Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Compared to WACC
Find pure play firms (also need to do this for APV analysis).
Unlever each pure play firm to get unlevered beta (need to
do this for APV analysis too).
Get average unlevered beta and unlevered cost of capital
(last step for APV).
D
re ra ra rd
E
Combine with cost of debt to get WACC:
D
D
WACC
rd 1 Tc
re
DE
DE
WOW Incorporated
WOW Inc. is considering a simple, one-year project.
At the beginning of the year, a cash outlay of $500 is
required, none of which is depreciable or deductible.
One year later the project produces earnings before
interest and taxes (EBIT) of either $1,200 or $550, with
equal probability. Hence, the expected EBIT is $875.
Assume the projects net salvage value at the end of the
year is zero and the corporate tax rate is 34% (ignore
personal taxes for the moment). Let the market return on
a one-year risk-free bond be 6%.
APV
The after-tax cash flows for this project are
simply -$500 at t=0 and $875 x (1- 0.34)
= $578 at t=1.
Suppose risk-adjusted rate = 12%.
Then, NPV = -500 + 875 (1-0.34)/1.12 = $16.
Financing: $349 in debt and $151 in equity.
Tax Shield = 349 0.06 0.34 = $7.
Therefore, APV = $16 + $7.
WACC
WACC
Therefore, WACC = 0.70(6%) x (1- 0.34) + 0.30(26%) =
10.6%.
Discounting the projects unlevered cash flow of $578 by
the WACC of 10.6% gives a project value of $523 and an
NPV of $23.
This is the same answer obtained using the APV
approach.
Acme Filters
Acme Filters
Acme Filters
Acme Filters
Acme Filters
B
A
S
E
L
I
N
E
P
E
R
F
O
R
M
A
N
C
E
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
E
B
I
T
2
0
.
4
0
2
6
.
8
0
3
.
4
0
3
6
.
1
0
3
7
.
9
0
T
a
x
@
3
4
%
6
9
9
1
1
3
6
1
2
2
7
1
2
8
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
3
4
%
3
4
.
0
%
E
B
I
T
(
1
t
)
1
3
.
4
6
1
7
.
6
9
2
.
0
4
2
3
.
8
3
2
5
.
0
1
D
e
p
r
e
c
i
a
i
o
n
2
5
0
3
5
0
1
5
1
5
0
1
7
G
i
v
e
n
O
C
F
3
4
.
9
6
3
1
.
1
9
3
.
5
4
3
6
.
3
3
7
.
7
1
W
C
0
4
0
4
2
0
5
2
0
6
0
G
i
v
e
n
C
A
P
X
1
0
.
7
1
0
.
1
1
0
.
4
1
.
5
1
3
.
1
F
C
F
2
0
.
2
6
1
7
.
0
9
1
8
.
9
4
1
9
.
6
3
1
8
.
5
1
rC
T
e
m
i
n
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
1
6
4
.
2
1
F
C
F
G
r
o
w
t
h
2
%
2
.
0
%
F 20.2617.0918.9419.638273
Margin Improvement
V
A
L
U
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
:
M
A
R
G
I
N
I
M
P
R
O
V
E
M
E
N
T
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
E
B
I
T
2
.
0
4
2
.
6
8
3
.
3
4
3
.
6
1
3
.
7
9
E
B
I
T
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
1
0
.
0
%
T
a
x
@
3
4
%
0
6
9
0
9
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
2
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
3
4
%
3
4
F
C
F
1
.
3
5
1
.
7
2
.
2
0
2
.
3
8
2
.
5
0
rC
T
e
m
i
n
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
1
9
F
C
F
G
r
o
w
t
h
2
%
2
.
0
%
F
1
.
3
5
1
.
7
2
.
2
0
2
.
3
8
2
4
.
6
N
PV
@
13.5%18.61
U
nleveragedR
ate13.50%
V
A
L
U
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
:
W
O
R
K
I
N
G
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
W
C
1
6
.
