Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
(D10101001)
Jonathan Burke (D10001805)
Adinda Oktavia Kusumanegara (M10301821)
(M10301107)
Ghilman Fatih (M10201818)
Outline
1
Introduction
3
Questions and
Analysis
2
The Scenarios
4
Conclusion
Introduction
Centralized System
Consumer Demand
Retailer
Consumer Demand
Supplier
Warehouse
Decentralized System
Retailer
Consumer Demand
Retailer
Consumer Demand
Retailer
Consumer Demand
Supplier
Retailer
Consumer Demand
Retailer
Introduction
Decentralized
System
Centralized
System
Introduction
Order from
supplier
Inventory at
least 4 period
away from
retailers
Allocation
to retailers
Inventory
of retailers
Cost Of
Goods Sold
Holding Cost
= Revenue
(COGS +
Holding)
Supplier
= Demand met /
Total demand *
100%
The Scenarios
The Scenarios
Demand Correlation
Control:
Strong Negative
None (Normal)
Strong Positive
Demand
mean
Standard Deviation (Demand
Variance):
High Variance: 15
Medium: 10
Low Variance: 5
The Scenarios
120%
110%
140000
100%
120000
90%
80%
100000
70%
80000
60%
50%
60000
40%
40000
30%
20%
20000
10%
0
Centralized
Decentralized
0%
Revenue
Cost of
Goods Sold
Holding
Cost
Profit
Fill Rate
Centralized Decentralized
143000
142500
71500
71250
48450
47025
23050
97%
24225
97%
Decentralized
At medium variance, with average correlation, the centralized system outperforms
the decentralized system very marginally in terms of revenue, but underperforms
slightly in terms of COGS. However, the profit advantage of the decentralized system
is significant. For a business, this is the most important performance metric.
Since this case is done in a neutral and medium variance, we want to see how
significant is the different for the profit by looking at profit margin
Profit margin = profit / revenue
Centralized: 23050/143000 = .16 16%
Decentralized: 24225/142500 = .17 17 %
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
Varianc Medium Varianc Varianc Medium Varianc Varianc Medium Varianc
e
e
e
e
e
e
7198
7488
7411
7260
7323
7367
7514
7443
7425
7194
7428
7366
7221
7302
7352
7438
7417
7392
7188
7335
7085
7235
7242
7120
7350
7289
7112
50175
48450
46725
50175
48450
46725
50175
48450
46725
50400
47025
43650
50400
47025
43650
50400
47025
43650
20015
24310
25645
20285
23050
25505
22455
24100
25905
19860
25155
26490
20330
24225
26730
21480
24695
26750
97%
97%
97%
97%
97%
98%
96%
97%
97%
97%
96%
94%
97%
97%
95%
95%
96%
94%
300
100%
250
95%
200
90%
150
85%
100
100%
250
200
95%
150
90%
100
80%
50
75%
Order
105%
300
50
Demand
Decentralized
85%
80%
Fillrate
Demand
Order
Fillrate
60000
105%
60000
105%
50000
100%
50000
100%
40000
95%
40000
30000
90%
30000
20000
85%
20000
10000
80%
10000
85%
75%
80%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
95%
90%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
Strong Positive
Medium
105% 300
350
300
Decentralized
105%
100%
250
95%
200
90%
150
85%
100
50
80%
50
85%
75%
80%
250
200
150
100
Demand
Order
100%
95%
90%
Fillrate
Demand
Order
Fillrate
60000
105%
50000
105%
50000
100%
40000
100%
40000
95%
30000
95%
30000
90%
20000
85%
20000
90%
10000
80%
10000
85%
75%
80%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
350
300
100%
250
80%
200
Decentralized
105%
100%
200
95%
150
60%
150
40%
100
90%
100
85%
50
20%
50
80%
0%
75%
Demand
Order
Fillrate
Demand
Order
Fillrate
50000
120%
50000
105%
40000
100%
40000
100%
80%
30000
95%
30000
60%
20000
40%
10000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
90%
20000
85%
10000
80%
75%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
Neutral High
Variance
120% 400
100% 350
300
80%
250
60%
200
150
40%
100
20%
50
0%
0
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Demand
Order
Fillrate
Decentralized
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Demand
Order
Fillrate
60000
120%
60000
120%
50000
100%
50000
100%
40000
80%
40000
80%
30000
60%
30000
60%
20000
40%
20000
40%
10000
20%
