Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Preanalytical Phase
Vladimir Palicka
Charles University
Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
International Symposium Patient Safety, Prague, April 12, 2013
Preanalytical Phase
The Weakest Point in Quality
Management
To err is human:
building a safer health system
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS
National Academy Press, Washington, DC,
2000
Errors in medicine
10-20 % of errors negatively influence health
care quality
> 3 % of errors are of direct influence on
patient safety
the more tests, the more errors
Laboratory error
A defect occurring at any part of the
laboratory cycle, from ordering tests to
reporting results and appropriately
interpreting and reacting to these
ISO/PDTS 22367
analytical quality
Downsizing, shortages
total quality
preanalytics
approx 62 % (46 68%)
postanalytics
approx 23 % (18 45%)
Preanalytical errors
Retrospective analysis
2001-2005
4.715.132 samples in 105 labs
The most common reason for sample rejection
Missing sample (37.5%)
Haemolysis (29.3%)
(serum 38.6%, plasma 68.4%)
Alsina J: CCLM 2008, 46: 849
preanalytical errors
misidentification
wrong sampling
pumping with fist
wet skin
tourniquet time
sample mixing (inverting)
time for transport and centrifugation
Detection of inappropriateness
Visual inspection of lipaemic, icteric and/or
haemolysed samples is
highly unreliable
and should be replaced by automated
systems (serum indices)
Haemolysis
upper reference limit for free Hb
plasma 20 mg/l
serum 50 mg/l
Visible haemolysis after centrifugation
free Hb > 300 mg/l = 18.8 mmol/l
(approximately 0.5% of Ery are lysed)
Haemolysis - reasons
in vivo in vitro
Up to 2% samples are haemolysed
At minimum 50 possible reasons
inherited-acquired haemolytic anaemia
haemoglobinopathias
HELLP syndrome
drugs, infection
artificial heart valves
transfusion of incompatible blood
Haemolysis - reasons
Inappropriate shaking the sample
Temperature discomfort
High centrifugation force
Long centrifugation
To early centrifugation
Late serum/plasma separation
Wrong separation barrier
Re-centrifugation of gel-tubes
Pneumatic sample transporting
Haemolysis
The most common reasons of the
wrong samples
Frequency
40 70% of all rejected samples
(5-times more than any other reason)
Haemolysis
increased concentration/activity:
AST, ALT, CK, LDH, lipase
creatinine, urea, Fe, Mg, P, K
decreased concentration/activity:
ALP, GGT
Alb, bilirubin, Cl, G, Na
Special care: newborn bilirubin !!
Haemolysis
Immunoassay
False negative troponin T
False increase of troponin I
False increase of PSA
Negative bias: testosterone, cortisol, FPIA
Impossibility to measure:
insulin, glukagon, CT, PTH, ACTH, gastrin
To err is human
building a safer health system
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS
National Academy Press, Washington, DC,
2000
To err is human
to delay is deadly
Consumer Reports Health
Safe Patient Project.org
EQA - PAPA
Australia, New Zealand
12-year period
59 participating laboratories
3.9 million specimens
PAPA incident rate: 1.22 %
most significant incident
Bar codes
History: local grocery, 1948
Patent was applied for 1949
Patent issued 1952
Today: more that 2 dozen different linear
bar code symbologies
Most frequent used: Code 128, Code 39
Error rate expected 1:400.000 1.800.000
China example
60 in-patient sampled
in 32 of them (53 percent)
common full name shared with
1 101 other patients
attending the same hospital (Hong Kong)
wristband errors
Join Commission on Accreditation
CAP Q-Probes
mean wristband error rates
5.4 8.4 %
after the introduction of QIM
< 1.0 %
wristband errors
4-years study
464 bed public hospital
bar-coded wristbands
total wristband error rates 10.6-16.5%
training sessions
total wristband error rates 0.4-1.5%
Dhatt GS: CCLM 2001, 49/5: ??
wristband errors
2 hospitals in Sweden (230+152 beds)
295 nurses/phlebotomists
questionnaire
undesirable practice
9.6% not asking name and ID
17% not checking identity
79% not checking wristband during ID
43% using health care card for ID
home mesage
identification mistakes are not easily detectable
no immediate harm or signal
many steps no personal responsibility
mostly not systematic
not considered as the big problem
fear of blame
human factor involved
home mesage
patient identification is common duty of clinicians,
phlebotomists and clinical chemists
technical equipment is necessary
(but must be under the control)
ISO, SOP, EQA are extremely important
education and enthusiasm of people is the corner
stone
home mesage
Patient safety
and proper care
is the target !