Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
MODULE-5
Measuring Brand Equity
MODULE 5
Measuring Brand Equity:
Methods for measuring Brand EquityQualitative Techniques & Quantitative
Techniques, Comparative methods-Brand
based comparisons, Marketing based
comparisons-Conjoint Analysis, Holistic
methods.
Free associations
Projective techniques
Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Techniques
Brand personality & values
Experimental methods
1. Free associations
Marketers use free associations tasks mainly to
identify the range of possible brand associations in
consumers minds but free association may also
provide some rough indication of the relative
strength, favorability and uniqueness of brand
associations.
It involves some questions
What do you like best about the brand? What are its
positive aspects?
What do you dislike? What are its disadvantages?
What do you find unique about the brand? How is it
different from other brands? In what ways is it the same?
The two main issues to consider in conducting free
association tasks are what types of probes to give data.
2. Projective techniques
3. ZMET
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
5. Experiential Methods
By tapping more directly into their actual home, work,
or shopping behaviors, researchers might be able to
elicit more meaningful responses from consumers.
Advocates of the experiential approach have sent
researchers to consumers homes in the morning to
see how they approach their days, given business
travelers Polaroid cameras and diaries to capture
their feelings when in hotel rooms, and conducted
beeper studies in which participants are instructed
to write down what theyre doing when they are paged.
Drawbacks of Qualitative
Techniques
The in-depth insight that emerge have to be
tempered by the realization that the sample are
often very small & may not necessarily generalize
the broader population.
It leads to obtain different conclusions.
2. Quantitative Research
Techniques
QR typically employs various types of scale
question form which researcher can draw
numerical representation an summaries.
Types of QRT
1. Awareness
2. Image
3. Brand responses
4. Brand relationships
Awareness
Recognition
Ability of consumers to identify the brand (and its elements) under
various circumstances
Brand recognition is especially important for packaging and some
marketing researchers have used creative means to assess the
visibility of package design
Recall
Ability of consumers to retrieve (get back, regain) the actual brand
elements from memory
Unaided vs. aided recall
Corrections for guessing
Any research measure must consider the issue of consumers making
up responses or guessing.
Strategic implications
The advantage of aided recall measures is that they yield insight into
how brand knowledge is organized in memory and what kind of cues
or reminders may be necessary for consumers to be able to retrieve
the brand from memory.
The important point to note is that the category structure that exists
in consumers mindsas reflected by brand recall performancecan
have profound implications for consumer choice and marketing
strategy.
Image
One vitally important aspect of the brand is its image, as
reflected by the associations that consumers hold for it.
Ask open-ended questions to tap into the strength,
favorability, and uniqueness of brand associations. It
involves 2 considerations.
1. These associations should be rated on scales for
quantitative analysis.
2. Other approaches: a more complicated quantitative
techniques to assess overall brand uniqueness is
multidimensional scaling, or perceptual maps, MDS is a
procedure for determining the perceived relative images
of a set of objects such as product or brands, MDS
transforms consumer judgment of similarity or preference
into distance represented in perceptual space.
Brand Responses
The purpose of measuring more general higher-level
considerations is to find out how consumer combine
all the more specific lower-level consideration about
the brand in their minds to form different types of
brand responses and evaluation.
To measuring brand equity with a combination of
four key brand response constructs:
1) Relative barrier or brand price
2) Brand quality perceptions
3) Brand purchase loyalty
4) Self-report future brand purchase trend
Brand Relationships
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Behavioral loyalty
Brand substitutability:
Other brand resonance dimensions: although
attitudinal attachment may require a fairly
straightforward set of question both sense of
community and active engagement could call for
more varied measures because of their more
diverse set of issues.
Fourniers Brand relationship Research: 6 facets of
Brand relationship quality
Interdependence
Self concept connection
Commitment
Love/ passion
Intimacy
Brand partner quality
2 methods
1.Comparative Methods
2.Holistic Methods
1. Comparative Methods
Brand-Based Approaches
Competitive brand can be useful benchmarks in
brand-based comparative approaches, although
consumers may interpret marketing activity for a
fictitiously named or unnamed version of the product
or service in terms of their general product category
knowledge they may also have a particular brand.
Marketing-Based Approaches
The brand is held fixed and consumer
response is examined based on changes in
marketing programs.
Applications: Explore price premiums effect
on switching, consumer evaluations of
marketing activities, brand extensions, etc.
Advantage: Ease of implementation
Disadvantage: Difficult to determine whether
consumer responses are caused by brand
knowledge or generic product knowledge
Conjoint Analysis
2. Holistic Methods
We use comparative methods to approximate
specific benefits of brand equity, holistic methods
place an overall value on the brand in either
abstract utility terms or concrete financial terms.
Attempt to place an overall value on the brand
in
either abstract utility terms or concrete financial
terms
Net out various considerations to determine the
unique contribution of the brand
Holistic methods:
Residual approaches
Valuation approaches
Residual Approaches
Valuation Approaches
Attempt to place a financial value on brand
equity for accounting purposes
Useful in cases of mergers and acquisitions,
brand licensing, fund raising, and brand
management decisions
Valuation approaches types:
Accounting background
Historical perspectives
General approaches
Interbrands brand valuation methodology
Accounting Background
Intangible assets are typically lumped under
the heading of goodwill and include things
such as patents, trademarks, and licensing
agreements,
as
well
as
softer
considerations such as the skill of the
management and customer relations.
In an acquisition, the goodwill item often
includes a premium paid to gain control,
which, in certain instances, may even exceed
the value of tangible and intangible assets
Historical Perspectives
In
Australia
Rupert
Murdochs
News
Corporation included a valuation of some of its
magazines on its balance sheets in 1984.
British firms used brand values primarily to
boost their balance sheets.
In the United States, generally accepted
accounting principles (blanket amortization
principles) mean that placing a brand on the
balance sheet would require amortization of
that asset for up to 40 years. Such a charge
would severely hamper firm profitability; as a
result, firms avoid such accounting maneuvers.
General Approaches
In determining the value of a brand in an
acquisition or merger, firms can choose from
three main approaches:
Cost approach: Brand equity is the amount of
money that would be required to reproduce or
replace the brand
Market approach: The present value of the future
economic benefits to be derived by the owner of
the asset
Income approach: The discounted future cash flow
from the future earnings stream for the brand
THANK YOU