01 FO - NP2001 - E01 - 1 FDD-LTE Radio Network Planning

FDD-LTE Radio Network Planning
ZTE University
Contents
FDD-LTE network deployment strategy

FDD-LTE site selection
FDD-LTE network simulation
FDD-LTE spectral efficiency
The process of FDD-LTE network planning
Information collection
Information collection is to gather any information

relate to LTE network proposal, such as:
Operators requirements
Operators existent network sites density and distribution
The frequency band and bandwidth available for LTE system
The environment information of the city to be covered
Subscribers and traffic model forecast
Digital map
.
Deployment strategy
Which
Whicharea
areathe
theLTE
LTEradio
radionetwork
networkwill
willbe
beintroduced
introducedin
infirst?
first?
Deployment strategy
Deployment strategy
2.6G LTE
900/1800 GSM
2.1 HSPA
Hot Spots
800M LTE
900 GSM/UMTS
Rural
Urban
Voice capacity + data capacity
Voice/Data coverage
Operators need to operate their pipe precisely !
Large cell for coverage

Small cell for capacity
Better indoor coverage to reduce power consumption
Requirements and targets
Coverage requirements
Coverage
Coveragearea
area
Coverage
CoverageQoS
QoS
Coverage
Coveragespecial
specialtarget
target
Morphology
Shadowing Standard
Deviation(dB)
Area Coverage
Probability
Cell Edge User

Throughput
(kbps)
Dense
Urban
Urban
Subur
ban
Rural
95%
95%
95%
90%
Dense
Urban
Urban
Subu
rban
Rural
512
384
256
128
Requirements and targets
Capacity requirements
subscriber
subscribertarget
targetand
and
density
density
Traffic
Trafficmodel
model
Stages
Stagesand
andphases
phases
Typical
RAB Bearer Rate Bearer Rate Intensity UL Vol. DL Vol.
service
Type UL (kbps)
DL (kbps) (mErl) (kByte) (kByte)
Voice
Voice
12.2
12.2
20
Video
Data
128
128
1.5
conference
Video/Audio
Data
256
256
180
750
Streaming
Web Browsing
Data
128
500
125
450
/ HTTP
FTP
Data
500
2000
225
900
Gaming
Data
128
128
125
450
Interactive
P2P
Data
500
2000
500
1500
Propagation model calibration
CW test
Tune the propagation
model parameters
After calibration, the
exact propagation model
will be used in network
design and planning
Radio network design
Link budget analysis

Capacity analysis
Radio network design

Coverage
Requirements
Capacity
Requirements
Link Budget
Capacity analysis
Cell radius and

site number
Site number and

Cell radius
Which is
limitation
The final site number

and cell radius
Site selection and survey
Base on the network design result

of cell range or inter-site distance
Base on existent network site
distribution information or other
candidate site, select fit legacy
site to reuse or add new site.
Site selection can be run by tools
or manually.
Candidate
Candidatesite
site
Result
Resultsite
site
Coverage prediction and simulation
Parameters setting
Coverage prediction
Monte carol simulation
The process of FDD-LTE network planning
Contents

Site Selection
How to process so many candidate sites and so large area

How to priority covered POI
Site Selection Principle
Inter site distance following network design result.

Preference for the existing base station
Try to select the ideal honeycomb structure of the site
The selected site should be close to important areas
and dense areas
Antenna must have enough isolation space to avoid
interference between systems
Try to avoid select very high build or hill as site
address in urban area
Manual site selection
We found tool has obvious limits in term of balancing between

threshold, coverage, traffic load, cost of sites etc. Manually adjust the
result is necessary.
Network
Networkdesign
designresult:
result:
Cell
Cellrange
range
Inter
Intersite
sitedistance
distance
Site Selection Method
Proposal I
Proposal II
Proposal I
Proposal I
295 site cover POI
Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-80 number of POI
coverage>95%
363
69%
95%>coverage>85%
13
2%
85%>coverage>75%
12
2%
coverage<75%
146
27%
Total
534
100%
ProposalII
Proposal II
Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-80 number of POI %

coverage>95%
499
93%
95%>coverage>85%
1%
85%>coverage>75%
1%
coverage<75%
26
5%
Total
534
100%
total
total445
445
Anchor
AnchorSites
Sites
154
154
ProposalII
Proposal II
total
total1000
1000
Anchor
AnchorSites
Sites
188
188
Contents

