounds may have the same formula
Isomers: e.g., n-butanol and diethyl ether
H H H H
H H H H H
C C H C H
C
H C C OH C O C
H H H H H H H

Structural (constitutional) isomer


•Shape= geometry around a C atom depends on bonding
arrangement
•4 single bonds tetrahedral
•2 single bonds, 1 double bond trigonal planar
•1 single 1 triple OR 2 double bonds linear

Directly related to hybridization of C-atom orbitals


2
Review of Some Relevant Principles From General Chemistry
1. Lewis dot structures: atoms, molecules, and ions
Examples: atoms in first row of periodic table

Li Be B C N O F Ne

molecules:
H H H
H C H H O H H Cl C C
H H
H

ions:

H H O
H N H H O H Cl C O
H H

Rules: -show only valence e-


- show any formal charge present
- obey octet rule where appropriate

Formal Charge: a method of “e- bookkeeping”


NH3 + H+ NH4+

Atom Formal Charge = group # - net# of e- “belonging to nucleus”


(lone pair counts as 2; shared pair contributes 1)

e.g., NH4+; N’s group # = 5; net # of e- = 4 formal charge = +1


For NH3; N’s group # = 5; net # of e- = 5 formal charge = 0
2. Octet Rule: An atom or ion is especially stable when its valence 3

“shell” has a noble gas configuration (i.e., 8 e- in most cases; 2e- for
H, He, or Li+) some examples
H
H C H H H F Li
H

Once the outer shell of any atom is filled, no more e- can be added
•Larger atoms (3rd period and higher elements) may accommodate
more outer level e- due to their d and f orbitals, e.g., H2SO4, PCl5)

•Species (atoms, ions, molecules) that do not fulfill the octet rule
tend to be much less stable, and therefore much more reactive, e.g.,
CH3+, BF3, Li.

3. Electronegativity: affinity of an atom for e-’s


•For Na ; electronegativity very low Note extreme opposite
positions in periodic
•For Cl ; electronegativity very high table

Combination of electronegativity and octet rule suggests that :


Na will lose 1 e- very readily to form Na+
Cl will gain 1 e- readily to give Cl-
Stability is
Thus: Na + Cl Na+ + Cl- increased !

4. Ionic Bonding: bonding based an electrostatic attraction


Cl-
e.g., in solid NaCl:
Na+
4
•Each Na+ is equally attracted to 6 neighboring Cl- ions
•Each Cl- is equally attracted to 6 neighboring Na+ ions
•Explains physical and chemical properties (BP 1413 oC; aqueous
solution, conducts electricity, etc.)

5. Covalent Bonding: give rise to very different structure types

Consider 2 Hydrogen atoms: H. H.


•Electronegativities are identical
•E-shared to form a covalent bond (shared equally “pure” covalent)

H H not H+ H-

•The octet rule is still obeyed for each atom


H
Consider CH4 (methane)
H C H
H
•C,H electronegativties almost identical
•C-H is considered a covalent bond

•What if electronegativity difference is intermediate?


•“polar covalent” or polar bond

e.g. H2O
2H. + O 2H+ + O2-

H O H
The O-H bond is considered a “polar bond” 5

Consider their respective positions on the periodic table

Electronegativity increasing
Electronegativity increasing
O
The electronegativity difference causes bonding e- to be “polarized”
H H
δ + and δ - are symbols used to depict partial + or - character
δ -

Molecule has a “net dipole moment”


O C polar
and is considered O
δ +
δ +

H Cl
Other examples:

δ - δ -
δ +
δ -

δ +
A polar molecule Has polar bonds, but dipoles
cancel; hence, not a polar
molecule
H H
6
All organic molecules haveCcovalent
C bonds of various types; some
have ionic bonds too H H

Sometimes, atoms are bound by 2 or 3 covalent bonds


H H H
C C C O
H H H
These have
“double” bonds
H
C O
H
O
C
6. Relevance of bonding
H 3type
C to
CHchemical
3 and physical properties

e.g. acetone δ -

δ+ O δ- δ+ O δ- δ+ O δ-
δ +
Dipoles can align to increase intermolecular attraction:
influences BP, MP, other physical properties

