WINDS OF CHANGE FROM VENDOR LOCK-IN TO THE META CLOUD

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of

Bachelor Of Technology
IN
COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERIN
SRI SATYANARAYANA ENGINEERING COLLEGE

PRESENTED BY
V.Mounika
Under the estimated guidance of
11X91A0553
K.Pavani
11X91AO521
M.Veera Kumari
11X91A0529
Y.SUSHMA M.Tech
B.Sreeja
11X91A0507
Asst. professor
V.Naveena
11X91A0552

CONTENTS  Abstract  Introduction  Architecture  Existing system  Disadvantages  Proposed system  Advantages  Software requirements  Hardware requirements  Conclusion .

data lock-in.ABSTRACT The cloud computing paradigm has achieved widespread adoption in recent years. even though public cloud availability is generally high.  .” mainly because of concerns related to service availability.  Low costs and high flexibility make migrating to the cloud compelling. however.  Lock in is particularly problematic.  Despite its obvious advantages. many companies hesitate to “move to the cloud. outages still occur. and legal uncertainties.

 This meta cloud would abstract away from existing offerings. migrating to a different cloud if they discover problems or if their estimates predict future issues.INTRODUCTION A need for businesses to permanently monitor the cloud they’re using and be able to rapidly “change horses” that is. it helps user find right set of cloud services for a particular use case and supports an application’s initial deployment and run time migration. technical incompatibilities.  .

.

including computer services such as the Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) and VMware v Cloud. ultimately incompatible and follow no standards but their own.  Some of these services are conceptually comparable to each other. whereas others are vastly different. such as the Amazon Simple Storage Service(S3).EXISTING SYSTEM Cloud providers are flooding the market with a confusing body of services. but they’re all.  . or key-value stores.

 Low costs and high flexibility make migrating to the cloud compelling.DISADVANTAGES  Its success is due to largely to customers ability to use services on demand with a pay-as-you go pricing model. . which has proved convenient in many aspects.

. it helps user find the right set of cloud services for a particular use case and supports an application’s initial deployment and runtime migration. This meta cloud would abstract away from existing offerings technical incompatibilities thus mitigating vendor lock-in. we introduce the concept of a meta cloud that incorporates design time and runtime components.PROPOSED SYSTEM  Here.

 This meta cloud would abstract away from existing offerings technical incompatibilities. thus mitigating vendor lock-in .ADVANTAGES  We introduce the concept of a meta cloud that incorporates design time and runtime components.

Java Scripts .JDBC .0 .SOFTWARE REQURIMENTS Operating System  Application Server  Front End  Scripts  Database  Database connectivity  .Java .Tomcat5.My sql .Windows95 .

HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS Processor  Speed  RAM   Hard Disk .Pentium-III -1.1GHz -256 MB (min) -20 GB .

yet lack integration.CONCLUSION The meta cloud can help migrate vendor lock-in and promises transparent use of cloud computing services.  Most of the basic technologies necessary to realize the meta cloud already exist.  .

THANK YOU .