FDD-LTE network planning flow
Planning Parameters
Digital
Digitalmap
map
database
database
Propagation
Propagation
model
model
Network
Network
parameter
parameter
Service
Service
parameters
parameters
Digital map
Digital map
Clutter Name
Surface
(km2)
Percentage(%
)
POI
51.257
0.13%
High Density Urban - City Center
1.861
0.005%
Commercial/Industrial
111.895
0.28%
Airports
42.062
0.11%
Medium Density Urban
705.708
1.79%
Low Density Urban
2,142.73
5.42%
Dense Forest
13,071.82
34.83%
Water
3,953.01
10.00%
Open - Vegetated
121.342
0.31%
Open - Non Vegetated
18,636.93
47.14%
total
39533.137
100%
Propagation model
Propagation model
K1
K2
K3
K4
K5
K
6
K7
Dense
Urban
64.9
9
48.7
2
-26.5
0.6
1
8.64
3.23
Urban
13.6
6
44.4
1
5.77
0.0
6
6.55
1.63
Suburban
-7.01
Rural
Coastal High Rise

Highway
Dense Forest
42.6
22.8
0.4
0
2.31
9
3
5
6.55
Dense
Urba
Suburba
Rura
Highway
41.2
19.2
0.3
Urban
n
n
l
3.85
0
4
6
3
7.05
0.33
0
0
0
0
0
28.6
44.4
5.9
0
-10
0
1.14
2.03
1.54
3.04
0
1.21
Open - Vegetated
-0.69
0.95
-0.66
2.2
Open - Non Vegetated
0.52
0.12
-0.42
1.54
Low Density Urban
0.76
1.54
0.89
1.55
Medium Density
Urban
-0.03
-0.48
-1.22
0.68
High Density Urban City Center
1.95
-3.57
-3.21
Commercial/Industrial
-2.23
-2.72
-0.25
2.63
Airports
-2.15
-7.78
Water
0.44
-5.7
Propagation model
3D
3DRay
RayTracing
TracingModel
Model
Building
Building
Data
DataBase
Base
Network information
Sites
1
n
Transmitters
1
n
Cells
n
n
Neighbours
Site Equipment
Service information
n
Environment
n
n
n 1
n
Mobility
Traffic Map
Clutter Weights
User Profile
1
n
Service Usage
n
1
Terminals
n
1
Services
Mobility
Radio Beare
Traffic mix
3G
3Gtraffic
trafficmix
mixexample
example
Servic
e
Type
CS
CS
PS
PS
PS
PS
Typical service
RAB Type
(UL:DL)
Voice
DCH:DCH
Video telephony
DCH:DCH
E-mail
DCH:DCH
Audio/video
DCH:DCH
streaming
Mobile office Internet
DCH:HSDPA
/e-commerce
Mobile office Internet
HSUPA:HSDPA
/e-commerce
Bearer
Rate
UL (kbps)
Bearer
Rate
DL (kbps)
12.2
64
64
12.2
64
64
20.0
1.5
-
60
250
64
128
150
64
500
50
300
300
500
200
600
Intensity UL Vol. DL Vol.

