Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Prepared By:
Maunish Shah
Contents
Objective of Hydrofracturing
Introduction to Hydrofracturing
Hydrofracturing Treatment Design
Surface Equipments for Hydrofracturing
Treatment
Case Study
2
Objectives of Hydrofracturing
Increase recovery of hydrocarbon.
Bypassing damaged
zone
Pumps
Blender
Process
Pad fluid
Sand slurry
Well
Displacing fluid
Shale
Shale
Reservoir
20-100m
Propped Frac
Stresses
Vertical : v (Over
bourdon stress)
Horizontal : hx, hy
Frac develops
perpendicular to least
principal stress plane
5
Fracture Orientation
Data Requirements
Uncontrollable Reservoir Parameters
10
Reservoir Data
SBHP:
6837 psi
BHT: 142C (Object-II)
Porosity: 10-16%
Water Saturation: 40-50%
Permeability: 0.17 md ( Approx.)
Fracture gradient:0.81psi/ft (Approx.)
Gross Pay Thickness: 6 m
Net Pay Thickness: 6 m
X-direction extent: 2000m(Assumed)
Y-direction extent: 2000m(Assumed)
Acreages:
988 acres (Assumed)
11
Fracture Optimization
20T
40T
60T
80T
Fig. 2 Fracture Profile Of Well (Object-II) Picture for Different Proppant Tonnage
12
Fracture Optimization
Pad stage
Slurry
stage
Flush
Stage
Stag Length
e
(min:sec
No.
)
Fluid Type
Clean
Volum
e
(bbls)
Propp
.
Conc.
(ppg)
45:27
HL_BOR_H40_1
500.0
Slurr
y
Rate
(bpm
)
11.00
3:46
HL_BOR_H40_1
40.0
1.00
11.00
5:51
HL_BOR_H40_1
60.0
2.00
11.00
8:04
HL_BOR_H40_1
80.0
3.00
11.00
11:27
HL_BOR_H40_1
110.0
4.00
11.00
15:02
HL_BOR_H40_1
140.0
5.00
11.00
17:43
HL_BOR_H40_1
160.0
6.00
11.00
10:16
HL_BOR_H40_1
90.0
7.00
11.00
27:16
2% KCL
300.0
11.00
0.00
10
1:00
SHUT-IN
0.00
14
Proppant
Type
(20/40)
Sinter
Bauxite
Sinter
Bauxite
Sinter
Bauxite
Sinter
Bauxite
Sinter
Bauxite
Sinter
Bauxite
Sinter
Bauxite
Proppant
(tones)
0.00
0.76
2.29
4.57
8.38
13.34
18.29
12.00
30
60
90
120
150
Time (min)
15
12
6.40
4.80
3.20
1.60
0
0
30
60
90
120
150
Time (min)
Fig. 4 Pressure Graph, Slurry Rate and Proppant Concentration During (60T) HF Treatmen
15
Fracture Picture
TVD
(m)
Width (in)
Proppant Concentration (lb/ft) vs. Proppant Concentration (lb/ft) vs. Proppant Concentration (lb/ft) vs.
(ft)
(ft)
(ft)
3086
3103
3121
3138
3155
3172
3189
3206
3223
BEST CASE
STRATIFIED
WORST CASE
3240
4.00
Best Case
3257
2000
7000
12000 -0.6
-0.3
0.1
0.6 0
120
240
400 400
0.80
Stratified
280
160
0.80
Worst Case
0 0
120
240
400
Thank You
17