3
0
2
.
1
0
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
i
e
s
F
C
F
1
6
.
3
0
2
.
1
0
0
.
0
0
.
0
0
.
0
N
PV
@
13.5%15.9
U
nleveragedR
ate13.50%
Asset Sales
V
A
L
U
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
:
A
S
E
T
S
A
L
E
S
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
C
A
P
X
9
.
0
6
.
9
0
3
.
4
0
0
.
0
0
.
0
A
s
e
t
S
a
l
e
s
F
C
F
9
.
0
6
.
9
0
3
.
4
0
0
.
0
0
.
0
N
PV
@
13.5%15.61
U
nleveragedR
ate13.50%
V
A
L
U
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
:
L
O
N
G
R
U
N
G
R
O
W
T
H
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
rC
T
e
m
i
n
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
6
4
.
4
8
O
l
d
G
r
o
w
t
h
2
%
2
.
0
%
F
0
.
0
0
.
0
0
.
0
0
.
0
N
e
w
5
5
N
PV
@
13.5%34.23
U
nlveragedR
ate13.50%
Capital Structure
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
R
e
v
o
l
v
e
r
@
7
.
5
%
1
3
.
0
0
.
2
4
.
8
1
.
7
2
0
.
9
2
0
.
0
B
a
n
k
L
o
a
n
@
8
.
0
%
8
0
6
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
S
u
b
D
e
b
t
@
9
.
5
%
1
5
.
0
1
5
0
.
1
5
.
1
5
.
1
5
0
.
0
.
0
L
T
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
T
otalD
e
b
t
2
4
3
.
0
2
1
0
.
2
1
9
4
.
8
1
8
1
.
7
1
7
0
.
9
1
6
0
.
0
E
quiy 664771459 72
Tax-Shield
IT
N
T
E
R
E
S
T
T
A
X
S
H
I
E
L
D
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
a
x
S
h
i
e
l
d
7
.
3
5
6
.
4
8
6
.
0
6
5
.
6
9
5
.
3
8
rF
e
m
i
n
a
V
a
l
u
e
1
9
5
C
F
7
.
3
5
6
.
4
8
6
.
0
6
5
.
6
9
1
2
5
.
2
3
N
PV
@
9.5%10.24
B
A
S
E
L
I
N
E
P
E
R
F
O
R
M
A
N
C
E
1
5
2
.
9
1
IV
N
T
R
E
S
T
T
A
X
S
H
I
E
L
D
0
2
4
A
LUC
R
ETIO
N
:M
A
R
G
IN
IM
PR
O
V
EM
EN
T18.61
W
A
C
C
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
E
B
I
T
2
.
4
2
9
.
4
8
3
6
.
7
4
3
9
.
7
1
4
1
.
6
9
E
B
I
T
+
1
0
%
T
a
x
@
3
4
%
7
6
3
1
0
0
2
1
2
9
1
5
0
1
7
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
3
4
3
4
.
0
%
E
B
I
T
(
1
t
)
1
4
.
8
1
1
9
.
4
6
2
4
.
2
5
2
6
.
2
1
2
7
.
5
2
D
e
p
r
e
c
i
a
i
o
n
2
5
0
3
5
0
1
0
1
5
0
1
7
0
G
i
v
e
n
O
C
F
3
6
.
3
1
3
2
.
9
6
3
5
.
7
5
3
8
.
7
1
4
0
.
2
W
C
1
2
0
1
0
4
2
0
5
2
0
6
1
0
W
C
+
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
A
P
X
.
7
3
.
2
7
.
1
.
5
1
3
.
A
P
X
+
S
a
l
e
F
C
F
4
6
.
9
1
2
7
.
8
6
2
4
.
5
2
.
0
1
2
1
.
0
2
rC
T
e
m
i
n
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
5
0
8
7
F
C
F
G
r
o
w
t
h
5
%
5
.