(mErl)
(kbit)
(kbit)
Traffic mix
% Subs Mobile
TV or Video
iPhone and other new terminals push the Data serveic
iPhone
2007
$599
ta
To
SMALLER
CHEAPER
FASTER
2008
$199
th
d
i
w
nd
a
lB
Average
New application
iPhone
% of users
All phones
147 million devices in 2014

50% = embedded modems
42% = USB modems
Mobile
Social
video
networks
30.9%
49.7%
4.6%
Facebook
YouTube
Google
Maps
20%
30.4%
36%
4%
1.5%
Orange
1%
2.6%
France
Typical
user :~20 MB /month
iPhone
: 400 MB/month
Data
card : 600 MB/month
Traffic mix
China Unicom UMTS/HSPA traffic mix
Speech
12.2(erl)
CS64(erl)
PS64/64(kbps)
PS64/128(kbps)
PS64/384(kbps)
HSPA(kbps)
UL
DL
0.02
0.001
0.0113 0.0452
0.0045 0.0226
0.0019 0.0113
0.1751 1.0509
Average
AverageDate
Datetraffic
traffic
@BH
:
0.51MB
@BH : 0.51MB
iPhone and Data card

Data
DataTaffic/month
Taffic/month
iPhone
iPhone:400
:400MB
MB
Data
card
:
600
Data card : 600MB
MB
Data
DataTaffic@BH
Taffic@BH
iPhone
iPhone:4
:4MB
MB
Data
card
:
4.8
Data card : 4.8MB
MB
For
Foraamonth
month
64MB
64MB
Signal Level Coverage Prediction
RS receive level prediction

Coverage by Signal Level 0
% Focus
Zone
31,422.26
79.5
Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-80
4,186.34
10.6
5,522.01
14
8,962.24
22.7
17,507.21
44.3
21,793.95
55.1
99 Signal Level (dBm) >=Best

94
10590
31,422.26
79.5
85
81
76
72
67
63
58
54
49
45
40
36
31
27
22
18
13
9
4
0
-105
-104
-103
-102
-101
-100
-99
-98
-97
-96
-95
-94
-93
-92
-91
-90
-89
-88
-87
-86
-85
-84
-83
-82
-81
-80
-79
-78
Surface
(km2)
Best Signal Level (dBm)
Focus
FocusZone
Zone

Proposal II
Proposal I
Focus
FocusZone
Zone

Best Signal Level (dBm) >=80
coverage>95%
number of
POI
499
93%
95%>coverage>85%
1%
85%>coverage>75%
1%
coverage<75%
26
5%
Total
534
100
%
POI
POI

Population
Populationor
or
Traffic
Traffic
%Populatio
n
99.82
37.49
46.57
65.73
90.62
96.33
99.82

High
HighWay
Way
31.76
37.9
51.02
74.38
82.2
93.66

Surface
2000sites
2000sites
sites
Coverage by Signal Level
Surface
(km2)
% Focus
Zone
8,258.52
20.9
10,305.11
26.1
15,134.02
38.3
25,553.83
64.6
29,983.91
75.8
37,613.23
95.1
Average throughput prediction
11.13Mbps
RU
%
50%CDF
9.16Mbps
CDF
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
16,000
18,000
20,000
22,000
24,000
26,000
28,000
30,000
32,000
34,000
36,000
38,000
40,000
42,000
44,000
46,000
48,000
50,000
100
96
92
87
83
79
75
71
67
62
58
54
50
46
42
37
33
29
25
21
17
12
8
4
0
Application Channel Throughput (DL) (kbps)
RU
SU
MU
DU
50%CDF kbps
9159
8594.4
6558.9
6106.5
Average(kbps)
11138.5
10479.8
7633.2
6930.5
Average throughput prediction

User
Userprofile
profile
Service
Terminal
FTP
Download
MIMO
Terminal
UL Volume
(KBytes)
Calls/hou
r
1
1,000
Density
(Subscribers/km2
)
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Total number of
connected users
94.8
%
94.5
%
93.7
%
92.4
%
92.3
%
91.0
%
DL Volume
(KBytes)
4,000
Signal Level Coverage Prediction
Other coverage prediction
Monte Carlo simulation
Signal quality prediction
Throughput prediction
Other coverage prediction
Effective modulation
Handover
Contents