10000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
Neutral Medium
Decentralized
350
120%
300
105%
300
100%
250
100%
80%
200
95%
60%
150
90%
40%
100
85%
50
20%
50
80%
0%
75%
250
200
150
100
Demand
Order
Fillrate
Demand
Order
Fillrate
60000
120%
50000
105%
50000
100%
40000
100%
40000
80%
30000
60%
20000
40%
10000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
95%
30000
90%
20000
85%
10000
80%
75%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
Neutral Low
Variance
120% 250
300
250
100%
200
80%
150
60%
Decentralized
105%
100%
200
95%
150
90%
100
100
40%
50
20%
50
80%
0%
75%
Demand
Order
85%
Fillrate
Demand
Order
Fillrate
50000
120%
50000
105%
40000
100%
40000
100%
80%
30000
95%
30000
60%
20000
40%
10000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
90%
20000
85%
10000
80%
75%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
300
100%
250
Decentralized
105%
300
100%
250
200
95%
200
95%
150
90%
150
90%
100
85%
50
0
80%
Demand
Order
100
85%
50
0
80%
Fillrate
Demand
Order
Fillrate
60000
105%
60000
105%
50000
100%
50000
100%
40000
95%
30000
40000
95%
30000
90%
20000
90%
20000
10000
85%
10000
85%
80%
80%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
Strong Negative
Medium
120% 300
350
300
Decentralized
120%
100%
250
100%
80%
200
80%
60%
150
60%
40%
100
40%
50
20%
50
20%
0%
0%
250
200
150
100
Demand
Order
Demand
Fillrate
Order
Fillrate
60000
120%
50000
120%
50000
100%
40000
100%
40000
80%
30000
60%
20000
40%
10000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
80%
30000
60%
20000
40%
10000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
250
100%
200
80%
150
60%
Decentralized
105%
100%
200
95%
150
90%
100
100
40%
50
20%
50
80%
0%
75%
Demand
Order
85%
Fillrate
Demand
Order
Fillrate
50000
120%
50000
105%
40000
100%
40000
100%
80%
30000
95%
30000
60%
20000
40%
10000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
90%
20000
85%
10000
80%
75%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
9700
Centralized
10000
60000
9700
9700
9700
9700
9800
9600
9700
50000
8000
40000
6000
30000
4000
20000
2000
10000
0
Demand
Orders Centralized
Holding Centralized
Profit Centralized
Fillrate Centralized
12000
9700
10000
Decentralized
9700
60000
9600
9400
9700
9700
9500
9500
9600
9400
50000
8000
40000
6000
30000
4000
20000
2000
10000
0
Demand
Orders Decentralized
Holding Decentralized
Profit Decentralized
Fillrate Decentralized
Fill Rate
The speed at which current inventory can meet current demand.
Fillrate=
Neutral Medium
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Demand
Order
Decentralized
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Fillrate
Demand
Order
Fillrate
30000
120%
25000
120%
25000
100%
20000
100%
20000
80%
15000
60%
10000
40%
5000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
80%
15000
60%
10000
40%
5000
20%
0%
Holding Cost
Profit
Fillrate
73000
Decentraliz
ed
72800
Cost of Goods
Sold
36500
36400
Holding Cost
24225
23512.5
Profit
12275
12887.5
99%
98%
Centralized
Fill Rate
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxx
130%
80000
120%
70000
110%
60000
100%
50000
80%
90%
70%
40000
60%
50%
30000
40%
20000
30%
20%
10000
0
10%
Centralized
Revenue
Decentralized
Profit
Fill Rate
0%
Conclusion
In question number one, the profit of centralized is smaller because it is
holding too much goods. However, the profit margin between centralized
and decentralized is insignificant thus we can conclude these two system
when demand mean is 50 have the same effect.
When demand variance is low, the retailer can control the market demand
easier and decide how many safety stock and inventory they should be
maintained. So holding cost of the centralized and the decentralized are
not significantly different.
When demand variance is high, centralized warehouse that the risk of
demand variation be pooled is clearly important based on the profit margin
which is quite big.