Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Glass 1
Coupling of glass
tank with electrical
network
Gob temperature
(Spectral remote
sensing)
Glass 2
Floatglass
window glasses
display glasses
Blowing
Bottles
...
Foaming
Fiberproduction
Fluid-Fiber-Interaction
Glass 3
Simulation of
temperature field
Cooling in a
furnace
Control of furnace
temperature to minimize
the thermal stress
Tempering of glass
Glass 4
2.
3.
Glass 5
N. Siedow
Fraunhofer-Institute
for Industrial Mathematics,
Kaiserslautern, Germany
Glass 6
Introduction
2.
3.
Grey Absorption
4.
5.
Conclusions
Glass 7
Drop temperature
Thermal
stress
Measurement Simulation
Glass 8
mm cm
Conductivity in W/(Km)
Heat transfer on a
With Radiation
Without Radiation
Temperature in C
Heat radiation on a
macroscale
Glass 9
mm cm
T r
r
r
r
(r , t ) (k ( r ) T (r , t )) qr (T ) , (r , t ) Dt
t
r
r
r
T (r , 0) T0 (r ), r D
cm m
+ boundary
conditions
r r r
r
r
qr I (r , , )d d
0 S2
Heat radiation on a
r
r r
r r
r
I (r , , ) ( ) I (r , , ) ( ) B(T ( r , t ), )
macroscale
Glass 10
Rosseland-Approximation
nm
PN-Approximation
mm cm
Discrete-Ordinate-Method (FLUENT)
Heat radiation on a
ITWM-Approximation-Method
macroscale
Glass 11
r ' r / rref
' / ref
1
ref xref
r r
r r
r
I (r ', , ) I (r ', , ) B(T , )
'
Glass 12
r
E
I B
Rosseland-Approximation
1
r
2
E
B
O
(
) B
r 4 1 B
r
T r
cm m
(r , t ) k (r )
T (r , t )
t
3 0 T
Glass 13
BUT
r 4 1 B
r
T r
cm m
(r , t ) k (r )
T (r , t )
t
3 0 T
Glass 14
Rosseland-Approximation
nm
PN-Approximation
mm cm
Discrete-Ordinate-Method (FLUENT)
Heat radiation on a
ITWM-Approximation-Method
macroscale
Glass 15
I
(
r
,
B
(
T
(
r
, t ), )
1
r
r
r
r
I (r , , ) E
B
(
T
(
r
, t ), )
Neumann series
r r
r
2 r
3 r
4 r
2
3
I (r , , ) E 2 (
) 3 (
) 4 (
)4
r
... B(T ( r , t ), )
Larsen, E., Thmmes, G. and Klar, A., , Seaid, M. and Gtz, T., J. Comp. Physics 183, p. 652-675
(2002).
Thmmes,G., Radiative Heat Transfer Equations for Glass Cooling Problems: Analysis and
Numerics. PhD, University Kaiserslautern, 2002
Glass 16
G G 4 B
3
2
identical to P1Approximation
SP3-Approximation O(8)
(G 2U ) G 4 B
3
2
8
9
2
U U G B
5
5
35
coupled system of
equations
Glass 17
2200 kg/m3
900 J/kgK
1 W/Km
1.0 m
300 K
gray medium
Absorption coefficient: 1/m
Glass 18
Rosseland-Approximation
nm
PN-Approximation
mm cm
Discrete-Ordinate-Method (FLUENT)
Heat radiation on a
Full-discretization method
Klar
ITWM-Approximation-Method
macroscale
Glass 19
Rosseland-Approximation
nm
PN-Approximation
mm cm
Discrete-Ordinate-Method (FLUENT)
Heat radiation on a