0
%
F 46.9127.8624.52.01271.9
WACC Calculation
W
A
C
C
C
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
S
o
u
r
c
e
o
f
u
n
d
s
D
e
b
t
:
$
A
m
t%
o
f
u
n
d
s
A
f
t
e
r
t
a
x
c
o
s
t
W
e
i
g
h
t
e
d
c
o
s
t
R
e
v
o
l
v
i
n
g
c
r
e
d
i
t
@
7
.
5
%
$
1
3
4
.
2
0
%
0
.
0
5
0
.
2
1
%
B
a
n
k
d
e
b
t
@
8
.
0
%
8
0
2
6
.
1
0
%
0
.
0
5
3
1
.
3
8
%
S
u
b
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
e
d
d
e
b
t
@
9
.
5
%
1
5
0
4
8
.
9
0
%
0
.
0
6
3
3
.
0
8
%
iT
E
totalyfunds 36
q
u
4
2
0
.
8
0
%
0
.
2
9
5
6
.
1
4
%
0710.0% 10.81%
W
A
C
C
Y
e
a
r
0
Y
e
a
r
1
Y
e
a
r
2
Y
e
a
r
3
Y
e
a
r
4
Y
e
a
r
5
E
B
I
T
2
.
4
2
9
.
4
8
3
6
.
7
4
3
9
.
7
1
4
1
.
6
9
E
B
I
T
+
1
0
%
T
a
x
@
3
4
%
7
6
3
1
0
0
2
1
2
9
1
5
0
1
7
T
a
x
R
a
t
e
3
4
3
4
.
0
%
E
B
I
T
(
1
t
)
1
4
.
8
1
1
9
.
4
6
2
4
.
2
5
2
6
.
2
1
2
7
.
5
2
D
e
p
r
e
c
i
a
i
o
n
2
5
0
3
5
0
1
0
1
5
0
1
7
0
G
i
v
e
n
O
C
F
3
6
.
3
1
3
2
.
9
6
3
5
.
7
5
3
8
.
7
1
4
0
.
2
W
C
1
2
0
1
0
4
2
0
5
2
0
6
1
0
W
C
+
R
e
d
u
c
t
i
o
n
C
A
P
X
.
7
3
.
2
7
.
1
.
5
1
3
.
A
P
X
+
S
a
l
e
F
C
F
4
6
.
9
1
2
7
.
8
6
2
4
.
5
2
.
0
1
2
1
.
0
2
rC
T
e
m
i
n
a
l
V
a
l
u
e
5
0
8
7
F
C
F
G
r
o
w
t
h
5
%
5
.
0
%
F 46.9127.8624.52.01271.9
Miles, J. and Ezzel, R., 1980, The Weighted Average Cost of Capital,
Perfect Capital markets and Project Life: A Clarification, Journal of Financial
and Quantitative Analysis, 15, pp. 719-730.
The value of Interest tax shield found by the second assumption (constant
proportion) would be lesser than the actual value of tax shield because once
you rebalance your debt, the interest tax shield for the next year is known.
Therefore for that one year you should discount @ kd and the rest at Ka.
In other words, Year 1 Interest Tax Shield should be known at the beginning
of the year and hence discount @ Kd. Year 2 ITS will be known at the
beginning of year 2 and hence for one year (between yr1 and yr2) discount
at Kd and for the other year/s (between t=0 and t=1/n-1) discount @ka.
PGP Ltd.
PGP Ltd is planning to build a hydrogen powered
locomotive engine. The investment for the project is
expected to be Rs. 12.5 Mn. and the sales will generate
a pretax Operating annual cash flow of Rs. 2.085 Mn.
Given that PGP Ltd.s Kd= 8%, Ke=14.6% Tc=35% Wd=
50/125 and We=75/125.
(i)Find the NPV of the project.
(ii)Find the APV of the project under two conditions, if
the all equity Ke is 12%:
(a)
(b)
(c)