Evolution of Speed
LTE Frequency and Bandwidth

E-UTRAN Band
UL: eNode B receive, UE transmit
DL: eNode B transmit, UE receive
FUL_low FUL_high
FDL_low FDL_high
Duplex Mode
1920 MHz
1980 MHz
2110 MHz
2170 MHz
FDD
1850 MHz
1910 MHz
1930 MHz
1990 MHz
FDD
1710 MHz
1785 MHz
1805 MHz
1880 MHz
FDD
1710 MHz
1755 MHz
2110 MHz
2155 MHz
FDD
824 MHz
849 MHz
869 MHz
894MHz
FDD
830 MHz
840 MHz
875 MHz
885 MHz
FDD
2500 MHz
2570 MHz
2620 MHz
2690 MHz
FDD
880 MHz
915 MHz
925 MHz
960 MHz
FDD
1749.9 MHz
1784.9 MHz
1844.9 MHz
1879.9 MHz
FDD
10
1710 MHz
1770 MHz
2110 MHz
2170 MHz
FDD
11
1427.9 MHz
1452.9 MHz
1475.9 MHz
1500.9 MHz
FDD
12
[TBD]
[TBD]
[TBD]
[TBD]
FDD
13
777 MHz
787 MHz
746 MHz
756 MHz
FDD
14
788 MHz
798 MHz
758 MHz
768 MHz
FDD
...
33
1900 MHz
1920 MHz
1900 MHz
1920 MHz
TDD
34
2010 MHz
2025 MHz
2010 MHz
2025 MHz
TDD
35
1850 MHz
1910 MHz
1850 MHz
1910 MHz
TDD
36
1930 MHz
1990 MHz
1930 MHz
1990 MHz
TDD
37
1910 MHz
1930 MHz
1910 MHz
1930 MHz
TDD
38
2570 MHz
2620 MHz
2570 MHz
2620 MHz
TDD
Flexible Bandwidth
1.4M
Unpaired-Spectrum
3M
5M
Paired-Spectrum
10M
15M
20M
LTE Spectrum Defined by 3GPP
Different bandwidth and antenna, different

speed
Spectrum efficiency
A comparison between different bandwidth
Conclusion: Its a little different between different
Spectrum efficiency
A comparison between different MIMO mode
Conclusion: The spectrum efficiency will increase if

antenna increases.
Spectrum efficiency
A comparison between different frequency
Conclusion: The spectrum efficiency will be different in

different frequency. With the increase of frequency, the
spectrum efficiency decreases, especially when in a
large scale difference.
FDD-LTE BBU Solution Product B8200
B8200
Carrier Support
3*20MHz
Baseband Capacity
DL:450Mbps & UL:150Mbps
Active Users Support
1200 Users/Sector
Availability index
99.9997%
Interface
3xCPRI; 3xGE/FE 1xGPS;

8xE1/T1
Dimension (mm)
88.4(H)482.6(W)197 (D)
Weight
7.48kg Max.
Compact, light-weight, easy
Power Consumption
303W Max.
Plug & play, easy maintenance
Power Supply
-48VDC
Low, green equipment
Cooling
Fan Cooling
Automatically network planning
Working Temperature
-15 +50
installation
and optimizing
FDD-LTE RRU Solution Product

R8882
Carrier & Sector
20MHz Frequency Bandwidth
Availability
99.9998%
RF Output
2*40W
Receive Sensitivity (dBm)
-131.15 dBm@QPSK;
-100.81 dBm@16QAM;
-89.6 dBm@64QAM
R8882
installation

Low TX power, green equipment
and optimizing
Interface
2 CPRI Ports and 4 Antenna Ports
Dimension (mm)
380(H) x 320(W) x 140(D)
Weight
18kg
Power Consumption
330W Max; 197W AVG.
Power Supply
-48VDC
Cooling
Natural Cooling (No FAN)
Working Temperature
-40 +55
FDD-LTE eNB Solution Product