Full-discretization method
ITWM-Approximation-Method
macroscale
Glass 20
I k ( x, ) I k ( xb , )e k d ( x , ) k
Formal
solution:
d ( x , )
k s
k
B
(
T
(
x
))
e
ds
with
I k ( x, )
k 1
I ( x, , )d
B k (T ( x))
k 1
B(T ( x), )d
k
( ) k const. k k 1
Taylor Approximation with respect x
to
Glass 21
I k ( x, ) I k ( xb , )e k d ( x , ) k
Formal
solution:
d ( x , )
k s
k
B
(
T
(
x
))
e
ds
with
I k ( x, )
k 1
I ( x, , )d
B k (T ( x))
k 1
B(T ( x), )d
k
( ) k const. k k 1
I k ( x, ) I k ( xb , )e k d ( x , ) B k (T ( x)) 1 e k d
k
1
dB
1 1 k d e k d
T ( x )
k
dT
Glass 22
I k ( x, ) I k ( xb , )e k d ( x , ) k
Formal
solution:
d ( x , )
k s
k
B
(
T
(
x
))
e
ds
with
I k ( x, )
k 1
I ( x, , )d
B k (T ( x))
k 1
B(T ( x), )d
k
( ) k const. k k 1
Rosseland:
k
1
dB
I k ( x, ) B k (T ( x))
T ( x)
k dT
Glass 23
I k ( x, ) I k ( xb , )e k d ( x , ) k
Formal
solution:
d ( x , )
k s
k
B
(
T
(
x
))
e
ds
with
I k ( x, )
k 1
I ( x, , )d
B k (T ( x))
k 1
B(T ( x), )d
k
( ) k const. k k 1
I k ( x, ) I k ( xb , )e k d ( x , ) B k (T ( x)) 1 e k d
k
1
dB
1 1 k d e k d
T ( x )
k
dT
Glass 24
MK
1 dB k k
A T ( x, t ) k B k (T ) I k ( xb , ) e k d ( x , ) d
k 1 k dT
k 1 S 2
qr ( x)
MK
dB k
(T ) 1 e k d T ( x )d
k 1 dT
S2
MK
Ak
( ) d ( x , )
T
)
d
(
x
,
)
e
S2
Lentes, F. T., Siedow, N., Glastech. Ber. Glass Sci. Technol. 72 No.6 188-196 (1999).
Glass 25
MK
1 dB k k
A T ( x, t ) k B k (T ) I k ( xb , ) e k d ( x , ) d
k 1 k dT
k 1 S 2
qr ( x)
MK
dB k
(T ) 1 e k d T ( x )d
k 1 dT
S2
MK
Ak
( ) d ( x , )
T
)
d
(
x
,
)
e
S2
Lentes, F. T., Siedow, N., Glastech. Ber. Glass Sci. Technol. 72 No.6 188-196 (1999).
Glass 26
MK
1 dB k k
A T ( x, t ) k B k (T ) I k ( xb , ) e k d ( x , ) d
k 1 k dT
k 1 S 2
qr ( x)
MK
dB k
(T ) 1 e k d T ( x )d
k 1 dT
S2
MK
Ak
( ) d ( x , )
T
)
d
(
x
,
)
e
S2
Boundary conditions
Convection term
Glass 27
1
I (r , ) I (r , ) B (T ), r G,
Introduce
I (r , y, ),
y G, so that I (r , ) I (r , r , )
1
r I (r , y, ) y I (r , y,
) I (r ,
) B (T )
Glass 28
1
r I (r , y, ) y I (r , y,
) I (r ,
) B (T )
Ansatz:
1
I ( r , y , ) i I i ( r , y , )
i 0
Glass 29
k d ( x , )
B (T ( x)) 1 e
k
k d
k
1
k d dB
1 1 k d e
T ( x )
k
dT
q B I d
S2
MK
qr ( x) k B (T ) I ( xb , ) e
k 1
S2
k d ( x , )
dB k
d
(T ) 1 (1 k d )e k d
k 1 dT
S2
MK
T ( x )d
N. Siedow, D. Lochegnies, T. Grosan, E. Romero, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 [8] 2181-2187 (2005)
Glass 30
Glass
T0=200C
Parameters:
Density
kg/m3
Specific heat
J/kgK
Conductivity
Thickness
2500
1250
1 W/Km
0.005 m
Semitransparent Region:
0.01 m 7.0 m
Wall T=600C
Absorption coefficient:
0.4 /m 7136 /m (8
bands)
Glass 31
Computational time
for 3000 time steps
Exact
81.61 s
Ida
00.69 s
Fsa
00.69 s
Glass 32
Glass 33
1m
T=1300
K
gravity
T=1800 K
adiabatic
5m
Radiation with diffusely reflecting gray walls in a gray
material
Glass 34
40 / m
FLUENT-DOM
ITWM-UDF
>5000
Iterations
86 Iterations
Glass 35
Grey Kappa
Glass 36
Problem:
Remark Frequency
Glass 37
Glass 38
Glass 39
( ) B(T , )d
0
B(T , )d
0
Rosseland-mean absorption
coefficient
B
0 T (T , )d
1 B
0 ( ) T (T , )d
Glass 40
( ) B(T , )d
MK
B (T , )d
P 55.4071m 1
Rosseland-mean absorption
coefficient
MK
MK
B
(T , )d
T
1 B
(T , )d
( ) T
R 0.4202m 1
Glass 41
Glass 42
MK
I ( x, , ) d
MK
MK
( ) I ( x, , )d ( ) B(T ( x), )d
J
( x, ) ( x, ) J ( x, ) ( x, ) D(T ( X )), D(T ( X ))
x
MK
If
( x, )
( ) I ( x, , ) B(T ( x), ) d
MK
I ( x, , ) B(T ( x), ) d
then
MK
B(T ( x), ) d
J ( x, )
MK
I ( x, , ) d
Glass 43
( x, )
MK
( ) I ( x, , ) B(T ( x), ) d
MK
I ( x, , ) B(T ( x), ) d
The Grey Kappa is not depending on wavelength BUT on position and direction
The Grey Kappa can be calculated, if we know the solution of the rte
How to approximate the
intensity?
AND
Glass 44
( x, )
( ) I ( x, , ) B(T ( x), ) d
MK
I ( x, , ) B(T ( x), ) d
I ( x, , ) 1 e ( ) d ( x, ) B(T , )
dT
dB
1 1 ( ) d ( x, ) e ( ) d ( x, )
( x)
(T , ) ...
( )
dx
dT
x
0 xl/2
lx l/2 x l
d ( x, ) h( x )
Glass 45
%
( x, T ) P (T )G1 ( x) R (T )G2 ( x) Planck-RosselandSuperposition
MK
( ) B(T
ref
, )e ( ) h ( x ) d
G1 ( x)
P (Tref )
MK
( ) h ( x )
B (Tref , )e
d 0 : G1 ( x) 1 G2 ( x) 0
d : G1 ( x) 0 G2 ( x) 1
a
dB
1 1 ( )h( x) e ( ) h ( x )
(Tref , ) d
( )
dT
Planck-mean value
Rosseland-mean value
Glass 46
Glass 47
Glass 48
PRS
PRS
Planck
Rosseland
Calculated in
advanced
Glass 49
PRS
PRS
Planck
Rosseland
Glass 50
Undesired crack
Glass 51
1.
2.
N. Siedow, D. Lochegnies, T. Grosan, E. Romero, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 [8] 2181-2187 (2005)
Glass 52
high
high viscosity
low viscosity
Linear-elastic material
Newtonian fluid
temperatur
e
Glass 53
Glass 54
N. Siedow, D. Lochegnies, T. Grosan, E. Romero, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 [8] 2181-2187 (2005)
Glass 55
N. Siedow, D. Lochegnies, T. Grosan, E. Romero, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 [8] 2181-2187 (2005)
CPU time in s:
Glass 56
N. Siedow, D. Lochegnies, T. Grosan, E. Romero, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 [8] 2181-2187 (2005)
ITWM model gives the closest result for transient and residual
stresses
Glass 57
Glass 58
Glass 59
Glass 60
Glass 61