Also, if a reactive reagent


δ + comesδ - along “seeking” a positive charge,
it may attack a δ + site and react; Conversely, if a reactive reagent
H 3C Br
HO “seeking”
comes along a site of e- density, it may attack a δ - site
and react
We will observe this phenomenom many, many times !
7
7. Resonance: A term used to describe a compound that cannot be
represented by a single LewisOdot structure
O
e.g. CH3NO2 H C N
3 H3C N
O
O

Experimentally:
•Both N-O bond lengths are same! O 2-
1

•Each of the resonance forms above are equally possible


•CH3NO2 behaves likeH3C N
O 12 -

•Thus, CH3NO2 is a “resonance hybrid” of these two forms shown


•This is NOT an equilibrium!!
•Symbol used to show that structures are related by resonance

•Note how one can show the conversion of one resonance form to
the other by showing only the movement of e- (curved arrows below)
O
O
H3C C
H3C C
O
O

The use of this kind of arrow to show e- movement in a more


general sense (= “curved arrow formalism”) will be a critical tool
used throughout this course!!!
8
Molecular structures of covalently-bonded compounds
Q: How do we know them ?
A: X-ray crystallography, spectral analysis

8. Molecular Geometry

A. Bond Length: Dependent on:


• Bond order (single, double, etc.) C=C vs. C-C
• Size of atoms C-C vs. H-H
• Electronegativity difference C-C vs. C-F

B. Bond Angles: Generally, angles are arranged so that e- pairs (lone


or bonding) are as far apart as possible (VSEPR Theory)

•If any combination of 4 atoms or lone pairs is associated with the


central atom:

Shape is tetrahedral
109.5o H
C H
H
H Tetrahedral

N H
H
H
107o
Appears Pyramidal
O
H H
105o

Appears Bent
•If any combination of 3 atoms or lone pairs is associated with the 9

central atom:
Shape is trigonal planar
F 120o
B
F F

•If any combination of 2 atoms or lone pairs is associated with the


central atom: 180o
Shape is linear
O C O

All of this is based on…

9. Orbitals and Hybridization

A. Background: Electrons possess characteristics of particles and


waves - - must be dealt with accordingly

Mathematical way of doing this involves Quantum Mechanics

Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle: We can only calculate the


probability that an electron is in a certain region; hypothesizes
bounded areas for electron existence “orbitals”
Definitions: 10
Atomic orbitals: mathematical wave functions (ψ ) describing energy
states and corresponding regions in space in which a given e- can exist
In organic chemistry terms, an orbital is a region of space where the
probability of finding an electron is high

Orbitals are also known as energy levels… two different orbitals will
correspond to two distinct energy levels having certain discreet values

Some Key Principles:

•Aufbau Principle: lowest energy orbitals filled first


•Pauli Exclusion Principle: no more than two e- per orbital; spins must
be paired (+1/2 and -1/2)
•Hund’s Rule: for orbitals of equal energy, fill one e- at a time, only
add 2nd e- to an orbital once all have one unpaired e- each.

Review quantum numbers: must know 1s, 2s, and 2p orbitals and their
shapes (Figure 1.5, pg 21)

B. Simplest Case: the 1s orbital. Spherical shape, nucleus at center


11
e- in a H atom occupy the 1s orbital- 90% probability that the e- is
within 1Å of nucleus; not uniform; probability goes up as r
decreases (r is the distance from the center of nucleus)

This e- can be depicted as a “smear” or “cloud” of e- density, or e-


probability about the nucleus

Wave function= ψ ; magnitude decreases with


increasing r; mathematical sign can be + or -

Electron density= ψ 2; magnitude decreases more


rapidly with increasing r; must always be +
1s orbital
Mathematical sign is always + for 1s orbital
(not true for any other)

C. 2s orbital: larger; also spherical, but ψ is + beyond 1Å; -


inside 1Å there is a spherical ‘node’ at 1Å; ψ 2=0 at that
radius (e- cannot exist within that space)

2s orbital

e- can cross such nodes by virtue of their wavelike nature

Higher energy than 1s; avg. distance to nucleus is greater


12
The 2p orbitals: 3 of them (px, py, pz)

•Each has two lobes of equal size but opposite mathematical sign;
dumbbell shape

•Cannot occupy same space mutually perpendicular (2px, 2py, 2pz)

