Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Halliday vs Chomsky
Halliday is always courteous and circumspect when referring
to Chomsky: he only hints at their differences. Nevertheless,
it becomes clear from the hints that their theories of
language differ radically. Chomsky believes that language is
innate, Halliday believes that it is learned. Chomsky believes
that all human beings possess a grammatical programme
hardwired into the brain, Halliday does not he believes that
grammar mirrors function and is mastered through
experience. Chomsky believes in Universal Grammar:
Halliday does not. Chomsky believes that language exists
separately from experience, Halliday believes that language
only develops through experience of other people and the
world around us. Chomskys theory is Cartesian in other
words: mind exists separately from matter; Hallidays ideas
are Darwinian in other words: language and the mind obey
the same laws as all other aspects of reality. Chomskys
theories are metaphysical: Hallidays are scientific.
http://www.slideshare.net/petitlutin/general-linguistics-1
http://www.studyplace.org/wiki/Halliday_Function_of_Langua
ge
http://ihjournal.com/michael-halliday-at-80-a-tribute
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Halliday#Grammar_as_s
ystemic