Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
This presentation consists of:
a) Introduction
b) Material and method
- Study area
- Satellite and ancillary data
- Digital image processing
c) Accuracy assessment
d) Conclusion
INTRODUCTIO
N
INTRODUCTION
Hyperspectral remote sensing is one of technique for
INTRODUCTION
In vegetation studies, hyperspectral data can be
INTRODUCTION
However, the main problem with supervised methods is
INTRODUCTION
Recent advances in sensor technology have led to the
MATERIAL &
METHOD
STUDY AREA
The Flevopolder (52 30 N and 5 28 E)
SATELLITE DATA
On 5 July 1991 AVIRIS
ANCILLARY DATA
Agricultural land use in
Beans
Flax
Maize
Onions
Sugar beet
Wheat
Grass
Potato
Clover
ANCILLARY DATA
This is parcel division of different
METHODOLOGY
DATA PREPARATION
PRE PROCESSING
Radiometric correction
Convert DN to
reflectance
DATA CLASSIFICATION
Hyperspectral Analysis
Maximum Likelihood
ACCURACY
ASSESSMENT
PRE - PROCESSING
The pre processing involved two main
stages:
a) Radiometric correction
b) Convert DN to reflectance
(a)Radiometric correction
The pre - processing, consisting of dark
current correction, vignetting and
radiometric calibration of the sensors
themselves, is performed by the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena,
California.
PRE - PROCESSING
(b)Convert DN to reflectance
The observed digital numbers (DNs) are linearly
related to radiances (in mW/cm2/m/sr) according:
Radiance = DN / 200
Reflectance can be calculated using formula:
Reflectance = offset + gain radiance
where offset and gain for the calibration of AVIRIS
has been given.
DATA CLASSIFICATION
The data classifications were performed using classifications
approaches:
a) Maximum Likelihood
b) Hyperspectral Analysis Approach
Maximum Likelihood
Two steps were carried out in the extraction of crop types:
i) Select training area
ii) Supervised classification
Hyperspectral Analysis Approach
Four steps were carried out in the extraction of crop types:
i) Minimum Noise Fraction
ii) Pixel Purity Index
iii) N D Visualization and Endmember
Extraction
iv) Spectral Angle Mapper
Maximum
Likelihood
Maximum Likelihood
Classifier
Maximum Likelihood classifier was
Hyperspectral
Analysis
Eigenvalues of MNF
Transformed Bands versus
band number
MNF Band 3 2 1
MNF Band 7 4 2
PPI image
enhanced using
density slice
Image showing
pure or extreme
pixel
(iii) n - D Visualization
and Endmember
Extraction
The distribution of the AVIRIS data in n
(iii) n - D Visualization
and Endmember
Extraction
RESULTS
The classification result of AVIRIS image using (a) Maximum
a)
b)
ACCURACY
ASSESSMENT
ACCURACY ASSESSMENT
a) Maximum Likelihood
Accuracy = 60.57 %
Kappa coefficient = 0.52
Class
Producers Accuracy
(%)
Water
100
100
Wheat
77.69
100
Onion
76.19
5.23
Sugar beet
Clover
Bean
51.21
79.70
Potato
100
84.19
Grass
66.29
21.22
Peas
Maize
ACCURACY ASSESSMENT
b) Spectral Angle Mapper
Accuracy = 47.59 %
Kappa coefficient = 0.37
Class
Producers Accuracy
(%)
Water
1.45
100
Wheat
61.26
100
Onion
25
5.23
Maize
Sugar beet
21.70
29.68
Clover
Bean
50.97
48.84
Potato
75.83
84.72
Grass
1.12
0.31
Peas
11.63
3.94
CONCLUSION
THANK
YOU