•Lobes of each are separated by a planar node going through nucleus

•Higher energy than 1s and 2s

•These (1s, 2s, and three 2p) are all the orbitals a carbon atom has !!
13
E. Electron Configuration: for atoms of individual elements (Figure
1.6, pg 22)

F. Molecular Orbitals (MO’s): mathematical combinations of atomic


orbitals (ψ ’s)
Rules:
•Can add or subtract AO’s mathematically to get MO’s
•If we combine n orbitals, we must end up with n orbitals
•Overall energy of new orbitals must be same after combination

Simplest Example: H2

•Two 1s Atomic Orbitals (AO’s) combine to form two new MO’s


(σ and σ *)
•One MO arises from addition of the AO’s; the other from
subtraction
14
Addition “bonding” MO (s);
Subtraction “antibonding” MO (s*)

“Orbital Diagram” (Figure 1.10, pg 25)

Note that net overall energy of orbitals is the same as before, but
the system is more stable because the 2 previously unpaired e-’s
can both go into a lower energy orbital !
•Stability is gained through bond formation
•A bond results from overlap of two s-orbitals = a “σ -bond”
Note that Hund’s rule and the Pauli Exclusion principle are still obeyed
15
Contrast this to what would happen if two He atoms came together:

Two of the four e- would have to occupy the higher energy σ *


antibonding orbital bond formation not favorable in this
instance He exists in monoatomic form

Other Implications:

•H2- can exist in theory, but would be unstable because the third e-
would have to go into a σ * orbital

•If enough energy were applied to an H2 molecule, an e- could be


“excited” to the σ * MO

•In most common bonding situations, bonding MO’s are filled,


antibonding MO’s are not
16
G. Hybrid Atomic Orbitals
Let’s take a closer look at CH4…
Experimentally, we knowH that:
H bonds
CC-H
1. It has four equvalent
2. It is tetrahedral H H

Neither observation is consistent with the results expected from


carbon AO’s

Quantum Theory explains this:


The most favorable way for carbon to form bonds to four H
atoms is to mathematically combine 2s and three 2p orbitals to
give four new equivalent hybrid atomic orbitals
•called sp3 orbitals (each is “one part s to three parts p”)
•sp3 hybrid orbital energy is intermediate between s and p
•valence e- of carbon are redistributed- one e- per sp3 orbital
•each
2p sp orbital can then combine with an H atom’s 1s orbital to
3

form MO’s (only the bonding MO’s are filled) spform 3 σ-


bonds
2s (x4)
1s
1s MIX

The Carbon atom of CH4


A “Free Carbon Atom”
The shape of sp3 orbitals is dictated by the math of the combination 17
17

(Figure 1.11)

This same situation occurs anytime a C atom is bonded to four


neighbors

e.g., look at ethane (Figure 1.17)

Note that free rotation can occur around the C-C bond (CH3s can
“twirl around”

Applies to more complex molecules as well


18
Q: What about a situation where a C atom is only bonded to three
neighboring atoms, and shares two e- pairs with one of the neighbors ?

A: a difference in hybridization occurs!

H (a.k.a.Hethylene, mol. Formula C2H4)


e.g. simplest case: ethene
C C
H H

Experimentally:

•Ethene has four equivalent C-H bonds; two to each C

•Each C has trigonal planar geometry

•All the atoms in the molecule are in a single plane

•Molecule is rigid (no out of plane rotations or bending)

Neither unhybridized AO’s nor sp3 hybridization can explain this!


19
Quantum Theory states:

•The most favorable way for carbon to form bonds with three
neighbors is to combine 2s and two of the three 2p orbitals to give
three equivalent hybrid atomic orbitals

•called sp2 orbitals (each is one part s to two parts p)

•sp2 energy is intermediate between s and p (lower Energy than sp3)

•Shape of sp2 orbitals is dictated by the math of combination (Figure


1.21)

•Valence e- redistributed; one per sp2; one in the remaining 2p

•Each sp2 orbital can then combine with an H atom’s 1s OR the


neighboring carbons sp2 orbital to form MO’s

•Only the bonding MO’s are filled σ -bonds


20
•The unhybridized p-orbitals can also overlap to form a (weaker)
bond; the 2nd bond of the “double bond” a “π -bond”

•p-orbitals must be parallel and inline with one another to overlap


for bond formation to occur; explains rigidity; barrier to rotation
around C=C without breaking π -bond !
Fig 1.23, 1.24
21
This restricted
H 3C rotation
CH3 leads to a special type of isomerism:
H 3C H
cis-trans isomerism
C C C C
H H H CH3

“cis-2-butene” “trans-2-butene”

“cis-2-butene is a different compound from “trans-2-butene” !!


