Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ERRORS
Dr ASHA KUMARI
SR, DEPT OF
BIOCHEMISTRY
Increasing and
Measuring Impact
Sandy De Groote
Associate Professor
Scholarly Communication Librarian
University Library
H
H
1
1
Scholars Publish :
To share findings
PANEL SAMPLING
Probability Proportional to Size
Selecting a group of participants through a
"Proportional to size" refers the number
random sampling method and then asking that
of units awarded to variables in the
group for the same information again several
assessment as determined by the
times over a period of time.
population.
This longitudinal sampling-method allows for A village that has only 2,500 residents
estimates of changes in the population.
requires fewer healthcare facilities than a
city of 250,000.
Multidisciplinary (55)
Scopus
20,000 peer reviewed journals (plus conference
proceedings, books)
Citation information only goes back to 1996
Google Scholar
# of journals unknown lots but not all - permission
from publishers to index
also other sources conference proceedings books,
repositories
Web of Science
Scopus
Google Scholar
De Groote SL,
Raszewski R.
Coverage of Google
Scholar, Scopus, and
Web of Science: a
case study of the hindex in nursing. Nurs
Outlook. 2012 NovDec;60(6):391-400.
H Index
An index to quantify an individuals scientific research
output. J.E. Hirsch
The h-index is based on the set of a researchers most
cited papers and the number of citations that the
researcher has received in other people's publications
A scientist has index h if h of [his/her] Np papers have at
least h citations each, and the other (Nph) papers have at
most h citations each.
variants of h-index
g-index
a-index
and more
Calculating H-Index
Article # ---- Times Cited
1-----87
2-----70
3-----46
A scientist has index h if h of
[his/her] Np papers have at least h
5-----19
citations each, and the other
6-----15
(Np h) papers have at most h
7-----10
citations each
8 ---- 9
9 ---- 8
10--- 6
11---- 4
12---- 1
Calculating H-Index
Article # ---- Times Cited
1-----87
2-----70
8 articles have been cited at least 8
or more times and the remaining
3-----46
articles have been cited 8 or less
5-----19
6-----15
7-----10
A scientist has index h if h of
8 ---- 9
[his/her] Np papers have at least h
citations each, and the other
9 ---- 8
(Np h) papers have at most h
10--- 6
citations each
11---- 4
12---- 1
Web of
Science
Scopu
s
http://impactstory.org/
PLoS
http://article-level-metrics.plos.org/
impactstory.org
http://www.altmetric.com/
ORCID
http://orcid.org/
More Information
Selecting journal publication venues
http://researchguides.uic.edu/journalselection
Measuring Impact
http://researchguides.uic.edu/if
Contact Sandy De Groote
Associate Professor & Scholarly Communication Librarian
sgroote@uic.edu
312-413-9494
OBSERVATION:
There are two types of observation:
Naturalistic:The normal environment; everything is left as it
normally is.One weakness is that it may allows extraneous
variables to effect the IV therefore the researcher cannot claim
cause and effect.
Controlled:The environment is changed by the researcher, the
situation is controlled.This reduces the number of extraneous
variable.
Observation vs Experiment
Observations are readily obtained, but subject to bias,
that is systematic errors
Some observational designs are less subject to bias
than others
Experiments are hard to do well
Experiments can answer narrow questions definitively
Generalizability of results from experiments may be at
issue, eg new drug testing that excludes women subjects
B. Biases
1. Internal validity
2. External validity
(contd)
Advantages
Meta-analysis
Combining results from a range of published studies
Established methodology, not just literature review
Observational studies
Case Series
Case-control studies
Cohort Studies
(Meta-Analyses)
Controls
A control is a standard of comparison for
Effects
Variability
Case-control studies
Controlled studies Retrospective
Clinical trials
A clinical trial is a comparative, prospective experiment
conducted in human subjects.
Historical controls
Historical controls
Are better than no controls Example: ddI vs AZT for
AIDS Are better than no controls Example: ddI vs AZT
for AIDS
But not by much Example: gastric freezing for peptic
ulcer
Blinding
Good practice: factors that can affect the evaluation of
outcome should not be permitted to influence the
evaluation process Double-blind design Neither
patient nor outcome evaluator knows Rx to which
patient was assigned Single-blind Patient or evaluator
is blinded as to Rx, but not both Triple-blind Patient,
Physician, and Data analyst are blinded as to Rx identity