Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Of Structures
Using Response Spectra
Or
Ed Wilson
Professor Emeritus of Civil Engineering
University of California, Berkeley
February 24, 2010
SUMMARY OF PRESENTATION
On Advanced Numerical Modeling and Analytical Techniques
1. Personal Remarks 50 years experience of dynamic analysis
2. Seismic Analysis Using Response Spectra CQC3
3. Comparison with Direct Time History Dynamic Analysis
4. Retrofit of the San Mateo Bridge
_-
1931
1950
1950 - 52
1953 - 54
1953 - 54
1955 - 57
1957 - 63
1960
1963- 65
1965 -91
Professor at UC Berkeley
Loads
2.
3.
Free Exchange Of Information Gave
programs to profession prior to publication
4.
5.
25
20
15
10
5
0
-5
-10
-15
-20
-25
TIME - seconds
10
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
- 10
- 12
4
5
6
TIME - seconds
10
y() MAX
20
18
16
14
12
10
Figure15.2bPseudoAccelerationSpectrum,
5.0 Percent
Damping
PercentofGravity
6
4
2
0
PERIOD - Seconds
100
90
80
1.0 Percent Damping
5.0 Percent Damping
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Sa y() MAX
PERIOD - Seconds
Major Approximation
yT ( t ) y ( t ) u g ( t )
yT (t ) y (t ) ug (t )
Where
yT ( t ) The Total Displacement
y(t) The Displacement Ralative to the
Earthquake Ground Motion
u g (t) The Earthquake Ground Displacements
At the Base of the Structure
Plan View
0
Summary of Multi-Component
Combination Rules
1. The 100/30 and 100/40 percent rules
have no theoretical basis.
2. The SRSS combination rule, applied
to equal spectra, produces identical
results for all reference systems and
requires only one analysis to produce
all design forces and displacements.
2
Fpeak [ F0
2
F90
(1 a )
2
( F0
2
2
F90 ) sin
1
2 2
Fz ]
M 3 ( t ) C3
M 2 (t ) C2
R( t )
1.0
P(t )
P(t )
c Pcr
b M c 2 (1
) b M c 3 (1
)
Pe 2
Pe3
Where the forces acting on the frame element crosssection at time t are P(t ), M 2 (t ) and M 3 (t )
including the static forces prior to the application of
the dynamic loads. The empirical constants are code
and material dependent and are normally defined as
c and . b
Resistance factors
C 2 and C 3
c Pcr
M 2 (max) C2
M 3 (max) C3
1.0
P (max)
P (max)
b M c 2 (1
) b M c 3 (1
)
Pe 2
Pe 3
50 percent
SAP
STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
PROGRAM
ALSO A PERSON
Who Is Easily Deceived Or Fooled
Who Unquestioningly Serves Another
SAP
1971 - 72
Solid-Sap
Rewritten by Ed Wilson
1972 -73
SAP IV
1973 74
NON SAP
Bathe
SAP 80
1987 - 1990
SAP 90
FIELD MEASUREMENTS
REQUIRED TO VERIFY
1. MODELING ASSUMPTIONS
2. SOIL-STRUCTURE MODEL
3. COMPUTER PROGRAM
4. COMPUTER USER
CHECK OF RIGID
DIAPHRAGM
APPROXIMATION
MECHANICAL
VIBRATION
DEVICES
FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF
PERIODS AND MODE SHAPES
MODE
TFIELD
TANALYSIS
Diff. - %
1.77 Sec.
1.78 Sec.
0.5
1.69
1.68
0.6
1.68
1.68
0.0
0.60
0.61
0.9
0.60
0.61
0.9
0.59
0.59
0.8
0.32
0.32
0.2
11
0.23
0.32
2.3
FIRST DIAPHRAGM
MODE SHAPE
15 th Period
TFIELD = 0.16 Sec.
BASE ISOLATION
Isolators
BUILDING
IMPACT
ANALYSIS
FRICTION
DEVICE
CONCENTRATED
DAMPER
NONLINEAR
ELEMENT
GAP ELEMENT
BRIDGE DECK
ABUTMENT
PLASTIC
HINGES
2 ROTATIONAL DOF
Mechanical Damper
F = f (u,v,umax )
F = ku
F = C vN
Mathematical Model
NONLINEAR
DIAGONALS
BASE
ISOLATION
COMPUTER MODEL
92 NODES
103 ELASTIC FRAME ELEMENTS
56 NONLINEAR DIAGONAL ELEMENTS
COMPUTER TIME
REQUIREMENTS
PROGRAM
ANSYS
INTEL 486
3 Days
ANSYS
CRAY
3 Hours
SADSAP
INTEL 486
( B Array was 56 x 20 )
( 4300 Minutes )
( 180 Minutes )
2 Minutes
EXAMPLE OF
FRAME WITH
UPLIFTING
ALLOWED
UPLIFTING
ALLOWED
EQ
DL
Left
Right
LEFT
RIGHT
200
0
-200
-400
-600
TIME - seconds
10
Uplift
Max.
Max.
DisplaceColumn
0.05
ment
Force
Computer
(inches)
(kips)
Time
Without
14.6 Sec
With
15.0 Sec
Percent
Diff.
Max.
Base
Shear
(kips)
Max.
Base
Moment
(k-in)
Max.
Strain
Energy
(k-in)
Max. Uplift
(inches)
7.76
924
494
424,000
1,547
0.0
5.88
620
255
197,000
489
1.16
-24%
-33%
-40%
-53%
-68%
2.
2.
ANCHOR PIERS
Hayward Fault
East
Concluding Remarks
1. The 100/30 percent Rule should replaced by the
SRSS Rule - Until the CQC3 is implemented in SAP
2000.
2. Response Spectra Seismic Analysis is an Approximate
Method and is restricted to linear structural behavior
and may satisfy a design code. However, it may not
produce a Performance Based Design
3. In general, Nonlinear Time-History Analyses produce
more realistic results and can produce Performance
Based Design
A = B + C*D
64 bits - REAL*8
Year
1962
Computer
or CPU
CDC-6400
Operations
Per Second
50,000
Relative
Speed
1964
CDC-6600
100,000
1974
CRAY-1
3,000,000
60
1981
IBM-3090
20,000,000
400
1981
CRAY-XMP
40,000,000
800
1994
Pentium-90
3,500,000
70
1995
Pentium-133
5,200,000
104
1995
DEC-5000 upgrade
14,000,000
280
1998
Pentium II - 333
37,500,000
750
1999
69,000,000
1,380
2003
Pentium IV 2,000
220,000,000
4,400
2006
2009
AMD - Athlon
Intel Core 2 Duo
440,000,000
1,200,000,000
8,800
25,000