These do not interconvert!

•Cis and trans isomers are also known as “geometrical isomers”.


This is one type of “stereoisomerism” (the connectivity is the
same, but the arrangement of atoms in space is somehow different)
H C C H
Ok, but there are also molecules wherein a C atom is bound to
only two others!

e.g. simplest case: ethyne (a.k.a. “acetylene”)


22
Experimentally:
•Ethyne has two equivalent C-H bonds; one to each C
•Each C has linear geometry
•all the atoms form a line

Neither unhybridized AO’s, sp2, nor sp3 hybridization can explain


this !

Quantum Theory states:

•The most favorable way for a C atom to form bonds with these
two neighbors is to combine the 2s and one of the three 2p orbitals
to give two equivalent hybrid atomic orbitals

•called sp orbitals (each is “one part s to one part p”)

•sp orbital energy intermediate between s and p (lower E than sp2)

•Shape of sp orbitals- again dictated by the math (Figure 1.27)


23
•Valence e redistributed- 1 per sp orb.; 1 in each remaining 2p orb.
-

•Each sp orbital can then combine with an H atom’s 1s OR the


neighboring carbon’s sp orbital to form MO’s

•Only the bonding MO’s are filled σ -bonds

•The two pairs of unhybridized p-orbitals can also overlap to form


two p-bonds; the other two bonds of the “triple bond”

•Each pair of p-orbitals must again be parallel and inline for π -bond
to form

Figures 1.28, 1.29


24
Q: Are there any consequences of hybridization besides shape?

A: yes! Bond strengths and lengths

•Double bonds are shorter and stronger than single bonds

•Orbitals having more “s-character” form single bonds that are


stronger and shorter
(e.g., order of strength: sp-sp > sp-sp2 > sp-sp3 ~ sp2-sp2 > sp2-sp3 >
sp3-sp3)

•in general: more “s-character” lower energy

How does all this related back to VSEPR theory ?

Recall the shapes of ammonia and water; these can be


rationalized by hybridization!

Consider NH3: N bound only to 3 atoms, but there is also a


lone pair!

Molecule hybridizes to get the e- as far apart as possible!


Pyramid shape, but if lone pair is “counted”, it is tetrahedral!!

H2O does the same thing! It has two lone pairs and two bonds
“bent” shape, but if you count lone pairs; it is ~ tetrahedral!!
25
This way of thinking applies to other molecules too.

Contrast NH3 with BF3:


(NH3 has lone pair, BF3 does not; therefore NH3 has pyramidal shape;
BF3 is flat (trigonal planar)

Another example: consider CO2


(only two atoms around the central carbon, but each forms a double
bond with the carbon, hence the shape is linear)

H. Structural Formulas of Organic Chemistry


Several different ways to draw organic molecules; Figure 1.36

Another common practice: lone pairs on O, N or other atoms are


sometimes omitted, they’re just assumed to be there.
26
Condensed and bond-line (“shorthand”) presentations are especially
important; structures are complex!! Also, need to distinuish many
isomers H H H
H
C H H C H
H C C H C C
Some structures
H
are
~
~ cyclic; easiest to draw as~~bond-line structures
H C C C C
H C H H C H
H H H

Cyclohexane Benzene
In condensed formulas, it’s easier to draw structures with C’s and H’s
absent, known as “implicit” carbons and hydrogens

Also, will need a way to represent the three-dimensionality (3-D) of


these structures; use “wedges and dashes” (Figure 1.37)

- (wedges) Depict atoms coming out of the plane of the paper


- (dashes) Depicts atoms going into the plane of the paper

It is ESSENTIAL to learn to visualize organic structures in 3D !!

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen