Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
AGENDA
Introduction
Problem Statements
Objectives
Literature Review
Materials and Methods
Preliminary Results
Work Schedule
Expected Outcome
References
Publications
2
INTRODUCTION
Molten metal
Filling phase
Solidification
period
Cooling
phase
Part Ejection
PROBLEM
STATEMENTS
In terms of
temperature
as
temperature
material
Melt
temperature
PIM, melt
is referred
processing
of
the
PP
is a crystalline
material
-doesnt have a sharp
melting point
-due to different level of
crystallinity
PP with different Melt
Flow Index (MFI)
Low viscosity - easier
flow and vice-versa
Mould surface
temperature
In
semi-crystalline
materials
the
mould
temperature
is
an
important
factor
in
determining the degree
of crystallinity in the
polymer.
Different
temperatures
can affect polymer flow,
causing
asymmetrical
flow, should be kept
uniformed throughout the
process
Heat is extracted out of
mould
through
the
circulation of coolant.
Higher
mould
temperature- longer cycle
time
Lower
mould
temperatureShorter cycle time
A
study
was
done
on
thermokinetical asymmetry [2]. If
melt flows inside a mould
channel, the flow front is formed
in a fountain flow. The flow is
symmetrical to axis of symmetry.
It happens only if the conditions of
flow are the same near both
mould walls . ( equal temperature,
surface roughness etc.)
In a case of temperature
difference, flow front is not
symmetrical. It shifts towards one
of the walls which is of a higher
temperature.
This is caused by lower viscosity
of melt which is in contact with
higher temperature mould wall
and therefore is heated up.
7
OBJECTIVES
LITERATURE REVIEW
Cooling phase
-Many researches were done on cooling channels [7-10]. Feature
based approach
(FBA), Configuration space method, visibility
based approach and
solid freeform fabrication (SFF) supporting on
Recent
of optimization
conformalmethods
cooling channels
(CCC).
-Taguchi method, Artificial neural network
(ANN), Fuzzy logic, Genetic algorithm (GA),
Finite element method, Response surface
methodology, Blackboard- based expert
system a case-based reasoning (CBR), Linear
Figure 6 Types of cooling
regression model, Grey relational analysis and
channels
Cavity pressure
signals and principals
9
component analysis [11].
Design and
Conduct
Experiments
Problem Identification
Problem Analysis
Determine
Input Variables
and the
Number of
Quality Criteria
Concept Evaluation
Statistical
analysis
Variable
influence
analysis TAGUCHI
The optimum
level of
parameters
are
determined
Variable
response
analysis]-Face
centered cubic
(FCC)
Simulation Work
Result Analysis/
Discussion
Experimental Work
10
Meshing
Assigning boundary
conditions (mesh density,
injection location,
material, inlet/outlet of
cooling circuit)
Filling and Cooling
Analysis
Warpage Analysis
11
Taguchi
technique
is
used as a screening
method to rank the
importance of the input
variables
on
overall
quality. The relationship
of variables over the
quality criterion is shown
in terms of percentages.
1. Analysis of
variable (Taguchi
technique)
2. Analysis of
variable
responses
(Quadratic modelFace Centered
Cubic (FCC)
technique)
Face
centered
cubic
design is to examine the
non-linear
interactions
between input variables
and a set of criteria that
define part quality. The
result is shown in terms
of
a
response
plot
indicating how sensitive
each quality criterion is
to the selected input
variable.
12
Melt
Mold
Coolant
Material
PP
Material
Medium
Water (pure)
Temperature
20 C
Flow rate
10.00 (lit/min)
Reynolds Number
20000<RE<30000
Characteristics
thickness)
Rectangular plate
120 x 50 x 3
13.703
18.0000
13
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Estimated
cycle time:
Table 3 - Fill and cool Analyses of 3mm rectangular
24.9 s
plate
Fill analysis
Cool analysis
Cooling
channel Fill
Design
diamete time
r (mm)
(s)
D1
D2
D3
D4
Injection Pressur
pressure e drop
(MPa)
(MPa)
Time to
reach
Cycle
ejection time
temp.