B8800
Carrier & Sector
3*20MHz
RF Output
4*40W
-131.15 dBm@QPSK;
-100.81 dBm@16QAM;
-89.6 dBm@64QAM
1600 Users/Sector
Baseband Capacity
Availability
99.9997%
Backhaul Interface
3xGE/FE; 8xE1/T1
Large Capacity
Dimension (mm)
950(H) 600(W) 450(D)
Rich Interface
Weight
<150kg
Higher Efficiency, Lower Power
Power Consumption
994W Avg. with S111(3*20MHz)
Power Supply
-48VDC; 110~220VAC;+24VDC
Cooling
Fan Cooling
Working Temperature
-15 +50
BS8800
Consumption
and optimizing
FDD-LTE eNB Solution Product B8900

Carrier & Sector
3*20MHz
RF Output
4*40W
-131.15 dBm@QPSK;
-100.81 dBm@16QAM;
-89.6 dBm@64QAM
BS8900
installation
1600 Users/Sector
Baseband Capacity
Availability
99.9997%
Backhaul Interface
3xGE/FE; 8xE1/T1
Dimension (mm)
1700(H)950(D)600(W)
Weight
Full configuration without

battery: 355Kg

Low TX power, green equipment
Power Consumption
1105W Avg. with S111(3*20MHz)
Power Supply
-48VDC; 110~220VAC;+24VDC
Conditioner
Heat Exchanger
Working Temperature
-40 +55
and optimizing
Glossary
CBD: Central Business District

QOS: Quality of Service
RAB: Radio Access Bearer
CW: Continuous Wave
POI: Point of Interest
RNP: Radio Network Planning
DU: Dense urban
SU: Suburbs urban
RU: Rural urban
MU: Medium urban
SE: Spectrum Efficiency
ESE: Effective Spectrum Efficiency
ISD: Inter-station Distance
CPRI: Common Public Radio Interface
QPSK: Quaternary Phase Shift Keying
QAM: Quadrature Amplitude Modulation
CDF: Cumulated Distribution Function

01 FO - NP2001 - E01 - 1 FDD-LTE Radio Network Planning

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

01 FO - NP2001 - E01 - 1 FDD-LTE Radio Network Planning

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

FDD-LTE Radio Network Planning

FDD-LTE network deployment strategy

The process of FDD-LTE network planning

Information collection is to gather any information

Voice capacity + data capacity

Operators need to operate their pipe precisely !

Large cell for coverage

Requirements and targets

Cell Edge User

Requirements and targets

Propagation model calibration

Radio network design

Link budget analysis

Radio network design

Cell radius and

Site number and

The final site number

Site selection and survey

Base on the network design result

Coverage prediction and simulation

The process of FDD-LTE network planning

FDD-LTE network deployment strategy

How to process so many candidate sites and so large area

Site Selection Principle

Inter site distance following network design result.

Manual site selection

We found tool has obvious limits in term of balancing between

Site Selection Method

Site Selection Method

295 site cover POI

Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-80 number of POI

Site Selection Method

Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-80 number of POI %

Site Selection Method

FDD-LTE network deployment strategy

FDD-LTE network planning flow

High Density Urban - City Center

Medium Density Urban

Low Density Urban

Open - Non Vegetated

Coastal High Rise

Open - Non Vegetated

Low Density Urban

High Density Urban City Center

Intensity UL Vol. DL Vol.

iPhone and other new terminals push the Data serveic

147 million devices in 2014

user :~20 MB /month

card : 600 MB/month

China Unicom UMTS/HSPA traffic mix

iPhone and Data card

FDD-LTE network planning flow

Signal Level Coverage Prediction

RS receive level prediction

Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-80

Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-82

Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-86

Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-93

Best Signal Level (dBm) >=-96

99 Signal Level (dBm) >=Best

Best Signal Level (dBm)

RS receive level prediction

RS receive level prediction