Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
-EAT-352 (CONCRETE
BUILDING DESIGN II)MOHD FAIZ BIN MOHAMMAD ZAKI
www.company.com
EAT 352
www.company.com
EAT 352
EAT 352
EAT 352
CONT
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
Retaining wall
prevents the retain
earth from
assuming its
natural angle of
repose.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
This caused the
retained earth to
exert a lateral
pressure on the wall ,
thereby tending to
overturn , slide and
settle the retaining
wall structure.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
The wall must designed to be stable under the
effects of the lateral pressure, and also to
satisfy
Usual requirements
of strength
Serviceability
www.company.com
EAT 352
www.company.com
EAT 352
GRAVITY WALL
Gravity walls depend on their mass (stone,
concrete or other heavy material) to resist pressure
from behind. Its usually constructed of plain
concrete or stone masonry.
www.company.com
EAT 352
COUNTERFORT WALL
Used where overall height of wall is to large to be constructed
economically as a cantilever.
They consist of the wall and footing of cantilever retaining
walls, with the addition of structural supports that tied at
interval by counterforts or bracing walls. The function is to
increase the resistance to the pressure from the weight of the
soil.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CANTILEVER WALL
.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
the economic
height range up to
6.0 m; if exceed
this height , more
economic to use
pre-stressing
techniques
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
The stability of the
wall is maintained
by the
-weight of soil on
the base slab plus
-self weight of
structure.
www.company.com
EAT 352
SURCHARGE
.
www.company.com
EAT 352
www.company.com
EAT 352
STABILITY ANALYSIS
THREE SETS OF LOAD COMBINATIONS must be
considered at the ultimate limit state. The first two
combinations will be used for consideration of both
structural failure , (STR), and geotechnical failure,
(GEO).
The third combination consider the possible loss of
equilibrium (EQU) of the structure such as
overturning. The partial safety factors to be used for
these three combinations.
www.company.com
EAT 352
www.company.com
EAT 352
OVERTURNING
This occurs because of unbalanced moments and
when overturning moment about toe due to lateral
pressure is larger than the resisting moment due to
the weights of wall and weight of soil above the
heel slab. The critical conditions are when
maximum horizontal force acts with a minimum
vertical load.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
A partial safety factor of 0.9 is applied to the permanent
vertical load Vk (weight of wall + weight of soil) if its effect is
favourable'. The 'unfavourable' effects of the permanent earth
pressure loading Hk at the rear face of the wall are multiplied
by a partial safety factor of 1.1.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
The 'unfavourable' effects of the variable surcharge
loading, if any, are multiplied by a partial safety
factor of 1.5.
www.company.com
EAT 352
SLIDING
The resistance against sliding is essentially
provided by the friction between the bottom surface
of the base slab and the soil beneath it.
Resistance provided by the passive earth pressure
on the front face of the base may make some
contribution, but since this material is often
backfilled against the face, its resistance cannot be
guaranteed and is usually ignored.
www.company.com
EAT 352
SLIDING
A partial safety factor of f = 1.0 is applied to the permanent
vertical load Vk, if its effect is 'favourable' (i.e. contribute to
the sliding resistance) and the 'unfavourable effects of the
permanent earth and surcharge pressures at the rear face of
the wall are multiplied by partial safety factor of f = 1.35 and
1.5 respectively.
www.company.com
EAT 352
SETTLEMENT
The width of the base slab must be adequate to
distribute the vertical force to the foundation soil
without causing excessive settlement or rotation.
To determine the required size of the base the
bearing pressure underneath it is assessed on the
basis of the ultimate limit state (GEO).
Since the base slab of the wall is subjected to the
combined effects of an eccentric vertical load
coupled with an overturning moment, the analysis is
similar to that for foundation design.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
The distribution of bearing pressure will be as
shown in the figure provided the effective
eccentricity e lies within the middle third of the
base. The bearing pressure is then given by,
www.company.com
EAT 352
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
The stem is designed to resist the moment caused
by the force f Hf, with f values taken for load
combination 1 if this load combination is deemed to
be critical.
The flexural reinforcement is provided near the rear
face of the stem, and my be curtailed in stages for
economy.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
In the case of toe slab, the net pressure is obtained
by deducting the weight of the concrete in the toe
slab from the upward acting soil pressure.
The net pressure acts upward and the flexural
reinforcement has to be provided at the bottom of
toe slab.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
The heel slab must be designed to resist the
moment due to downward pressure from the weight
of the retained earth (plus surchage, if any) and
concrete slab.
Since the net pressure acts downward,
the flexural reinforcement is
provided at the top of the heel
slab.
www.company.com
EAT 352
CONT
Two sets of load combinations must be considered at the
ultimate limit state . For load combination 1, the moment due
to the horizontal load on the maximum bearing pressure at the
toe of the wall is 'unfavourable' whilst the moments of the
weight of the wall and the earth acting on the heel of the wall
act in the opposite sense and are thus ' favourable' .
Hence the partial safety factor for the lateral earth pressure
and lateral surcharge are 1.35 and 1.5 respectively.
www.company.com
EAT 352