Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Year
: February 2011
GODFREY
HODGSON
HOLMES
TARCA
CHAPTER 3
APPLYING THEORY TO
ACCOUNTING REGULATION
Theory of efficient
markets
Theory of efficient
markets
The market for accounting data is not
efficient
The free-rider problem distorts the
market
Users cannot agree on what they want
Accountants cannot agree on procedures
Firms must produce comparable data
The government must therefore intervene
6
Agency theory
The demand for accounting
information:
for stewardship purposes
for decision-making purposes
Agency theory
Because of imbalances between data
suppliers and data users, uncertainty
and risk exist
Resources and risk are likely to be misallocated between the parties
To the extent the market mechanism is
inefficient, accounting regulation is
required to reduce inefficient and
inequitable outcomes
8
Theories of regulation
There are three theories of
regulation:
public interest theory
regulatory capture theory
private interest theory
10
11
Regulatory capture
theory
The public interest is not protected
because those being regulated come
to control or dominate the regulator
The regulated protect or increase their
wealth
Assumes the regulator has no
independent role to play but is simply
an arbiter between battling interest
groups
12
Regulatory capture
theory
Professional accounting bodies or the
corporate sector seek to control the
setting of accounting standards
13
Application of public
interest theory
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (US, 2002)
Accounting Standards Review Board
(AUS, 1984)
But:
Managers have incentives to voluntarily
correct market failure perceptions about
their firms
15
Application of capture
theory
Was the ASRB captured by the
accounting profession?
Is international harmonisation
evidence of capture by large
companies, the ASX and the
accounting profession?
Has the IASB been captured by the
FASB?
16
Application of private
interest theory
The private interest theory could be
applied to the establishment of the
ASRB
17
Standard setting as a
political process
Standard setting is a political process
because it can affect many conflicting
and self-interested groups
The regulator must make a political
choice
The regulator must have a mandate to
make social choices
The recognition of doubtful debts can
affect entities differently
18
Financial instruments
The adoption of IAS 39 Financial
Instruments Recognition and
Measurement in the EU has been a
highly political process
19
Intangible assets
The adoption of IAS 38 Intangible
Assets in Australia illustrates the role
of politics in the standard setting
process
20
Regulatory framework
for
financial reporting
A financial reporting environment is
made up of:
legal setting
economic setting
political setting
social setting
21
Regulatory framework
for
financial reporting
The elements of a regulatory
framework are :
statutory requirements
corporate governance
auditors and oversight
independent enforcement bodies
22
Statutory requirements
Company law
Securities market law
Accounting standards
force of law
Taxation law
23
Corporate governance
The structures, processes and
institutions within and around
organisations that allocate power and
resource control among participants.
Davis
Supranational and national bodies
have issued corporate governance
recommendations
24
25
Independent
enforcement
bodies
Independent enforcement bodies
EU
26
Convergence is a complicated
process
28
29
International auditing
standards
Historically auditing was selfregulated
Best auditing practice has become
enshrined in auditing standards
Governments have become involved
due to market failure
30
Summary
In this chapter:
we reviewed theories proposed to explain
the practice and regulation of financial
reporting and auditing
we reviewed the regulatory framework for
financial reporting and the institutional
structure for setting accounting and
auditing standards
31
Efficient markets
Agency relationships
Public interest
Regulatory capture
Private interest
Political process
Regulatory framework
Accounting and auditing standards
32
33