(s)
(s)
Cooling
time
(s)
6.00
1.703
4.500
4.500
30.530
16.950
19.530
2.860
8.00
1.737
3.852
3.852
51.550
17.800
21.810
5.100
10.00
1.762
4.105
4.105
52.330
18.120
22.830
6.100
6.00
1.702
4.484
4.484
31.450
17.380
20.490
3.820
8.00
1.740
3.848
3.848
51.660
17.840
21.160
4.450
10.00
1.741
3.848
3.848
51.380
17.770
21.380
4.670
6.00
1.700
4.510
4.510
31.290
108.60
25.220 53.330
0
17.610
20.490
3.820
8.00
1.740
3.855
3.855
51.530
17.580
21.030
4.330
10.00
1.739
3.850
3.850
51.750
17.710
21.750
5.050
6.00
1.701
4.506
4.506
30.420
214.20
25.440 48.870
0
16.920
8.00
1.738
3.880
3.880
50.250
10.00
1.689
7.368
7.368
22.420
18.92
0
19.75
17.260
0
20.17
17.020
14
0
2.250
3.040
3.520
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT-TAGUCHI
Table 4 - DOE
Part
thickne
ss
(mm)
Process
Parameters
(Input
variables)
Le
ve
ls
1
2
Mould
surfac
e
temp.
(C)
Melt
temp.
(C)
Cooling
time
(s)
Cycle
time
(s)
Volumetric
shrinkage
(%)
Warpage
in +Z
direction
(m)
Sink
mark
index
(%)
25
220
65 5 - 240
Table
Taguchi
A
Runs
Melt temp.
(C)
Mould surface
temp. (C)
220
25
220
65
260
25
260
65
Taguchi Design
Taguchi Orthogonal Array
Design
L4(2**2)
15
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
DESIGN OF EXPERIMENT-TAGUCHI
Runs
Melt
temp.
(C)
Mould
surface
temp.
(C)
Cooling
time
(s)
Cycle
time
(s)
Volumet
ric
shrinkag
e
(%)
Warpage
in +Z
direction
(m)
Sink
Mark
Index
(%)
220
25
26.9448
43.6615
8.0390
220
65
0.0051
17.1833
8.3143
260
25
33.0345
49.4007
8.8826
260
65
0.0065
16.6019
9.1041
0.03667
3
0.04471
6
0.04026
3
0.05075
3
16
1.2504
1.2517
1.7078
1.7723
PRELIMINARY RESULTS
Melt
temp.
(C)
Mould
surface
temp.
(C)
Cooling
time
(s)
Cycle
time
(s)
Volumetri
c
shrinkage
(%)
Warpage
in +Z
direction
(mm)
Sink Mark
Index
(%)
17
GANTT CHART
PROJECT
ACTIVITIES
Stage A
Selection Project
Title
Problem
Identification and
Analysis
Concept
Evaluation
Stage B
Concept
Generation
Build and conduct
DOE's
Tabulation of
simulation results
Stage C
Optimization
Statistical Analysis
Stage D
Experimental work
(IM)
Troubleshooting
Data and Result
tabulation
Stage E
Report Preparation
Thesis Submission
JUL
2012
SEP
OCT
AUG
NOV
2013
MAR
APR
DEC
JAN
FEB
MAY
JUN
18
EXPECTED OUTCOME
19
REFERENCES
[1] C.L Li, C.G. Li, A.C.K Mok. Analysis of thermal residual stress in plastic
injection by J.
Mater. Process.
[2] C.L. Li, C.G. Li, A.C.K. Mok, Automatic layout design of plastic injection
mould cooling
system. Computer Aided Design 37, (2005) pp. 645-662.
[3] A.B.M. Saifullah, S.H.Masood, Igor Sbarski, New cooling channel design for
injection
moulding. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering
(2009), Vol I.
[4] D.E Dimla, M. Camilotto, F.Miani, Design and optimization of conformal
cooling channels in injection moulding tools.
[5] Xu,X.Sachs,E.Allen,Samuel.Cima, Michael. (1998). Designing Conformal
Cooling Channels for Tooling.Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication
Symposium, University Of Texas, Austin. 1 (1), pp131-146.
[6] Duleba,Branislac,Ing. (2011). Conformal Cooling for Plastics Injection
Moulding.Department of Technologies and Materials, Technical University of
Kosice, Letna. 1 (1), pp1-5.
[7] Choi,J.H.Choi.S.H.Park,D.Park.C.H.Rhee.B.O . (2012). Design Optimization
for an
Injection Mould
for Minimizing Temperature Deviation. International
Journal of
Automotive Technology. 13 (2),
pp273-277.
[8] Hassan, Hamdy. (2008). Effect of Cooling System on the polymer
temperature and solidification during Injection Molding.Applied Thermal
Engineering. 29 (1), 1786-1791
[9] Bharti, P.K. Khan, M.I. (2010). Recent methods for optimization of plastic
injection
molding process- A retrospective and literature
review.
20
International Journal of
Engineering Science and Technology. 2 (9), p4540-
PUBLICATIONS
21
D1
D3
D2
D4