Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Plaster Articulator
Philip Pfaff (1756)
VIRTUAL ARTICULATORS
Additional Requirements
Adjustable horizontal, lateral condylar guide element &
allow protrusive movements
A mechanism to accept the face bow transfer .
A terminal hinge locking
positional device .
Removable mounting plates
that can be positioned accurately
An adjustable incisal guide table
Adjustable intercondylar width of the condylar element .
ADVANTAGES
LIMITATIONS
Classification
Several classifications of articulators were
proposed. The most popular methods of
classifying articulators are :
Based on the theories of occlusion
Based on the ability to simulate jaw movements.
Based on the adjustability of the articulator.
Classification
based
on
THEORIES of OCCLUSION
BONWILLS THEORY OF
OCCLUSION
CONICAL THEORY OF
OCCLUSION
R.E.HALL (1915)
SPHERICAL THEORY OF
Monson
(1918)
OCCLUSION
Classification
Based
on
the ability to simulate
jaw movements
Class -I
These are simple articulators
capable of accepting a single
static registration. Only vertical
motion is possible. These
articulators are used in cases
where a tentative jaw relation
is done .
Ex : Barn door hinge articulator .
Class II
These articulators permit horizontal and vertical
movements but they do not
orient the movement of TMJ
with a face bow.
Ex: Mean value articulator
Class III
These articulators permit horizontal and vertical
movements. They do accept face bow transfer but
this facility is limited. They cannot allow total
customization of condylar pathways. These
instruments simulate condylar pathways by using
average or mechanical equivalents for the whole or
part of the condylar motion.
Class IV
These articulators accept three
dimensional dynamic registrations. They
are capable of accurately reproducing the
condylar pathways for each
patient. They allow point
orientation of the casts using
a face bow transfer.
CLASSIFICATION
Based
on
the adjustability
FULLY
Based
on
the
adjustability
SEMI
ADJUSTABLE
NON
ADJUSTABLE
ADJUSTABLE
of the articulator can accept the
following five
records:
articulators
can be classified as :
Arcon articulators
Non-arcon articulators
Arcon articulators
The term arcon was derived by Bergstrom from the
words articulator and condyle.
Example : Hanau University series
and Whip mix articulators.
The condylar element is attached to the lower member
of the articulator and the condylar guidance is
attached to the upper member. This articulator
resembles the temporo mandibular joint. (Here, the
condylar guidance is the mechanical analog of the
glenoid fossa).
Non-arcon articulators
Upper member :
It is a triangular frame with the base of the triangle placed
posteriorly. The apex of the triangle contains a provision to accom
modate the vertical rod (incisal pin). The vertical rod can be locked
in position within the upper member
with the help of a thumbscrew. Two condylar
elements are seen projecting on either side of
the base of the triangle. They articulate with
the condylar guidance of the lower member.
The maxillary cast is attached to the upper
member during articulation .
.
Lower member :
Condylar guidance :
It is represented by a slot (condylar track) located on the upper
part of the vertical arm of the lower member. The slot is
inclined at an angle equal to the average inclination of the
condylar guidance in the population.
The condylar element of the upper member
passes through this track. A spring is mounted
within this track (condylar guidance) to stabilize the condylar
elements when no movements are made. This condylar
guidance does not accept face-bow transfer .
Parts
of
hanau articulator
Condylar guidance :
The condylar guidance's are the control centers of the
Articulator and their adjustably assimilate the
multiple function of the glenoid fossa .